Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2211-6834
  • E-ISSN: 2211-6842
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This paper proposes a minimalist analysis of locative prepositions in Central Catalan, from a comparative perspective. Specifically, I claim that certain semantic and syntactic properties that are usually considered part of the field of the extended projection of PPs in cartographic approaches (categories like Place, Degree, K, and AxPart, for example) are in fact properties of the DP in the complement of a preposition. This claim takes the view that adpositions are a functional projection that relates two DPs, the Figure and the Ground, and not a lexical head that projects a functional domain on its own, as Ns, Vs or As (cf. den Dikken 2010Koopman 2000). The final part of the paper proposes a model to account for the variation that locative prepositions exhibit across Romance languages following the Conjecture of Borer (1984) (known as the Borer-Chomsky Conjecture since Baker 2008). More precisely, I propose a model in which microparametric differences among Romance simple locative prepositions depend on the particular composition of features in .


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aboh, Enoch O.
    2010 The P route. InGuglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (Eds.), Mapping spatial PPs: The cartography of syntactic structures (Volume6), 225–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  2. Acedo-Matellán, Víctor
    2010 Argument structure and the syntax-morphology interface. A case study in Latin and other languages. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2016The morphosyntax of transitions: A case study in Latin and other languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198733287.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198733287.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Acedo-Matellán, Víctor & Jaume Mateu
    2013 Satellite-framed latin vs. verb-framed romance: A syntactic approach. International Journal of Latin and Romance Linguistics25(2). 227–265.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Acedo-Matellán, Víctor & Cristina Real-Puigdollers
    (2014) On the syntactic and semantic differences between locative a and en in Catalan: Evidence from Quantifier Scope. Ms. University of Oxford and Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Aguilar-Guevara, Ana
    2014 Weak definites. Semantics, lexicon and pragmatics. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Universiteit Utrecht dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Aguilar-Guevara, Ana & Joost Zwarts
    2010 Weak definites and reference to kinds. Proceedings of SALT 20, 179–196. 10.3765/salt.v20i0.2583
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v20i0.2583 [Google Scholar]
  8. Albareda Valls, Cristina
    (2013) Les variants al·lomòrfiques de la preposició ‘a’ en algunes varietats del català: descripció i anàlisi. Estudis de llengua i literatura catalanes (66). 261–300.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Anderson, Stephen & Edward L. Keenan
    1985 Deixis. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 259–308. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Asbury, Anna
    2008 The morphosyntax of case and adpositions. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Universiteit Utrecht dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Asbury, Anna, Berit Gehrke, Jakub Dotlacil, & Rick Nouwen
    2008Syntax and semantics of spatial P. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.120
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.120 [Google Scholar]
  12. Asher, Nicholas & Pierre Sablayrolles
    1995 A typology and discourse semantics for motion verbs and spatial PPs in French. Journal of semantics12(2). 163–209. 10.1093/jos/12.2.163
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/12.2.163 [Google Scholar]
  13. Baker, Mark C.
    2003Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615047
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615047 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2008 The macroparameter in a microparametric world. InTheresa Biberauer (ed.), The limits of syntactic variation, 351–374. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.132.16bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.132.16bak [Google Scholar]
  15. Bittner, Maria & Ken Hale
    1996 The structural determination of case and agreement. Linguistic Inquiry27(1). 1–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Borer, Hagit
    1984Parametric syntax: Case studies in Semitic and Romance languages. Foris, Dordrecht. 10.1515/9783110808506
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808506 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2005aStructuring Sense: In Name Only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2005bStructuring Sense: The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263929.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263929.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  19. Borik, Olga & M. Teresa Espinal
    2015 Reference to kinds and to other generic expressions in Spanish: definiteness and number. The Linguistic Review32 (2): 167–225. 10.1515/tlr‑2014‑0023
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2014-0023 [Google Scholar]
  20. Bosque, Ignacio
    1997 Preposición tras preposición. InManuel Almeida and Josefa Dorta (eds.), Contribuciones al estudio de la lingüística hispánica. Homenaje al profesor Ramón Trujillo, 133–155. Tenerife: Montesinos.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Bosque, Ignacio, and Pascual Masullo
    1998 On verbal quantification in Spanish. InOlga Fullana & Francesc Roca (eds.), Studies on the syntax of Central Romance Languages, 9–63. Girona: Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat de Girona.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Botwinik-Rotem, Irena
    2008 Why are they different? An exploration of Hebrew locative PPs. InAnna Asbury, Berit Gehrke, Jakub Dotlacil, & Rick Nouwen (eds.), Syntax and semantics of spatial P, 331–364. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.120.17bot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.120.17bot [Google Scholar]
