1887
Volume 20, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-6834
  • E-ISSN: 2211-6842
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper examines the count-mass distinction in Terena (Aruák, Brazil) by focusing on plural marking availability, numeral and quantifier distribution and cardinal versus volume interpretation in quantity judgment tests. The data collected from the initial research of these features in Terena reveals the relevancy of the count-mass distinction in the language with some signature properties: (i) only count nouns can be directly combined with numerals; (ii) only count nouns can be used with the quantifier with the interpretarion of many individuals rather than a large quantity; and finally, (iii) only count nouns can express cardinality of individuals in a comparative sentence such as . Plural morpheme distribution is unsuitable for distinguishing count from mass nouns (such as in English) since mass nouns can be pluralized in Terena, provided noun denotations have individuals to allow for number rather than volume quantity interpretation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lv.00028.san
2020-10-01
2020-11-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Yurievna
    1999 The Arawak language family. In Robert Malcolm Ward Dixon & Alexandra Yurievna Aikhenvald (eds.), The Amazonian languages, 65–106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Yurievna. Unusual classifiers in Tariana
    2000 In Gunter Senft (ed.), Systems of nominalclassification, 93–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Butler, Nancy Evelyn
    2003The multiple functions of the definite article in Terena. Série Linguística, SIL.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chiercia, Gennaro
    1998 Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of “semantic parameter”. In Susan Rothstein (ed.), Events and grammar, 53–103. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑3969‑4_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3969-4_4 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chiercia, Gennaro. Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation
    2010Synthese 174. 99–149. 10.1007/s11229‑009‑9686‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9686-6 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ekdahl, Elizabeth Muriel; Butler, Nancy Evelyn
    1979Aprenda Terêna. Brasília: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Julio, Aronaldo
    2018 Língua terena: prosódia, semântica e aspectos da prática escolar. Master thesis. Profllind/ Museu Nacional/ Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ).
  8. Mathieu, Eric
    2012 On the mass/count distinction in Ojibwe. In Diane Massam (ed.), Count and Mass Across Languages, 172–198. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654277.003.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654277.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  9. Rodrigues, Aryon Dall’Igna
    2005 Sobre as línguas indígenas e sua pesquisa no Brasil. Ciência e Cultura, vol.57 n. 2, 35–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Rosa, Andréa Maques
    2010 Aspectos morfológicos do Terena (Aruák). Master thesis. Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS).
  11. Rothstein, Susan
    2010 Counting and the mass count distinction. Journal of Semantics, 27(3), p. 343–397. 10.1093/jos/ffq007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffq007 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lv.00028.san
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lv.00028.san
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Arawakan , comparatives , countability , nouns , plural , quantification , Terena and under-represented languages
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error