Volume 17, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-6834
  • E-ISSN: 2211-6842
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This paper discusses object drop in English ‘reduced written register’ (RWR), such as recipes ( Haegeman 1987a , b , Massam & Roberge 1989 , Massam 1992 ) and diaries. Object drop differs from subject drop in RWR ( Haegeman 1997 , 2007 , this issue); dropped subjects can be of any person and can be expletives, while dropped objects can be third person only and cannot be expletives. I propose that object drop in RWR is dependent on article drop. I analyze null articles in RWR as the presence of a phonologically null determiner with the semantics of a choice function. To analyze object drop, I adopt Tomioka (2003) ’s analysis for Japanese null pronouns, in which a null determiner, combined with NP ellipsis, allows a constituent with pronominal-like semantics to go wholly unpronounced. I argue that a similar process is at work in English RWR, and argue that this analysis allows us to understand the person and expletive restrictions.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Baltin, Mark & Paul M. Postal
    1996 More on reanalysis hypotheses. Linguistic Inquiry27(1). 127–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beukema, Frits & Peter Coopmans
    1989 A Government-Binding perspective on the imperative in English. Journal of Linguistics25(2). 417–36. doi: 10.1017/S002222670001416X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222670001416X [Google Scholar]
  3. Chomsky, Noam
    1975Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Constant, Noah
    2012 Witnessable quantifiers license type-e meaning: Evidence from contrastive topic, equatives and supplements. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT)22. 286–306. doi: 10.3765/salt.v22i0.2652
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v22i0.2652 [Google Scholar]
  5. Elbourne, Paul D.
    2005Situations and individuals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fodor, Janet & Ivan Sag
    1982 Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy5. 355–98. doi: 10.1007/BF00351459
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00351459 [Google Scholar]
  7. Haegeman, Liliane
    1987a Complement ellipsis in English: or how to cook without objects. In Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen (ed.), Studies in Honour of René Derolez, 248–261. Ghent: Seminarie voor Engelse en Oud-Germaanse Taalkunde R.U.G.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 1987b Register variation in English: some theoretical implications. Journal of English Linguistics20. 230–48. doi: 10.1177/007542428702000207
    https://doi.org/10.1177/007542428702000207 [Google Scholar]
  9. Haegeman, Liliane 1990 Understood subjects in English diaries. Multilingua9(2). 157–199. doi: 10.1515/mult.1990.9.2.157
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1990.9.2.157 [Google Scholar]
  10. 1997 Register variation, truncation, and subject omission in English and in French. English Language and Linguistics1(2). 233–70. doi: 10.1017/S1360674300000526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674300000526 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2007 Subject omission in present-day written English: On the theoretical relevance of peripheral data. Rivista di grammatica generativa32. 91–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Haegeman, Liliane & Tabea Ihsane
    1999 Subject ellipsis in embedded clauses in English. English Language and Linguistics3(1). 117–145. doi: 10.1017/S1360674399000155
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674399000155 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2001 Adult null subjects in the non-pro-drop languages: two diary dialects. Language Acquisition9(4). 329–346. doi: 10.1207/S15327817LA0904_03
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327817LA0904_03 [Google Scholar]
  14. Haegeman, Liliane
    . This issue. Unspeakable sentences: Subject omission in written registers: a cartographic analysis.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Heim, Irene
