1887
Volume 18, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-6834
  • E-ISSN: 2211-6842
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Our Aromanian data come from Diviakë, Libofshë and Fier, three locations close to one another in southern Albania, and from Këllez, also in southern Albania. We argue that the impossibility of embedding sentences directly under V-v (Agree Resistance Theorem) leads to the overall shape of complementation in Romance. Section 2, on finite complementizers, shows that Aromanian supports analyses of complementizers as wh- pronouns independently developed for other Romance languages. Section 3 elaborates a proposal originally put forth for Albanian, where the subjunctive particle is identical to the Linker – namely that the main role of subjunctive particles is introducing a variable EPP argument, subject to control. Section 4 argues that Prepositional introducers of non-finite sentences amount to an obliquization strategy to circumvent Agree Resistance – as does the nominalization (relativization) strategy of Section 2 (and the predication strategy in Section 3).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lv.16003.man
2019-02-01
2019-10-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adger, David & Joseph Quer
    2001 The syntax and semantics of unselected embedded questions. Language77. 107–133. 10.1353/lan.2001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arsenijević, Boban
    2009 Clausal complementation as relativization. Lingua119. 39–50. 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.08.003 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bayer, Josef
    2001 Two grammars in one: Sentential complements and complementizers in Bengali and other South Asian languages. InPeri Bhaskararao and K. V. Subbarao (eds.), The Yearbook of South Asian Languages: Tokyo Symposium on South Asian Languages – Contact, Convergence and Typology, 11–36. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Besten, Hans den
    1984 On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. InWerner Abraham (ed.), On the formal syntax of West-Germania, 47–131. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boeckx, Cedric & Norbert Hornstein
    2006 The virtues of control as movement. InWilliam Davies & Stanley Dubinsky (eds.), Special Issue on Raising and Control. Syntax9. 118–130.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bresnan, Joan
    1972 Theory of complementation in English syntax. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT; Cambridge, Mass.
  7. Campos, Hector
    2005 Noun modification, pseudo-articles, and last resort operations in Arvantovlaxika and in Romanian. Lingua115. 311–347. 10.1016/j.lingua.2003.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2003.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2008 Some notes on adjectival articles in Albanian. Lingua119. 1009–1034. 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.014 [Google Scholar]
  9. Campos, Hector & Melita Stavrou
    2005 Polydefinites in Greek and Aromanian. In: Olga M. Tomić (ed.), Balkan syntax and semantics, 137–173. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cecchetto, Carlo & Caterina Donati
    2010 On labeling: Principle C and head movement. Syntax13. 241–278. 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2010.00140.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2010.00140.x [Google Scholar]
  11. Chierchia, Gennaro
    1984 Topics in the syntax and semantics of infinitives and gerunds. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
  12. Chomsky, Noam
    1981Lectures on Government and Binding. Dodrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 1995The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2001 Derivation by phase. InMichael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dikken, Marcel den
    2006Relators and linkers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dikken, Marcel den & Pornsiri Singhapreecha
    2004 Complex Noun Phrases and linkers. Syntax7. 1–54. 10.1111/j.1368‑0005.2004.00064.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-0005.2004.00064.x [Google Scholar]
  17. Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen
    1994The syntax of Romanian. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110886597
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110886597 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen, Isabela Nedelcu & Ion Giurgea
    2013 Genitive DPs and pronominal possessors. InCarmen Dobrovie-Sorin & Ion Giurgea (eds.), A Reference Grammar of Romanian: Volume 1: The noun phrase, 309–354. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.207.06dob
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.207.06dob [Google Scholar]
  19. Donati, Caterina
    1998 Elementi di sintassi della comparazione. Doctoral Dissertation, Università di Firenze.
  20. Franco, Ludovico, M. Rita Manzini & Leonardo M. Savoia
    2015 Linkers and agreement. The Linguistic Review32. 277–332.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Giorgi, Alessandra
    2009About the Speaker: Towards a Syntax of Indexicality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571895.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571895.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Haegeman, Liliane
    2012 The syntax of MCP: Deriving the truncation account. In Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman, Rachel Nye. Main Clause Phenomena, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.190.05hae
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.190.05hae [Google Scholar]
  23. Higginbotham, James
    1985 On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry16, 547–621.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hill, Virginia
    2002 Complementizer Phrases (CP) in Romanian. Rivista di Linguistica14.2. 223–248.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2013a The emergence of the Romanian subjunctive. The Linguistic Review30. 547–583. 10.1515/tlr‑2013‑0016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2013-0016 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2013b The emergence of the Romanian supine. Journal of Historical Linguistics3. 230–271. 10.1075/jhl.3.2.03hil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.3.2.03hil [Google Scholar]
  27. Hornstein, Norbert
    1999 Movement and Control. Linguistic Inquiry30. 69–96. 10.1162/002438999553968
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999553968 [Google Scholar]
  28. Isac, Daniela
    2015The morphosyntax of imperatives. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198733263.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198733263.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  29. Jones, Michael
    1993Sardinian Syntax. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Jordan, Maria
    2009 Loss of infinitival complementation in Romanian diachronic syntax, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Florida.
