Pazar Laz as a weak verb-framed language

References

1. Acedo-Matellán, Victor
   2016 The morphosyntax of transitions: A case study in Latin and other languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198733287.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198733287.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
2. Asbury, Anna, Berit Gehrke & Veronika Hegedus
   2007 One size fits all: Prefixes, particles, adpositions and cases as members of the category P. InCem Keskin (ed.), UiL OTS Yearbook, 1–17. Utrecht: UiL OTS.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Beavers, John, Beth Levin & Shiao Wei Tham
   2010 The typology of motion revisited. Journal of Linguistics46. 331–337. 10.1017/S0022226709990272
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226709990272 [Google Scholar]
4. Bowerman, Melissa & Erik Pederson
   1992 Topological relations picture series. InStephen. C. Levinson (ed.), Space stimuli kit 1.2: November 1992, 51–59. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bucaklişi, İsmail A., Hasan Uzunhasanoğlu & İrfan Aleksiva
   2007 Didi Lazuri nenapuna- Büyük Lazca Sözlük. İstanbul: Chiviyazilari.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Caha, Pavel
   2007 The superset principle. GLOW 2007 presentation [Generative Linguistics in the Old World]. Tromsø: University of Tromsø.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Demirok, Ömer F.
   2013 Agree as a unidirectional operation: Evidence from Laz. İstanbul: Boğaziçi University MA thesis.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Dikken, Marcel den
   1995 Particles. On the syntax of verb-particle, triadic, and causative constructions. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dixon, Robert M. W.
   1994 Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611896
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611896 [Google Scholar]
10. Eren, Ömer
    2016 Spatial prefixes of Pazar Laz: A nano-syntactic approach. İstanbul: Boğaziçi University MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Fábregas, Antonio
    2007 The exhaustive lexicalisation principle. Nordlyd34. 165–199. 10.7557/12.110
    https://doi.org/10.7557/12.110 [Google Scholar]
12. Felix, Ameka F., Carlien de Witte & David Wilkins
    1999 Picture series for positional verbs: Eliciting the verbal component in locative descriptions. InDavid Wilkins (ed.), Manual for the 1999 field season, 48–54. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. doi:  10.17617/2.2573831
    https://doi.org/10.17617/2.2573831 [Google Scholar]
13. Folli, Raffaella & Gillian Ramchand
    2005 Prepositions and results in Italian and English: An analysis from event decomposition. InHenk J. Verkuyl, Henriette De Swart & Angeliek van Hout (eds.), Perspectives on aspect, 81–105. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/1‑4020‑3232‑3_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3232-3_5 [Google Scholar]
14. Gehrke, Berit
    2008 Ps in motion: On the semantics and syntax of P elements and motion events. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Holisky, Dee A.
    1991 Laz. InAlice. C. Harris (ed.), The Indigenous languages of the Caucasus: The Kartvelian languages. Delmar, NY: Caravan Books.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Koopman, Hilda
    2000 The syntax of specifiers and heads. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203171608
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203171608 [Google Scholar]
17. Kutscher, Silvia
    2011 On the expression of spatial relations in Ardesen-Laz. Linguistic Discovery9. 49–77. 10.1349/PS1.1537‑0852.A.394
    https://doi.org/10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.394 [Google Scholar]
18. Lacroix, René
    2009 Description de dialecte Laze d’Arhavi (caucaasique du sud), Turquie, grammaire et textes. Lyon: University Lyon dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Levin, Beth
    1993 English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. McIntyre, Andrew
    2002 Idiosyncrasy in particle verbs. InNicole Dehé, Ray Jackendoff, Andrew McIntyre & Silke Urban (eds.), Verb-particle explorations, 95–118. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110902341.95
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110902341.95 [Google Scholar]
21. Öztürk, Balkız
    2010 Subjects in Pazar and Ardeshen Laz. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi2. 33–50.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Öztürk, Balkız
    2019 The loss of case system in Ardeshen Laz and its morphosyntactic consequences. STUF: Language Typology and Universals72(2). 193–219.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Öztürk, Balkız & Markus A. Pöchtrager
    (eds.) 2011 Pazar Laz. Münich: LINCOM: Languages of the World Materials.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Öztürk, Balkız & Eser. E. Taylan
    2017 Omnipresent little vP in Pazar Laz. InRoberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Angel Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain, 207–232. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Pantcheva, Marina B.
    2011 Decomposing path: The nanosyntax of directional expressions. Tromsø: University of Tromsø dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Ramchand, Gillian
    2008a Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486319
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486319 [Google Scholar]
27. Ramchand, Gillian
    2008b Lexical items in complex predications: Selection as Underassociation. Nordlyd35. 115–141. 10.7557/12.139
    https://doi.org/10.7557/12.139 [Google Scholar]
28. Riemsdijk, Henk van
    1990 Functional prepositions. InHarm Pinkster and Inge Genée (eds.), Unity in diversity, 229–241. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110847420.229
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110847420.229 [Google Scholar]
29. Son, Minjeong
    2009 Linguistic variation and lexical parameter: The case of directed motion. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics15(1). 213–222.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Son, Minjeong & Peter Svenonius
    2008 Microparameters of cross-linguistic variation: Directed motion and resultatives. Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 388–396.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Svenonius, Peter
    2006 The emergence of axial parts. Nordlyd33. 49–77.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Svenonius, Peter
    2007 Adpositions, particles and the arguments they introduce. InEric Reuland, Tanmoy Bhattacharya & Giorgos Spathas (eds.), Argument Structure, 63–103. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.108.08sve
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.108.08sve [Google Scholar]
33. Svenonius, Peter
    2010 Spatial P in English. InGuglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Mapping spatial PPs: The cartography of syntactic structure, 127–161. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
34. Talmy, Leonard
    2000a Toward a cognitive semantics: Concept structuring systems, vol.1, Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Talmy, Leonard
    2000b Toward a cognitive semantics: Typology and process in concept structuring, vol.2, Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Taylan, Eser E. & Balkız Öztürk
    2014 Transitivity in Pazar Laz. Acta Linguistica Hungarica61. 271–296. 10.1556/ALing.61.2014.3.2
    https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.61.2014.3.2 [Google Scholar]
37. Zubizarreta, Maria L. & Eunjeong Oh
    2007 On the syntactic composition of manner and motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5132.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5132.001.0001 [Google Scholar]