Methodological solutions for researching the variation of partitives in languages with rich nominal morphology

References

1. Ahn, Dorothy & Uli Sauerland
   2017 Measure constructions with relative measures: Towards a syntax of non-conservative construals. The Linguistic Review, , –. 10.1515/tlr‑2017‑0001
   https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2017-0001 [Google Scholar]
2. Al Siyabi, Iman
   2022 New Media Technologies for Learning to Use “one in three” Partitives. Poster presentation, PARTE 2022 conference: Methods for approaching variation: partitives and beyond. Budapest, Hungary: Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem. https://btk.kre.hu/konf/parte/userfiles/18_PARTE_POSTER_AlSiyabi_one%20in%20three%20English%20Partitives.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
3. Al Siyabi, Iman, Maris Camilleri & Anne Tamm
   2023 Fractional proportional partitives (FPP): focus on the variation in “one in three” partitives and agreement in Maltese, Gulf, Tunisian and Standard Arabic. InHajner, Réka, Kata Kubínyi, Dóra Pődör & Anne Tamm (eds.). European Partitives in comparison. [Károli Theoretical and Experimental Research in Linguistics/Elméleti és kísérleti nyelvészeti kutatások 1]. –. Budapest/Paris: Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary/L’Harmattan. 10.56037/978‑2‑336‑47225‑6‑5
   https://doi.org/10.56037/978-2-336-47225-6-5 [Google Scholar]
4. Argus, Reili
   2008 Eesti keele muutemorfoloogia omandamine [Acquisition of Estonian morphology]. Tallinn: Tallinn University PhD dissertation.
5. Argus, Reili & Helle Metslang
   2023 North and Standard Estonian. InDaniel Abondolo & Riitta Valijärvi (eds.), The Uralic Languages, –. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315625096‑8
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315625096-8 [Google Scholar]
6. Bakardzhieva-Morikang, Svitlana & Krasimir Kabakčiev
   2024 Ukrainian biaspectuality: An instantiation of compositional aspect in a verbal-aspect language. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, (), –. 10.29038/eejpl.2024.11.1.bak
   https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2024.11.1.bak [Google Scholar]
7. Basile, Rodolfo
   2024 ‘I Am Also Found on Facebook’. InElvira Glaser, Petra Sleeman, Thomas Strobel & Anne Tamm (eds.), Partitive constructions and partitive elements within and across language borders in Europe (LiVVaL — Linguaggio e Variazione. Variation in Language 3), –. Venice: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari. https://edizionicafoscari.unive.it/it/edizioni/libri/978-88-6969-795-1/
   [Google Scholar]
8. Berends, Sanne
   2019 Acquiring Dutch quantitative ER. Amsterdam: LOT Publications. 10.5117/NEDTAA2021.1.008.BARB
   https://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2021.1.008.BARB [Google Scholar]
9. Bleotu, Adina Camelia
   2023 Agreement with collective nouns in English and Romanian. A distributional approach. Talk at“Crosslinguistic perspectives on partitivity and related phenomena”, Bucharest, November 24–25, 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Brandner, Ellen
    2024 The Indefinite Article as an Exponent for Partition. InElvira Glaser, Petra Sleeman, Thomas Strobel & Anne Tamm (eds.), Partitive constructions and partitive elements within and across language borders in Europe (LiVVaL — Linguaggio e Variazione. Variation in Language 3), –. Venice: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari. https://edizionicafoscari.unive.it/it/edizioni/libri/978-88-6969-795-1/. 10.30687/978‑88‑6969‑795‑1/002
    https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-795-1/002 [Google Scholar]
11. Caha, Pavel
    2021 The marking of mass, count and plural denotations in multi-dimensional paradigms. Studia Linguistica, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cardinaletti, Anna & Giuliana Giusti
    2020 Indefinite determiners in informal Italian: A preliminary analysis. Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/ling‑2020‑0081
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0081 [Google Scholar]
13. Carlier, Anne & Beatrice Lamiroy
    2014 The grammaticalization of the prepositional partitive in Romance. InSilvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, –. 10.1515/9783110346060.477
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346060.477 [Google Scholar]
14. Chaika, Lesia, Natalia Lehka, Anne Tamm & Natalia Vaiss
    2024 Ukrainian aspect and object case in ukTenTen. The partitive genitive of perfective verbs and mass nouns. InElvira Glaser, Petra Sleeman, Thomas Strobel & Anne Tamm (eds.), Partitive constructions and partitive elements within and across language borders in Europe (LiVVaL — Linguaggio e Variazione. Variation in Language 3), –. Venice: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari. https://edizionicafoscari.unive.it/it/edizioni/libri/978-88-6969-795-1/. 10.30687/978‑88‑6969‑795‑1/008