  23. Brucart, Josep Maria
    2002 Els determinants. InJoan Solà, Maria Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró, & Manuel Pérez Saldanya (eds.), Gramàtica del català contemporani, volume2, 1435–1516. Barcelona: Empúries.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2012 Copular alternation in Spanish and Catalan attributive sentences. Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Univerdade do Porto7, 9–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Carlson, Greg, Rachel Sussman, Natalie Klein & Michael Tanenhaus
    2006 Weak definite noun phrases. InProceedings of NELS36. 179–196.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Chappell, Helen & Alan Peyraube
    2008 Chinese Localizers: Diachrony and some typological considerations. InDan Xu (ed.), Space in Languages of China, 15–37. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑8321‑1_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8321-1_2 [Google Scholar]
  27. Chomsky, Noam
    1970 Remarks on Nominalizations. InRoderick Jacobs & Peter Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 184–221. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2000 Minimalist inquiries: The framework. InRoger Martin, David Michaels, Juan Uriagereka & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2005 Three factors in language design. Linguistic inquiry, 36(1). 1–22. 10.1162/0024389052993655
    https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389052993655 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2008 On Phases. InRobert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & M. Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  31. Cinque, Guglielmo
    1971 Analisi Semantica della Deissi in Italiano. Padova. Università di Padova, BA dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Collins, Chris
    2007 Home Sweet Home. NYU Working Papers in Linguistics1. 1–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Clua, Esteve
    1996 Weak prepositions in Tortosan Catalan: Alternation of prepositions, allomorphy or phonological process. Catalan working papers in linguistics, 29–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Danon, Gabi
    2006 Caseless nominals and the projection of DP. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory24(4), 977. 10.1007/s11049‑006‑9005‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9005-6 [Google Scholar]
  35. Demonte, Violeta
    2011 Los eventos de movimiento en español: construcción léxico-sintáctica y microparámetros preposicionales. InJuan Cuartero Oltal, Luis García Fernández & Carsten Sinner (eds.), Estudios sobre perífrasis y aspecto, 16–42. Munique: Peniope.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Den Dikken, Marcel
    2010 On the functional structure of locative and directional PPs. InGuglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (Eds.), Mapping spatial PPs: The cartography of syntactic structures (Volume6), 74–126. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  37. Diccionari Normatiu de l’Institut d’Estudis Catalans
    Diccionari Normatiu de l’Institut d’Estudis Catalans 2007 2nd edition. Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Catalans.
  38. Diessel, Holger
    1999Demonstratives: Form, function and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.42
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.42 [Google Scholar]
  39. Eguren, Luis J.
    1999 Pronombres y adverbios demostrativos. las relaciones deícticas. InIgnacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, 929–972. Madrid: Espasa.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Espinal, Maria Teresa & Sonia Cyrino
    2017a On weak definites and their contribution to event kinds. InOlga Fernández-Soriano, Elena Castroviejo & Isabel Pérez-Jiménez (Eds.), Boundaries, Phases and Interfaces. Case studies in honor of Violeta Demonte, 129–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.239.07esp
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.239.07esp [Google Scholar]
  41. Espinal, M. Teresa & Sonia Cyrino
    2017b The definite article in Romance expletives and long weak definites. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics2(1): 23. 1–26, doi:  10.5334/gjgl.160
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.160 [Google Scholar]
  42. Espinal, Maria Teresa & Louise McNally
    2011 Bare nominals and incorporating verbs in Spanish and Catalan. Journal of Linguistics, 47(1). 87–128. 10.1017/S0022226710000228
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226710000228 [Google Scholar]
  43. Fabra, Pompeu
    1933Gramàtica catalana. Barcelona: Institut d’estudis catalans.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Fábregas, Antonio
    2007a (Axial) parts and wholes. Nordlyd34 (2). 1–32. 10.7557/12.109
    https://doi.org/10.7557/12.109 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2007b The exhaustive lexicalisation principle. Nordlyd34 (2). 165–199. 10.7557/12.110
    https://doi.org/10.7557/12.110 [Google Scholar]
  46. Folli, Raffella
    2008 Complex PPs in Italian. InAnna Asbury, Berit Gehrke, Jakub Dotlacil & Rick Nouwen (eds.), Syntax and semantics of spatial P, 197–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.120.10fol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.120.10fol [Google Scholar]
  47. Franco, Ludovico
    2016 Axial parts, phi-features and degrammaticalization: the case of italian presso/pressi in diachrony. Transactions of the Philological Society114 (2). 149–170. 10.1111/1467‑968X.12067
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12067 [Google Scholar]
  48. Franco, Ludovico & M. Rita Manzini
    2017 Instrumental prepositions and case: Contexts of occurrence and alternations with datives. Glossa2 (1): 8. 1–37. 10.5334/gjgl.111
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.111 [Google Scholar]
  49. Gehrke, Berit
    2008 Ps in motion: On the semantics and syntax of P elements and motion events. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Universiteit Utrecht dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Gramàtica Normativa de l’Institut d’Estudis Catalans
    Gramàtica Normativa de l’Institut d’Estudis Catalans. 1st edition 2016 Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Catalans.
