1887
Volume 17, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-6834
  • E-ISSN: 2211-6842
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

In this paper, we present evidence in favour of a syntactic approach to subject drop in Swiss French text messages. Subject drop in our corpus follows patterns found in various so-called "written abbreviated registers" such as diaries, notes etc.: it occurs at the beginning of main sentences and after preposed adjuncts. Based on a corpus of 1100 text messages, collected in 2009/10 (www.sms4science.ch), we test predictions put forward by two approaches to argument drop in abbreviated registers, i.e. the "Avoid Weak Start" hypothesis by Weir (2012a) and the "Truncated CP hypothesis" by Haegeman (2013) . While for our data the first approach cannot be excluded, our results more strongly support the syntactic one, despite the fact that some data, especially preposed strong subject without clitic resumption, challenge existing analyses. These data suggest that dropped referential subjects can be analysed as instances of familiar topic drop.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lv.14020.sta
2018-01-26
2019-10-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Lyon
    Lyon Corpus, CHILDES: childes.psy.cmu.edu/data/Romance
  2. PFC (Phonologie du Français Contemporain)
    PFC (Phonologie du Français Contemporain): www.projet-pfc.net; see:
  3. Durand, Jacques , Bernard Laks & Chantal Lyche
    2002 La phonologie du français contemporain: usages, variétés et structure. In C. Pusch & W. Raible (eds.): Romanistische Korpuslinguistik- Korpora und gesprochene Sprache/Romance Corpus Linguistics – Corpora and Spoken Language, 93–106. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2009 Le projet PFC: une source de données primaires structurées. In J. Durand , B. Laks & C. Lyche (eds.): Phonologie, variation et accents du français, 19–61. Paris: Hermès.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. sms4science.ch
    sms4science.ch Corpus: www.sms4science.ch; see:
  6. Stark, Elisabeth , Ruef, Beni & Simone Ueberwassser
    2009–2014SMS Corpus. University of Zurich. https://sms.linguistik.uzh.ch
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Androutsopoulos, Jannis & Gurly Schmidt
    2002 SMS-Kommunikation: Ethnografische Gattungsanalyse am Beispiel einer Kleingruppe. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik36. 49–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Anis, Jacques
    2007 Neography – Unconventional Spelling in French SMS Text Messages. In B. Danet & S. C. Herring (eds.), The Multilingual Internet – Language, Culture and Communication Online, 87–115. New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304794.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304794.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  9. Béguelin, Marie-José
    2012 La variation graphique dans le corpus suisse de SMS en français. In S. Caddéo , et al. (eds.), Penser les langues avec Claire Blanche-Benveniste, 47–63. Aix-en-Provence: Presses de l’Université de Provence.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Biber, Douglas
    1995Dimensions of Register Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511519871
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519871 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bieswanger, Markus 2013 Micro-linguistic structural features of computer-mediated communication. In S. Herring , D. Stein & T. Virtanen (eds.), Handbook of the Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, 463–485. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110214468.463
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214468.463 [Google Scholar]
  12. Blanche-Benveniste, Claire
    , 2nd edn. 2000Approches de la langue parlée en français. Gap: Ophrys.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cardinaletti, Anna
    2004 Toward a cartography of subject positions. In L. Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures Volume 2, 115–165. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Chomsky, Noam
    2001 Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, 1–52. Cambridge & Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cinque, Guglielmo
    1990Types of A’-Dependencies. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Culbertson, Jennifer
    2010 Convergent evidence for categorial change in French: From subject clitic to agreement marker. Language86(1). 85–132. doi: 10.1353/lan.0.0183
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0183 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dell, François
    1984 L’accentuation dans les phrases en français. In F. Dell , D. Hirst & J. -R. Vergnaud (eds.), Forme sonore du langage: Structure des représentations en phonologie, 65–122. Paris: Hermann.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth
    1996 Phonological Phrasing and Accentuation in French. In M. Nespor & N. Smith (eds.), Dam Phonology, 1–38. La Haye: Holland Academic Graphics.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Detges, Ulrich
    2013 First person pronouns in spoken French. A case study in cliticization. In K. Jeppesen Kragh & J. Lindschouw (eds.), Deixis and Pronouns in Romance Languages, 33–47. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.136.03det
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.136.03det [Google Scholar]
  20. Fairon, Cédrick , Jean René Klein & Sébastien Paumier
    2006Le Langage SMS. Étude d’un corpus informatisé à partir de l’enquête « Faites don de vos SMS à la science ». Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ferguson, Charles A.
