1887
Volume 17, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2211-6834
  • E-ISSN: 2211-6842
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This squib investigates syntactic variation and change in the Degree Phrase (DegP) using three modifiers in the semantic field of ‘different’ as a case study: English and and French . The squib makes two main claims. The synchronic claim is that these modifiers display extensive microsyntactic variation, spanning a range of positions from A in the DegP to D in the DP. The diachronic claim is that items in this class display a tendency to move to higher syntactic positions in a way that is familiar from better-studied syntactic domains. Data from the DegP is thus compatible with, and useful for, generative theories of syntactic variation and change.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lv.17.1.05oxf
2017-06-29
2019-08-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adamson, Sylvia
    2000 A lovely little example: Word order options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Olga Fischer , Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English, 39–66. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.53.04ada
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.53.04ada [Google Scholar]
  2. Alrenga, Peter
    2007Dimensions in the semantics of comparatives. Santa Cruz, CA: UC Santa Cruz dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2010 Comparisons of similarity and difference. In Patricia Cabredo Hofherr & Ora Matusansky (eds.), Adjectives: Formal analyses in syntax and semantics, 155–186. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.153.05alr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.153.05alr [Google Scholar]
  4. “another, adj. and pron. (and adv.).” OED Online. Oxford University Press 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Beck, Sigrid
    2000 The semantics of different: Comparison operator and relational adjective. Linguistics and Philosophy23. 101–139. doi: 10.1023/A:1005566722022
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005566722022 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brasoveanu, Adrian
    2008 Sentence-internal readings of same/different as quantifier-internal anaphora. West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL)27. 72–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Breban, Tine
    2003 The grammaticalization of the adjectives of identity and difference in English and Dutch. Languages in Contrast4. 167–201.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2006English adjectives of comparison: Lexical and grammaticalized uses. Leuven, Belgium: University of Leuven dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2008 Grammaticalization, subjectification and leftward movement of English adjectives of difference in the noun phrase. Folia Linguistica42. 259–306. doi: 10.1515/FLIN.2008.259
    https://doi.org/10.1515/FLIN.2008.259 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2009 Structural persistence: A case based on the grammaticalization of English adjectives of difference. English Language and Linguistics13. 77–96. doi: 10.1017/S1360674308002888
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674308002888 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2010English adjectives of comparison: Lexical and grammatical uses (Topics in English Linguistics 63). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110216011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110216011 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cinque, Guglielmo
    2005 Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry36. 315–332. doi: 10.1162/0024389054396917
    https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389054396917 [Google Scholar]
  13. Corver, Norbert
    1997 The internal syntax of the Dutch extended adjectival projection. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory15. 289–368. doi: 10.1023/A:1005846812956
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005846812956 [Google Scholar]
  14. “different, adj., n., and adv.” OED Online. Oxford University Press 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Heim, Irene
    1985 Notes on comparatives and related matters. Ms., University of Texas, Austin.
  16. Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
    2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kayne, Richard S.
    2005 Some notes on comparative syntax, with special reference to English and French. In Guglielmo Cinque & Richard S. Kayne (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, 3–69. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kennedy, Christopher & Louise McNally
    2005 Scale structure and the semantic typology of gradable predicates. Language81. 345–381. doi: 10.1353/lan.2005.0071
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0071 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kramer, Ruth
    2010 The Amharic definite marker and the syntax-morphology interface. Syntax13. 196–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2010.00139.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2010.00139.x [Google Scholar]
  20. Laca, Brenda & Liliane Tasmowski
    2003 From non-identity to plurality: French différent as an adjective and as a determiner. In Josep Quer , Jan Schroten , Mauro Scorretti , Petra Sleeman & Els Verheugd (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2001: Selected papers from Going Romance, 155–176. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.245.10lac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.245.10lac [Google Scholar]
  21. 2004Différents. In Francis Corblin & Henriëtte de Swart (eds.), Handbook of French semantics, 109–118. Stanford: CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. “other, adj., pron., and n., and adv. 1.” OED Online. Oxford University Press 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Piggott and Newell
    Piggott and Newell 2006 Syllabification and the spell-out of phases in Ojibwa words. In Eva Dobler & Yukio Furukawa (eds.), McGill working papers in linguistics20(2). 39–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Quirk, Randolph , Sidney Greenbaum , Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
    1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou
    2003Syntactic change: A Minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486326
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486326 [Google Scholar]
  26. “same, adj., pron., and adv.” OED Online. Oxford University Press 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Svenonius, Peter & Christopher Kennedy
    2006 Northern Norwegian degree questions and the syntax of measurement. In Mara Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of interpretation, 129–157. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110197723.3.133
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197723.3.133 [Google Scholar]
  28. Tovena, Lucia M. & Marleen Van Peteghem
    2006 La place de différents dans le syntagme nominal et les déterminants. In Francis Corblin , Sylvie Ferrando & Lucien Kupferman (eds.), Indéfini et prédication, 449–460. Paris: Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. White, Jonathan R.
    1997 Result clauses and the structure of degree phrases. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics9.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2004 Syntactic autonomy and result clauses. The Department of English in Lund: Working Papers in Linguistics4. 93–120.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lv.17.1.05oxf
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): adjectives , comparatives , degree words , different , English , grammaticalization , other , postdeterminers and syntactic change
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error