1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Linguistic Variation
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Multifunctionality and contextual realization
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper aims to make a contribution to the study of the nature of syntactic categories by analysing a single element in a single language, namely the marker in Yixing Chinese. Although this marker has previously been analysed as an adjectivaliser (Hu and Perry 2018), we show that it has a much broader range of uses. We suggest that the bulk of cases can be captured in a unified way by supposing that the marker in question displays a type of possessive semantics (which we label ), which is defined by delineating a (in the sense of e.g. Carlson 1977; Chierchia 1998), with similar semantics being expressed by adjectival elements in languages such as English. It is observed, however, that this meaning can emerge in the absence of the marker , and that can, in a restricted set of cases, surface in the absence of this meaning, and we suggest that these facts are attributable to the diachronic development of the marker and can be captured synchronically by making use of late-insertion mechanisms for phonological and semantic features. We propose that the case of provides a suggestive argument for a approach to syntactic features, whereby syntactic features are not inherently specified for interface interpretations. Other cross-linguistic implications of our analysis are noted, in particular for the representation of adjectives.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lv.22013.per
2024-03-04
2024-12-02

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lv.22013.per
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baker, Mark & William Croft
    2017 Lexical categories: legacy, lacuna, and opportunities for functionalists and formalists. Annual Review of Linguistics. –. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011516‑034134
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011516-034134 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, Mark C.
    2003 Lexical categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615047
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615047 [Google Scholar]
  3. Beard, Robert
    1976 Once more on the analysis of ed-adjectives. Journal of Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S0022226700004850
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700004850 [Google Scholar]
  4. Beck, David
    2002 The typology of parts of speech systems: the markedness of adjectives. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Carlson, Gregory N.
    1977 Reference to kinds in English. University of Massachusetts, Amherst dissertation.
  6. Chafe, Wallace
    2012 Are adjectives universal? the case of Northern Iroquoian. Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chan, Marjorie & Hongmo Ren
    1989 Wuxi tone sandhi: from last to first syllable dominance. Acta Linguista Hafniensia. –. 10.1080/03740463.1988.10416058
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.1988.10416058 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chao, Yuen Ren
    1926 北京, 蘇州,常州語助詞的研究 [A study of particles in Beijing, Suzhou and Changzhou dialects]. 清華學報 [Tsing Hua journal of Chinese studies] . –.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. 1928 [2011] 現代吳語的研究 [Studies of the modern Wu dialects]. Beijing: Commercial Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Rint Sybesma
    2009 De 的 as an underspecified classifier: first explorations. 语言学论丛 [Yuyanxue Luncong] . –.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Chierchia, Gennaro
    1998 Reference to kinds across language. Natural Language Semantics(). –. 10.1023/A:1008324218506
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008324218506 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chomsky, Noam
    1970 Remarks on nominalization. InRoderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in english transformational grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. 1995 The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Chung, Sandra
    2012 Are lexical categories universal? the view from chamorro. Theoretical Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/tl‑2012‑0001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2012-0001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Collins, Chris & Edward Stabler
    2016 A formalization of Minimalist Syntax. Syntax(). –. 10.1111/synt.12117
     https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12117 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dixon, R. M. W.
    1977 Where have all the adjectives gone?Studies in Language. –. 10.1075/sl.1.1.04dix
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.1.1.04dix [Google Scholar]
  17. Dixon, R. M. W. & Alexandra Aikhenvald
    (eds.) 2004 Adjective classes: a crosslinguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199270934.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199270934.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. (eds.) 2012 Possession and ownership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Duffield, Nigel
    2017 On what projects in Vietnamese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics(). –. 10.1007/s10831‑017‑9161‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-017-9161-1 [Google Scholar]
  20. Embick, David & Rolf Noyer
    2001 Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry(). –. 10.1162/002438901753373005
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438901753373005 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ernst, Thomas
    1995 Negation in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory(). –. 10.1007/BF00992855
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992855 [Google Scholar]
  22. Evans, Nicholas & Stephen C. Levinson
    2009 The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sci ences. –. 10.1017/S0140525X0999094X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999094X [Google Scholar]
  23. Francez, Itamar & Andrew Koontz-Garboden
    2015 Semantic variation and the grammar of property concepts. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2015.0047
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2015.0047 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2017 Semantics and morphosyntactic variation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198744580.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198744580.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Francis, Elaine J. & Stephen Matthews
    2005 A multi-dimensional approach to the category ‘verb’ in Cantonese. Journal of Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S0022226705003270
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226705003270 [Google Scholar]
  26. Gil, David
    2005 Word order without syntactic categories: how Riau Indonesian does it. InAndrew Carnie, Heidi Harley & Sheila Ann Dooley (eds.), Verb first: on the syntax of verb-initial languages, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.73.17gil
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.73.17gil [Google Scholar]
  27. Grano, Thomas
    2012 Mandarin hen and universal markedness in gradable adjectives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory(). –. 10.1007/s11049‑011‑9161‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9161-1 [Google Scholar]
  28. Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
    1993 Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. InKenneth L. Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Haspelmath, Martin
    2007 Pre-established categories don’t exist: consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/LINGTY.2007.011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/LINGTY.2007.011 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2010 Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2010.0021
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0021 [Google Scholar]
  31. Heine, Bernd
    1997 Possession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511581908
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581908 [Google Scholar]
