Volume 19, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2211-6834
  • E-ISSN: 2211-6842
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



In this article I will show that there is not a single diachronic path that leads to the loss of the verb second property so that different languages can have different ways towards a non V2 grammar. I will also show that the progressive loss of subject inversion contexts is not the only factor that played a role in the change, because there are V2 languages in which nominal subject inversion was never attested but they are still V2, i.e. they have I to C movement. I will identify various factors which may play a role and are related to the type of verb second found in different languages. I will consider various types of factors and show that they can play a role or not in the loss of V2 depending on the type of V2 that the language displays. I will also identify an additional factor that has not been considered in the literature namely the type of complementizer system: a change in this area can contribute to destabilizing the V2 grammar.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Adams, Marianne
    1987 ‘From Old French to the Theory of pro-drop’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory5: 1–32. 10.1007/BF00161866
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00161866 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alber, Birgit
    1994 Indizi per l’esistenza di uno split-CP nelle lingue germaniche. In: G. Borgato (ed.), Teoria del linguaggio e analisi linguistica. XX Incontro di grammatica generativa, 3–23. Padova: Unipress.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderssen, Merete & Westergaard, Marit
    2010 Frequency and Economy in the Acquisition of Variable Word Order. Lingua: 2569–2588. 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.06.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.06.006 [Google Scholar]
  4. Axel, Kathrin
    2007Studies on Old High German Syntax. Left Sentence Periphery, Verb Placement and Verb Second. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.112
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.112 [Google Scholar]
  5. Belletti, Adriana
    2004 ‘Aspects of the low IP area’, InLuigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, 16–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 2008 The CP of clefts. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa33. 191–204.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2013 Revisiting the CP of Clefts. InGünther Grewendorf & Thomas Ede Zimmermann: Discourse and Grammar. From Sentence Types to Lexical Categories, 91–114. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Benincà, Paola
    2006 A detailed map of the left periphery of Medieval Romance. InRaffaella Zanuttini (ed.), Crosslinguistic research in syntax and semantics: Negation, tense and clausal architecture, 53–86. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Benincà, Paola and Cecilia Poletto
    2004 Topic, Focus and V2: defining the CP sublayers. InLuigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, 52–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bocci, Giuliano & Cecilia Poletto
    2016 Syntactic and Prosodic Effects of Information Structure in Romance. InCaroline Féry and Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), inHandout of Information structure, 642–662. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bidese, Ermenegildo
    2008Die diachronische Syntax des Zimbrischen. Tuebingen: Günter Narr Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bidese, Ermenegildo & Alessandra Tomaselli
    2007 The loss of V2 phenomena in Cimbrian. Linguistische Berichte210. 209–228.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bidese, Ermenegildo, Andrea Padovan & Alessandra Tomaselli
    2013Linguistische Berichte. Sonderheft 19.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2012 A binary system of complementizers in Cimbrian relative clauses. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax90. 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bosco, Ilaria
    1999 Christlike unt korze dottrina. Un’analisi sintattica della lingua cimbra del XVII secolo. Padova: Padova University dissertation.