    1982 Simplified registers and linguistic theory. In L. K. Obler & L. Menn (eds.), Exceptional Language and Linguistics, 49–66. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Frascarelli, Mara & Hinterhölzl, Roland
    2007 Types of topics in German and Italian. In K. Schwabe & S. Winkler (eds.), On Information Structure, Meaning and Form. Generalizations across languages, 87–116. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.100.07fra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.100.07fra [Google Scholar]
  23. Haegeman, Liliane
    1997 Register variation, truncation and subject omission in English and in French. English Language and Linguistics1. 233–270. doi: 10.1017/S1360674300000526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674300000526 [Google Scholar]
  24. 1999 Adult null subjects in non pro-drop languages. In M. -A. Friedemann & L. Rizzi (eds.), The Acquisition of Syntax, 128–169. London: Addison, Wesley and Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2004 Topicalization, CLLD and the Left Periphery. ZAS Papers in Linguistics35. 157–192.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2013 The syntax of registers. Diary subject omission and the privilege of the root. Lingua130. 88–110. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  27. . (this issue). Unspeakable sentences. Subject omission in written registers: a cartographic analysis.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Haegeman, Liliane & Tabea Ihsane
    1999 Subject ellipsis in embedded clauses in English, English Language and Linguistics3, 117–145. doi: 10.1017/S1360674399000155
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674399000155 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2001 Adult Null Subjects in the non-pro-drop Languages: Two Diary Dialects, Language Acquisition9. 329–346. doi: 10.1207/S15327817LA0904_03
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327817LA0904_03 [Google Scholar]
  30. Herring, Susan C.
    2007 A Faceted Classification Scheme for Computer-Mediated Discourse. [email protected]4, article 1, www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2007/761. (24July 2015.)
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hymes, Dell 1971Pidginization and creolization of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Janda, Richard J.
    1985 Note-taking English as a simplified register. Discourse Processes8. 437–454. doi: 10.1080/01638538509544626
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538509544626 [Google Scholar]
  33. Jun, Sun-Ah & Fougeron, Cécile
    2000 A Phonological Model of French Intonation. In A. Botinis (ed.), Intonation: Analysis, Modeling and Technology, 209–242. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑4317‑2_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4317-2_10 [Google Scholar]
  34. Léautaud, Pierre
    1989Le Fléau. Journal particulier 1917–1939 Paris: Mercure de France.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Little, Greta D.
    1978 Subject deletion in English. Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States: LACUS forum5. 289–297.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Mayol, Laia
    2010 Contrastive pronouns in null-subject Romance languages. Lingua120. 2497–2514. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.04.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.04.009 [Google Scholar]
  37. Napoli, Donna Jo
    1982 Initial material deletion in English. Glossa16(1). 85–111.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Nariyama, Shigeko
    2004 Subject ellipsis in English. Journal of Pragmatics36. 237–264. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(03)00099‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00099-7 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2013 Discourse Coherence and Referent Identification of Subject Ellipsis in Japanese. In A. Włodarczyk & H. Włodarczyk (eds.): Meta-Informative Centering in Utterances: Between Semantics and Pragmatics, 167–181. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.143.08nar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.143.08nar [Google Scholar]
  40. Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel
    1986Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Oh, Sun-Young
    2005 English zero anaphora as an interactional resource, 1, Research on Language and Social Interaction38. 267–302. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3803_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3803_3 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2006 English zero anaphora as an interactional resource, 2, Discourse studies8. 817–846. doi: 10.1177/1461445606067332
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606067332 [Google Scholar]
  43. Oosterhof, Albert & Gudrun Rawoens
    . (this issue). Register variation and distributional patterns in article omission in Dutch headlines.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Panckhurst, Rachel
    2009 Short Message Service (SMS). Typologie et problématiques futures. In T. Arnavielle (ed.), Polyphonies, pour Michelle Lanvin, 33–52. Montpellier: Université Paul Valéry Montpellier 3.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Plath, Silvia
    1983The journals of Sylvia Plath. Ed. by T. Hughes & Fr. McCollough . New York: Ballantine Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Reich, Ingo
    . (this issue). On the omission of articles and copulae in German.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Reust, Fabiola
    2015L’ellipse de l’article dans les SMS suisses français. Zurich: University of Zurich MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Rizzi, Luigi
    1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht, Boston & London: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  49. Rizzi, Luigi & Shlonsky, Ur
    2007 Strategies of subject extraction. In H-M. Gärtner & U. Sauerland (eds.), Interfaces + recursion = language? Chomsky’s minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics, 115–60. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Robert-Tissot, Aurélia
    . Forthoming. Le sujet et son absence dans les SMS français. Une analyse syntaxique. Vincennes: Presses universitaires de Vincennes.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Sigurðsson, Halldór Á.