  51. Grimshaw, Jane
    2000 Locality and Extended Projection. InPeter Coopmans, Martin Everaert & Jane Grimshaw (eds.) Lexical Specification and Insertion, 115–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.197.07gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.197.07gri [Google Scholar]
  52. Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
    1993 Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. InKen Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Harley, Heidi, & Rolf Noyer
    1999 Distributed morphology. Glot international4(4). 3–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Herskovits, Annette
    1987Language and Spatial Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Hinzen, Wolfram
    2014 On the rationality of case. Language Sciences46. 133–151. 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  56. Hinzen, Wolfram & Michelle Sheehan
    2013The philosophy of universal grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654833.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654833.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  57. Hoop, Helen de
    1996Case Configuration and Noun Phrase Interpretation. New York, NY: Garland Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Hottenroth, Priska-Monika
    1982 The system of local deixis in Spanish. InJürgen Weissenborn & Wolfgang Klein (eds.), Here and There: Cross-Linguistic Studies on Deixis and Demonstration, 133–153. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pb.iii.2‑3.07hot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.iii.2-3.07hot [Google Scholar]
  59. Katz, Jerrold & Paul M. Postal
    1964An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Kayne, Richard
    2007 A short note on where vs. place. InRoberta Maschi, Nicoletta Penello & Piera Rizzolatti (eds.), Miscellanea di Studi Linguistici offerti a Laura Vanelli da amici e allievi padovani, 245–257. Udine: Forum.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Koopman, Hilda
    2000 Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions and particles: The structure of Dutch PPs. InThe Syntax of Specifiers and Heads: Collected essays of Hilda J. Koopman, 198–255. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203171608
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203171608 [Google Scholar]
  62. Levinson, Stephen C.
    2004 Deixis. InLaurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics, 97–121. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Levinson, Stephen, Sérgio Meira, & The Language and Cognition Group
    2003 ‘Natural Concepts’ in the Spatial Topological Domain-Adpositional Meanings in uistic Perspective: An Exercise in Semantic Typology. Language79, 3 (2003) 485–516. www.jstor.org/stable/4489463
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Longobardi, Giuseppe
    1994 Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry25(4). 609–665.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. 2001 How comparative is semantics? a unified parametric theory of bare nouns and proper names. Natural language semantics9 (4), 335–369. 10.1023/A:1014861111123
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014861111123 [Google Scholar]
  66. 2008 Reference to individuals, person, and the variety of mapping parameters. InHenrik H. Müller & Alex Klinge (eds.), Essays on nominal determination: From morphology to discourse management, 189–211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.99.11lon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.99.11lon [Google Scholar]
  67. Manzini, M. Rita. & Ludovico Franco
    2016 Goal and DOM datives. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory34 (1). 197–240. 10.1007/s11049‑015‑9303‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9303-y [Google Scholar]
  68. Martin, Txuss & Wolfram Hinzen
    2014 The grammar of the essential indexical. Lingua148. 95–117. 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.05.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.05.016 [Google Scholar]
  69. Mateu, Jaume
    2002 Argument structure. Relational construal at the syntax-semantics interface. Bellaterra, Cerdanyola: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Matushansky, Ora & Joost Zwarts
    2018 The partial nominality of Axial Parts. Handout. Talk presentedFebruary 16th at Universitat Pompeu Fabra. You can download a version of this talk at: www.trees-and-lambdas.info/matushansky/Downloads/Axial-handout-SIM.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Noonan, Maire
    2010À to zu. InGuglielmo Cinque & Luiggi Rizzi (Eds.), Mapping spatial PPs: The cartography of syntactic structures (Volume6), 161–195. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  72. Pantcheva, Marina
    2008 The place of PLACE in Persian. InAnna Asbury, Berit Gehrke, Jakub Dotlacil & Rick Nouwen (Eds.), Syntax and semantics of spatial P (Volume120), 305–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.120.16pan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.120.16pan [Google Scholar]
  73. 2011 Decomposing Path. The nanosyntax of directional expressions. Tromsø. Tromsø: University of Tromsø dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Pérez Saldanya, Manuel
