oa Methods for studying variation in partitives

References

1. Barbiers, Sjef
   2017 Kwantitatief er en ze. Nederlandse Taalkunde22(2).163–187. 10.5117/NEDTAA2017.2.BARB
   https://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2017.2.BARB [Google Scholar]
2. Berends, Sanne
   2019 Acquiring Dutch quantitative ER. Amsterdam: LOT Publications 547.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Brandner, Ellen
   2024 The indefinite article as an exponent for partition. InElvira Glaser, Petra Sleeman, Thomas Strobel & Anne Tamm (eds.), Partitive constructions and partitive elements within and across language borders in Europe (Linguaggio e Variazione. Variation in Language), 19–54. Venice: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari. https://edizionicafoscari.unive.it/it/edizioni/libri/978-88-6969-795-1/10.30687/978‑88‑6969‑795‑1/002
   https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-795-1/002 [Google Scholar]
4. Bricmont, Jean & Julie Franck
   2010 Chomsky, France, reason, power. InJulie Franck & Jean Bricmon (eds.). Chomsky notebook, 53–73. Columbia University Press. 10.7312/bric14474‑004
   https://doi.org/10.7312/bric14474-004 [Google Scholar]
5. Buchstaller, Isabelle & Karen P. Corrigan
   2011a How to make intuitions succeed. InApril McMahon & Warren Maguire (eds.), Analysing variation in English, 30–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511976360.003
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976360.003 [Google Scholar]
6. Buchstaller, Isabelle & Karen P. Corrigan
   2011b Judge not lest ye be judged: Exploring methods for the collection of socio-syntactic data. InFrans Gregersen, Jeffrey K. Parrott & Pia Quist. (eds.), Language variation – European perspectivesIII1, 149–160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/silv.7.12buc
   https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.7.12buc [Google Scholar]
7. Cardinaletti, Anna & Giuliana Giusti
   2018 Indefinite determiners: Variation and optionality in italo-romance. InRoberta D’Alessandro & Diego Pescarini (eds.), Advances in dialectology. Sketches of Italo-Romance grammars, 135–161. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004354395_008
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004354395_008 [Google Scholar]
8. Chaika, Lesia, Natalia Lehka, Anne Tamm & Natalia Vaiss
   2024 Ukrainian aspect and object case in ukTenTen. The partitive genitive of perfective verbs and mass nouns. InElvira Glaser, Petra Sleeman, Thomas Strobel & Anne Tamm (eds.), Partitive constructions and partitive elements within and across language borders in Europe (Linguaggio e Variazione. Variation in Language), 173–223. Venice: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari. https://edizionicafoscari.unive.it/it/edizioni/libri/978-88-6969-795-1/10.30687/978‑88‑6969‑795‑1/008
   https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-795-1/008 [Google Scholar]
9. Chomsky, Noam
   1965 Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Coppen, Peter-Arno, Walter Haeseryn & Folkert de Vriend
    2012 Electronic ANS (Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst, Dutch Reference Grammar). https://e-ans.ivdnt.org/
11. Cornips, Leonie
    1994 Syntactische variatie in het algemeen Nederlands van Heerlen. [Syntactic variation in Heerlen Dutch]. Amsterdam: IFOTT, University of Amsterdam PhD dissertation.
12. Cornips, Leonie & Cecilia Poletto
    2005 On standardising syntactic elicitation techniques (part 1). Lingua1151, 939–957. 10.1016/j.lingua.2003.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2003.11.004 [Google Scholar]
13. Corver, Norbert, Marjo van Koppen & Huib Kranendonk
    2013 De nominale woordgroep vanuit dialect-vergelijkend perspectief. Variaties en generalisaties [The noun phrase in Dutch dialects from a comparative perspective. Variations and generalisations]. Nederlandse Taalkunde181, 107–137. 10.5117/NEDTAA2013.2.CORV
    https://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2013.2.CORV [Google Scholar]
14. CoSTeP corpus
    CoSTeP corpus: https://pub.cl.uzh.ch/wiki/public/costep/start
15. D’Arcy, Alexandra
    2011 Corpora: Capturing language in use. InWarren Maguire & April McMahon (eds.), Analysing variation in English, 49–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511976360.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976360.004 [Google Scholar]
16. Etxeberria, Urtzi
    2021 The partitive marker in Basque and its relation to bare nouns and the definite article. InPetra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580), 319–355. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110732221‑010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110732221-010 [Google Scholar]
17. Falco, Michelangelo & Roberto Zamparelli
    2019 Partitives and partitivity. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics4(1): 111. 10.5334/gjgl.642
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.642 [Google Scholar]
18. Gelderen, Elly van
    2004 Grammaticalization as economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.71
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.71 [Google Scholar]
19. Gerards, David Paul
    2020 Bare partitives in Old Spanish and Old Portuguese. Zurich: University of Zurich PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gerards, David Paul & Elisabeth Stark
    2020 Why “partitive articles” do not exist in Old Spanish. InTabea Ihsane (ed.), Disentangling bare nouns and nominals introduced by a partitive article, 105–139. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004437500_005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004437500_005 [Google Scholar]
