1887
image of Tap/trill variation and change across generations of Spanish-Creole bilinguals in San Andrés, Colombia
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This work examines the behavior of vibrant (presenting linguo-alveolar contact) tap/trill variation across generations of bilingual Afro-Caribbean speakers of Spanish and an English-Lexifier Creole, known here as Raizal Creole, in the Archipelago of San Andrés, Colombia. In these islands, a bilingual Spanish variety, known here as Raizal Spanish, coexists with a monolingual Spanish variety spoken by Colombian immigrants (Costeño Spanish). Data consists of over 3,300 tokens (867 trills and 2531 taps) compared across three generations of Raizal Spanish speakers with a sample of 528 segments (133 trills and 395 taps) produced in Costeño Spanish. Results show that although the frequency of use of vibrant taps and trills in younger generations increasingly resembles those presented in the monolingual variety, the behavior of rhotic variation is different in both Spanish varieties. In addition, non-vibrant or approximant variants are increasingly prevalent in the first and second generation informants with rates doubling those of the younger generation and monolingual Costeño Spanish. Results of the cross-variety comparison show that Raizal Spanish displays a generational continuity where a restructuring of the constraint ordering starts in the second generation and is completed with younger Raizales. On the contrary, Costeño Spanish behaves differently in terms of the systematic linguistic conditionings. The evidence suggests that rhotic variation has changed internally within both varieties.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lv.22021.res
2024-03-25
2024-10-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aaron, J. E.
    (2006) Variation and change in Spanish future temporal expression: Rates, constraints, and grammaticization (Doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico).
  2. (2010) Pushing the envelope: Looking beyond the variable context. Language variation and change, (), –. 10.1017/S0954394509990226
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394509990226 [Google Scholar]
  3. Aaron, J. E., & Hernández, J. E.
    (2007) Quantitative evidence for contact-induced accommodation. Spanish in contact: Policy, social and linguistic inquiries, .
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Restrepo-Ramos, F.
    (2019) A sociophonetic analysis of Islander Creole rhotics. Proceedings of the Florida Linguistics Yearly Meeting, (), pp.–.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2021) Non-vibrant bilingual rhotics in a Creole-Spanish Contact Scenario. IULC Working Papers, ().
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (2022a) Neutralization of the tap/trill contrast in the bilingual Spanish-Creole community of the Archipelago of San Andres, Colombia. Ikala: Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, (). 10.17533/udea.ikala.v27n1a07
    https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v27n1a07 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2022b) Converging paths of variation: Bilingual rhotics and linguistic change in the Archipelago of San Andres, Colombia. Isogloss: Open Journal of Romance Linguistics (). 10.5565/rev/isogloss.115
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.115 [Google Scholar]
  8. Balam, O.
    (2013) Neutralization of the intervocalic rhotic contrast in Northern Belizean Spanish. Borealis–An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, (), –. 10.7557/1.2.2.2601
    https://doi.org/10.7557/1.2.2.2601 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bartens, A.
    (2009) A comparison of the English-based Creoles of Nicaragua and San Andrés and Old Providence. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (2013) San Andrés Creole English. The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bickerton, D.
    (1975) Dynamics of a Creole system (pp.–). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Blecua, B.
    (2001) Las vibrantes del español: manifestaciones acústicas y procesos fonéticos. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona dissertation.
  13. Boersma, P. & Weenink, D.
    (2022) Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.2.09, retrieved15 February 2022fromwww.praat.org/
  14. Bradley, T., & Willis, E.
    (2012) Rhotic variation and contrast in Veracruz Mexican Spanish. Estudios de fonética experimental, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cicres, J., & Blecua, B.
    (2015) Caracterización acústica de las róticas fricativas prepausales en español peninsular. Loquens (), –. 10.3989/loquens.2015.019
    https://doi.org/10.3989/loquens.2015.019 [Google Scholar]
  16. Colantoni, L.
    (2006) Increasing periodicity to reduce similarity: an acoustic account of deassibilation in rhotics. InSelected proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonetics and Phonology (pp.–). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Constitution of the Republic of Colombia
    Constitution of the Republic of Colombia (1991) [Online] Accessed in January 2018. Retrieved from: www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/inicio/Constitucion%20politica%20de%20Colombia.pdf
  18. DANE
    DANE (2005) 2005 Census of Colombia. [Online] Accessed onOctober 2020. Available on the Web: systema59.dane.gov.co/cgibin/RpWebEngine.exe/PortalAction?&MODE=MAIN&BASE=CG2005BASICO&MAIN=WebServerMain.inl
  19. DANE
    DANE (2018) 2018 Census of Colombia. [Online] Accessed inMarch 2022. Available on the Web: systema59.dane.gov.co/bincol/RpWebEngine.exe/Portal?BASE=CNPVBASE4V2&lang=esp
  20. De Friedemann, Nina
    (1989) Religión y tradición oral en San Andrés y Providencia. InSan Andrés y Providencia: Tradiciones culturales y coyuntura política, edited byIsabel Clemente. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Díaz-Campos, M.
