1887
image of The second genitive in the history of Russian and across its dialects
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this paper, we provide a survey of the diachronic development of the Russian second genitive (Gen2). As endpoints of this development, we consider data from Russian dialects representing different dialect groups. Assumedly, the expansion of Gen2 started off as ‘recycling’ of the genitive of a declension type that became obsolete already in the pre-written period. Nouns of this declension type were adopted by another declension, carrying their old genitive over as a variant form. This alternative ending started spreading, always as a variant, to other nouns in the adoptive declension. As the survey of the literature shows, in the course of this expansion new constraints evolved, including phonological, morphophonological, phonotactic, syntactic and semantic conditioning. While there is no declension class or even individual nouns where Gen2 became the only option, it expanded to different extents in different dialects. We believe that the diversity of functions associated with the form, the range of language-internal factors driving its expansion, as well as the current geographic distribution of constraints on its formation weaken the claim that emergence of Gen2 as a morphological category dedicated to partitive was due to contact with the languages of the Circumbaltic area, a suggestion made on a macro-areal basis and also based on comparison with the northern dialects alone. While we cannot argue that the data we present disproves the contact factor, we would at least expect that the increased granularity of dialectal data would provide some data to support it. This is not what happens, which we consider to be an argument against contact-induced change.

The aim of the paper is two-fold: to present a synopsis of the discussions of the history of Gen2 and a survey of the data on the use of Gen2 in the dialects, both firsthand and available from the literature; and to question the role of contact in the emergence of the new category of Gen2 in Russian.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lv.21004.ter
2022-01-31
2022-05-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bernstein, Samuil B.
    1974 Ocherk sravnitelnoj grammatiki slavjanskix jazykov. Cheredovanija. Imennyje osnovy. [A survey of the comparative grammar of Slavic. Alternations. Nominal stems]. Moscow: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blevins, Juliette
    2017 Areal Sound Patterns: From Perceptual Magnets to Stone Soup. InRaymond Hickey (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics, 88–121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.   10.1017/9781107279872.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107279872.006 [Google Scholar]
  3. Breu, Walter
    1994 Der Faktor Sprachkontakt in einer dynamischen Typologie des Slavischen. Hans Robert Mehlig (ed.) Slavistische Linguistik 1993, Munich. 41–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Britain, David & Peter Trudgill
    2005 New dialect formation and contact-induced reallocation: Three case studies from the English Fens. International Journal of English Studies5.1. 183–209.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Britain, David
    1997 Dialect contact, focusing and phonological rule complexity: the koineisation of Fenland English. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics: A selection of papers from NWAVE 25, 4. 141–169
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bromlej, Sofja V. & Lidia N. Bulatova
    1972Ocherki morfologii russkikh govorov [Essays on morphology of Russian dialects]. Moscow: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Corbett, Greville
    2008 Determining morphosyntactic feature values: the case of case. In: Greville G. Corbett & Michael Noonan (eds.), Case and grammatical relations: papers in honour of Bernard Comrie, 1–34. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.81.01det
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.81.01det [Google Scholar]
  8. Dahl, Östen
    2016 Thoughts on language-specific and crosslinguistic entities. Linguistic Typology 2016; 20(2). 427–437. 10.1515/lingty‑2016‑0016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0016 [Google Scholar]
  9. Daniel, Michael, Ruprecht von Waldenfels, Aleksandra Ter-Avanesova, Polina Kazakova, Ilya Schurov, Ekaterina Gerasimenko, Daria Ignatenko, Ekaterina Makhlina, Maria Tsfasman, Samira Verhees, Alexei Vinyar, Vasilisa Zhigulskaya, Maria Ovsjannikova, Sergei Say & Nina Dobrushina
    2019 Dialect loss in the Russian North: modeling change across variables. Language Variation and Change. Vol.31. No.3. 353–376. 10.1017/S0954394519000243
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394519000243 [Google Scholar]
  10. Daniel, Michael
    2014 The second genitive in Russian. In: Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds). Partitive cases and related categories, 347–377. Berlin, NY: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110346060.347
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346060.347 [Google Scholar]
  11. DARJA
    DARJA 1986–2004 Dialektologicheskiy atlas russkogo jazyka. Centr evropejskoy chasti SSSR. Vypusk I. Fonetika. 1986. Vypusk II. Morfologija. 1989. Vypusk III, chast’ 1. Leksika. 1997. Chast’ 2. Sintaksis i leksika. 2004. Avanesov, R. I., Bromlej, S. V., Kuzmina, I. B., Morakhovskaya, O. N. (Eds.), [Dialectological Atlas of Russian. Central European Part of the USSR. Issue I. Phonetics. Issue II. Morphology. Issue III, Part 1. Lexicon. Part 2. Lexicon and Syntax], Moscow: Vinogradov Institute of the Russian Language Russian Academy of Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dyachenko, Svetlana V., Elena G. Zhidkova, Anna V. Malysheva, Roman V. Ronko & Alexandra V. Ter-Avanesova
    2018 Ekspedicija v Opočetskij rajon Pskovskoj oblasti [Fieldtrip to the Opočka municipality of the Pskov district]. Russkij jazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii2(36) 2018 257–312.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Diels, Paul
    1963Altkirchenslavische Grammatik, I-II. Heidelberg: Sammlung slavischer Lehr-und Handbücher.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Eckert, Rainer
    1963 Osnovy na -u- v praslavjanskom jazyke [*u-stems in Common Slavic]. Uchenye zapiski Instituta slavianovedenija. Vol.27. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences. 3–133.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Es’kova, Natalja A.