  32. Higginbotham, James
    1985 On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Hirtle, W. H.
    1970 -ed adjectives like ‘verandahed’ and ‘blue-eyed’. Journal of Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S0022226700002334
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700002334 [Google Scholar]
  34. Holmberg, Anders
    2015 The syntax of yes and no. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701859.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701859.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hu, Xuhui
    2023 Bundling telicity, verbal quantification and perfective aspect: a study on lә in Yixing Chinese. Journal of Linguistics (FirstView). 10.1017/S0022226723000063
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226723000063 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hu, Xuhui & J. Joseph Perry
    2018 The syntax and phonology of non-compositional compounds in Yixing Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory(). –. 10.1007/s11049‑017‑9386‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9386-8 [Google Scholar]
  37. Huang, C. T. James
    1988 Wo pao de kuai and Chinese phrase structure. Language(). –. 10.2307/415435
     https://doi.org/10.2307/415435 [Google Scholar]
  38. Huang, He
    2016 荆音韵汇:两百年前的宜兴话 [Jing Yin Yun Hui: Yixing dialect two hundred years ago]. Shanghai: Zhong Xi Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 2017a 从地理语言学的角度看地名学的语言学功能 [A geolinguistic approach to toponymy]. 中國言語硏究 [Studies in Chinese Language] . –.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. 2017b 同音冲突的地理格局触发官话化 [Mandarinization triggered by the geographical pattern of homonymic collision]. 语言学论丛 [Yuyanxue Lungcong] . –.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. 2017c 多维接触与语言扩散模型 [Multidimensional contact and language diffusion models]. 中国语文 [Studies of the Chinese Language] . –.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. 2017d 社会地理语言学视野下的微观方言研究 [Microstudies of dialects from the view of social and geographical linguistics]. Peking University dissertation.
  43. Huang, Zhaoyan
    2005 方言“佬”的性质 [The nature of ‘lao’ in dialects]. 广西社会科学 [Journal of Guangxi Social Sciences] . –.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Hudson, R. A.
    1975 Problems in the analysis of ed-adjectives. Journal of Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S002222670000428X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222670000428X [Google Scholar]
  45. Kaufman, Daniel
    2012 Austronesian nominalism and its consequences: a Tagalog case study. Theoretical Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/THLI.2009.001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/THLI.2009.001 [Google Scholar]
  46. Krifka, Manfred, Francis Jeffry Pelletier, Gregory N. Carlson, Alice ter Meulen, Godehard Link & Gennaro Chierchia
    1995 Genericity: an introduction. InGregory N. Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.), The generic book, –. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Li, Yen-hui Audrey
    2012 de in Mandarin e in Taiwanese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Lin, Tzong-Hong Jonah
    2015 Tense in Mandarin Chinese sentences. Syntax(). –. 10.1111/synt.12032
     https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12032 [Google Scholar]
  49. Lin, Jo-wang
    2010 A tenseless analysis of Mandarin Chinese revisited: a response to Sybesma 2007. Linguistic Inquiry(). –. 10.1162/ling.2010.41.2.305
     https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2010.41.2.305 [Google Scholar]
