oa A prosodic-cyclic theory of circumfix linearization

References

1. Alexiadou, Artemis
   2013 Deriving color adjectival nominalizations. Linguística: Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto. –.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Alexiadou, Artemis & Gianina lordăchioaia
   2014 Two syntactic strategies to derive deadjectival nominals. Anglica Wratislaviensia. –.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Alstott, Johanna Victoria
   2023 Ordinal numbers: Not superlatives, but modifiers of superlatives. InJuhyae Kim, Burak Öney, Yao Zhang & Fengyue (Lisa) Zhao (eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd semantics and linguistic theory conference, –. Linguistic Society of America.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Arche, María J., Antonio Fábregas & Rafael Marin
   2021 On event-denoting deadjectival nominalizations. The Linguistic Review(). –. 10.1515/tlr‑2021‑2063
   https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2021-2063 [Google Scholar]
5. Arregi, Karlos & Andrew Nevins
   2012 Morphotactics: Basque auxiliaries and the structure of spellout. Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑3889‑8
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3889-8 [Google Scholar]
6. Benz, Johanna
   2023 The syntax of the content reading in German nominalizations. InSuet-Ying Lam & Satoru Ozaki (eds.), NELS 53: Proceedings of the fifty-second annual meeting of the north east lingusitic society, GLSA.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bhatt, Rajesh
   2006 Covert modality in non-finite contexts. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197341
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197341 [Google Scholar]
8. Bresnan, Joan W.
   1971 Sentence stress and syntactic transformations. Language(). –. 10.2307/412081
   https://doi.org/10.2307/412081 [Google Scholar]
9. Bresnan, Joan W.
   1972 Stress and syntax: A reply. Language(). –. 10.2307/412138
   https://doi.org/10.2307/412138 [Google Scholar]
10. Bylinina, Lisa, Natalia Ivlieva, Alexander Podobryaev & Yasutada Sudo
    2014 A non-superlative semantics for ordinals and the syntax and semantics of comparison classes. Manuscript. Meertens Institut, Institut Jean-Nicod, Higher School of Economics, and UCL.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Chierchia, Gennaro
    1998 Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics. –. 10.1023/A:1008324218506
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008324218506 [Google Scholar]
12. Chomsky, Noam
    2008 On phases. InRobert Freidin, Carlos Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory, –. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7713.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7713.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
13. Chung, Sandra
    2003 The syntax and prosody of weak pronouns in Chamorro. Linguistic Inquiry(). –. 10.1162/002438903322520151
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438903322520151 [Google Scholar]
14. Cinque, Guglielmo
    1999 Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
15. Cohn, Abigail C.
    1989 Stress in Indonesian and bracketing paradoxes. Natural language & linguistic theory(). –. 10.1007/BF00138076
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138076 [Google Scholar]
16. Cohn, Abigail C. & John J. McCarthy
    1998 Alignment and parallelism in Indonesian phonology. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory. –.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Conners, Thomas J.
    2002 Circumfixation: An unnoticed complication for Indonesian stress. manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Conners, Thomas J.
    2003 Circumfixation: An unnoticed problem for Indonesian stress. Paper presented atAFLA X, University of Hawai’i, Mānoa.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Dahlstrom, Amy
    2000 Morphosyntactic mismatches in Algonquian: Affixal predicates and discontinuous verbs. InArika Okrent & John P. Boyle (eds.), The proceedings of the panels from the chicago linguistic society’s thirty-sixth meeting, –. Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Eisengarten, Renate
    1976 Die Funktionen des ke-an-formativs in der Bahasa Indonesia: Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena dissertation.
21. Fitzpatrick, Justin
    2004 A concatenative theory of possible affix types. InI. A. Salanova (eds.), Papers from EVELIN: MIT working papers in linguistics, Cambridge, Mass: MIT.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Foley, William A.