    (2008) Variable production of the trill in spontaneous speech: Sociolinguistic implications. InSelected proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology (pp.–).
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Dittmann, M.
    (1992) El criollo sanAndrésano: Lengua y cultura. Cali: Universidad del Valle.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Enciso-Patiño, P.
    (2004) Estado del arte de la etnoeducación en Colombia con énfasis en política pública. Colombia. Ministerio de Educación Nacional.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Espy-Wilson, C. Y., Boyce, S. E., Jackson, M., Narayanan, S., & Alwan, A.
    (2000) Acoustic modeling of American English/r. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, (), –. 10.1121/1.429469
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.429469 [Google Scholar]
  25. Ferguson, C. A.
    (1990) From esses to aitches: identifying pathways of diachronic change. Studies in Typology and Diachrony for Joseph H. Greenberg. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, –. 10.1075/tsl.20.06fer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.20.06fer [Google Scholar]
  26. Florez, S.
    (2006) A Study of language attitudes in two Creole-speaking islands: San Andrés and Providence (Colombia). Ikala, Revista de lenguaje y cultura, () pp.–. 10.17533/udea.ikala.2783
    https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.2783 [Google Scholar]
  27. Foulkes, P., & Docherty, G.
    (2006) The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of phonetics, (), –. 10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  28. Garrett, A., Bowern, C., & Evans, B.
    (2015) Sound change. The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. González, G.
    (2004) Los nuevos Pañamanes en la isla de San Andrés. Maguare, ().
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Gries, S.
    (2019) On classification trees and random forests in corpus linguistics: Some words of caution and suggestions for improvement. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, (), –. 10.1515/cllt‑2018‑0078
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2018-0078 [Google Scholar]
  31. Grimes, B.
    (2000) Ethnologue: Languages of the world. 14th edition. Dallas: SIL International.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hagiwara, R. E.
    (1995) Acoustic realizations of American /r/ as produced by women and men. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics No. 90. Los Angeles, CA: University of California
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hammond, R.
    (1999) On the non-occurrence of the phone [r)] in the Spanish sound system. Advances in Hispanic Linguistics, ed. byJavier Gutiérrez-Rexach and Fernando Martínez-Gil, –. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Henriksen, N., & Willis, E.
    (2010) Acoustic characterization of phonemic trill production in Jerezano Andalusian Spanish. InSelected proceedings of the 4th Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology (pp.–). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Henriksen, N.
    (2014) Sociophonetic analysis of phonemic trill variation in two sub-varieties of Peninsular Spanish. Journal of Linguistic Geography, (), –. 10.1017/jlg.2014.1
    https://doi.org/10.1017/jlg.2014.1 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hualde, J. I.
    (2005) The sounds of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras “José Benito Vives de Andrés”
    Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras “José Benito Vives de Andrés” (2012) Atlas de la reserva de biósfera Seaflower: Archipiélago de San Andrés, Providencia y Santa Catalina. InGómez-López (Eds.). San Andrés Isla, Colombia. Retrieved from: www.observatorio.biosferaseaflower.org/index.php/es/publicaciones/item/361-atlas-de-la-reserva-debiosfera-seaflower
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Johnson, D.
    (2009) Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and linguistics compass, (), –. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2008.00108.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00108.x [Google Scholar]
  39. Kawahara, S.
    (2010) Praat Script for Automatic Extraction of Formant Frequencies [Online]Accessed onJanuary 2018. Retrieved from: user.keio.ac.jp/~kawahara/resource.html
  40. Labov, W.
    (1984) Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. InLanguage in use: readings in sociolinguistics. John Baugh and Joel Sherzer (eds), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. (2001) Principles of linguistic change, Volume 2: Social factors. Language in Society Oxford, .
    [Google Scholar]
  42. (2010) Principles of linguistic change, volume 3: Cognitive and cultural factors (Vol.). John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781444327496
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444327496 [Google Scholar]
  43. Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I.
    (1996) The sounds of the world’s languages (Vol.). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Lastra, Y., & Butragueño, P. M.