  16. Cecchetto, Carlo
    2001 Proper Binding Condition Effects are Phase Impenetrability Condition Effects. In: Kim Minjoo &Uri Strauss, Proceedings of NELS 31, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Cocchi, G., and C. Poletto
    2007 Complementizer deletion and complementizer doubling, inC. Picchi and A. Pona (eds.), Proceedings of the XXXII Incontro di Grammatica generativa, Quaderni del Dipartimento di Linguistica – Università di Firenze, 49–62. Alessandria: Ed. dell’Ors.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Costa, João
    2001 The Emergence of Unmarked Word Order. InGeraldine Legendre, Jane Grimshaw, and Sten Vikner (eds), Optimality- Theoretic Syntax, 171–203. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Cruschina, Silvio
    2011Discourse-Related Features and Functional Projections. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fuss, Eric
    2003 On the historical core of V2 in Germanic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics26. 195–231. 10.1017/S0332586503001082
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586503001082 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2008Word order and language change. On the interface between syntax and morphology. Habilitationsschrift, Universität Frankfurt.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Giorgi, Alessandra & Fabio Pianesi
    1997Tense and aspect: from semantics to morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Grewendorf, Günther & Cecilia Poletto
    2011 Hidden verb second: The case of Cimbrian. InMichael T. Putnam (ed.), Studies on German-Language islands, 301–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.123.12gre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.123.12gre [Google Scholar]
  24. Grewendorf, Günther
    2008 The Left Clausal Periphery: Clitic Left Dislocation in Italian and Left Dislocation in German. InBenjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey, and Claudia Maienborn (eds), Dislocated Elements in Discourse: Syntactic, Semantic, and Pragmatic Perspectives, 49–94. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Haegeman, Liliane
    1997 Negative inversion and the structure of CP. Paper presented at theLinguistic Colloquium, University of Wuppertal.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hoekstra, Eric
    1993 Dialectal variation inside CP as parametric variation, Linguistische Berichte5.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kaiser, Georg A.
    2002Verbstellung und Verbstellungswandel in den romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. 10.1515/9783110911640
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110911640 [Google Scholar]
  28. van Kampen, Jacqueline
    2010 Typological Guidance in the Acquisition of V2 Dutch. Lingua120 (2): 264–83. 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.07.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.07.005 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kemenade, Ans van
    1987Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110882308
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110882308 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jacobs, Joachim
    2015 Was für ein Hauptsatzphänomen ist V2? Talk delivered at the V2 Workshop Wuppertal24.07.2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ledgeway, Adam
    2003 ‘Il sistema completivo dei dialetti meridionali. La doppia serie di complementatori’, Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia27: 89–147.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 2007 Old Neapolitan Word Order: Some Initial Observations. InA. L. Lepschy, A. Tosi (eds), Languages of Italy: Histories and dictionaries, Ravena, Longo, 119–146.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 2008 Satisfying V2 in early romance: Merge vs. move. Journal of Linguistics44. 437–470. 10.1017/S0022226708005173
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226708005173 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lightfoot, David
    1995 Why UG Needs a Learning Theory: Triggering Verb Movement. InAdrian Battye and Ian Roberts (eds), Clause Structure and Language Change, 31–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 1999The Development of language: Acquisition, change, and evolution. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 2006How New Languages Emerge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511616204
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616204 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lightfoot, David & Marit Westergaard
    2007 Language Acquisition and Language Change: Interrelationships. InLanguage and Linguistics Compass1 (5): 396–416. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2007.00023.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00023.x [Google Scholar]
  38. Lohnstein, Horst
    . In press. The grammatical basis of verb second – the case of German. InRebecca Woods, Sam Wolfe & Theresa Biberauer, Rethinking Verb Second. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Manzini, Maria Rita & Leonardo Savoia
    2005I dialetti italiani e romanci: morfosintassi generativa, vol.3. Alessandria: Edizioni Dell’Orso.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Oniga, Renato
    2014Latin. A linguistic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Paoli, Sandra
    2007 The fine structure of the left periphery: COMPs and subjects: Evidence from Romance. Lingua117. 1057–1079. 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.007 [Google Scholar]
  42. Petrova, Svetlana
    2015 Free word order in Germanic: Insights from object order in Middle Low German. Linguistische Berichte244, 355–382.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Poeppel, David & Kenneth Wexler
    1993 The Full Competence Hypothesis of Clause Structure in Early German. Language69: 1–33. 10.2307/416414
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416414 [Google Scholar]
  44. Poletto, Cecilia
    2000The Higher Functional Field: Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 2001 Complementizer deletion and verb movement in standard Italian. In: Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 265–286. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 2002 The left-periphery of V2-Rhaetoromance dialects: A new view on V2 and V3. InSief Barbiers, Leonie Cornips & Susanne van der Kleij (eds.), Syntactic microvariation, 214–42. Amsterdam: Meertens Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 2006 Parallel phases: A study of the high and low periphery of Old Italian. InMara Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of interpretation, 261–95. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197723.4.261
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197723.4.261 [Google Scholar]
  48. 2014Word order in Old Italian. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660247.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660247.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  49. Poletto, C.
