Volume 24, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2211-6834
  • E-ISSN: 2211-6842
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Besides its main use as a form of the movement verb ‘to go’, the Spanish form (lit. go) is also used as a verbal discourse marker. Here we trace this transition from a purely verbal form to a discourse marker by searching a historical corpus of documents in Spanish, which reveals the increasing use over time of in exclamatives to replace a presentational construction. We focus on in isolation and in combination with an indefinite DP or a bare NP. We analyze the meaning of as an epistemic discourse marker, by means of which the speaker expresses a judgment, a subjective epistemic and evidential evaluation of a proposition accessible from context. We postulate that these constructions sit in a Judgment Phrase at the syntactic-pragmatic interface (Krifka 2020), a position to which also moves when its meaning is that of an expressive intensifier that directly modifies over one or more (contextually salient) properties of the noun contained in the DP/NP.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra
    2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blakemore, Diane
    1987Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2002Relevance and linguistic meaning: the pragmatics and semantics of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486456
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486456 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brems, Lieselotte, Lobke Ghesquière & Freek Van de Velde
    2014Intersubjectivity and intersubjectification in Grammar and Discourse: Theoretical and descriptive advances. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.65
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.65 [Google Scholar]
  5. Castroviejo, Elena
    2008 Deconstructing exclamations. Catalan Journal of Linguistics7(1). 41–90. 10.5565/rev/catjl.132
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.132 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2020 Exclamatives. InDaniel Gutzmann, Lisa Matthewson, Cécile Meier, Hotze Rullmann & Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics, Wiley. 10.1002/9781118788516.sem020
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118788516.sem020 [Google Scholar]
  7. D’Avis, Franz-Josef
    2002 On the interpretation of wh-clauses in exclamative environments. Theoretical Linguistics. 28(1). 5–32. 10.1515/thli.2002.28.1.5
    https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2002.28.1.5 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2013 8 Exklamativsatz. InJörg Meibauer, Markus Steinbach & Hans Altmann (eds.), Satztypen des Deutschen, 171–201. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110224832.171
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110224832.171 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2017 Exclamatives, Normalcy Conditions and Common Ground. Revue de sémantique et pragmatique. 401. 17–34. 10.4000/rsp.279
    https://doi.org/10.4000/rsp.279 [Google Scholar]
  10. Davidse, Kristin, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens
    2010Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110226102
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102 [Google Scholar]
  11. Demonte, Violeta & Olga Fernández-Soriano
    2013 Evidentials dizque and que in Spanish. Grammaticalization, parameters and the (fine) structure of Comp. Lingüística81. 211–234.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Diewald, Gabriele
    2011 Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics49(2). 365–390. 10.1515/ling.2011.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.011 [Google Scholar]
  13. Espinal, M. Teresa & Xavier Villalba
    . In press. Marcadores de discurso deverbales. InConcepción Company Company ed. Sintaxis Histórica de la Lengua Española, Vol.IV1. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Geurts, Bart
    2019 Communication as commitment sharing: Speech acts, implicatures, common ground. Theoretical Linguistics. 45(1–2). 1–30. 10.1515/tl‑2019‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2019-0001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ghezzi, Chiara & Piera Molinelli
    2014 (eds.). Discourse and pragmatic markers from Latin to the Romance languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681600.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681600.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier
    1996 The semantics of exclamatives. InEdward Garrett & Felicia Lee (eds.), Syntax at Sunset. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics, 146–162. Los Angeles: UCLA.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2001 Spanish exclamatives and the interpretation of the left periphery. InJohan Rooryck, Yves de Hulst & Jan Schroten (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 1999, 167–194. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.221.07gut
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.221.07gut [Google Scholar]
  18. 2008 Spanish root exclamatives at the syntax/semantics interface. Catalan Journal of Linguistics71. 117–133. 10.5565/rev/catjl.134
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.134 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gutzmann, Daniel
    2019The grammar of expressivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198812128.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198812128.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gutzmann, Daniel & Katharina Turgay
    2014 Expressive intensifiers and external degree modification. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics17(3). 185–228. 10.1007/s10828‑014‑9069‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-014-9069-3 [Google Scholar]
  21. Haegeman, Liliane & Virginia Hill
    2013 The syntacticization of discourse. InRaffaella Folli, Christina Sevdali & Robert Truswell (eds.). Syntax and its limits, 370–390. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0018
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0018 [Google Scholar]
  22. Heine, Bernd
    2013 On discourse markers: grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else?Linguistics51(6). 1205–1247. 10.1515/ling‑2013‑0048
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0048 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hickey, Raymond
    (ed.) 2004Motives for language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486937