    https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-795-1/008 [Google Scholar]
15. Cornips, Leonie & Petra Sleeman
    2024  Variation in the use of the partitive pronoun ER in regional (Heerlen) standard Dutch. InAnne Tamm & Petra Sleeman (eds.), Methods for approaching variation: partitive constructions and partitive elements, special issue ofLinguistic Variation. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.23026.cor. 10.1075/lv.23026.cor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.23026.cor [Google Scholar]
16. Davatz, Jan, Tabea Ihsane & Elisabeth Stark
    2023 Enquêtes dialectologiques à Evolène : les articles dits ‘partitifs’ et leurs équivalents. InDorothée Aquino-Weber, Sara Cotelli Kureth, Andres Kristol, Aurélie Reusser-Elzingre & Maguelone Sauzet (eds.). “Coum’on étèila que kòoule… Come una stella cadente… Comme une étoile filante…”. Mélanges à la mémoire de Federica Diémoz, –. Neuchâtel, Switzerland: Librairie Droz. doi:https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-253575
    [Google Scholar]
17. Dikken, Marcel den & Éva Dékány
    2018 Adpositions and case: Alternative realisation and concord. Finno-Ugric Languages and Linguistics. –.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Dirdal, Hildegunn, Eva Thue Vold, Ingrid Kristine Hasund, Eli-Marie Danbolt Drange & Elin Maria Berg
    2022 Design and construction of the Tracking Written Learner Language (TRAWL) Corpus: A longitudinal and multilingual young learner corpus. Nordic Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, (), –, 10.46364/njltl.v10i2.1005
    https://doi.org/10.46364/njltl.v10i2.1005 [Google Scholar]
19. Ehala, Martin
    2009 Keelekontakti mõju eesti sihitiskäänete kasutamisele [The impact of language contact on the usage of the Estonian object cases]. Keel ja Kirjandus, , –. 10.54013/kk735a3
    https://doi.org/10.54013/kk735a3 [Google Scholar]
20. Etxeberria, Urtzi
    2021 The partitive marker in Basque and its relation to bare nouns and the definite article. InPetra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580), –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110732221‑010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110732221-010 [Google Scholar]
21. Falco, Michelangelo & Roberto Zamparelli
    2019 Partitives and partitivity. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics(), –. 10.5334/gjgl.642
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.642 [Google Scholar]
22. Garzonio, Jacopo & Cecilia Poletto
    2020 Partitive objects in negative contexts in Northern Italian Dialects. Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/ling‑2020‑0079
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0079 [Google Scholar]
23. Giusti, Giuliana & Petra Sleeman
    2021 Partitive elements in the languages of Europe. An advancement in the understanding of a multifaceted phenomenon. InPetra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580), –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110732221‑001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110732221-001 [Google Scholar]
24. Graën, Johannes, Dolores Batinic & Martin Volk
    2014 Cleaning the Europarl corpus for linguistic applications. InJosef Ruppenhofer & Gertrud Faaß (eds.), Proceedings of the 12th edition of the KONVENS conference, –. Hildesheim: Universitätsverlag Hildesheim.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Glaser, Elvira
    2024  Bare nouns, indefinite articles and partitivity in an Early New High German cookbook. InAnne Tamm & Petra Sleeman (eds.), Methods for approaching variation: partitive constructions and partitive elements, special issue ofLinguistic Variation. 10.1075/lv.23045.gla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.23045.gla [Google Scholar]
26. Glaser, Elvira & Thomas Strobel
    2020 The rise and fall of partitive markers in some Germanic varieties. InIhsane, Tabea (ed.). Disentangling Bare Nouns and Nominals Introduced by a Partitive Article. –. Leiden/Boston: Brill. 10.5167/uzh‑198358
    https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-198358 [Google Scholar]
27. Hajner, Réka, Kata Kubínyi, Dóra Pődör & Anne Tamm
    (eds.) 2023 European Partitives in comparison. [Károli Theoretical and Experimental Research in Linguistics/Elméleti és kísérleti nyelvészeti kutatások 1], Budapest/Paris: Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary/L’Harmattan. 10.56037/978‑2‑336‑47225‑6
    https://doi.org/10.56037/978-2-336-47225-6 [Google Scholar]
