1887
image of Towards a syntactic understanding of connective particles
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The contrastive connector ‘but’ is rigidly sentence-initial in most Spanish varieties. However, at least three Spanish dialects allow locating it at the end of a sentence. This paper discusses the properties of as attested in the dialect spoken in Bahia Blanca (Argentina), i.e., the so-called . First, I demonstrate that cannot be reduced to superficially similar phenomena in Spanish. Then, I offer a comparison between and its sentence-initial counterpart showing that they share a number of non-trivial characteristics but also differ in relevant regards. Based on these properties, I advance an account of the phenomenon according to which instances of that express concessivity may optionally attract the CP projection to their left. While the analysis does not cover all properties of , it highlights aspects of the syntax of connective particles that require further investigation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lv.20015.mun
2022-03-02
2022-05-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abels, Klaus
    2003 Successive cyclicity, anti locality and adposition stranding. Storrs: University of Connecticut dissertation.
  2. Alexiadou, Artemis
    2006 Left dislocation (including CLLD). InMartin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, Volume I, 668–699. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 10.1002/9780470996591.ch37
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996591.ch37 [Google Scholar]
  3. Astruc, Lluïsa
    2004 Right-dislocations: Influence of information structure on prosodic phrasing and intonation. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics1. 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, Mark C.
    2008 The macroparameter in a microparametric world. InTheresa Biberauer (ed.), The limits of syntactic variation, 351–373. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.132.16bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.132.16bak [Google Scholar]
  5. Biberauer, Theresa
    2010 Semi null-subject languages, expletives and expletive pro reconsidered. InTheresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, 153–199. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Blakemore, Diane
    1987Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Blanco, Isabel, Silvia Rigatuso & Silvia Suardíaz de Antollini
    1982 Asimilación lingüística de los inmigrantes italianos en Aldea Romana. Cuadernos del Sur15. 99–115.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bosque, Ignacio & Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach
    2009Fundamentos de sintaxis formal. Madrid: Akal.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Calvo Pérez, Julio
    2000 Partículas en castellano andino. InJulio Calvo Pérez (ed.), Teoría y práctica del contacto: el español de América en el candelero, 73–111. Madrid & Frankfurt am Main: Iberoamericana & Vervuert. 10.31819/9783865278883‑005
    https://doi.org/10.31819/9783865278883-005 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cardinaletti, Anna
    2009 On a (wh-)moved topic in Italian, compared to Germanic. InArtemis Alexiadou, Jorge Hankamer, Thomas McFadden, Justin Nuger & Florian Schäfer (eds.), Advances in comparative Germanic syntax, 3–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.141.02ona
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.141.02ona [Google Scholar]
  11. 2011 German and Italian modal particles and clause structure. The Linguistic Review28(4). 493–531. 10.1515/tlir.2011.014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2011.014 [Google Scholar]
  12. Carrilho, Ernestina
    2005 Expletive ele in European Portuguese dialects. Lisbon: Universidade de Lisboa dissertation.
  13. Cinque, Guglielmo
    1977 The movement nature of left dislocation. Linguistic Inquiry8(2). 397–412.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 1999Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Coromines, Joan
    1995Diccionari etimológic i complementari de la llengua catalana. Vol VI. Barcelona: Curial Edicions Catalanes.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Cusihuamán, Antonio
    2001Gramática Quechua, Cuzco Collao. Cuzco: Centro de Estudios Regionales Bartolomé de las Casas.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Emonds, Joseph
    1970 Root and structure-preserving transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
  18. Escobar, Linda
    1997 Clitic left dislocation and other relatives. InMaterials on left dislocation, 233–273. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.14.13esc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.14.13esc [Google Scholar]
  19. Estrella-Santos, Ana
    2018 ¿Te gustó pero?: posposición de ‘pero’ en el habla del Ecuador. Ianua. Revista Philologica Romanica18. 1–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fontanella de Weinberg, María Beatriz
    1979La asimilación lingüística de los inmigrantes. Mantenimiento y cambio de lengua en el sudoeste bonaerense. Bahía Blanca: Universidad Nacional del Sur.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Frascarelli, Mara
    2000The syntax-phonology interface in focus and topic constructions in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑9500‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9500-1 [Google Scholar]
  22. Frey, Werner
    2012 On two types of adverbial clauses allowing root-phenomena. InLobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds.), Main clause phenomena. New horizons, 405–429. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.190.18fre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.190.18fre [Google Scholar]
  23. Haegeman, Liliane
    2002 Anchoring to speaker, adverbial clauses and the structure of cp. Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics2. 117–180.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2004 Topicalization, CLLD and the left periphery. ZAS Papers in Linguistics35(1). 157–192. 10.21248/zaspil.35.2004.226
    https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.35.2004.226 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2006 Conditionals, factives and the left periphery. Lingua116(10). 1651–1669. 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.03.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.03.014 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2014 West Flemish verb-based discourse markers and the articulation of the speech act layer. Studia Linguistica68(1). 116–139. 10.1111/stul.12023
    https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12023 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hardman, Martha James, Juana Vásquez, Juan de Dios Yapita, Lucy Therina Briggs, Nora Clearman England & Laura Martin
    1988Aymara: compendio de estructura fonológica y gramatical. La Paz: ILCA.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Haselow, Alexander
    2013 Arguing for a wide conception of grammar: The case of final particles in spoken discourse. Folia Linguistica47(2). 10.1515/flin.2013.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2013.015 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hernanz, Maria Lluïsa
    2007 Emphatic polarity and C in Spanish. InLaura Brugè (ed.), Studies in Spanish syntax, 104–115. Venice: Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hill, Virginia
    2007 Vocatives and the pragmatics-syntax interface. Lingua117(12). 2077–2105. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  31. Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita
    2008 Contrast, concessive, and corrective: Toward a comprehensive study of opposition relations. Journal of Pragmatics40(4). 646–675. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kany, Charles E.
