1887
image of Crosslinguistic variation in partitives
Preview this online first article:

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lv.21020.lur
2022-02-10
2022-05-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/lv.21020.lur/lv.21020.lur.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lv.21020.lur&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Badia Margarit, Antonio M.
    1947 Los complementos pronominalo-adverbiales derivados de IBI e INDE en la peninsula ibérica. (= Anejos de la Revista de Filología Española 38). Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bech, Gunnar
    1952 Über das niederländische Adverbialpronomen er. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague8. 5–32. Kopenhagen: Nordisk Sprog- og Kulturforlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berends, Sanne, Petra Sleeman, Aafke Hulk & Jeannette Schaeffer
    . 2021. The L2 acquisition of the referential semantics of Dutch partitive pronoun ER constructions. InPetra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti eds. Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580) 237–260. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110732221‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110732221-007 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bosveld-de Smet, Leonie M.
    1998On mass and plural quantification. The case of French des/du-NP’s. Groningen: University of Groningen dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cardinaletti, Anna & Giuliana Giusti
    2006 The syntax of quantified phrases and quantitative clitics. InMartin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol.V, 23–93. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470996591.ch71
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996591.ch71 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2017 Quantified expressions and quantitative clitics. InMartin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, 2nd edn., 1–61. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom063
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom063 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2018 Indefinite determiners: Variation and optionality in Italo-Romance. InDiego Pescarini & Roberta D’Alessandro (eds.), Advances in Italian dialectology: Sketches of Italo-Romance grammars, 135–161. Amsterdam: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2020 Indefinite determiners in informal Italian: A preliminary analysis. Linguistics58(3), 679–712.   10.1515/ling‑2020‑0081
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0081 [Google Scholar]
  9. Carlier, Anne
    2007 From preposition to article: The grammaticalization of the French partitive. Studies in Language31. 1–49. 10.1075/sl.31.1.02car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.31.1.02car [Google Scholar]
  10. . 2021. Du/Des NPs in French: a comparison with bare nouns in English and Spanish. InPetra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti eds. Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580), 77–108. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110732221‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110732221-003 [Google Scholar]
  11. Carlier, Anne & Béatrice Lamiroy
    2014 The grammaticalization of the prepositional partitive in Romance. InSilvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, 477–523. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110346060.477
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346060.477 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chappell, Hilary & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
    2019 Optional and alternating case marking: Typology and diachrony. Language and Linguistics Compass. 13(3): e12311.   10.1111/lnc3.12311
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12311 [Google Scholar]
  13. Conti, Luz & Silvia Luraghi
    2014 The Ancient Greek partitive genitive in typological perspective. InSilvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, 443–476. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110346060.443
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346060.443 [Google Scholar]
  14. Crispim, Maria de Lourdes
    1996 Artigos definidos e demonstrativos num corpus do séc. XIII. InIvo Castro (ed.), Actas do XII Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística. Vol. II: Linguística Histórica. História da Língua, 79–90. Lisboa: Associação Portuguesa de Linguística.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dahl, Eystein
    2014 Partitive Subjects and Objects in Indo-Iranian and beyond. InSilvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, 417–442. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110346060.417
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346060.417 [Google Scholar]
  16. Daniel, Michael
    2014 The second genitive in Russian. InSilvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, 17–62. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110346060.347
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346060.347 [Google Scholar]
  17. Eberenz, Rolf
    2008 Ninguno quiere del agua turbia beber: sobre construcciones partitivas y su representación en algunos géneros textuales del español preclásico. InJohannes Kabatek (ed.), Sintaxis histórica del español y cambio lingüístico. Nuevas perspectivas desde las Tradiciones Discursivas, 151–172. Madrid, Frankfurt a. M.: Iberoamericana, Vervuert.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Englebert, Annick
    1992Le “petit mot” DE. Étude de sémantique historique. Geneva/Paris: Librairie Droz.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Etxeberria, Urtzi
    . 2021. The partitive marker in Basque and its relation to bare nouns and the definite article. InPetra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti eds. Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580) 319–355. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110732221‑010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110732221-010 [Google Scholar]
  20. Falco, Michelangelo & Roberto Zamparelli
    2019 Partitives and partitivity. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics4(1), p.111.   10.5334/gjgl.642
