Towards a syntactic understanding of connective particles

References

1. Abels, Klaus
   2003 Successive cyclicity, anti locality and adposition stranding. Storrs: University of Connecticut dissertation.
2. Alexiadou, Artemis
   2006 Left dislocation (including CLLD). InMartin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, Volume I, 668–699. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 10.1002/9780470996591.ch37
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996591.ch37 [Google Scholar]
3. Astruc, Lluïsa
   2004 Right-dislocations: Influence of information structure on prosodic phrasing and intonation. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics11. 1–14.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baker, Mark C.
   2008 The macroparameter in a microparametric world. InTheresa Biberauer (ed.), The limits of syntactic variation, 351–373. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.132.16bak
   https://doi.org/10.1075/la.132.16bak [Google Scholar]
5. Biberauer, Theresa
   2010 Semi null-subject languages, expletives and expletive pro reconsidered. InTheresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, 153–199. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Blakemore, Diane
   1987 Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Blanco, Isabel, Silvia Rigatuso & Silvia Suardíaz de Antollini
   1982 Asimilación lingüística de los inmigrantes italianos en Aldea Romana. Cuadernos del Sur151. 99–115.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bosque, Ignacio & Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach
   2009 Fundamentos de sintaxis formal. Madrid: Akal.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Calvo Pérez, Julio
   2000 Partículas en castellano andino. InJulio Calvo Pérez (ed.), Teoría y práctica del contacto: el español de América en el candelero, 73–111. Madrid & Frankfurt am Main: Iberoamericana & Vervuert. 10.31819/9783865278883‑005
   https://doi.org/10.31819/9783865278883-005 [Google Scholar]
10. Cardinaletti, Anna
    2009 On a (wh-)moved topic in Italian, compared to Germanic. InArtemis Alexiadou, Jorge Hankamer, Thomas McFadden, Justin Nuger & Florian Schäfer (eds.), Advances in comparative Germanic syntax, 3–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.141.02ona
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.141.02ona [Google Scholar]
11. Cardinaletti, Anna
    2011 German and Italian modal particles and clause structure. The Linguistic Review28(4). 493–531. 10.1515/tlir.2011.014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2011.014 [Google Scholar]
12. Carrilho, Ernestina
    2005 Expletive ele in European Portuguese dialects. Lisbon: Universidade de Lisboa dissertation.
13. Cinque, Guglielmo
    1977 The movement nature of left dislocation. Linguistic Inquiry8(2). 397–412.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Cinque, Guglielmo
    1999 Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Coromines, Joan
    1995 Diccionari etimológic i complementari de la llengua catalana. Vol VI. Barcelona: Curial Edicions Catalanes.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Cusihuamán, Antonio
    2001 Gramática Quechua, Cuzco Collao. Cuzco: Centro de Estudios Regionales Bartolomé de las Casas.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Emonds, Joseph
    1970 Root and structure-preserving transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
18. Escobar, Linda
    1997 Clitic left dislocation and other relatives. InMaterials on left dislocation, 233–273. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.14.13esc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.14.13esc [Google Scholar]
19. Estrella-Santos, Ana
    2018 ¿Te gustó pero?: posposición de ‘pero’ en el habla del Ecuador. Ianua. Revista Philologica Romanica181. 1–22.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fontanella de Weinberg, María Beatriz
    1979 La asimilación lingüística de los inmigrantes. Mantenimiento y cambio de lengua en el sudoeste bonaerense. Bahía Blanca: Universidad Nacional del Sur.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Frascarelli, Mara
    2000 The syntax-phonology interface in focus and topic constructions in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑9500‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9500-1 [Google Scholar]
22. Frey, Werner
    2012 On two types of adverbial clauses allowing root-phenomena. InLobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds.), Main clause phenomena. New horizons, 405–429. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.190.18fre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.190.18fre [Google Scholar]
23. Haegeman, Liliane
    2002 Anchoring to speaker, adverbial clauses and the structure of cp. Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics21. 117–180.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Haegeman, Liliane
    2004 Topicalization, CLLD and the left periphery. ZAS Papers in Linguistics35(1). 157–192. 10.21248/zaspil.35.2004.226
    https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.35.2004.226 [Google Scholar]
25. Haegeman, Liliane
    2006 Conditionals, factives and the left periphery. Lingua116(10). 1651–1669. 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.03.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.03.014 [Google Scholar]
26. Haegeman, Liliane
    2014 West Flemish verb-based discourse markers and the articulation of the speech act layer. Studia Linguistica68(1). 116–139. 10.1111/stul.12023
    https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12023 [Google Scholar]
27. Hardman, Martha James, Juana Vásquez, Juan de Dios Yapita, Lucy Therina Briggs, Nora Clearman England & Laura Martin
    1988 Aymara: compendio de estructura fonológica y gramatical. La Paz: ILCA.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Haselow, Alexander
    2013 Arguing for a wide conception of grammar: The case of final particles in spoken discourse. Folia Linguistica47(2). 10.1515/flin.2013.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2013.015 [Google Scholar]
29. Hernanz, Maria Lluïsa
    2007 Emphatic polarity and C in Spanish. InLaura Brugè (ed.), Studies in Spanish syntax, 104–115. Venice: Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Hill, Virginia
    2007 Vocatives and the pragmatics-syntax interface. Lingua117(12). 2077–2105. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.01.002 [Google Scholar]
31. Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita
    2008 Contrast, concessive, and corrective: Toward a comprehensive study of opposition relations. Journal of Pragmatics40(4). 646–675. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.001 [Google Scholar]