  31. Joseph, Brian
    1983The synchrony and diachrony of the Balkan infinitive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kallulli, Dalina
    2008 Resumption, relativization, null objects and information structure. InJ. Hartmann, Veronica Hegedus & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Sounds of Silence: Empty Elements in Syntax and Phonology, 235–264. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kayne, Richard
    1976 French relative “que”. InFritz Hensey and Marta Luján (eds.), Current Studies in Romance Linguistics, 255–299. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2010Comparisons and contrasts. Oxford University Press, New York, pp.190–227.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kornfilt, Jaklyn
    1997Turkish. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Landau, Idan
    2004 The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory22. 811–87. 10.1007/s11049‑004‑4265‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-004-4265-5 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2006 Severing the distribution of PRO from Case. InWilliam Davies & Stanley Dubinsky (eds.), Special Issue on Raising and Control. Syntax9. 153–170.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2013Control in generative grammar. A research companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139061858
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061858 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2015A two-tiered theory of control. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262028851.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262028851.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  40. Larson, Richard & Hiroko Yamakido
    2008 Ezafe and the deep position of nominal modifiers. In: Louise McNally & Chris Kennedy (eds.), Adjectives and adverbs. Syntax, Semantics, and Discourse, 43–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Ledgeway, Adam
    2003 Il sistema completivo dei dialetti meridionali: La doppia serie di complementatori, Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia27. 89–147.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2005 Moving Through the Left Periphery: The Dual Complementiser System in the Dialects of Southern Italy. Transactions of the Philological Society103. 339–96. 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2005.00157.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2005.00157.x [Google Scholar]
  43. Lekakou, Marika & Kriszta Szendrői
    2012 Polydefinites in Greek: Ellipsis, close apposition and expletive determiners. Journal of Linguistics48. 107–149. 10.1017/S0022226711000326
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226711000326 [Google Scholar]
  44. Manzini, M. Rita
    2009 Pro, pro and NP-trace (raising) are interpretations. InKleanthes Grohmann (ed.), Phase theory: Features, Arguments, Interpretations, 131–180. Amsterdam/Oxford: Elsevier. 10.1515/9783110213966.131
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213966.131 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2012 The status of complementizers in the left periphery. InLobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye. Main Clause Phenomena, 297–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.190.13man
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.190.13man [Google Scholar]
  46. 2014 Unifying minimality and the OCP: Local anti-identity as economy. InKuniya Nasukawa & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.). Identity Relations in Grammar, 123–160. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Manzini, M. Rita & Anna Roussou
    2000 A minimalist theory of A-movement and control. Lingua110: 409–447. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(00)00006‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(00)00006-1 [Google Scholar]
  48. Manzini, M. Rita & Leonardo M. Savoia
    2003 The nature of complementizers. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa28. 87–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 2005I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa. Alessandria: Ed. dell’Orso.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 2007A Unification of Morphology and Syntax. Investigations into Romance and Albanian dialects. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203968154
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203968154 [Google Scholar]
  51. 2011Grammatical Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511974489
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974489 [Google Scholar]
  52. 2018 The complementizer system of Aromanian (South Albania). InGabriela Pană Dindelegan, Adina Dragomirescu, Irina Niculae, Alexandru Nicolae. Comparative and Diachronic Perspectives on Romance Syntax, 227–256. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Mensching, Guido
    2000Infinitive Constructions with specified subjects. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Neeleman, Ad & Hans van de Koot
    2006 Syntactic Haplology. InMartin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdjik (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol.IV. Blackwell, Oxford, pp.684–710. 10.1002/9780470996591.ch69
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996591.ch69 [Google Scholar]
  55. Portner, Paul
    2004 The semantics of imperatives within a theory of clause types. InK. Watanabe & R. B. Young (eds.), The proceedings of SALT 14. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications. 10.3765/salt.v14i0.2907
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v14i0.2907 [Google Scholar]
  56. 2016 Imperatives. InMaria Aloni & Paul Dekker (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics, 593–626. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139236157.021
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139236157.021 [Google Scholar]
  57. Richards, Norvin
    2010Uttering Trees. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262013765.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262013765.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  58. Riemsdijk, Henk van
    2008 Identity Avoidance: OCP-effects in Swiss Relatives. InRobert Freidin, Carlos Otero & Maria-Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 227–250. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0010
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  59. Rivero, Maria-Luisa
    1994 Clause structure and V-Movement in the languages of the Balkans. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory12. 63–120. 10.1007/BF00992746
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992746 [Google Scholar]
  60. Rizzi, Luigi
    1990Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. 1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. InLiliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  62. Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou
    2003Syntactic Change. A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486326
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486326 [Google Scholar]
  63. Rosenbaum, Peter
    1967The grammar of English complement constructions. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Santorini, Beatrice
    1989 The generalization of the Verb-Second Constraint in the History of English. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
  65. Svenonius, Peter
    2006 The emergence of axial parts. Nordlyd33. 1–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Stowell, Timothy
    1981 Origins of phrase structure. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
  67. Szemerényi, Oswald
    1999Introduction to Indo-European Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Williams, Edwin
    1981 Predication. Linguistic Inquiry11. 203–238.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Yip, Moira
    1998 Identity Avoidance in Phonology and Morphology. InSteven Lapointe, Diane Brentari & M. Farrell (eds.), Morphology and Its Relation to Phonology and Syntax, 216–246. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Zanuttini, Raffaella
    1997Negation and clausal structure. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. 2008 Encoding the addressee in the syntax: Evidence from English imperative subjects. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory26. 185–218. 10.1007/s11049‑007‑9029‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-007-9029-6 [Google Scholar]
  72. Zanuttini, Raffaella, Miok Pak & Paul Portner
    2012 A syntactic analysis of interpretive restrictions on imperative, promissive, and exhortative subjects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory30. 1231–1274. 10.1007/s11049‑012‑9176‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-012-9176-2 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lv.16003.man
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): complementizer , control , oblique case , prepositional complementizer , subjunctive particle and wh-pronoun
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error