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486937 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kayne, Richard
    2010 Why isn’t this a complementizer?InComparisons and contrasts, 190–227. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kennedy, Christopher & Louise McNally
    2005 Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language81(2). 345–381. 10.1353/lan.2005.0071
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0071 [Google Scholar]
  26. Krifka, Manfred
    2015 Bias in commitment space semantics: Declarative questions, negated questions, and question tags. InSarah D’Antonio, Mary Moroney, & Carol Rose Little (eds.), Proceedings of SALT251, 328–345. 10.3765/salt.v25i0.3078
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v25i0.3078 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2017 Negated Polarity Questions as Denegations of Assertions. InChungmin Lee, Ferenc Kiefer & Manfred Krifka (eds.), Contrastiveness in information structure, alternatives and scalar Implicatures, 359–398. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑10106‑4_18
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10106-4_18 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2019 Commitments and beyond. Theoretical Linguistics.ç 45(1–2). 73–91. 10.1515/tl‑2019‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2019-0006 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2020 Layers of assertive clauses: Propositions, judgements, commitments, acts. InJutta M. Hartmann & Angelika Wöllstein (eds.), Propositionale Argumente im Sprachvergleich: Theorie und Empirier./Propositional arguments in cross-linguistic research: Theoretical and empirical issues. Gunter Narr Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2021 Modelling Questions in commitment spaces. InMoritz Cordes (ed.), Asking and answering: Rivalling approaches to interrogative methods, 63–95. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Larrivée, Pierre & Cecilia Poletto
    2018 Mapping the syntacticisation of discourse: The case of sentential particles. Foundation for Italian Studies Working Papers11, 45–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Liebert, Wolf-Andreas, Gisela Redeker & Linda R. Waugh
    1997Discourse and perspective in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.151
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.151 [Google Scholar]
  33. Manzini, M. Rita
    2014 The Romance k-complementizers. InPeter Svenonius (Ed.), Functional structure from top to toe, 148–187. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199740390.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199740390.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  34. Marandin, Jean-Marie
    2008 The exclamative clause type in French. InStefan Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the 15th HPSG Conference, 436–456. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 10.21248/hpsg.2008.25
    https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2008.25 [Google Scholar]
  35. Michaelis, Laura A.
    2001 Exclamative constructions. InMartin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wolfgang Raible & Wulf Österreicher (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, vol.21, 1038–1050. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110171549.2.10.1038
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110171549.2.10.1038 [Google Scholar]
  36. Narrog, Heiko
    2015 (Inter) subjectification and its limits in secondary grammaticalization. Language Sciences471. 148–160. 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.07.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.07.010 [Google Scholar]
  37. Octavio de Toledo, Álvaro
    2001 ¿Un viaje de ida y vuelta?: La gramaticalización de “vaya” como marcador y cuantificador. Anuari de Filologia. Secció F, Estudios de lengua y literatura españolas111. 47–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Ortiz Cruz, Demelsa
    2011 En torno a la gramaticalización de vaya como interjección. InElena Carmona & Santiago del Rey Quesada (eds.), Id est, loquetin peritia: aportaciones a la lingüística diacrónica de los jóvenes investigadores de Historiografia e Historia, 323–333. Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Poletto, Cecilia, & Emanuela Sanfelici
    2018 On relative complementizers and relative pronouns. Linguistic Variation18(2). 265–298. 10.1075/lv.16002.pol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.16002.pol [Google Scholar]
  40. Portner, Paul & Raffaella Zanuttini
    2004 The semantics of nominal exclamatives. InReinaldo Elugardo & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), Ellipsis and nonsentential speech, 57–67. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑2301‑4_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2301-4_3 [Google Scholar]
  41. Potts, Chris
    2005The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273829.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273829.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2007 The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics33(2). 165–198. 10.1515/TL.2007.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TL.2007.011 [Google Scholar]
  43. Real Academia Española
    Real Academia Española 2010Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Real Academia Española
    Real Academia Española 2021Diccionario de la lengua española, [v. 23.5 online]. https://dle.rae.es (March 22nd, 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Real-Puigdollers, Cristina, M. Teresa Espinal & Xavier Villalba
    2022Vaya in Spanish. From a judgement to a commitment marker. Ms. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Rett, Jessica
    2011 Exclamatives, degrees and speech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy34(5). 411–442. 10.1007/s10988‑011‑9103‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-011-9103-8 [Google Scholar]
  47. 2021 The Semantics of Emotive Markers and Other Illocutionary Content. Journal of Semantics. 38(2). 305–340. 10.1093/jos/ffab005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffab005 [Google Scholar]
  48. Rizzi, Luigi
    1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. InLiliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  49. Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou
    2003Syntactic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486326