32. Kany, Charles E.
    1947 Some aspects of Bolivian popular speech. Hispanic Review151. 72–79. 10.2307/470623
    https://doi.org/10.2307/470623 [Google Scholar]
33. Kayne, Richard
    1994 The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. König, Ekkehard
    1988 Concessive connectives and concessive sentences: cross-linguistic regularities and pragmatic principles. InJohn A. Hawkins (ed.), Explaining language universals, 145–166. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
35. König, Ekkehard
    1994 Concessive clauses. InRonald E. Asher (ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 679–681. Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Lakoff, Robin
    1971 If’s, and’s and but’s about conjunction. InCharles J. Fillmore & Terence Langendoen (eds.), Studies in linguistic semantics, 114–149. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Wilson.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Laprade, Richard
    1981 Some cases of Aymara influence on La Paz Spanish. InMartha James Hardman (ed.), The Aymara language in its social and cultural context, 207–227. Gainesville: The University Presses of Florida.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Lasnik, Howard
    1981 Restricting the theory of transformations. InNorbert Hornstein & David Lightfoot (eds.), Explanation in linguistics, 152–173. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Levas, Raül
    2018 El marcador contraargumentativo pero en posición no inicial en el castellano de Mallorca. Paper presented at theII Meeting on Spanish Dialects. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Lipski, John M.
    1994 Latin American Spanish. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
41. López, Luis
    2009 A derivational syntax for informational structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557400.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557400.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
42. Maiden, Martin & Cecilia Robustelli
    2013 A reference grammar of modern italian. New York: Routledge2nd edn.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Malchukov, Andrej L.
    2004 Towards a semantic typology of adversative and contrast marking. Journal of Semantics21(2). 177–198. 10.1093/jos/21.2.177
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/21.2.177 [Google Scholar]
44. Martín zorraquino, María Antonia & José Portolés
    1999 Los marcadores del discurso. InIgnacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Volumen 3: Entre la oración y el discurso. Morfología, chap. 63, 4051–4213. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Mulder, Jean & Sandra Thompson
    2008 The grammaticalization of final but in Australian English conversation. InRitva Laury (ed.), Crosslinguistic studies of clause combining: the multifunctionality ofconjunctions, 179–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.80.09mul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.80.09mul [Google Scholar]
46. Munaro, Nicola & Cecilia Poletto
    2003 Ways of clause typing. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa271. 87–105.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Munaro, Nicola & Cecilia Poletto
    2009 Sentential particles and clausal typing in venetan dialects. InBenjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds.), Dislocated elements in discourse, 173–199. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Portolés, José
    2001 Marcadores del discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Real Academia Española
    Real Academia Española 2009 Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Rigatuso, Elizabeth & Yolanda H. Hipperdinger
    1998 Factores convergentes en procesos de mantenimiento y cambio de lengua. Lengua e inmigración en el sudoeste bonaerense. InDinko Cvitanovic & Nilsa M. Alzola de Cvitanovic (eds.), La Argentina y el mundo del siglo XX. Actas de las jornadas internacionales, 702–714. Bahía Blanca: Universidad Nacional del Sur.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Rivarola, José Luis
    1976 Las conjunciones concesivas en español medieval y clásico. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. 10.1515/9783111328294
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111328294 [Google Scholar]
52. Schutze, Carson T.
    2014 Judgement data. InRobert J. Podesva & Devyani Sharma (eds.), Research methods in linguistics, 27–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139013734.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013734.004 [Google Scholar]
53. Selkirk, Elisabeth
    2011 The syntax-phonology interface. InJohn Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan Yu (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, vol.21, 435–483. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell Malden. 10.1002/9781444343069.ch14
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343069.ch14 [Google Scholar]
54. Sosa, Juan Manuel
    1991 Fonética y fonología de la entonación del Español Hispanomericano. Amherst: University of Massachussets dissertation.
55. Speas, Peggy & Carol L. Tenny
    2003 Configurational properties of point of view roles. InAnna Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), Asymmetry in grammar. Volume 1: Syntax and semantics, 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/la.57.15spe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.57.15spe [Google Scholar]
56. Stratford, Billie Dale
    1989 Structure and use of Altiplano Spanish. Gainesville: University of Florida dissertation.
57. Toscano Mateus, Humberto
    1953 El español en el Ecuador. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Vallduví, Enric
    1992 The informational component. New York: Garland.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Vann, Robert
    2001 El castellà catalanitzat a Barcelona: perspectives linguistiques i culturals. Catalan ReviewXV(1). 117–131. 10.3828/CATR.15.1.6
    https://doi.org/10.3828/CATR.15.1.6 [Google Scholar]
60. Zubizarreta, María Luisa
    1998 Prosody, focus and word order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Zwart, Jan-Wouter
    2009 Relevance of typology to minimalist inquiry. Lingua119(11). 1589–1606. 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.011 [Google Scholar]