  50. Marantz, Alec
    1997 No escape from syntax: don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Marvin, Tatjana
    2002 Topics in the stress and syntax of words. MIT dissertation.
  52. McCawley, James D.
    1992 Justifying part-of-speech assignments in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Mitrović, Moreno & Phoevos Panagiotidis
    2020 Adjectives exist, adjectivisers do not: a bicategorial typology. Glossa(). . 10.5334/gjgl.940
     https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.940 [Google Scholar]
  54. Nevins, Andrew & Neil Myler
    2014 A brown-eyed girl. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Nichols, Johanna
    1988 On alienable and inalienable possession. InWilliam Shipley (ed.), In honor of Mary Haas, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110852387.557
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110852387.557 [Google Scholar]
  56. Nichols, Johanna & Balthasar Bickel
    2013 Possessive classification. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures (online). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Paul, Waltraud
    2005a Adjectival modification in Mandarin Chinese and related issues. Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/ling.2005.43.4.757
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2005.43.4.757 [Google Scholar]
  58. 2005b Adjectives in Mandarin Chinese: the rehabilitation of a much ostracized category. InPatricia Cabredo Hofherr & Ora Matushansky (eds.), Adjectives: formal analyses in syntax and semantics, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.153.04pau
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.153.04pau [Google Scholar]
  59. 2012 Why Chinese de is not like French de: a critical analysis of the predicational approach to nominal modification. Studies in Chinese Linguistics(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. 2015 New perspectives on Chinese syntax. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110338775
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110338775 [Google Scholar]
  61. Perry, J. Joseph
    2016 Tone and prosodic constituency in Gyalsumdo. University of Cambridge dissertation.
  62. . Ms. Mapping and pruning: an approach to prosodification. Available at: https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/004275
  63. Pietsch, Lukas
    2005 “Some do and some doesn’t”: verbal concord variation in the north of the British Isles. InBernd Kortmann, Tanja Hermann, Lukas Pietsch & Susanne Wagner (eds.), A comparative grammar of British English dialects. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197518.125
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197518.125 [Google Scholar]
  64. Shi, Youwei
    1982 常州方言的“佬” [‘Lao’ in Changzhou dialect]. 中国语文 [Studies of the Chinese Language] (). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Snyder, William
    2012 Parameter theory and motion predicates. InVioleta Demonte & Louise McNally (eds.), Telicity, change and state: a categorial view of event structure, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693498.003.0011
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693498.003.0011 [Google Scholar]
  66. Sybesma, Rint
    2007 Whether we tense-agree overtly or not. Linguistic Inquiry(). –. 10.1162/ling.2007.38.3.580
     https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.3.580 [Google Scholar]
  67. Tham, Shiao Wei
    2013 Change of state verbs and result state adjectives in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S0022226713000261
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226713000261 [Google Scholar]
  68. Tsujioka, Takae
    2002 The syntax of possession in Japanese. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Wetzer, Harrie
    1996 Nouniness and verbiness: a typological study of adjectival predication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110813586
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110813586 [Google Scholar]
  70. Wood, Jim
    2015 Icelandic morphosyntax and argument structure. Springer: Dordrecht. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑09138‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09138-9 [Google Scholar]
  71. 2023 Icelandic nominalizations and allosemy. Manuscript available at: https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/005004. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198865155.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198865155.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  72. Wood, Jim & Alec Marantz
    2017 The interpretation of external arguments. InRoberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Ángel J. Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Yip, Virginia & Stephen Matthews
    2011 Cantonese: a comprehensive grammar (2nd edition). New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. You, Xiaohui
    2004 浅谈“佬” 字的音义 [An initial discussion of the sound and meaning of ‘lao’]. 西南民族大学学报 [Journal of Southwest Minzu University] . –.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Zeijlstra, Hedde
    2008 On the syntactic flexibility of formal features. InTheresa Biberauer (ed.), The limits of syntactic variation, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.132.06zei
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.132.06zei [Google Scholar]
  76. 2020 Labeling, selection and feature checking. InPeter W. Smith, Johannes Mursell & Katharina Hartmann (eds.), Agree to agree: agreement in the Minimalist Programme, –. Berlin: Language Science Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Zhang, Niina Ning
    2012 De and the functional expansion of classifiers. Language and Linguistics(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Zhu, Keyi
    2002 名词后缀“佬” 的感情色彩 [The emotion connotation of noun suffix ‘lao’]. 咬文嚼字 [Digesting Words] . –.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lv.22013.per
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: Minimalist Syntax ; adjectives ; Yixing Chinese ; contextual allomorphy ; contextual allosemy ; Distributed Morphology

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error