    2015 Paradigms as triggers of semantic change: Demonstrative adverbs in Catalan and Spanish. Catalan journal of linguistics14. 113–135. 10.5565/rev/catjl.165
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.165 [Google Scholar]
  75. Pretorius, Erin
    2017 Spelling out P: a unified syntax of Afrikaans adpositions and V-particles. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Ramchand, Gillian & Peter Svenonius
    2014 Deriving the functional hierarchy. Language Sciences, 46. 152–174. 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.06.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.06.013 [Google Scholar]
  77. Real Puigdollers, Cristina
    2010 A microparametric approach on goal of motion constructions: properties of adpositional systems in Romance and Germanic. Catalan Journal of Linguistics11. 125–150. 10.5565/rev/catjl.97
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.97 [Google Scholar]
  78. 2013Lexicalization by phase: The role of prepositions in argument structure and its cross-linguistic variation. Bellaterra, Cerdanyola: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Van Riemsdijk, Henk C.
    1978 A case study in syntactic markedness: The binding nature of prepositional phrases. Studies in generative grammar (4). 1–313.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Van Riemsdijk, Henk C. & Norbert Corver
    (eds.) 2001Semi-lexical Categories: The Function of Content Words and the Content of Function Words. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Romeu, Juan
    2014 Cartografía mínima de las construcciones espaciales. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Rooryck, Johan
    1996 Prepositions and minimalist case marking. InHoskuldur Thráinsson, Samuel David Epstein & Steve Peter, (Eds.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax (Volume2), 226–256. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑9806‑9_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9806-9_9 [Google Scholar]
  83. Roy, Isabelle
    2007 Body Part Nouns in Expressions of Location in French. Nordlyd, 33(1). 98–119. doi:  10.7557/12.78
    https://doi.org/10.7557/12.78 [Google Scholar]
  84. Roy, Isabelle & Peter Svenonius
    2009 Complex prepositions. InJean Gilbert, Cecile Guimier & Michael Krause (Ed.), Autour de la Préposition, 105–116. Caen: Presses Universitaires de Caen.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Sancho Cremades, Pelegrí
    2002 La preposició i el sintagma preposicional. InJoan Solà, Maria-Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró & Manuel Pérez Saldanya (Eds.), Gramàtica del català contemporani (Volume2), 1689–1796. Barcelona: Empúries.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Saragossà, Abelard
    2004 El valor dels adjectius demostratius segons les lingüístiques catalana i castellana: problemes i solucions. InCesáreo Calvo Rigual, Emili Casanova, Francisco Javier Satorre Grau (eds.), Quaderns de filologia. Estudis lingüístics (Volume9), 199–243.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Stvan, Laurel Smith
    1998 The semantics and pragmatics of bare singular noun phrases. Evanston: Northwestern University dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Svenonius, Peter
    2004 Limits on P: filling in holes vs. falling in holes. Nordlyd, 31(2). 431–445. doi:  10.7557/12.13
    https://doi.org/10.7557/12.13 [Google Scholar]
  89. 2007 The Emergence of Axial Parts. Nordlyd, 33(1). 49–77. doi:  10.7557/12.85
    https://doi.org/10.7557/12.85 [Google Scholar]
  90. 2010 Spatial P in English. InGuglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Mapping Spatial PPs: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures (Volume6), 127–160. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  91. Talmy, Leonard
    2000Toward a cognitive semantics (Volume2). Cambridge: MIT press.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Terzi, Arthonto
    2010 Locative prepositions and place. InGuglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Mapping Spatial PPs: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures (Volume6), 196–224. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  93. Torrego, Esther
    1998The dependencies of objects. Cambridge, CA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/2337.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2337.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  94. Tortora, Christina
    2005 The Preposition’s Preposition in Italian: Evidence for Boundedness of Space. InRandall Gess & Edward J. Rubin (Eds.), Theoretical and Experimental Approaches to Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the 34th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages(LSRL), Salt Lake City, March 2004, 307–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.272.19tor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.272.19tor [Google Scholar]
  95. 2008 Aspect inside place PPs. InAnna Asbury, Berit Gehrke, Jakub Dotlacil, & Rick Nouwen (Eds.), Syntax and semantics of spatial P, 273–304. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.120.14tor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.120.14tor [Google Scholar]