28. Hoop, Helen de
    1992 Case configuration and Noun Phrase interpretation. Groningen: University of Groningen PhD dissertation.
29. Hoop, Helen de
    2003 Partitivity. InLisa Cheng & Rint Sybesma (eds.), The second Glot International state-of-the-article book, –. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. (Hoop, Helen de 2002 Partitivity. InThe Second Glot International State-Of-the-Article Book (Originally published 2003, , –). De Gruyter, Inc. 10.1515/9783110890952.179, https://hdl.handle.net/2066/104531)
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110890952.179 [Google Scholar]
30. Huhmarniemi, Saara & Merilin Miljan
    2016 The partitive split in Finnish and Estonian. Finno-Ugric Languages and Linguistics, (), –. https://full.btk.ppke.hu/index.php/FULL/article/view/46
    [Google Scholar]
31. Huumo, Tuomas & Liina Lindström
    2014 Partitives across constructions: on the range of uses of the Finnish and Estonian “partitive subjects”InLuraghi, Silvia & Tuomas Huumo (eds.). Partitive Cases and Related Categories, −. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110346060.153
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346060.153 [Google Scholar]
32. Ihsane, Tabea & Elisabeth Stark
    2020 Introduction: Shades of partitivity: Formal and areal properties. Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/ling‑2020‑0078
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0078 [Google Scholar]
33. Ihsane, Tabea & Elisabeth Stark
    (eds.) 2020 Special Issue: Shades of partitivity: Formal and areal properties. Linguistics, (). 10.1515/ling‑2020‑0078
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0078 [Google Scholar]
34. Ivaska, Ilmari & Anne Tamm
    2024 Same yet different: Distributional differences in the use of partitive objects in Estonian and Finnish. InAnne Tamm & Petra Sleeman (eds.), Methods for approaching variation: partitive constructions and partitive elements, special issue ofLinguistic Variation. 10.1075/lv.23042.iva
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.23042.iva [Google Scholar]
35. Jackendoff, Ray
    1977 X-bar syntax: A study of phrase structure (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph No. 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Jurkiewicz-Rohrbacher, Edyta
    2019 Polish verbal aspect and its Finnish statistical correlates in the light of a parallel corpus. University of Helsinki and University of Regensburg: doctoral dissertation. hdl.handle.net/10138/300771.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Kilgarriff, Adam, Pavel Rychlý, Pavel Smrz & David Tugwell
    2004 The Sketch Engine. InGeoffrey Williams & Sandra Vessier (eds.), Proceedings of the eleventh EURALEX international congress, –. Lorient, France: Université de Bretagne Sud.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Kiparsky, Paul
    1998 Partitive case and aspect. InMiriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors, –. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Klockmann, Heidi & Lenka Garshol
    2023 Agreement errors in Norwegian L1, English L2 pseudo partitive. (Talk) “Crosslinguistic perspectives on partitivity and related phenomena”Bucharest, November 24–25, 2023. Bucharest; Romania.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
    2001 “A piece of the cake” and “a cup of tea”: partitive and pseudo partitive nominal constructions in the Circum-Baltic languages. InÖsten Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.), The Circum-Baltic languages. Volume 2: Grammar and typology, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.55.11kop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.55.11kop [Google Scholar]
41. Kratzer, Angelika
    2004 Telicity and the meaning of objective case. InJacqueline Guéron & Jacqueline Lecarme (eds.), The syntax of time, –. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/6598.003.0017
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6598.003.0017 [Google Scholar]
42. Kubínyi, Kata & Anne Tamm
    2023 Introduction to European Partitives in Comparison. InHajner, Réka, Kata Kubínyi, Dóra Pődör & Anne Tamm (eds.). European Partitives in comparison. [Károli Theoretical and Experimental Research in Linguistics/Elméleti és kísérleti nyelvészeti kutatások 1]. –. Budapest/Paris: Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary/L’Harmattan. 10.56037/978‑2‑336‑47225‑6‑1
    https://doi.org/10.56037/978-2-336-47225-6-1 [Google Scholar]
43. Kuznetsova, Julia & Tore Nesset
    2015 In which case are Russians afraid? Bojat’sja with genitive and accusative objects. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, (), –. 10.1353/jsl.2015.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1353/jsl.2015.0009 [Google Scholar]