    1947 Some aspects of Bolivian popular speech. Hispanic Review15. 72–79. 10.2307/470623
    https://doi.org/10.2307/470623 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kayne, Richard
    1994The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. König, Ekkehard
    1988 Concessive connectives and concessive sentences: cross-linguistic regularities and pragmatic principles. InJohn A. Hawkins (ed.), Explaining language universals, 145–166. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 1994 Concessive clauses. InRonald E. Asher (ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 679–681. Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lakoff, Robin
    1971 If’s, and’s and but’s about conjunction. InCharles J. Fillmore & Terence Langendoen (eds.), Studies in linguistic semantics, 114–149. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Wilson.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Laprade, Richard
    1981 Some cases of Aymara influence on La Paz Spanish. InMartha James Hardman (ed.), The Aymara language in its social and cultural context, 207–227. Gainesville: The University Presses of Florida.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Lasnik, Howard
    1981 Restricting the theory of transformations. InNorbert Hornstein & David Lightfoot (eds.), Explanation in linguistics, 152–173. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Levas, Raül
    2018 El marcador contraargumentativo pero en posición no inicial en el castellano de Mallorca. Paper presented at theII Meeting on Spanish Dialects. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Lipski, John M.
    1994Latin American Spanish. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. López, Luis
    2009A derivational syntax for informational structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557400.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557400.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  42. Maiden, Martin & Cecilia Robustelli
    2013A reference grammar of modern italian. New York: Routledge2nd edn.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Malchukov, Andrej L.
    2004 Towards a semantic typology of adversative and contrast marking. Journal of Semantics21(2). 177–198. 10.1093/jos/21.2.177
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/21.2.177 [Google Scholar]
  44. Martín zorraquino, María Antonia & José Portolés
    1999 Los marcadores del discurso. InIgnacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Volumen 3: Entre la oración y el discurso. Morfología, chap. 63, 4051–4213. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Mulder, Jean & Sandra Thompson
    2008 The grammaticalization of final but in Australian English conversation. InRitva Laury (ed.), Crosslinguistic studies of clause combining: the multifunctionality ofconjunctions, 179–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.80.09mul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.80.09mul [Google Scholar]
  46. Munaro, Nicola & Cecilia Poletto
    2003 Ways of clause typing. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa27. 87–105.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 2009 Sentential particles and clausal typing in venetan dialects. InBenjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds.), Dislocated elements in discourse, 173–199. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Portolés, José
    2001Marcadores del discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Real Academia Española
    Real Academia Española 2009Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Rigatuso, Elizabeth & Yolanda H. Hipperdinger
    1998 Factores convergentes en procesos de mantenimiento y cambio de lengua. Lengua e inmigración en el sudoeste bonaerense. InDinko Cvitanovic & Nilsa M. Alzola de Cvitanovic (eds.), La Argentina y el mundo del siglo XX. Actas de las jornadas internacionales, 702–714. Bahía Blanca: Universidad Nacional del Sur.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Rivarola, José Luis
    1976Las conjunciones concesivas en español medieval y clásico. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. 10.1515/9783111328294
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111328294 [Google Scholar]
  52. Schutze, Carson T.
    2014 Judgement data. InRobert J. Podesva & Devyani Sharma (eds.), Research methods in linguistics, 27–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139013734.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013734.004 [Google Scholar]
  53. Selkirk, Elisabeth
    2011 The syntax-phonology interface. InJohn Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan Yu (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, vol.2, 435–483. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell Malden. 10.1002/9781444343069.ch14
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343069.ch14 [Google Scholar]
  54. Sosa, Juan Manuel
    1991 Fonética y fonología de la entonación del Español Hispanomericano. Amherst: University of Massachussets dissertation.
  55. Speas, Peggy & Carol L. Tenny
    2003 Configurational properties of point of view roles. InAnna Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), Asymmetry in grammar. Volume 1: Syntax and semantics, 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/la.57.15spe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.57.15spe [Google Scholar]
  56. Stratford, Billie Dale
    1989 Structure and use of Altiplano Spanish. Gainesville: University of Florida dissertation.
  57. Toscano Mateus, Humberto
    1953El español en el Ecuador. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Vallduví, Enric
    1992The informational component. New York: Garland.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Vann, Robert
    2001 El castellà catalanitzat a Barcelona: perspectives linguistiques i culturals. Catalan ReviewXV(1). 117–131. 10.3828/CATR.15.1.6
    https://doi.org/10.3828/CATR.15.1.6 [Google Scholar]
  60. Zubizarreta, María Luisa
    1998Prosody, focus and word order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Zwart, Jan-Wouter
    2009 Relevance of typology to minimalist inquiry. Lingua119(11). 1589–1606. 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.011 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lv.20015.mun
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lv.20015.mun
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: concessivity ; connective discourse particles ; Spanish variation ; vocatives
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error