    1982 The semantics of definite and indefinite Noun Phrases. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.
  16. 1991 Artikel und Definitheit. In Arnim von Stechow and Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch des zeitgenossischen Forschung, 487–535. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hornstein, Norbert & Amy Weinberg
    1981 Case theory and preposition stranding. Linguistic Inquiry12(1). 55–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Huang, C.-T. James
    1984 On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry15(4). 531–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 1991 Remarks on the status of the null object. In Robert Freidin (ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, 56–76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ionin, Tania
    2006This is definitely specific: specificity and definiteness in article systems. Natural Language Semantics14(2). 175–234. doi: 10.1007/s11050‑005‑5255‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-005-5255-9 [Google Scholar]
  21. Johnson, Kyle
    2012 Pronouns vs. definite descriptions. In Misha Becker , John Grinstead & Jason Rothman (eds.), Generative linguistics and acquisition: Studies in honor of Nina M. Hyams, 157–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kratzer, Angelika
    1998 Scope or pseudoscope? Are there wide-scope indefinites?In Susan Rothstein (ed.), Events and grammar, 163–196. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑3969‑4_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3969-4_8 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2009 Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry40(2). 187–237. doi: 10.1162/ling.2009.40.2.187
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.2.187 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lewis, David
    1975 Adverbs of quantification. In Edward L. Keenan (ed.), Formal semantics of natural language, 3–15. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511897696.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511897696.003 [Google Scholar]
  25. Mårdh, Ingrid
    1980Headlinese: On the grammar of English front page headlines. Malmö: CWK Gleerup.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Massam, Diane
    1992 Null objects and non-thematic subjects. Journal of Linguistics28. 115–37. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700015012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700015012 [Google Scholar]
  27. Massam, Diane & Yves Roberge
    1989 Recipe context null objects in English. Linguistic Inquiry20(1). 134–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Matthewson, Lisa
    1999 On the interpretation of wide-scope indefinites. Natural Language Semantics7(1). 79–134. doi: 10.1023/A:1008376601708
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008376601708 [Google Scholar]
  29. Neeleman, Ad & Kriszta Szendrői
    2007 Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry38(4). 671–714. doi: 10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.671
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.671 [Google Scholar]
  30. Postal, Paul M. 1969 On so-called ‘pronouns’ in English. In David A. Reibel & Sanford A. Schane (eds.), Modern studies in English, 201–44. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 1971Cross-over phenomena. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Postal, Paul M. & Geoffrey K. Pullum
    1988 Expletive noun phrases in subcategorized positions. Linguistic Inquiry19(4). 635–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Prince, Ellen
    1981 On the interfacing of indefinite-this NPs. In Aravind K. Joshi , Bonnie L. Webber & Ivan A. Sag (eds.), Elements of discourse understanding, 231–50. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Reich, Ingo
    . This issue. On the omission of articles and copulae in German.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Reinhart, Tanya
    1997 Quantifier scope: how labor is divided between QR and choice functions. Linguistics and Philosophy20. 335–97. doi: 10.1023/A:1005349801431
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005349801431 [Google Scholar]
  36. Rizzi, Luigi
    1994 Early null subjects and root null subjects. In Toen Hoekstra & Bonnie D. Schwartz (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar, 151–77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lald.8.09riz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.8.09riz [Google Scholar]
  37. 1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: handbook of generative syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2006 Grammatically-based target-inconsistencies in child language. In Kamil Ud Deen , Jun Nomura , Barbara Schulz & Bonnie D. Schwartz (eds.), Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – North America[GALANA] (University of Connecticut Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4). Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Ross, John Robert
    1982 Pronoun deleting processes in German. Paper presented at theannual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Diego, California.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Siewierska, Anna
    2004Person. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511812729
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812729 [Google Scholar]
  41. Stowell, Tim
    1991Empty heads in abbreviated English. GLOW abstract, GLOW Newsletter #26, HAG.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 1999Words lost and syntax found in Headlinese: The hidden structure of abbreviated English in headlines, instructions and diaries. Unpublished manuscript/handout for talk given at York University, Toronto, Nov24 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 2013 The Syntax of Abbreviated English. Lecture given at the International Congress of Linguists, Geneva, July22 2013.
  44. Straumann, Heinrich
    1935Newspaper headlines: A study in linguistic method. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Tomioka, Satoshi
    2003 The semantics of Japanese null pronouns and its cross-linguistic implications. In Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds.), The interfaces: deriving and interpreting omitted structures, 321–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.61.16tom
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.61.16tom [Google Scholar]
  46. Weir, Andrew
    2012 Left-edge deletion in English and subject omission in diaries. English Language and Linguistics16(1). 105–29. doi: 10.1017/S136067431100030X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S136067431100030X [Google Scholar]
  47. 2013 Article drop in headlines and truncation of CP. Linguistics Society of America Annual Meeting Extended Abstracts. www.linguisticsociety.org/files/3540-6845-1-SM.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Winter, Yoad
    1997 Choice functions and the scopal semantics of indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy20. 399–467. doi: 10.1023/A:1005354323136
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005354323136 [Google Scholar]
  49. Zimmerman, Thomas Ede 1993 On the proper treatment of opacity in certain verbs. Natural Language Semantics1. 149–79. doi: 10.1007/BF00372561
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372561 [Google Scholar]
  50. Zwicky, Arnold M.
    1988 On the subject of bare imperatives in English. In Caroline Duncan-Rose (ed.), On language: Rhetorica, phonologica, syntactica: A festschrift for Robert P. Stockwell from his friends and colleagues. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error