44. Laugalienė, Asta
    2022 Partitivity in Finnish and Lithuanian: object marking. Vilnius: Vilnius University doctoral dissertation.
45. Lees, Aet
    2015 Case alternations in five Finnic languages: Estonian, Finnish, Karelian, Livonian and Veps. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004296367
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004296367 [Google Scholar]
46. Luraghi, Silvia
    2023 Beyond affectedness — partitive objects and degrees of agenthood in Ancient Greek. Linguistic Variation, (), –. 10.1075/lv.21002.lur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.21002.lur [Google Scholar]
47. Luraghi, Silvia & Seppo Kittilä
    2014 Partitive noun phrases in the Estonian core argument system. InSilvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110346060.17
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346060.17 [Google Scholar]
48. Luraghi, Silvia & Petra Sleeman
    (eds.) 2023 Partitives cross-linguistically: Dimensions of variation, special issue of Linguistic Variation(). 10.1075/lv.21002.lur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.21002.lur [Google Scholar]
49. Lyutikova, Ekaterina
    2023 Person Agreement with Anaphors: Evidence from Tatar. Languages, , . 10.3390/languages8010046
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010046 [Google Scholar]
50. Metslang, Helena
    2013 Grammatical relations in Estonian: Subject, object and beyond. (Dissertationes Philologiae Estonicae Universitatis Tartuensis 33). Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.
51. Metslang, Helena
    2014 Partitive noun phrases in the Estonian core argument system. InSilvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110346060.177
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346060.177 [Google Scholar]
52. Metslang, Helle
    2023 North and Standard Estonian. InMarianne Bakró-Nagy, Johanna Laakso & Elena Skribnik (eds.), Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0020
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0020 [Google Scholar]
53. Metslang, Helle & Külli Habicht
    2023 Partitive, genitive or nominative?InSilvia Luraghi & Petra Sleeman (eds.), Partitives cross-linguistically, special issue ofLinguistic Variation(), –. 10.1075/lv.20016.met
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.20016.met [Google Scholar]
54. Mežov, Oleksandr
    2008 Osoblyvostі vžyvannja rodovoho vіdmіnka u vtorynnіj semantyko-syntaksyčnіj funkcіjі ob’jekta [Features of the use of genitive case in the secondary semantic-syntactical function of object]. Fіlolohіčnі nauky: Movoznavstvo, –. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/153578245.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
55. Miestamo, Matti, Anne Tamm & Beáta Wagner-Nagy
    (eds.) (2015) Negation in Uralic Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Typological Studies in Language 108. 10.1075/tsl.108
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.108 [Google Scholar]
56. Nelson, Diane
    1998 Grammatical case assignment in Finnish. New York: Garland.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Norris, Mark
    2015 Case-marking in Estonian pseudopartitives. InAnna E. Jurgensen, Hannah Sande, Spencer Lamoureux, Kenny Baclawski & Alison Zerbe (eds.), Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS), –. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 10.20354/B4414110001
    https://doi.org/10.20354/B4414110001 [Google Scholar]
58. Nikolaeva, Irina
    2003 Possessive Affixes in the Pragmatic Structuring of the Utterance: Evidence from Uralic. InPirkko Suihkonen & Bernard Comrie (eds.), International Symposium on Deictic Systems and Quantification in Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia. Collection of Papers. Iževsk and Leipzig: Udmurt State University and Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, –.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Ogren, David Paul
    2018 Object case in Estonian da-infinitive constructions (Dissertationes Philologiae Estonicae Universitatis Tartuensis 41). Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.
