Volume 17, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2211-6834
  • E-ISSN: 2211-6842
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


In this paper, we consider variation in Verb Second (V2) word order in -questions across Norwegian dialects by investigating data from the Nordic Syntax Database (NSD), which consists of acceptability judgments collected at more than 100 locations in Norway. We trace the geographical distribution of the two main variables: phrasal vs. monosyllabic -elements (the latter argued to be heads) and subject vs. non-subject questions. In subject questions, non-V2 is realized by inserting the complementizer in second position instead of the verb. We also discuss the connection between non-V2 and the possibility of inserting the complementizer under extraction of a -subject from an embedded clause, i.e. in -trace contexts. Based on synchronic data, we propose a diachronic account of the geographical distribution and argue that the development from V2 to non-V2 has started in subject questions, thus allowing us to relate the loss of the V2 requirement to changes in the properties of the complementizer .


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Åfarli, Tor A.
    1986 Some syntactic structures in a dialect of Norwegian. Working Papers in Linguistics3. 93–111.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Åfarli, Tor A. & Kristin Melum Eide
    2000 Subject requirement and predication. Nordic Journal of Linguistics23. 27–48. doi: 10.1080/033258600750045769
    https://doi.org/10.1080/033258600750045769 [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderssen, Merete
    2006The Acquisition of Compositional Definiteness in Norwegian. University of Tromsø dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Caha, Pavel
    2009The Nanosyntax of Case. University of Tromsø dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cardinaletti, Anna & Michal Starke
    1996 Deficient pronouns: a view from Germanic. In Höskuldur Thráinsson , Samuel David Epstein & Steve Peter (eds.), Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, Vol.2, 21–65. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑9806‑9_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9806-9_2 [Google Scholar]
  6. Elstad, Kåre
    1982 Nordnorske dialektar. In Tove Bull & Kjellaug Jetne (eds.), Nordnorsk: Språkarv og språkforhold i Nord-Noreg, 11–100. Oslo: Det Norske Samlaget.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Engdahl, Elisabet
    2012 Optional expletive subjects in Swedish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics35. 99–144. doi: 10.1017/S0332586512000169
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586512000169 [Google Scholar]
  8. Faarlund, Jan Terje , Svein Lie & Kjell Ivar Vannebo
    1997Norsk referansegrammatikk. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fiva, Toril
    1996 Spørresetninger i Tromsødialekten. Nordica Bergensia9. 139–155.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. van Gelderen, Elly
    2004Grammaticalization as Economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.71
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.71 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2008The Linguistic Cycle: Language Change and the Language Faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2011 Where did Late Merge go? Grammaticalization as feature economy. Studia Linguistica62. 287–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.2008.00150.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2008.00150.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Gundel, Janet K.
    2002It-clefts in English and Norwegian. In Hilde Hasselgård , Bergljot Behrens , Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen & Stig Johansson (eds.), Information structure in a cross-linguistic perspective, 113–128. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Herrmann, Tanja
    2002Relative Clauses in Dialects of English: A Typological Approach. Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Iversen, Ragnvald
    1918Syntaksen i Tromsø bymaal. Kristiania: Bymaalslagets forlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Johannessen, Janne Bondi , Joel Priestley , Kristin Hagen , Tor A. Åfarli & Øystein A. Vangsnes
    2009 The Nordic Dialect Corpus – an Advanced Research Tool. NEALT Proceedings Series4. 73–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Johannessen, Janne Bondi , Øystein A. Vangsnes , Signe Laake , Arne Martinus Lindstad & Tor A. Åfarli
    2010 The Nordic Dialect Corpus and Database: Methodological challenges in collecting data. In Barry Heselwood & Clive Upton (eds.), Proceedings of Methods XIII Papers form the Thirteenth International Conference on Methods in Dialectology, 113–122. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Johannessen, Janne Bondi & Øystein A. Vangsnes
    2010 Nye nordiske isoglossar: Dialektforsking ved bruk av Nordisk syntaksdatabase (NSD). Svenska landsmål och svenskt folkliv, 2011. 69–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lie, Svein
    1978 Cleft wh-questions in Norwegian and their presuppositions. In Kirsten Gregersen , Hans Basbøll & Jacob Mey (eds.), Papers from the fourth Scandinavian conference of linguistics , 62–77. Odense: Odense University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 1992 Ka du sei?Maal og Minne1992. 62–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lightfoot, David & Marit Westergaard
    2007 Language Acquisition and Language Change: Inter-relationships. Language and Linguistics Compass1. 396–415. doi: 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2007.00023.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00023.x [Google Scholar]
  22. Lindstad, Arne Martinus , Anders Nøklestad , Janne Bondi Johannessen & Øystein A. Vangsnes
    2009 The Nordic Dialect Database: Mapping Microsyntactic Variation in the Scandinavian Languages. NEALT Proceedings Series4. 283–286.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Nilsen, Hilde
    1996Koffør dem sir det?University of Tromsø Cand philol thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Nordgård, Torbjørn
    1985Word Order, Binding and the Empty Category Principle. University of Trondheim Cand philol thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 1988 Omkring ordstilling i hv-spørsmål i norske dialekter. Skriftserie fra Institutt for fonetikk og lingvistikk, Universitetet i Bergen33. 26–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Norsk talespråkskorpus [NoTa corpus]
