1887
Volume 17, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2211-6834
  • E-ISSN: 2211-6842
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

- in-situ is a pervasive feature of Tano interrogative syntax, yet the Tano languages differ from one another in subtle ways with respect to the distribution of in-situ interrogatives. Languages like Krachi and Bono allow - in-situ in both main and embedded complement clauses, whereas closely related languages like Wasa and Asante Twi only allow - in-situ in main clauses. In this article, I argue that the generalization underpinning this variation in Tano concerns a prohibition on - items phrasing with C at the level of Intonational Phrase (ιP). I show that the ability of a - item to appear in-situ correlates with the prosodic status of its immediately containing clause. Embedded complement clauses are parsed as independent ιP units in Krachi and Bono, but not in Wasa and Asante Twi. Thus, ιP boundaries divide C from embedded interrogatives in Krachi and Bono, preventing the items from forming a prosodic constituent at the level of ιP. Conversely, no such boundaries intervene between embedded C and - in Wasa and Asante Twi, yielding prosodic mappings in which the items phrase together. Consequently, embedded - in-situ is prosodically licit in Krachi and Bono, but not in Wasa and Asante Twi. In this way, the Tano pattern of - in-situ variation described above reduces to a difference in how syntactic structures are externalized via prosodic mapping.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lv.17.1.06kan
2017-06-29
2019-09-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adonae, Daniels Ananey
    2005Aspects of Kaakyi Tonology. M.Phil. dissertation, University of Ghana, Legon.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beck, Sigrid
    1996 Quantified Structures as Barriers for LF Movement. Natural Language Semantics4: 1–56. doi: 10.1007/BF00263536
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00263536 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bokamba, Eyamba G.
    1976Question Formation in Some Bantu Languages. Ph.D. thesis, Indiana University.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Boersma, Paul and David Weenink
    2014 Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer (Version 5.4.01). Available from: www.praat.org.
  5. Cable, Seth
    2010The Grammar of Q: Q-Particles, Wh- Movement and Pied Piping. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195392265.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195392265.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen
    1991On the Typology of Wh- Questions. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chomsky, Noam
    2001 Derivation by Phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Crystal, Thomas H. and Arthur S. House
    1988 Segmental Durations in Connected-speech Signals: Current Results. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America83: 1553–1573. doi: 10.1121/1.395911
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.395911 [Google Scholar]
  9. Downing, Bruce
    1970Syntactic Structure and Phonological Phrasing in English. Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dundaa, Mark
    2007Transitional Primer: Can you read and write in Kaakyi?Tamale, Ghana: Ghana Insitute of Linguitics, Literacy, and Bible Translation.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fanselow, Gisbert
    2006 Partial Movement. In Martin Everaert , Henk van Riemsdijk , Rob Goedemans and Bart Hollebrandse (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax (Volume3), 437–492. London: Blackwell Publishing. doi: 10.1002/9780470996591.ch47
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996591.ch47 [Google Scholar]
  12. Green, Melanie and Philip J. Jaggar
    2003 Ex-situ and In-situ Focus in Hausa: Syntax, Semantics and Discourse. In Jacqueline Lecarme (ed.), Research in Afroasiatic Grammar II [CILT 241], 187–213. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.241.11gre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.241.11gre [Google Scholar]
  13. Hagstrom, Paul
    1998Decomposing Questions. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kandybowicz, Jason and Harold Torrence
    2011 How Why is Different: Wh- in-situ in Krachi. Snippets23: 5–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2012 Krachi Wh- In-situ: A Question of Prosody. In Jaehoon Choi , E. Alan Hogue , Jeffrey Punske , Deniz Tat , Jessamyn Schertz and Alex Trueman (eds.), Proceedings of the 29th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 362–370. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2013 Unweaving the Interrogative Rainbow: the Interplay between Syntax, Semantics, and Prosody in Four Tano Languages. Talk presented at the44th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, Georgetown University.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2015 Are Syntax and Prosody Entangled? Insights from Krachi In-situ Interrogatives. Ms. The Graduate Center, City University of New York and University of California, Los Angeles.
  18. Maxwell, Edith
    1981 Question Strategies and Hierarchies of Grammatical Relations in Kinyarwanda. InProceedings of the 7th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 166–177. Berkley, CA: University of California.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Muriungi, Peter Kinyua
    2005Wh- Questions in Kitharaka. Studies in African Linguistics34: 43–104.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Nespor, Marina and Irene Vogel
    1986Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Pak, Marjorie
    2008The Postsyntactic Derivation and its Phonological Reflexes. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Pesetsky, David
    2000Phrasal Movement and its Kin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Potsdam, Eric
    2006 More Concealed Pseudoclefts in Malagasy and the Clausal Typing Hypothesis. Lingua116: 2154–2182. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  24. Reinhart, Tanya
    1998Wh-in-situ in the Framework of the Minimalist Program. Natural Language Semantics6: 29–56. doi: 10.1023/A:1008240014550
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008240014550 [Google Scholar]
  25. Richards, Norvin
    2010Uttering Trees. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262013765.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262013765.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Rizzi, Luigi
    2001 On the Position Int(errogative) in the Left Periphery of the Clause. In Guglielmo Cinque and Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Saah, Kofi
    1988 Wh- Questions in Akan. Journal of West African Languages18: 17–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Sabel, Joachim and Jochen Zeller
    2006Wh-Question Formation in Nguni. In John Mugane , John P. Hutchinson and Dee A. Worman (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, 271–283. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Selkirk, Elisabeth
    1984Phonology and Syntax: the Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  30. 2009 On Clause and Intonational Phrase in Japanese: the Syntactic Grounding of Prosodic Constituent Structure. Gengo Kenkyu136: 35–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 2011 The Syntax-Phonology Interface. In John Goldsmith , Jason Riggle and Alan Yu (eds.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory (2nd edition), 435–484. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing. doi: 10.1002/9781444343069.ch14
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343069.ch14 [Google Scholar]
  32. Shlonsky, Ur and Gabriela Soare
    2011 Where’s ‘why’?. Linguistic Inquiry42: 651–669. doi: 10.1162/LING_a_00064
    https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00064 [Google Scholar]
  33. Snider, Keith
    1990 Tonal Upstep in Krachi: Evidence for Register Tier. Language66: 453–474. doi: 10.2307/414608
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414608 [Google Scholar]
  34. Torrence, Harold and Jason Kandybowicz
    2012 Comparative Tano Interrogative Syntax: Typological and Genetic Implications. Paper presented at the43rd Annual Conference on African Linguistics, Tulane University.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2013 Comparative Tano Interrogative Syntax: The View from Krachi and Bono. In Olanike Ola Orie and Karen W. Sanders (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference on African Linguistics, 222–234. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 2015Wh- Question Formation in Krachi. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics36.2: 253–286. doi: 10.1515/jall‑2015‑0011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jall-2015-0011 [Google Scholar]
  37. Truckenbrodt, Hubert
    2005 A Short Report on Intonation Phrase Boundaries in German. Linguistiche Berichte203: 273–296.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Williamson, Kay and Roger Blench
    2000 Niger-Congo. In Bernd Heine and Derek Nurse (eds.), African Languages: An Introduction, 11–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Zentz, Jason
    2015Wh-question Formation Strategies in Bantu. Ph.D. thesis, Yale University.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lv.17.1.06kan
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lv.17.1.06kan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error