    (2006) Un posible cambio en curso: el caso de las vibrantes en la ciudad de México. Estudios sociolingüísticos del español de España y América, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Law 47
  46. Law 1381
    Law 1381 (2010) [Online] Accessed inJanuary 2018. Retrieved from: www.mincultura.gov.co/areas/poblaciones/publicaciones/Documents/Ley%20de%20Lenguas%202013.pdf
  47. Lennes, M.
    (2002) Praat Script for Automatic Extraction of Segmental Duration[Online] Accessed onJanuary 2018. Retrieved from: phonetics.linguistics.ucla.edu/facilities/acoustic/praat.html
  48. Lewis, A.
    (2004) Coarticulatory effects on Spanish trill production. InProceedings of the 2003 Texas Linguistics Society Conference (Vol., p.).
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Lopez Alonzo, K. I.
    (2016) Rhotic production in the Spanish of Bluefields, Nicaragua, a language contact situation (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University).
  50. Mayer, M.
    (1969) Frog, where are you?New York: Dial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Meyerhoff, M.
    (2009) Replication, transfer, and calquing: Using variation as a tool in the study of language contact. Language Variation and Change, (), –. 10.1017/S0954394509990196
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394509990196 [Google Scholar]
  52. Morren, R.
    (2001) Creole-based trilingual education in the Caribbean archipelago of San Andrés, Providence and Santa Catalina. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, (), –. 10.1080/01434630108666434
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630108666434 [Google Scholar]
  53. Moya-Chaves, D.
    (2014) La situación sociolingüística de la lengua Creole de San Andrés Isla: el caso de San Luis. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, (), –. 10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2014.1.a05
    https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2014.1.a05 [Google Scholar]
  54. Nagy, N., & Irwin, P.
    (2010) Boston (r): Neighbo (r) s nea (r) and fa (r). Language Variation and Change, (), –. 10.1017/S0954394510000062
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394510000062 [Google Scholar]
  55. Natvig, D.
    (2022) Variation and stability of American Norwegian/r/in contact. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1075/lab.20085.nat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.20085.nat [Google Scholar]
  56. Patiño Rosselli, C.
    (1992) La criollística y las lenguas criollas de Colombia. Thesaurus: Boletín del Instituto Caro y Cuervo, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Picard, M.
    (1997) English Flapping and the feature [vibrant]. English Language & Linguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S136067430000054X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S136067430000054X [Google Scholar]
  58. Recasens, D.
    (1991) On the production characteristics of apicoalveolar taps and trills, Journal of Phonetics, , –. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30344‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30344-4 [Google Scholar]
  59. Ross, J.
    (2007) Routes for roots: entering the 21st century in San Andrés Island, Colombia. Caribbean Studies, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Sankoff, D., & Thibault, P.
    (1981) Weak complementarity: Tense and aspect in Montreal French. Syntactic change, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Solé, M.
    (2002) Aerodynamic characteristics of trills and phonological patterning. Journal of Phonetics, , –. 10.1006/jpho.2002.0179
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2002.0179 [Google Scholar]
  62. Stemberger, J. P., & Bernhardt, B. M.
    (2018) Tap and trill clusters in typical and protracted phonological development: Challenging segments in complex phonological environments. Introduction to the special issue. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, (), –. 10.1080/02699206.2017.1370019
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2017.1370019 [Google Scholar]
  63. Tagliamonte, S. A.
    (2006) Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511801624
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801624 [Google Scholar]
  64. (2012) Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change. Observation, Interpretation. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Tagliamonte, S., & Baayen, R.
    (2012) Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change, (), –. 10.1017/S0954394512000129
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394512000129 [Google Scholar]
  66. Thomas, E.
    (2011) Sociophonetics: An introduction. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑28561‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-28561-4 [Google Scholar]
  67. Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M.
    (1968) Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. InWinfred P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics (–). University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Weissglass, C. A.
    (2014) Spanish stop-rhotic sequences in Spanish-Basque bilinguals and second language learners: An acoustic study (Doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University).
  69. Willis, E.
    (2007) An acoustic study of the ‘pre-aspirated trill’in narrative Cibaeño Dominican Spanish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, (), –. 10.1017/S0025100306002799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100306002799 [Google Scholar]
  70. Zahler, S., & Daidone, D.
    (2014) A variationist account of trill/r/usage in the Spanish of Málaga. IULC Working Papers, ().
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lv.22021.res
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lv.22021.res
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: comparative approach ; Raizal Spanish ; rhotics ; variationist sociolinguistics
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error