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486326 [Google Scholar]
  50. Rosengren, Inger
    1992 Zur Grammatik und Pragmatik der Exklamation. InInger Rosengren (ed.), Satz und Illokution. vol.11, 263–306. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783111353210.263
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111353210.263 [Google Scholar]
  51. 1997 Expressive sentence types: A contradiction in terms. The case of exclamation. InToril Swan & Olaf Westvik (eds.), Modality in Germanic Languages. Historical and Comparative Perspectives, 38–68. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110889932.151
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110889932.151 [Google Scholar]
  52. Sadock, Jerrold M. & Arnold M. Zwicky
    1985 Speech act distinctions in syntax. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Volume I: Clause structure, 155–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Sánchez López, Cristina & Álvaro Octavio de Toledo
    2010 À propos de la distribution et de l’évolution des schémas de quantification interrogative et exclamative dans les langues romanes. InMaria Iliescu, Heidi Siller-Runggaldier & Paul Danler (eds.), Congrès international de linguistique et de philologie romanes, 507–522. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110231922.2‑507
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110231922.2-507 [Google Scholar]
  54. Sánchez López, Cristina
    2017 Mirativity in Spanish. Review of Cognitive Linguistics. 15(2). 489–514. 10.1075/rcl.15.2.08san
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.15.2.08san [Google Scholar]
  55. Sassoon, Galit Weidman
    2013 A typology of multidimensional adjectives. Journal of Semantics30(3). 335–380. 10.1093/jos/ffs012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffs012 [Google Scholar]
  56. Sassoon, Galit Weidman & Julie Fadlon
    2017 The role of dimensions in classification under predicates predicts their status in degree constructions. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics. 2(1). 10.5334/gjgl.155
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.155 [Google Scholar]
  57. Speas, Peggy & Carol L. Tenny
    2003 Configurational properties of point of view roles. InAnna Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), Asymmetry in grammar, 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.57.15spe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.57.15spe [Google Scholar]
  58. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
    1986Relevance: Communication and cognition. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Talmy, Leonard
    2000Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Tanghe, Sanne
    2013 Acerca de los intensificadores vaya y qué: un estudio comparativo. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies90(7). 751–770. 10.3828/bhs.2013.46
    https://doi.org/10.3828/bhs.2013.46 [Google Scholar]
  61. 2016Marcadores derivados de verbos de movimiento. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110489019
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110489019 [Google Scholar]
  62. Tirado, Irene
    2016 Aproximación sintáctica a las oraciones exclamativas del español. Borealis5(2). 191–219. 10.7557/
    https://doi.org/10.7557/ [Google Scholar]
  63. Traugott, Elisabeth Closs & Bernd Heine
    1991Approaches to grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    1982 From propositional to textual and expressive meanings; some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. InWinfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics, 245–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.24.09clo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.24.09clo [Google Scholar]
  65. 1995 Subjectification in grammaticalisation. InDieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003 [Google Scholar]
  66. 2003 From subjectification to intersubjectification. InRaymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, 124–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486937.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486937.009 [Google Scholar]
  67. 2008 Historical pragmatics. InLaurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 538–561. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756959.ch24
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756959.ch24 [Google Scholar]
  68. 2010 Revisiting subjectification and intersubjectification. InKristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–70. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. 2014 Toward a constructional framework for research on language change. Cognitive Linguistic Studies1(1). 3–21. 10.1075/cogls.1.1.01tra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.1.1.01tra [Google Scholar]
  70. Verhagen, Arie
    2005Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Villalba, Xavier
    2008 Exclamatives: A thematic guide with many questions and few answers. Catalan Journal of Linguistics71. 9–40. 10.5565/rev/catjl.131
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.131 [Google Scholar]
  72. 2017 Exclamatives, imperatives, optatives. InAndreas Dufter & Elisabeth Stark (Eds.), Manual of Romance morphosyntax and syntax. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110377088‑017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110377088-017 [Google Scholar]
  73. Villalba, Xavier & Anna Bartra-Kaufmann
    2010 Predicate focus fronting in the Spanish determiner phrase. Lingua120(4). 819–849. 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.07.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.07.010 [Google Scholar]
  74. Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber
    1993 Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua90(1). 1–25. 10.1016/0024‑3841(93)90058‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(93)90058-5 [Google Scholar]
  75. 2012Meaning and relevance. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139028370
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370 [Google Scholar]
  76. Zanuttini, Raffaella & Paul Portner
    2003 Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language79(1). 39–81. 10.1353/lan.2003.0105
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0105 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): epistemicity; exclamatives; expressivity; verbal discourse marker
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error