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.642 [Google Scholar]
  21. (eds.) 2019 Special collection: Partitives. Glossa. https://www.glossa-journal.org/collections/special/partitives/
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Fernández-Pena, Yolanda
    2020Reconciling synchrony, diachrony and usage in verb number agreement with complex collective subjects. New York/London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780367815899
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367815899 [Google Scholar]
  23. Foulet, Lucien
    1965Petite syntaxe de l’ancien français. Paris: Champion.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gerards, David Paul & Elisabeth Stark
    2020 Why “Partitive Articles” do not exist in (Old) Spanish. InTabea Ihsane (ed.), Disentangling bare nouns and nominals introduced by a partitive article (Syntax & Semantics 43), 105–139. Amsterdam: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Giannakidou, Anastasia
    1998Polarity sensitivity as (non)veridical dependency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.23 [Google Scholar]
  26. Giusti, Giuliana
    . 2021. Partitivity in Italian: A protocol approach to a multifaceted phenomenon. InPetra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti eds. Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580), 33–76. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110732221‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110732221-002 [Google Scholar]
  27. Giusti, Giuliana & Petra Sleeman
    . 2021. Partitive elements in the languages of Europe. An advancement in the understanding of a multifaceted phenomenon. InPetra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti eds. Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580), 1–30. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Glaser, Elvira
    1992 Umbau partitiver Strukturen in der Geschichte des Deutschen. Sprachwissenschaft17(2). 113–132.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 1993 Syntaktische Strategien zum Ausdruck von Indefinitheit und Partitivität im Deutschen (Standardsprache und Dialekt). InWerner Abraham & Josef Bayer (eds.), Dialektsyntax, 99–116. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. 10.1007/978‑3‑322‑97032‑9_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97032-9_5 [Google Scholar]
  30. Harris, Alive C. & Lyle Campbell
    1995Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620553
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620553 [Google Scholar]
  31. Heusinger, Klaus von & Jaklin Kornfilt
    . 2021. Turkish partitive constructions and (non-)exhaustivity. InPetra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti eds. Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580), 263–294. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110732221‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110732221-008 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hoeksema, Jacob
    1996 Introduction. InJacob Hoeksema (ed.), Partitives: Studies on the syntax and semantics of partitive and related constructions, 1–24. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110908985.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110908985.1 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hoop, Helen de
    1992Case configuration and noun phrase interpretation. University of Groningen dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2003 Partitivity. InLisa Cheng & Rint Sybesma (eds.), The second Glot International state-of-the-article book, 179–212. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hoop, Helen de & Andrej Malchukov
    2008 Case-marking strategies. Linguistic Inquiry39. 565–587. 10.1162/ling.2008.39.4.565
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2008.39.4.565 [Google Scholar]
  36. Huumo, Tuomas
    2003 Incremental existence: the world according to the Finnish existential sentence. Linguistics41(3). 461–493. 10.1515/ling.2003.016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2003.016 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2010 Nominal aspect, quantity, and time: The case of the Finnish object. Journal of Linguistics46(1). 83–125. 10.1017/S0022226709990223
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226709990223 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2013 Many ways of moving along a path: What distinguishes prepositional and postpositional uses of Finnish path adpositions?Lingua133. 319–335. 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.05.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.05.006 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2018 The partitive A: On uses of the Finnish partitive subject in transitive clauses. InIlja A. Seržant & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.), The diachronic typology of differential argument marking, 419–449. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. . 2021. Longitudinal or transverse? How the unbounded quantity expressed by the Finnish partitive case relates to time. InPetra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti eds. Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580), 295–317. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Iemmolo, Giorgio
    2013 Symmetric and asymmetric alternations in direct object encoding. STUF – Language Typology and Universals66. 378–403. 10.1524/stuf.2013.0019
    https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2013.0019 [Google Scholar]
  42. Iemmolo, Giorgio & Gerson Klumpp
    2014 Introduction to the special issue “Differential Object Marking: theoretical and empirical issues”. Linguistics52. 271–279.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Ihsane, Tabea
    2005 On the structure of French DU/DES ‘of the’ constituents. [email protected] (Generative Grammar in Geneva)4. 195–225.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (ed.) 2020Disentangling bare nouns and nominals introduced by a partitive article (Syntax & Semantics 43). Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004437500
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004437500 [Google Scholar]
  45. Ihsane, Tabea & Elisabeth Stark
    (eds.) 2020Shades of partitivity: Formal and areal properties. Special issue ofLinguistics58(3).