    2015 ‘Word order in the Old Italian DP’, inU. Shlonsky (ed.), The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, 109–127. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Poletto, Cecilia
    2016 Which clues for which V2. InErmenegildo Bidese, Federica Cognola & Manuela Caterina Moroni (eds.), Theoretical approaches to linguistic variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.234.09pol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.234.09pol [Google Scholar]
  51. Poletto, Cecilia & Alessandra Tomaselli
    2002 La sintassi del soggetto nullo nelle isole tedescofone del Veneto: Cimbro e sappadino a confronto. InGianna Marcato (ed.), La dialettologia oltre il 2001. Atti del convegno di Sappada/Plodn (Belluno) 1–5 Luglio 2001, 237–252. Padova: Padova Unipress.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Reis, Marga
    2016 Consecutive so … V2-clauses in German. InIngo Reich und Augustin Speyer (eds), Co- and subordination in German and other languages, 285–318. Hamburg: Buske Verlag.
  53. Renzi, Lorenzo & Giampaolo Salvi
    2010Grammatica dell’Italiano Antico. Bologna: Il Mulino.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Rinke, Esther
    2007Syntaktische Variation aus synchronischer und diachronischer Perspektive. Frankfurt am Main: Vervuert. 10.31819/9783964561930
    https://doi.org/10.31819/9783964561930 [Google Scholar]
  55. Rizzi, Luigi
    1996 Residual Verb Second and the Wh-criterion. InAdriana Belletti and Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Parameters and Functional Heads. Essays in Comparative Syntax, 63–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. 1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. InLiliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative grammar, 281–338. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  57. Roberts, Ian
    1993Verbs and diachronic syntax: A comparative history of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Roberts, I.
    2004 The C-system in Brythonnic Celtic languages, V2, and the EPP. InLuigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, 297–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Schreiber, Nina
    2010 Zur historischen Entwicklung des Komplementierers dass im Germanischen. PhD Thesis University of Frankfurt.
  60. Schwartz Bonnie, D. & Sten Vikner
    1989 All Verb Second Clauses are CPs. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax43, 27–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Sitaridou, Ioanna
    2005 A corpus-based study of null subjects in Old French and Old Occitan. InClaus D. Putsch, Johannes Kabatek & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Corpora and Diachronic Linguistics, 359–74. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Vance, B.
    1989 Null Subjects and Syntactic Change in Medieval French. Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University.
  63. Vanelli, L.
    1998I dialetti italiani settentrionali nel panorama romanzo. Studi di sintassi e morfologia. Roma: Bulzoni.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Vikner, Sten
    1995Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Wanner, Dieter
    1995 Les subordonnées à double complémentateur en roman medieval. InGiovanni Ruffino (ed.), Atti del XXI Congresso Internazionale di Linguistica e Filologia Romanza, Section 1., 421–433.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Westergaard, Marit
    2008 Acquisition and Change: On the Robustness of the Triggering Experience for Word Order Cues. Lingua. vol.118 (12). 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  67. 2009 Microvariation as diachrony: A view from acquisition. Journal of Comparative. Germanic Linguistics12. 49–79. 10.1007/s10828‑009‑9025‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-009-9025-9 [Google Scholar]
  68. 2016 Word order and finiteness in acquisition: A study of English and Norwegian wh-questions. InKristin Melum Eide (ed.) Finiteness Matters: On finiteness-related phenomena in natural languages, p.255–286. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/la.231.09wes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.231.09wes [Google Scholar]
  69. Wolfe, Sam
    2015 Microvariation in Medieval Romance syntax: A comparative approach. Cambridge: University of Cambridge dissertation.
  70. Yang, Charles
    2000 Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
  71. Zanuttini, Raffaella
    (1997): Negation and Clausal Structure: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): null subjects; null topics; Old Romance; split left periphery; verb second
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error