21. Gerards, David Paul & Elisabeth Stark
    2022 Non-maximal definites in Romance. InMarco Bril, Martine Coene, Tabea Ihsane & Petra Sleeman (eds.), RLLT19, special issue ofIsogloss. Open Journal of Romance Linguistics8(5)/5, 1–35. 10.5565/rev/isogloss.236
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.236 [Google Scholar]
22. Giusti, Giuliana & Petra Sleeman
    2021 Partitive elements in the languages of Europe. An advancement in the understanding of a multifaceted phenomenon. InPetra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580), 1–30. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110732221‑001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110732221-001 [Google Scholar]
23. Graën, Johannes, Dolores Batinic & Martin Volk
    2014 Cleaning the Europarl corpus for linguistic applications. InJosef Ruppenhofer & Gertrud Faaß (eds.), Proceedings of the 12th edition of the KONVENS conference, 222–227, Hildesheim: Universitätsverlag Hildesheim.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Haeseryn, Walter, Kirsten Romijn, Guido Geerts, Jaap de Rooij, Maarten van den Toorn
    1997 Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst. 2nd ed.Deurne: Wolters Plantyn.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hoeksema, Jack
    1984 Partitives. Ms., University of Groningen.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hoeksema, Jacob
    (ed.) 1996 Partitives: Studies on the syntax and semantics of partitive and related constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110908985
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110908985 [Google Scholar]
27. Hoffmann, Thomas
    2013 Obtaining introspective acceptability judgements. InManfred Krug & Julia Schlüter (eds.), Research methods in language variation and change, 99–118. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511792519.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511792519.008 [Google Scholar]
28. Hoop, Helen de
    1992 Case configuration and Noun Phrase interpretation [PhD dissertation]. Groningen: University of Groningen.
29. Ihsane, Tabea, Winistörfer, Oliver & Elisabeth Stark
    2023 Francoprovençal: a spatial analysis of ‘partitive articles’ and potential correlates in Swiss and Italian varieties. Isogloss. Open Journal of Romance Linguistics9(1)/4, 1–30. 10.5565/rev/isogloss.257
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.257 [Google Scholar]
30. ItWac corpus
    ItWac corpus: https://bellatrix.sslmit.unibo.it/noske/public/#open
31. Jong, Francesca de
    1983 Sommige niet, andere wel: De verklaring van een raadselachtig verschil. GLOT61, 229–246.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
    2001 “A piece of the cake” and “a cup of tea”: partitive and pseudo-partitive nominal constructions in the Circum-Baltic languages. InÖsten Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.), The Circum-Baltic languages. Volume 2: Grammar and typology, 523–568. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.55.11kop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.55.11kop [Google Scholar]
33. Kranendonk, Huib
    2010 Quantificational constructions in the nominal domain: Facets of Dutch microvariation. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Krifka, Manfred, Francis J. Pelletier, Greg Carlson, Alice ter Meulen, Gennaro Chierchia & Godehard Link
    1995 Genericity: An introduction. InGreg Carlson & Francis J. Pelletier (eds.), The generic book, 1–124. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Kristol, Andres
    2014 Les grammaires du francoprovençal : l’expression de la partitivité. Quelques leçons du projet ALAVAL. InLa Géolinguistique dans les Alpes au XXe siècle: méthodes, défis et perspectives. Actes de la Conférence annuelle sur l’activité scientifique du Centre d’études francoprovençales “René Willien”, 29–44. Saint Nicolas: Région autonome de la Vallée d’Aoste, Bureau régional pour l’ethnologie et la linguistique.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Kristol, Andres
    2016 Francoprovençal. InAdam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 350–362. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0020
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0020 [Google Scholar]
37. Labov, William
    1972 Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society11. 99–120. 10.1017/S0047404500006576
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006576 [Google Scholar]
38. Lado, Robert
    1957 Linguistics across cultures: Applied linguistics for language teachers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Newmeyer, Frederick J.
    2020 The relevance of introspective data. InSamuel Schindler, Anna Drożdżowicz & Karen Brøcker (eds.), Linguistic intuitions: Evidence and method, 149–164. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198840558.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198840558.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
40. Pinzin, Francesco & Cecilia Poletto
    2022 An indefinite maze: on the distribution of partitives and bare nouns in the Northern Italian dialects. InOra Matushansky, Laurent Roussarie, Michela Russo, Elena Soare & Sophie Wauquier (eds.). RLLT 17, Special issue ofIsogloss Open Journal of Romance Linguistics8(2)/20, 1–23. 10.5565/rev/isogloss.130
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.130 [Google Scholar]
41. Pfaff, Alexander
    2015 Adjectival and genitival modification in definite noun phrases in Icelandic – A tale of outsiders and inside jobs [PhD dissertation]. Tromsø: University of Tromsø.