60. Panka, Erzsébet
    2023 Object cases, definiteness, and aspect in Finnish and Hungarian. How Hungarian learners of Finnish use the partitive and total object cases. InHajner, Réka, Kata Kubínyi, Dóra Pődör & Anne Tamm (eds.). European Partitives in comparison. [Károli Theoretical and Experimental Research in Linguistics/Elméleti és kísérleti nyelvészeti kutatások 1]. –. Budapest/Paris: Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary/L’Harmattan. 10.56037/978‑2‑336‑47225‑6‑2
    https://doi.org/10.56037/978-2-336-47225-6-2 [Google Scholar]
61. Pajusalu, Renate
    2006 Multiple Motivations for Meaning of an Elative Wh-Construction in Estonian. Trames Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, (), –. 10.3176/tr.2006.4.02
    https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2006.4.02 [Google Scholar]
62. Pfaff, Alexander
    2024a Dimensions of Partitivity in Icelandic (and beyond). InAnne Tamm & Petra Sleeman (eds.), Methods for approaching variation: partitive constructions and partitive elements, special issue ofLinguistic Variation. 10.1075/lv.23034.pfa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.23034.pfa [Google Scholar]
63. Pfaff, Alexander
    2024b Pseudo partitives and Individuation. InElvira Glaser, Petra Sleeman, Thomas Strobel & Anne Tamm (eds.), Partitive constructions and partitive elements within and across language borders in Europe (LiVVaL — Linguaggio e Variazione. Variation in Language 3), –. Venice: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari. https://edizionicafoscari.unive.it/it/edizioni/libri/978-88-6969-795-1/
    [Google Scholar]
64. Pinzin, Francesco & Cecilia Poletto
    2021 Indefinite objects in micro-variation. A cross-linguistic analysis of the distribution of partitive articles, bare nominals and definite determiners in Northern Italy. Studia Linguistica, –.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Pinzin, Francesco & Cecilia Poletto
    2022a An indefinite maze: on the distribution of partitives and bare nouns in the Northern Italian dialects. Isogloss()/. –. 10.5565/rev/isogloss.130
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.130 [Google Scholar]
66. Pinzin, Francesco & Cecilia Poletto
    2022b How to make do with what you have got: Priming effects in dialectal data, the view from indefinite Partitives (Conference Presentation). ‘Partitive Articles’ in Francoprovençal and in the Northern Italian Dialects: DiFuPaRo closing workshop, 24 June 2022, Universität Zürich, Switzerland.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Pljušč, Marija J.
    2018 Katehorіjі sub’jekta і ob’jekta v strukturі prostoho rečennja. [Category of subject and object in structure of simple sentence]. Kyiv: Vidavnyctvo NPU іmenі M. P. Drahomanova.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Pool, Raili
    2007 Eesti keele teise keelena omandamise seaduspärasusi täis — ja osasihitise näitel [The acquisition of total and partial objects by learners of Estonian as a second language] (Dissertationes Philologiae Estonicae Universitatis Tartuensis 19). Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.
69. Pugh, Stefan Morgenschweis & Jeffrey Ian Press
    1999 Ukrainian: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Rueter, Jack & Nadežda Kabaeva
    2023 On quantification and the ablative in Erzya and Moksha. InHajner, Réka, Kata Kubínyi, Dóra Pődör & Anne Tamm (eds.). European Partitives in comparison. [Károli Theoretical and Experimental Research in Linguistics/Elméleti és kísérleti nyelvészeti kutatások 1]. –. Budapest/Paris: Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary/L’Harmattan. 10.56037/978‑2‑336‑47225‑6‑3
    https://doi.org/10.56037/978-2-336-47225-6-3 [Google Scholar]
71. Sauerland, Uli & Kazuko Yatsushiro
    2017 Two Nouns in Partitives: Evidence from Japanese. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics(), , –. 10.5334/gjgl.171
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.171 [Google Scholar]
72. Selkirk, Elisabeth
    1977 Some remarks on noun phrase structure. InPeter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax, –. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Serdobolskaya, Natalia & Maria Usacheva
    2023 Pseudo partitive constructions are not a subtype of nominal juxtaposition in Beserman. Journal of Uralic Linguistics(), –. 10.1075/jul.00018.ser
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00018.ser [Google Scholar]
74. Seržant, Ilja
    2021a Diachronic Typology of Partitives. InPetra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Partitive Determiners, Partitive Pronouns and Partitive Case, –. Berlin: de Gruyter, Linguistische Arbeiten 580. 10.1515/9783110732221‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110732221-004 [Google Scholar]
75. Seržant, Ilja