    2008 Normy russkogo literaturnogo jazyka XVIII-XIX vekov. Udarenie. Grammatičeskie formy. Varianty slov. Slovar’. Pojasnitel’nye stat’i. [Norms of Standard Russian in the 18th to 19th century. Stress, inflection, variation. Vocabulary. Explanatory notes] Moscow: Rukopisnye pamjatniki Drevnej Rusi.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Haspelmath, Martin
    2010 Comparative Concepts and Descriptive Categories in Crosslinguistic Studies. Language86. 663–687. 10.1353/lan.2010.0021
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0021 [Google Scholar]
  17. Helimski, Eugene
    2006 The “Northwestern” Group of Finno-Ugric Languages and its Heritage in the Place Names and Substratum Vocabulary of the Russian North. InJuhani Nuorluoto (ed.) Slavica Helsingiensia 27. The Slavicization of the Russian North. Mechanisms and Chronology. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press. 109–127.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Khaburgaev, Georgij A.
    1990 Ocherki istoricheskoy morfologii russkogo jazyka. Imena [A survey of the historical morphology of Russian. Nouns]. Moscow: Moscow State Univeristy.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria & Bernhard Wälchli
    2001 The Circum-Baltic Languages: An Areal-Typological Approach. InÖsten Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.) The Circum-Baltic Languages: Typology and Contact, vol.2: Grammar and Typology. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 615–750. 10.1075/slcs.55.15kop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.55.15kop [Google Scholar]
  20. Kotkov, Sergej I.
    1962 Juzhnovelikorusskoe narechie v XVII stoletii. Fonetika i morfologija [The southern dialect of Russian in the 17th century. Phonetics and Morphology]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Akademii nauk SSSR.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Krylov, Sergei & Aleksandra Ter-Avanesova
  22. Krys’ko, Vadim B.
    2020 Imennoe sklonenie [Nominal declension]. In: Krys’ko, V. B. (ed). Istoricheskaya grammatika russkogo jazyka [Historical grammar of Russian]. 105–134. Moscow: Azbukovnik.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kuzmina, Irina B.
    1993Sintaksis russkih govorov v lingvogeograficheskom aspekte [Syntax of Russian dialects in a linguageographical perspective]. Moscow: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kuznecov, Petr S.
    1959Ocherki istoricheskoj morfologii russkogo jazyka [A survey of historical grammar of Russian]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Akademii nauk SSSR.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lass, Roger
    1990 How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of Linguistics26. 79–102. 10.1017/S0022226700014432
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700014432 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lunt, Horace G.
    1974Old Church Slavonic grammar (6th edition). The Hague/Paris: Mouton. 10.1515/9783111563053
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111563053 [Google Scholar]
  27. Luraghi, Silvia & Seppo Kittilä
    2014 Typology and diachrony of partitive case markers. In: Luraghi, Silvia & Seppo Kittilä (eds.) Partitive cases and related categories54: 17–62. Berlin, NY: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110346060.17
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346060.17 [Google Scholar]
  28. Malysheva, Anna V.
    2018 Genitivnoe markirovanie kolichestvennyh pokazatelej glagola v severnorusskih govorah [Genitive of the verbal quantifiers in the dialects of the North]. In: Sergei A. Myznikov (ed.) Leksicheskij atlas russkih narodnyh govorov [Lexical atlas of Russian dialects]. Materialy i issledovanija. 269–284. Saint Petersburg: ILI RAN.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Malysheva, Anna V. & Roman V. Ronko
    2020 Russkij objektnyj genitiv pri otricanii po dannym dialektnykh korpusov i ustnogo korpusa NKRJA [Russian genitive of direct object with negation: data from dialect corpora and from the spoken subcorpus of the Russian National Corpus]. Voprosy jazykoznanija, 4: 25–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Markova, Nina V.