    Norsk talespråkskorpus [NoTa corpus]. The text lab. ILN, University of Oslo. www.tekstlab.uio.no/nota/oslo/index.html
  27. Rizzi, Luigi
    1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar: A Handbook of Generative Syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2001 On the position “(Int)errogative” in the left periphery of the clause. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.) Current Studies in Italian Syntax, 287–296. Oxford: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Rognes, Stig
    2011V2, V3, V4 (and maybe even more): The syntax of questions in the Rogaland dialects of Norway. University of Oslo MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Snyder, William
    2007Child Language: The Parametric Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sollid, Hilde
    2003Dialektsyntaks i Nordreisa: Språkdannelse og stabilisering i møtet mellom kvensk og norsk [Dialect syntax in Nordreisa: language creation and stabilization in a contact situation between Kven-Finnish and Norwegian]. University of Tromsø dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Stroh-Wollin. Ulla
    1997 Framväxten av obligatoriska som . In Patrik Åström (ed.), Studier i svensk språkhistoria4, 171–178. Stockholm: Institutionen för nordiska språk vid Stockholms universitet.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Stroh-Wollin, Ulla
    2002 Som-satser med och utan som [ Som-sentences with and without som ]. Uppsala University dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Svenonius, Peter
    1998 Clefts in Scandinavian: An investigation. ZAS Papers in Linguistics10. 163–190.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Søfteland, Åshild
    2014Utbrytingskonstruksjonen i norsk spontantale [The cleft construction in Norwegian spontaneous speech]. University of Oslo dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Taraldsen, Knut Tarald
    1986Som and the Binding Theory. In Lars Hellan , & Kirsti Koch Christensen (eds.), Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, 149–184. Dordrecht: Reidel. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑4572‑2_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4572-2_8 [Google Scholar]
  37. Travis, Lisa
    1984Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. MIT dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Vangsnes, Øystein A.
    1996Om-spørsmål i rogalandsk. Nordica Bergensia, 9. 166–188.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2005 Microparameters for Norwegian wh-grammars. Linguistic Variation Yearbook5. 187–226. doi: 10.1075/livy.5.07van
    https://doi.org/10.1075/livy.5.07van [Google Scholar]
  40. 2007 Pinning down fluctuating grammars: On main clause wh-syntax across Norwegian dialects. Talk given at NLVN seminar Dialogue between paradigms, Schæffergården12–15October.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2008 On peripheral doubling in Scandinavian. In Sjef Barbiers , Olaf Koeneman , Marika Lekakou & Margreet van der Ham (eds.), Microvariation in Syntactic Doubling, 419–441. Bingley: Emerald. doi: 10.1163/9781848550216_017
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9781848550216_017 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2013 Syncretism and functional expansion in Germanic wh-expressions. Language Sciences36. 47–65. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.019 [Google Scholar]
  43. Vangsnes, Øystein A. & Marit Westergaard
    2014Ka korpuse fortæll? Om ordstilling i hv-spørsmål i norske dialekter. [What does the corpus tell us? On word order in wh-questions in Norwegian dialects]. In Janne Bondi Johannessen & Kristin Hagen (eds.), Språk i Norge og nabolanda. Ny forskning om talespråk, 133–151. Oslo: Novus.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Westergaard, Marit
    2003 Word order in wh-questions in a North Norwegian dialect: Some evidence from an acquisition study. Nordic Journal of Linguistics26. 81–109. doi: 10.1017/S0332586503001021
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586503001021 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2005 Optional word order in wh-questions in two Norwegian dialects: A diachronic analysis of synchronic variation. Nordic Journal of Linguistics28. 269–296. doi: 10.1017/S0332586505001459
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586505001459 [Google Scholar]
  46. 2009a Microvariation as diachrony: A view from acquisition. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics12. 49–79. doi: 10.1007/s10828‑009‑9025‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-009-9025-9 [Google Scholar]
  47. 2009bThe Acquisition of Word Order: Micro-cues, information structure, and economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.145
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.145 [Google Scholar]
  48. 2009c Many Small Catastrophes: Gradualism in a Microparametric Perspective. In Paola Crisma & Guiseppe Longobardi (eds.), Historical Syntax and Linguistic Theory, 75–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199560547.003.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199560547.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2014 Linguistic variation and micro-cues in first language acquisition. Linguistic Variation14. 26–45. doi: 10.1075/lv.14.1.02wes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.14.1.02wes [Google Scholar]
  50. 2015 Koffør dæm IKKE sir det? Om ordstilling i hv-spørsmål i nordnorske dialekter. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift33:2. 175–199.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Westergaard, Marit & Øystein A. Vangsnes
    2005Wh-questions, V2, and the left periphery of three Norwegian dialects. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics8. 119–160. doi: 10.1007/s10828‑004‑0292‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-004-0292-1 [Google Scholar]
  52. Westergaard, Marit , Øystein A. Vangsnes & Terje Lohndal
    2012 Norwegian som: The complementizer that climbed to the matrix Left Periphery and caused Verb Second violations. In Valentina Bianchi & Cristiano Chesi (eds.), Enjoy Linguistics! Papers offered to Luigi Rizzi on the occasion of his 60th birthday, 329–343. Siena: CISCL Press.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error