1887
Volume 17, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-6834
  • E-ISSN: 2211-6842
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper discusses object drop in English ‘reduced written register’ (RWR), such as recipes ( Haegeman 1987a , b , Massam & Roberge 1989 , Massam 1992 ) and diaries. Object drop differs from subject drop in RWR ( Haegeman 1997 , 2007 , this issue); dropped subjects can be of any person and can be expletives, while dropped objects can be third person only and cannot be expletives. I propose that object drop in RWR is dependent on article drop. I analyze null articles in RWR as the presence of a phonologically null determiner with the semantics of a choice function. To analyze object drop, I adopt Tomioka (2003) ’s analysis for Japanese null pronouns, in which a null determiner, combined with NP ellipsis, allows a constituent with pronominal-like semantics to go wholly unpronounced. I argue that a similar process is at work in English RWR, and argue that this analysis allows us to understand the person and expletive restrictions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lv.14016.wei
2018-01-26
2019-10-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baltin, Mark & Paul M. Postal
    1996 More on reanalysis hypotheses. Linguistic Inquiry27(1). 127–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beukema, Frits & Peter Coopmans
    1989 A Government-Binding perspective on the imperative in English. Journal of Linguistics25(2). 417–36. doi: 10.1017/S002222670001416X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222670001416X [Google Scholar]
  3. Chomsky, Noam
    1975Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Constant, Noah
    2012 Witnessable quantifiers license type-e meaning: Evidence from contrastive topic, equatives and supplements. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT)22. 286–306. doi: 10.3765/salt.v22i0.2652
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v22i0.2652 [Google Scholar]
  5. Elbourne, Paul D.
    2005Situations and individuals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fodor, Janet & Ivan Sag
    1982 Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy5. 355–98. doi: 10.1007/BF00351459
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00351459 [Google Scholar]
  7. Haegeman, Liliane
    1987a Complement ellipsis in English: or how to cook without objects. In Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen (ed.), Studies in Honour of René Derolez, 248–261. Ghent: Seminarie voor Engelse en Oud-Germaanse Taalkunde R.U.G.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 1987b Register variation in English: some theoretical implications. Journal of English Linguistics20. 230–48. doi: 10.1177/007542428702000207
    https://doi.org/10.1177/007542428702000207 [Google Scholar]
  9. Haegeman, Liliane 1990 Understood subjects in English diaries. Multilingua9(2). 157–199. doi: 10.1515/mult.1990.9.2.157
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1990.9.2.157 [Google Scholar]
  10. 1997 Register variation, truncation, and subject omission in English and in French. English Language and Linguistics1(2). 233–70. doi: 10.1017/S1360674300000526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674300000526 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2007 Subject omission in present-day written English: On the theoretical relevance of peripheral data. Rivista di grammatica generativa32. 91–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Haegeman, Liliane & Tabea Ihsane
    1999 Subject ellipsis in embedded clauses in English. English Language and Linguistics3(1). 117–145. doi: 10.1017/S1360674399000155
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674399000155 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2001 Adult null subjects in the non-pro-drop languages: two diary dialects. Language Acquisition9(4). 329–346. doi: 10.1207/S15327817LA0904_03
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327817LA0904_03 [Google Scholar]
  14. Haegeman, Liliane
    . This issue. Unspeakable sentences: Subject omission in written registers: a cartographic analysis.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Heim, Irene