    2021b Typology of Partitives. Linguistics(), –. 10.1515/ling‑2020‑0251
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0251 [Google Scholar]
76. Ševčuk, Natalia
    2010 Hramatyčnі osoblyvostі ob’jekta pry dіjeslovax na poznačennja tvorennja. [Grammatical features of the object with verbs denoting creation]. Kul’tura slova, –.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Simonenko, Alexandra
    2019 Microvariation in Finno-Ugric possessive markers. InHsin-Lun Huang, Ethan Poole & Amanda Rysling (eds.), The North East Linguistic Society (NELS), –. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Sleeman, Petra & Tabea Ihsane
    2016 Gender mismatches in partitive constructions with superlatives in French. Glossa(), –.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Sleeman, Petra & Tabea Ihsane
    2017 The L2 acquisition of the French quantitative pronoun en by L1 learners of Dutch: vulnerable domains and cross-linguistic influence. InElma Blom, Leonie Cornips & Jeannette Schaeffer (eds.). Cross-linguistic Influence in Bilingualism. In honor of Aafke Hulk. –. [Studies in Bilingualism 52]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.52.14sle
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.52.14sle [Google Scholar]
80. Sleeman, Petra & Tabea Ihsane
    2020 Convergence and divergence in the expression of partitivity: a cross-linguistic experimental study. Linguistics:. –. 10.1515/ling‑2020‑0090
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0090 [Google Scholar]
81. Sleeman, Petra & Tabea Ihsane
    2021 The L2 acquisition of the quantitative pronoun in French by L1 speakers of German and the role of the L1. InGiuliana Giusti & Petra Sleeman (eds.). Partitive Determiners, Partitive Pronouns and Partitive Case. Linguistische Arbeiten. –. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110732221‑006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110732221-006 [Google Scholar]
82. Spoelman, Marianne
    2013 Prior linguistic knowledge matters. The use of the partitive case in Finnish learner language. Oulu: Acta Universitatis Ouluensis B Humaniora 111.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Sleeman, Petra & Silvia Luraghi
    2023 Crosslinguistic variation in partitives. InSilvia Luraghi & Petra Sleeman (eds.), Partitives cross-linguistically, special issue ofLinguistic Variation(), –. 10.1075/lv.21020.lur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.21020.lur [Google Scholar]
84. Stark, Elisabeth & Jan Pavel Davatz
    2021 Unexpected Partitive Articles in Francoprovençal. Studia Linguistica(). [Special issue editedbyFrancesco Pinzin & Cecilia Poletto].–. 10.1111/stul.12186
    https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12186 [Google Scholar]
85. Stark, Elisabeth & David Paul Gerards
    2020 ‘Partitive Articles’ in Aosta Valley Francoprovençal — Old Questions and New Data. InTabea Ihsane (ed.), Disentangling Bare Nouns and Nominals Introduced by a Partitive Article (Syntax & Semantics 43), Leiden/Boston: Brill, –. 10.1163/9789004437500_010
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004437500_010 [Google Scholar]
86. Stark, Elisabeth & Paul Widmer
    2020 Breton a-marking of (internal) verbal arguments: A result of language contact?. Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/ling‑2020‑0089
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0089 [Google Scholar]
87. Strobel, Thomas
    2012 On the areal and syntactic distribution of indefinite-partitive pronouns in German: methodological advances and empirical results within the project ‘Syntax of Hessian Dialects’ (SyHD). InÁlvarez Pérez, Xosé Afonso, Ernestina Carrilho & Catarina Magro (eds.). Proceedings of the International Symposium on Limits and Areas in Dialectology (LimiAr). Lisbon 2011 –. Lisboa: Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa. https://www.clul.ulisboa.pt/files/limiar/26_strobel.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
88. Tamm, Anne
    2011 Scalarity and dimensionality across categories. Estonian pseudopartitive constructions. Linguistica Uralica(), –. 10.3176/lu.2011.1.02
    https://doi.org/10.3176/lu.2011.1.02 [Google Scholar]
89. Tamm, Anne
    2014 The partitive concept versus linguistic partitives: from abstract concepts to evidentiality in the Uralic languages. InSilvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110346060.89
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346060.89 [Google Scholar]
90. Tamm, Anne
    2020 The Dutch partitive and quantitative pronoun “er” in lexicography: preliminary notes. InTibor M. Pintér & Katalin P. Márkus (eds.) Az ige vonzásában: Lexikográfiai, fordítástudományi tanulmányok és köszöntők Magay Tamás 90. születésnapjára, –. Budapest: Tinta Kiadó.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Tamm, Anne & Natalia Vaiss