  96. Tungseth, Mae E.
    (2008) Verbal prepositions and argument structure: Path, place and possession in Norwegian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.121
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.121 [Google Scholar]
  97. Ursini, Francesco-Alessio
    2013a On the Distributed Morphology of Spatial Prepositions and Anaphors. InProceedings of the 15th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar (SICOGG 15) :Seoul, South Korea, 07-Aug-2013 – 10-Aug-2013, 447–468. Hankuk: Hankuk University Press. Retrieved fromurn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-98065
    [Google Scholar]
  98. 2013b On the syntax and semantics of Spanish spatial prepositions. Borealis–An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics2 (1) 117–166. 10.7557/
    https://doi.org/10.7557/ [Google Scholar]
  99. 2015 On the syntax and semantics of Italian spatial Ps. Acta Linguistica Hungarica62 (1), 63–110. 10.1556/ALing.62.2015.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.62.2015.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  100. 2017 The Polysemy of Italian Spatial Ps. InRoberta D’Alessandro, Gabriele Iannaccaro, & Diana Passino (eds.), Di tutti i colori: A Festscrhift for Maria Grossmann, 349–369. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Ursini, Francesco-Alessio & Adriano Giannella
    2016 On the polysemy of Spanish spatial Ps. Borealis. An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics5 (2) 253–312. 10.7557/
    https://doi.org/10.7557/ [Google Scholar]
  102. Vandeloise, Claude
    1991Spatial prepositions: A case study from French. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Vanelli, Laura & Lorenzo, Renzi
    1995 La deissi. InLorenzo Renzi, Giampaolo Salvi & Anna Cardinaletti (eds.) Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione: Tipi di frasi, deissi, formazione delle parole, 261–376. Bologna: il Mulino.
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Wheeler, Max, Alan Yates, & Nicolau Dols
    1999Catalan. A comprehensive grammar. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Wiltschko, Martina
    2014The universal structure of categories: Towards a formal typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139833899
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139833899 [Google Scholar]
  106. Wood, Jim & Alec Marantz
    2017 The interpretation of external arguments. InRoberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Ángel J. Gallego. The verbal domain, 255–278. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Zamparelli, Roberto
    2000Layers in the Determiner Phrase. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Zeller, Jochen
    2001Particle Verbs and Local Domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.41
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.41 [Google Scholar]
  109. Zwarts, Joost
    1997 Vectors as Relative Positions: A Compositional Semantics of Modified PPs. Journal of semantics14 (1). 57–86. 10.1093/jos/14.1.57
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/14.1.57 [Google Scholar]
  110. 2003 Vectors across spatial domains: From place to size, orientation, shape and parts. InEmile van der Zee and John Slack (eds.), Representing Direction in Language and Space, 39–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199260195.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199260195.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  111. 2005 Prepositional aspect and the algebra of paths. Linguistics and Philosophy28 (6). 739–779. 10.1007/s10988‑005‑2466‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-005-2466-y [Google Scholar]
  112. Zwarts, Joost, & Yoad Winter
    2000 Vector space semantics: A model-theoretic analysis of locative prepositions. Journal of logic, language and information9.2. 169–211. 10.1023/A:1008384416604
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008384416604 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error