42. Pfaff, Alexander
    2017 Adjectival inflection as diagnostic for structural position – Inside and outside the Icelandic definiteness domain. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics20(3). 283–322. 10.1007/s10828‑017‑9091‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-017-9091-3 [Google Scholar]
43. Schilling, Natalie
    2013 Surveys and interviews. InRobert J. Podesva & Devyani Sharma (eds.), Research methods in linguistics, 96–115. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Schütze, Carson T.
    1996 The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
45. Schütze, Carson T.
    2016 The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. (Classics in Linguistics 2). Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.26530/OAPEN_603356
    https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_603356 [Google Scholar]
46. Schütze, Carson T. & Jon Sprouse
    2013 Judgment data. InRobert J. Podesva & Devyani Sharma (eds.), Research methods in linguistics, 27–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Schwartz, Bonnie & Rex Sprouse
    1996 L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research12(1). 40–72. 10.1177/026765839601200103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839601200103 [Google Scholar]
48. Selkirk, Elisabeth O.
    1977 Some remarks on noun phrase structure. InPeter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax, 285–316. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Seržant, Ilja
    2021 Diachronic typology of partitives. InPetra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti (eds.) Partitive determiners, Partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580). Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110732221‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110732221-004 [Google Scholar]
50. Sigurðsson, Halldor Armann
    1993 The structure of the Icelandic NP. Studia Linguistica47(2). 177–197. 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.1993.tb00845.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.1993.tb00845.x [Google Scholar]
51. Sigurðsson, Halldor Armann
    2006 The Icelandic noun phrase. Central traits. Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi1211. 193–236.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Sleeman, Petra
    2022a Het woordje er: klein, maar niet fijn. InAlla Peeters & Petra Sleeman (eds.), Taalmysteries, 166–169. Amsterdam: Lias.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Sleeman, Petra
    2022b Partitive pronouns and quantified adverbial NPs: A labeling account. InGabriela Alboiu, Daniela Isac, Alexandru Nicolae, Mihaela Tănase-Dogaru & Alina Tigău (eds.), A life in linguistics: A festschrift for Alexandra Cornilescu on her 75th birthday, 513–525. Bucharest: Bucharest University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Sleeman, Petra
    2023 Partitive pronouns in intransitive contexts in Italian and Dutch. InSilvia Luraghi & Petra Sleeman (eds.), Partitives cross-linguistically, special issue ofLinguistic Variation23(1). 217–243. 10.1075/lv.21018.sle
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.21018.sle [Google Scholar]
55. Sleeman, Petra & Tabea Ihsane
    2016 Gender mismatches in partitive constructions with superlatives in French. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 1(1): 35. 10.5334/gjgl.137
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.137 [Google Scholar]
56. Sleeman, Petra & Silvia Luraghi
    2023 Crosslinguistic variation in partitives. InSilvia Luraghi & Petra Sleeman (eds.), Partitives cross-linguistically, special issue ofLinguistic Variation23(1). 1–27. 10.1075/lv.21020.lur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.21020.lur [Google Scholar]
57. Strobel, Thomas & Elvira Glaser
    2020 The rise and fall of partitive markers in some Germanic varieties. InTabea Ihsane (ed.), Disentangling bare nouns and nominals introduced by a partitive article. Leiden: Brill, 17–53. 10.1163/9789004437500_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004437500_003 [Google Scholar]
58. UkTenTen corpus
    UkTenTen corpus: https://www.sketchengine.eu/corpora-and-languages/
59. Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander & Janne Bondi Johannessen
    2011 Reconciling corpus and questionnaire data in microcomparative syntax. A case study from North Germanic. InFrans Gregersen, Jeffrey K. Parrott & Pia Quist. (eds.), Language variation – European perspectivesIII1, 135–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/silv.7.11van
    https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.7.11van [Google Scholar]
60. Westveer, Thom
    2021 Gender mismatches in partitive constructions in French and German: How society shapes language. Amsterdam: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Zanoli, Emma
    2022 A linguistic perspective on feminization and gender-inclusive language. How partitive constructions can be used to uncover implicit gender bias in Italian. Annali di Ca’ Foscari561, 195–219. 10.30687/AnnOc/2499‑1562/2022/10/011
    https://doi.org/10.30687/AnnOc/2499-1562/2022/10/011 [Google Scholar]