    2011 Conditions on Argument Drop. Linguistic Inquiry42(2). 267–304. doi: 10.1162/LING_a_00042
    https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00042 [Google Scholar]
  52. Stark, Elisabeth
    2014 Frequency, Form and Function of Cleft Constructions in the Swiss SMS Corpus. In A.-M. de Cesare (ed.), Frequency, Form and Function of cleft constructions, 325–344. Berlin, Munich & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Stark, Elisabeth 2015 ’De l’oral dans l’écrit’? – Le profil variationnel des SMS (textos) et leur valeur pour la recherche linguistique. In K. Jeppesen Kragh & J. Lindschouw (eds.), Les variations diasystématiques et leurs interdépendances dans les langues romanes. Actes du Colloque DIA II à Copenhague (19–21 nov. 2012), 395–405. Strasbourg: Editions de linguistique et de philologie.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Stowell, Tim
    1991 “Empty Heads in Abbreviated English,” GLOW Abstract, GLOW Newsletter #26, HAG.
  55. 2013 “The Syntax of Abbreviated English,” lecture given at the International Congress of Linguists, Geneva, July 22, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Teddiman, Laura
    2011 Subject ellipsis by text type: an investigation using ICE-GB. In J. Newman , H. Baayen & S. Rice (eds.): Corpus-based studies in language use, language learning, and language documentation, 71–88. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Teddiman, Laura & John Newman
    2007 Subject Ellipsis in English: Construction of and Findings from a Diary Corpus, 26th conference on Lexis and Grammar, Bonifacio, 2–6 October 2007. Alberta: University of Alberta: Ms.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Thurlow, Crispin & Michèle Poff
    2013 Text Messaging. In S. C. Herring , D. Stein & T. Virtanen (eds.), Handbook of the Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, 163–190. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110214468.163
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214468.163 [Google Scholar]
  59. Walther, Joseph B.
    1996 Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research23. 3–43. doi: 10.1177/009365096023001001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001 [Google Scholar]
  60. Weir, Andrew
    2009 Subject pronoun drop in informal English. Richard M. Hogg Prize winning essay. people.umass.edu/aweir. (24July 2015.)
    [Google Scholar]
  61. 2012a Left edge deletion in English and subject omission in diaries. English Language and Linguistics16(1). 105–129. doi: 10.1017/S136067431100030X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S136067431100030X [Google Scholar]
  62. 2012b Article drop in headlinese. Talk given at ECO5, 7thofApril 2012 Ms.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. . (this issue). Object drop and article drop in reduced written register.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Woolf, Virginia
    1985The diary of Virginia Woolf. Vol.V: 1936-1941. Ed. by A. O. Bell , assisted by A. McNeillie . London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Zdorenko, Tatiana
    2010 Subject omission in Russian: a study of the Russian National Corpus. In St. Th. Gries , St. Wulff & M. Davies (eds.): Corpus-Linguistic Applications: Current Studies, New Directions, 119–133. Amsterdam: Rodopi. doi: 10.1163/9789042028012_009
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042028012_009 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lv.14020.sta
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lv.14020.sta
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): (Swiss) French , abbreviated registers , diary writing , English , subject drop and text messages
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error