    1991 Roditel’nyj padež sub”ekta v onežskix govorax [Subject genitive in the Onego dialects]. InAzarx, Julia S. (ed.), Sovremennye russkie govory [Modern Russian Dialects], 134–41. Moskva: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Matveev, Aleksandr K.
    2001Substratnaja toponimija Russkogo Severa [Substrate toponimics of the Russian North]. Part 1. Ekaterinburg: Ural University.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Meillet, Antoine
    1961Études sur ľétymologie et le vocabulaire du vieux slave. Part II. Paris: Librairie Émile Bouillon.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Mustajoki, Arto
    2006 Pochemu narodu mnogo, ili novyje nabljudenija nad upotrebleniem vtorogo roditelnogo padezha v sovremennom russkom jazyke [Why narodu mnogo, or some new observations on the use of the second genitive case in Modern Russian]. InArto Mustajoki & Olga Pussinen (eds.), Integrum: tochnye metody i gumanitarnye nauki, 216–269. Moscow: Letnij sad.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Obnorskij, Sergej P.
    1927Imennoe sklonenie v russkom jazyke. 1. Edinstvennoe chislo [Nominal declension in Russian. The Singular]. Leningrad: Izdatelstvo Akademii nauk.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ossovetsij, Iosif A.
    1969Slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo narodnogo govora (derevnja Deulino Ryazanskogo rajona Ryazanskoj oblasti) [A dictionary of a contemporary Russian dialect (village of Deulino of the Rjazan municipality of Ryazan district]. Moscow: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Polivanova, Anna K.
    2013Staroslavjanskij jazyk. Grammatika, Slovari. [Old Church Slavonic. Grammar and dictionaries] Moscow: Universitet Dmitrija Pozharskogo.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Ronko, Roman, Elena Volf, Maria Grebyonkina, Maria Ershova, Anna Okhapkina, Anna Khadasevich & Valeria Morozova
    2019Corpus of Opochka dialects. Moscow: Linguistic Convergence Laboratory, NRU HSE; V.V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute Russian Academy of Science (Available online at URL: https://linghub.ru/opochka)
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Sankoff, Gillian & Hélène Blondeau
    2007 Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language, 560–588. 10.1353/lan.2007.0106
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2007.0106 [Google Scholar]
  39. Seržant, Ilja A.
    2014 The independent partitive genitive in North Russian. InBjörn Wiemer & Ilja Seržant (eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Dialectology: The area of North, Northwest Russian and Belarusian vernaculars, Slavica Bergensia13. 270–329. Bergen: University of Bergen.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 2015 The independent partitive as an Eastern Circum-Baltic isogloss. Journal of Language Contact8.2. 341–418. 10.1163/19552629‑00802006
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-00802006 [Google Scholar]
  41. Shakhmatov, Alexej A.
    1957Istoricheskaya morfologija russkogo jazyka [Historical morphology of Russian]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe učebno-pedagogičeskoe izdatel’stvo Ministerstva Prosveščenija RSFSR.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Shulga, Marija V.
    1978 Paradigma tipa medъ v drevnerusskoj pismennosti [Paradigm type medъ in Old Russian writing]. InRuben I. Avanesov (ed.). Issledovanija po istoricheskoy morfologii russkogo jazyka. Moscow: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Spencer, Andrew & Ryo Otoguro
    2005 Limits to case: a critical survey of the notion. InMengistu Amberber & Helen de Hoop (eds.) Competition and variation in natural languages: the case for case, 119–145. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑008044651‑6/50007‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044651-6/50007-0 [Google Scholar]
  44. Ter-Avanesova, Aleksandra, Fedor Balabin, Svetlana Dyachenko, Anna Malysheva, Anastasia Panova & Valeria Morozova
    2019Corpus of the Malinino dialect. Moscow: Linguistic Convergence Laboratory, NRU HSE; V.V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute of the Russian Academy of Science. (Available online at URL: https://lingconlab.ru/malinino/)
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Unbegaun, Boris
    1935La langue russe au XVII siècle. Vol.1Paris: Champion.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. van Wijk, Nicolaus
    1957 (1931)Geschichte der altkirchenslavischen Sprache. Vol.1. Laut- und Formenlehre. Berlin-Leipzig. (quoted via the Russian translation inNicolaus van Wijk 1957 Istorija staroslavjanskogo jazyka. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo inostrannoj literatury.)
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Zalizniak, Andrej A.
    1967Russkoje imennoje slovoizmenenie [Russian nominal inflection]. Moscow: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 2004Drevnenovgorodskij dialekt [Old Novgorod Dialect]. Moscow: JaSK.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lv.21004.ter
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lv.21004.ter
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error