1887
image of Partitive pronouns in intransitive contexts in Italian and Dutch

Abstract

Abstract

In the literature it is often assumed that partitive pronouns can only be used in combination with elliptical objects of transitive or unaccusative verbs. Some counterevidence has been provided as well, however, showing that partitive pronouns may also occur with intransitive verbs. In this paper it is investigated, by means of a Grammaticality Judgment Task, if native speakers of Italian and Dutch accept the use of the partitive pronoun with three types of intransitive verbs, in combination with an elliptical quantified adverbial NP. It is shown that both groups of participants were quite ready to accept the partitive pronoun in these cases, in some contexts more than in others. Various explanations for the results are considered and one more specific suggestion is made to account for the data, also based on a comparison with other constructions and other languages.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lv.21018.sle
2022-01-27
2022-05-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/lv.21018.sle/lv.21018.sle.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lv.21018.sle&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Barbiers, Sjef
    2017 Kwantitatief er en ze. Nederlandse Taalkunde22(2). 163–187. 10.5117/NEDTAA2017.2.BARB
    https://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2017.2.BARB [Google Scholar]
  2. Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi
    1981 The syntax of “NE”. Some theoretical implications. The Linguistic Review1(2). 117–154. 10.1515/tlir.1981.1.2.117
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1981.1.2.117 [Google Scholar]
  3. Benincà, Paola
    1988 L’ordine degli elementi della frase e le costruzioni marcate. InLorenzo Renzi (ed.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, vol.1, 115–227. Bologna: il Mulino.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennis, Hans
    1986Gaps and dummies. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bentley, Delia
    2004Ne-cliticisation and split intransitivity. Journal of Linguistics40(2). 219–262. 10.1017/S002222670400252X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222670400252X [Google Scholar]
  6. Blom, Alied
    1977 Het kwantitatieve er. Spektator6. 387–395.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Burzio, Luigi
    1986Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑4522‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cardinaletti, Anna & Giuliana Giusti
    1992 Partitive ‘ne’ and the QP hypothesis. A case study. InElisabetta Fava (ed.), Proceedings of the XVII Meeting of Generative Grammar, 122–141. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2005 The syntax of quantified phrases and quantitative clitics. InHenk van Riemsdijk & Martin Everaert (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, 23–93. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cinque, Guglielmo
    1999Adverbs and functional heads. A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Corver, Norbert & Marjo van Koppen
    2018 Dutch. InJeroen van Craenenbroeck & Tanja Temmerman (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ellipsis, 721–764. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Elffers, Els, Sies de Haan & Ina Schermer
    2014 Het voltooid deelwoord in het Nederlands: beperkingen op het attributief gebruik. Nederlandse Taalkunde19(1). 47–76. 10.5117/NEDTAA2014.1.ELFF
    https://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2014.1.ELFF [Google Scholar]
  13. Giusti, Giuliana & Petra Sleeman
    2021 Partitive elements in the languages of Europe: An advancement in the understanding of a multifaceted phenomenon. InPetra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Partititive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case, 1–30. (Linguistische Arbeiten 580). Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110732221‑001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110732221-001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Grevisse, Maurice & André Goosse
    1989Nouvelle grammaire française. Paris: Duculot.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hanse, Joseph
    1987Nouveau dictionnaire des difficultés du français moderne (2nd revised edition). Paris: Duculot.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav
    1986 The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry17. 623–661.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Perlmutter, David M.
    1983 Personal vs. impersonal constructions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory1(1). 141–200. 10.1007/BF00210379
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00210379 [Google Scholar]
  18. Pino Serrano, Laura & Nuria Rodriguez Pedreira
    2016 Les accords du désaccord. Prédicats de mesure et objet(s). Lingvisticae Investigationes39(1). 88–115. 10.1075/li.39.1.04pin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/li.39.1.04pin [Google Scholar]
  19. Salvà, Sebastià
    2017 Past participle agreement in Majorcan Catalan: the relevance of inner aspect. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics6(1). 53–75. 10.7557/1.6.1.4101
    https://doi.org/10.7557/1.6.1.4101 [Google Scholar]
  20. Sleeman, Petra
    . Forthcoming. Partitive pronouns and quantified adverbial NPs: a labeling account. Bucharest University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Stroik, Thomas
    1990 Adverbs as V-sisters. Linguistic Inquiry21. 654–661.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Wechsler, Stephen & Yae-Sheik Lee
    1996 The domain of direct case assignment. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory14(3). 629–664. 10.1007/BF00133600
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133600 [Google Scholar]
  23. Will, Kimberly Page
    2019 The semantic and pragmatic functions of partitive clitic NE in Italian. Ithaca, NJ: Cornell University dissertation.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lv.21018.sle
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lv.21018.sle
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error