    1982 The semantics of definite and indefinite Noun Phrases. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.
  16. 1991 Artikel und Definitheit. In Arnim von Stechow and Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch des zeitgenossischen Forschung, 487–535. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hornstein, Norbert & Amy Weinberg
    1981 Case theory and preposition stranding. Linguistic Inquiry12(1). 55–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Huang, C.-T. James
    1984 On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry15(4). 531–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 1991 Remarks on the status of the null object. In Robert Freidin (ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, 56–76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ionin, Tania
    2006This is definitely specific: specificity and definiteness in article systems. Natural Language Semantics14(2). 175–234. doi: 10.1007/s11050‑005‑5255‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-005-5255-9 [Google Scholar]
  21. Johnson, Kyle
    2012 Pronouns vs. definite descriptions. In Misha Becker , John Grinstead & Jason Rothman (eds.), Generative linguistics and acquisition: Studies in honor of Nina M. Hyams, 157–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kratzer, Angelika
    1998 Scope or pseudoscope? Are there wide-scope indefinites?In Susan Rothstein (ed.), Events and grammar, 163–196. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑3969‑4_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3969-4_8 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2009 Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry40(2). 187–237. doi: 10.1162/ling.2009.40.2.187
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.2.187 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lewis, David
    1975 Adverbs of quantification. In Edward L. Keenan (ed.), Formal semantics of natural language, 3–15. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511897696.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511897696.003 [Google Scholar]
  25. Mårdh, Ingrid
    1980Headlinese: On the grammar of English front page headlines. Malmö: CWK Gleerup.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Massam, Diane
    1992 Null objects and non-thematic subjects. Journal of Linguistics28. 115–37. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700015012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700015012 [Google Scholar]
  27. Massam, Diane & Yves Roberge
    1989 Recipe context null objects in English. Linguistic Inquiry20(1). 134–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Matthewson, Lisa
    1999 On the interpretation of wide-scope indefinites. Natural Language Semantics7(1). 79–134. doi: 10.1023/A:1008376601708
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008376601708 [Google Scholar]
  29. Neeleman, Ad & Kriszta Szendrői
    2007 Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry38(4). 671–714. doi: 10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.671
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.671 [Google Scholar]
  30. Postal, Paul M. 1969 On so-called ‘pronouns’ in English. In David A. Reibel & Sanford A. Schane (eds.), Modern studies in English, 201–44. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 1971Cross-over phenomena. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Postal, Paul M. & Geoffrey K. Pullum
    1988 Expletive noun phrases in subcategorized positions. Linguistic Inquiry19(4). 635–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Prince, Ellen
    1981 On the interfacing of indefinite-this NPs. In Aravind K. Joshi , Bonnie L. Webber & Ivan A. Sag (eds.), Elements of discourse understanding, 231–50. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Reich, Ingo
    . This issue. On the omission of articles and copulae in German.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Reinhart, Tanya
    1997 Quantifier scope: how labor is divided between QR and choice functions. Linguistics and Philosophy20. 335–97. doi: 10.1023/A:1005349801431
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005349801431 [Google Scholar]
  36. Rizzi, Luigi
    1994 Early null subjects and root null subjects. In Toen Hoekstra & Bonnie D. Schwartz (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar, 151–77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lald.8.09riz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.8.09riz [Google Scholar]
  37. 1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: handbook of generative syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2006 Grammatically-based target-inconsistencies in child language. In Kamil Ud Deen , Jun Nomura , Barbara Schulz & Bonnie D. Schwartz (eds.), Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – North America[GALANA] (University of Connecticut Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4). Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Ross, John Robert
    1982 Pronoun deleting processes in German. Paper presented at theannual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Diego, California.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Siewierska, Anna
    2004Person. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511812729
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812729 [Google Scholar]
  41. Stowell, Tim
    1991Empty heads in abbreviated English. GLOW abstract, GLOW Newsletter #26, HAG.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 1999Words lost and syntax found in Headlinese: The hidden structure of abbreviated English in headlines, instructions and diaries. Unpublished manuscript/handout for talk given at York University, Toronto, Nov24 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 2013 The Syntax of Abbreviated English. Lecture given at the International Congress of Linguists, Geneva, July22 2013.
  44. Straumann, Heinrich
    1935Newspaper headlines: A study in linguistic method. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Tomioka, Satoshi
    2003 The semantics of Japanese null pronouns and its cross-linguistic implications. In Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds.), The interfaces: deriving and interpreting omitted structures, 321–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.61.16tom
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.61.16tom [Google Scholar]
  46. Weir, Andrew
    2012 Left-edge deletion in English and subject omission in diaries. English Language and Linguistics16(1). 105–29. doi: 10.1017/S136067431100030X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S136067431100030X [Google Scholar]
  47. 2013 Article drop in headlines and truncation of CP. Linguistics Society of America Annual Meeting Extended Abstracts. www.linguisticsociety.org/files/3540-6845-1-SM.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Winter, Yoad
    1997 Choice functions and the scopal semantics of indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy20. 399–467. doi: 10.1023/A:1005354323136
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005354323136 [Google Scholar]
  49. Zimmerman, Thomas Ede 1993 On the proper treatment of opacity in certain verbs. Natural Language Semantics1. 149–79. doi: 10.1007/BF00372561
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372561 [Google Scholar]
  50. Zwicky, Arnold M.
    1988 On the subject of bare imperatives in English. In Caroline Duncan-Rose (ed.), On language: Rhetorica, phonologica, syntactica: A festschrift for Robert P. Stockwell from his friends and colleagues. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lv.14016.wei
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): article drop , object drop , pro-drop , register variation , telegraphic register and written English
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error