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Jackendoff, Ray
    1977X’-Syntax: A study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Jong, Franciska de
    1983 Sommige niet, andere wel: De verklaring van een raadselachtig verschil. GLOT6. 229–246.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Keizer, Evelien
    2007The English Noun Phrase: The nature of linguistic categorization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627699
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627699 [Google Scholar]
  49. Kiparsky, Paul
    1998 Partitive case and aspect. InWilhelm Geuder & Miriam Butt (eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors, 265–307. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
    2001 “A piece of the cake” and “a cup of tea”: partitive and pseudo-partitive nominal constructions in the Circum-Baltic languages. InÖsten Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.), The Circum-Baltic languages. Volume 2: Grammar and Typology, 523–568. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.55.11kop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.55.11kop [Google Scholar]
  51. Lubbe, H. F. A. van der
    1982 Over echte en schijnbare partitieve woordgroepen. Spektator11. 367–378.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Luraghi, Silvia
    . MS. Partitives and differential marking of core arguments: A crosslinguistic survey. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pavia.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. 2013 Partitivi nel latino biblico. InStudi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata42(1). 41–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Luraghi, Silvia & Giovanna Albonico
    . 2021. The partitive article in Old Italian. Early stages in the grammaticalization of the Italian partitive article. InPetra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti eds. Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580), 169–201. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Luraghi, Silvia, Merlijn de Smit & Iván Igartua
    2020 Contact induced change in the languages of Europe: the rise and the development of partitive cases and determiners. Linguistics58(3). 869–903. 10.1515/ling‑2020‑0083
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0083 [Google Scholar]
  56. Luraghi, Silvia & Tuomas Huumo
    2014aIntroduction. InSilvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, 1–13. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110346060.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346060.1 [Google Scholar]
  57. (eds.) 2014bPartitive cases and related categories. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110346060
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346060 [Google Scholar]
  58. Luraghi, Silvia & Seppo Kittilä
    2014 Typology and diachrony of partitive case markers. InSilvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, 17–62. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110346060.17
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346060.17 [Google Scholar]
  59. Miestamo, Matti
    2014 Partitives and negation: a cross-linguistic survey. InSilvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, 63–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110346060.63
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346060.63 [Google Scholar]
  60. Philippa, Marlies, Frans Debrabandere, Arend Quak, Tanneke Schoonheim & Nicoline van der Sijs
    2003Etymologisch woordenboek van het Nederlands, part1. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. etymologiebank.nl
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Rutkowski, Pawel
    2007 The syntactic structure of grammaticalized partitives (pseudopartitives). University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics13(1), Article 26. https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol13/iss1/26
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Schutter, de G.
    1992 Partitief of kwantitatief er, of over de verklaring van syntactische variatie. Taal en Tongval44(1). 15–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Selkirk, Elisabeth
    1977 Some remarks on noun phrase structure. InPeter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax, 285–316. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Seržant, Ilja
    . 2021. Diachronic typology of partitives. InPetra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti eds. Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580) 111–167. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110732221‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110732221-004 [Google Scholar]
  65. Sleeman, Petra
    1998 The quantitative pronoun er in Dutch dialects. InSjef Barbiers, Johan Rooryck & Jeroen van de Weijer (eds.), Small words in the big picture: Squibs for Hans Bennis, 107–111. Leiden: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Sleeman, Petra & Giuliana Giusti
    eds. 2021. Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580). Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110732221
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110732221 [Google Scholar]
  67. Sleeman, Petra & Tabea Ihsane
    2016 Gender mismatches in partitive constructions with superlatives in French. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics1(1), p.35.   10.5334/gjgl.137
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.137 [Google Scholar]
  68. 2020 Convergence and divergence in the expression of partitivity in French, Dutch, and German. Linguistics58(3). 767–804.   10.1515/ling‑2020‑0090
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0090 [Google Scholar]
  69. . 2021. The L2 acquisition of the partitive pronoun en in French by L1 speakers of German and the role of the L1. InPetra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti eds. Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580), 205–236. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110732221‑006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110732221-006 [Google Scholar]
  70. Stickney, Helen
    2004The pseudopartitive and its illusory projections. Ms., University of Massachusetts.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Strobel, Thomas
    2017Pronominale Partitivität: Arealität und Mikrovariation einer morphosyntaktischen Variable in den Varietäten des Deutschen. University of Frankfurt dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Swart, Henriette de
    2006 Aspectual implications of the semantics of plural indefinites. InSvetlana Vogeleer & Liliane Tasmowski (eds.), Non-definiteness and plurality, 161–189. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.95.09swa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.95.09swa [Google Scholar]
  73. Tamm, Anne
    2014 The partitive concept versus linguistic partitives: from abstract concepts to evidentiality in the Uralic languages. InSilvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, 89–152. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110346060.89
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346060.89 [Google Scholar]
  74. Westveer, Thom
    2021Gender mismatches in partitive constructions in French and German: How society shapes language. Amsterdam: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Zwarts, Frans
    1987 Paradigmaloos ‘van’. TABU, Bulletin voor Taalwetenschap17. 184–192.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lv.21020.lur
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lv.21020.lur
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error