Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2211-6834
  • E-ISSN: 2211-6842
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



The paper presents an analysis of the Afrikaans degree modifier ‘very/much/many’. appears to be a single lexical item with a wide distribution in terms of the categories of gradable predicate with which it can combine. However, the paper shows that two syntactically distinct instances of should be distinguished. These instances of portion out the modification of different grammatical categories between them: one, a head, exclusively modifies gradable adjectives, and the other, an adjunct, modifies the remaining categories of gradable predicate.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Abney, Steven P.
    1987The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Massachusetts: MIT PhD.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauermeester, Eunice Marietha
    2007Die Kaapse Slawe in Kultuurhistoriese Perspektief: 1652–1838. Pretoria: University of Pretoria MA.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berghoff, Robyn
    2016Cross-categorial degree modification in Afrikaans: An analysis of the high-degree modifier ‘baie’. Utrecht: Utrecht University MA.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Biberauer, Theresa
    2002 Verb second in Afrikaans: Is this a unitary phenomenon?Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics34. 19–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bolinger, Dwight
    1972Degree words. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110877786
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877786 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bylinina, Lisa & Yasutada Sudo
    2015 Varieties of intensification. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory33(3). 881–895. 10.1007/s11049‑015‑9291‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9291-y [Google Scholar]
  7. Cheshire, Jenny, Paul Kerswill, Sue Fox & Eivind Torgersen
    2011 Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics15(2). 151–196. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2011.00478.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00478.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheshire, Jenny
    2013 Grammaticalisation in social context: The emergence of a new English pronoun. Journal of Sociolinguistics17(5). 608–633. 10.1111/josl.12053
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12053 [Google Scholar]
  9. Corver, Norbert
    1990The syntax of left branch constructions:Tilburg University PhD.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 1997a The internal syntax of the Dutch extended adjectival projection. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory15: 289–368. 10.1023/A:1005846812956
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005846812956 [Google Scholar]
  11. 1997b Much-support as a last resort. Linguistic Inquiry28(1). 119–164.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Davids, Achmat
    1990 Words the Cape slaves made: A socio-historical-linguistic study. South African Journal of Linguistics8(1). 1–24. 10.1080/10118063.1990.9723811
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10118063.1990.9723811 [Google Scholar]
  13. Davidson, Donald
    1967 The logical form of action sentences. InNicholsa Resche (ed.) The logic of decision and action. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Doetjes, Jenny
    1997Quantifiers and selection. Leiden: University of Leiden PhD.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2008 Adjectives and degree modification. InLouise McNally & Christopher Kennedy (eds.), Adverbs and adjectives: Syntax, semantics, and discourse (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 18), 123–155. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Doetjes, Jenny, Ad Neeleman & van de Koot, Hans
    1998Degree expressions and the autonomy of syntax. Leiden University/University College London.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hutchinson, Amélia P. & Janet Lloyd
    2003Portuguese: An essential grammar (Routledge Essential Grammars). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jackendoff, Ray
    1977X-bar syntax: A study of phrase structure (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 2.) Cambridge (Mass): MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 1991 Parts and boundaries. Cognition41(1). 9–45. 10.1016/0010‑0277(91)90031‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90031-X [Google Scholar]
  20. Kayne, Richard S.
    1994The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kennedy, Christopher
    1999Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. New York: Garland.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Matushansky, O.
    2002 Tipping the scales: The syntax of scalarity in the complement of seem. Syntax5(3). 219–276. 10.1111/1467‑9612.00052
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9612.00052 [Google Scholar]
  23. McNabb, Yaron
    2012The syntax and semantics of degree modification. Chicago: University of Chicago PhD.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Neeleman, Ad, van de Koot, Hans & Jenny Doetjes
    2004 Degree expressions. Linguistic Review21. 1–66. 10.1515/tlir.2004.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2004.001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Norde, Muriel
    2006 Van suffix tot telwoord tot bijwoord: degrammaticalisering en (re)grammaticalisering van tig. InTABU35, 33–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Norde, Muriel, Bernard D. Clerck & Timothy Colleman
    2014 The emergence of non-canonical degree modifiers in non-standard varieties of Dutch: A constructionalization perspective. InBoogaart Ronny, Colleman Timothy & Rutten Gijsbert (eds.), Extending the scope of construction grammar, 207–250. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Özyıldız, Deniz
    . in press. Quantifiers in Turkish. deniz.fr/pdfs/quantifiers.pdf. (28 February, 2017.) 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑44330‑0_17
  28. Quirk, Randolph
    1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London, New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Raidt, Edith Hildegard
    1982Afrikaans en sy Europese Verlede. Cape Town: Nasou Beperk.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Rett, Jessica
    2008 A degree account of exclamatives. Semantics and Linguistic Theory18. 601–618. 10.3765/salt.v18i0.2470
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v18i0.2470 [Google Scholar]
  31. Solt, Stephanie
    2010 Much support and more. InM. Aloni, H. Bastiaanse, T. de Jager, & K. Schulz (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Amsterdam Colloquium (pp.446–455). Berlin: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Svenonius, Peter
    2008 The position of adjectives and other phrasal modifiers in the decomposition of DP. InLouise McNally & Christopher Kennedy (eds.), Adverbs and adjectives: Syntax, semantics, and discourse (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Travis, Lisa DeMena
    1984Parameters and effects of word order variation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Tsujimura, Natsuko
    2001 Degree words and scalar structure in Japanese. Lingua111(1). 29–52. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(00)00027‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(00)00027-9 [Google Scholar]
  35. Vendler, Zeno
    1957 Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review66(2): 143. 10.2307/2182371
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371 [Google Scholar]
  36. Williams, Edwin
    1981 Argument structure and morphology. Linguistic Review1: 81–114. 10.1515/tlir.1981.1.1.81
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1981.1.1.81 [Google Scholar]
  37. Zwarts, Joost
    1992X’-syntax-X’-semantics. Utrecht: Utrecht University PhD.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2000 External arguments. InPeter Coopmans, Martin Everaert & Jane B. Grimshaw. Lexical specification and insertion. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 429–457. 10.1075/cilt.197.19zwa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.197.19zwa [Google Scholar]
  39. Zwicky, Arnold
    2006aMuch ado about a lot. Retrieved fromitre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/002990.html
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 2006bBig much squib. Retrieved fromitre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003157.html
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Afrikaans; degree modification; gradability
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error