    2019 Setting the boundaries: Partitive verbs in Estonian verb classifications. Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu aastaraamat. Estonian Papers in Applied Linguistics, –. 10.5128/ERYa15.09
    https://doi.org/10.5128/ERYa15.09 [Google Scholar]
92. Tiborcz-Tóth, Tünde
    2017 Magyarul tanulók köztes nyelvére vonatkozó megfigyelések észt forrásnyelvi környezetben — különös tekintettel a határozottság kifejezésére a magyarban. [Some observations about the Interlanguage of Hungarian-learners in Estonian source language environment focusing on the determinative system of Hungarian]. Pécs: University of Pécs PhD dissertation. https://pea.lib.pte.hu/bitstream/handle/pea/18210/tiborcz-toth-tunde-phd-2018.pdf
93. Tănase-Dogaru, Mihaela
    2022 Size nouns in Romanian. Gliding along the quantifying — evaluating continuum. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov Series IV: Philology and Cultural Studies(), –. 10.31926/but.pcs.2022.64.15.2.6
    https://doi.org/10.31926/but.pcs.2022.64.15.2.6 [Google Scholar]
94. Tóth, Gabriella, Kata Kubínyi & Anne Tamm
    2024 Possessive partitive strategies in Uralic: Evidence from Mari and Hungarian quantifiers and inflected adpositions. InElvira Glaser, Petra Sleeman, Thomas Strobel & Anne Tamm (eds.), Partitive constructions and partitive elements within and across language borders in Europe (LiVVaL — Linguaggio e Variazione. Variation in Language 3), –. Venice: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari. https://edizionicafoscari.unive.it/it/edizioni/libri/978-88-6969-795-1/. 10.30687/978‑88‑6969‑795‑1/005
    https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-795-1/005 [Google Scholar]
95. Vainikka, Anne
    1993 The three structural cases in Finnish. InAnders Holmberg & Urpo Nikanne (eds.), Case and other functional categories in Finnish syntax, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110902600.129
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110902600.129 [Google Scholar]
96. Vainikka, Anne & Joan Maling
    1996 Is partitive case inherent or structural?InJack Hoeksema (ed.), Partitives. Studies on the distribution and meaning of partitive expressions, –. Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110908985.179
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110908985.179 [Google Scholar]
97. Vainikka, Anne & Pauli Brattico
    2011 The Finnish accusative. Biolinguistica Fennica Working Papers, –. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274501023_The_Finnish_Accusative. (4 Jun, 2023.)
    [Google Scholar]
98. Vaiss, Natalia
    2022 Eesti vaatama-verbi ja selle vene ja ukraina vastete sihilisusest. [On the transitivity of the verb ‘watch’/’look’ in Estonian, Russian and Ukrainian]. Lähivõrdlusi. Lähivertailuja, , –. 10.5128/LV32.07
    https://doi.org/10.5128/LV32.07 [Google Scholar]
99. Verkuyl, Henk
    2022 The compositional nature of tense, mood and aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
100. Vihman, Virve-Anneli, Anna Theakston & Elena Lieven
     2020 Acquisition of symmetrical and asymmetrical Differential Object Marking subsystems in Estonian. InMardale, Alexandru & Silvina Montrul (eds.). Acquisition of Differential Object Marking [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 26], –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tilar.26.01vih
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.26.01vih [Google Scholar]
101. Von Heusinger, Klaus & Jaklin Kornfilt
     2017 Partitivity and Case Marking in Turkish and Related Languages. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics(), , –. 10.5334/gjgl.112
     https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.112 [Google Scholar]
102. Von Heusinger & Jaklin Kornfilt
     2021 Turkish partitive constructions and (non-)exhaustivity. InGiusti, Giuliana & Petra Sleeman (eds.), Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case, –. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110732221‑008
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110732221-008 [Google Scholar]
103. Vyxovanec’, Іvan & Kateryna Horodens’ka
     2004 Teoretyčna morfolohіja ukrajіns’kojі movy [Theoretical morphology of Ukrainian]. Kyіv: Ukraіns’ke vidavnictvo “Pul’sari”.
     [Google Scholar]
104. Westveer, Thom, Petra Sleeman & Enoch O. Aboh
     2021 Competing genders: French partitive constructions between grammatical and semantic gender. InMarc-Olivier Hinzelin, Natasha Pomino & Eva-Maria Remberger (eds.), Formal approaches to Romance morphosyntax, –. Linguistische Arbeiten 576. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110719154‑003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110719154-003 [Google Scholar]
105. uktenten
     uktenten 2020 = https://www.sketchengine.eu/uktenten-ukrainian-corpus/