    2007 A typology of information packaging in the clause. InTimothy Shopen (eds.), Language typology and syntactic description, –. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511619427.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619427.007 [Google Scholar]
23. Georgi, Doreen
    2012 A local derivation of global case splits. InArtemis Alexiadou, Tibor Kiss & Gereon Müller (eds.), Local modelling of nonlocal dependencies in syntax, –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110294774.305
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110294774.305 [Google Scholar]
24. Giegerich, Heinz J.
    1985 Metrical phonology and phonological structure: German and English. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Goddard, Ives
    1991 Observations regarding Fox (Mesquakie) phonology. InWilliam Cowan (eds.), Papers of the twenty-second Algonquian conference, –. Ottawa: Carleton University.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Goddard, Ives
    2015 The twenty-nine enclitics of Meskwaki. InMonica Macaulay & J. Randolph Valentine (eds.), Papers of the 43rd Algonquian conference, State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Goedemans, Rob & Ellen van Zanten
    2007 Stress and accent in Indonesian. InVincent van Heuven & Ellen van Zanten (eds.), Prosody in Indonesian languages, –. LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Halim, Amran
    1981 Intonation in relation to syntax in Indonesian. Dept. of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, The Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Halle, Morris & Alex Marantz
    1993 Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. InKenneth Locke Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20, –. Cambridge: MIT press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Halpern, Aaron
    1995 On the placement and morphology of clitics. Center for the Study of Language (CSLI).
    [Google Scholar]
31. Hamzah, Diyana & James Sneed German
    2014 Intonational phonology and prosodic hierarchy in Malay. InProceedings of interspeech2014, –. ISCA. 10.21437/Interspeech.2014‑22
    https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2014-22 [Google Scholar]
32. Hasanah, Hana Nurul
    2018 A literature study on the intonation of colloquial Indonesian. Etnolingual(). –. 10.20473/etno.v2i2.9468
    https://doi.org/10.20473/etno.v2i2.9468 [Google Scholar]
33. Hayes, Bruce
    1982 Extrametricality and English stress. Linguistic Inquiry(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
34. van Heuven, Vincent & Ellen van Zanten
    2007 Prosody in Indonesian languages: Concluding remarks. InVincent van Heuven & Ellen van Zanten (eds.), Prosody in Indonesian languages, –. LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Hewett, Matthew
    2023 Allomorphy in Semitic discontinuous agreement: Evidence for a modular approach to postsyntax. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory(). –. 10.1007/s11049‑022‑09559‑w
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-022-09559-w [Google Scholar]
36. Hidajat, Lanny
    2014 A distributed morphology analysis of Indonesian ke-/-an verbs. Linguistik Indonesia(). –. 10.26499/li.v32i1.12
    https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v32i1.12 [Google Scholar]
37. Inkelas, Sharon
    1990 Prosodic constituency in the lexicon. New York, NY: Garland.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Itô, Junko & Armin Mester
    2009 The extended prosodic word. InJanet Grijzenhout und Baris Kabak (eds.), Phonological domains: Universals and deviations, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110217100.2.135
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110217100.2.135 [Google Scholar]
39. Ito, Junko & Armin Mester
    2021 Recursive prosody and the prosodic form of compounds. Languages(). 10.3390/languages6020065
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6020065 [Google Scholar]
40. Jeoung, Helen
    2018 Optional elements in Indonesian morphosyntax: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.
41. Julien, Marit
    2002 Syntactic heads and word formation: A study of verbal inflection. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195149500.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195149500.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
42. Junus, Umar
    1971 Ke–an construction in Indonesian. Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/ling.1971.9.76.24
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1971.9.76.24 [Google Scholar]
43. Kalin, Laura
    2022 Infixes really are (underlyingly) prefixes/suffixes: Evidence from allomorphy on the fine timing of infixation. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2022.0017
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2022.0017 [Google Scholar]
44. Kalin, Laura & Nicholas Rolle
    2023 Deconstructing subcategorization: Conditions on insertion versus position. Linguistic Inquiry(). –. 10.1162/ling_a_00462
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00462 [Google Scholar]
45. Kayne, Richard S.
    1994 The antisymmetry of syntax. MIT press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. KBBI Daring
    KBBI Daring 2016 Kamus besar bahasa indonesia dalam jaringan (KBBI daring) [great Indonesian online dictionary]. Ed. Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia [Language Development and Cultivation Agency, Ministry of Culture, Education, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia].
    [Google Scholar]
47. Klavans, Judith L.
    1985 The independence of syntax and phonology in cliticization. Language(). –. 10.2307/413422
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413422 [Google Scholar]
48. Kroeger, Paul
    2014 External negation in Malay/Indonesian. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2014.0000
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2014.0000 [Google Scholar]
49. Lapowila, Hans
    1981 A generative approach to the phonology of Bahasa Indonesia. Canberra: The Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Lyon, Shirley
    1967 Tlahuitoltepec Mixe clause structure. International journal of American linguistics(). –. 10.1086/464937
    https://doi.org/10.1086/464937 [Google Scholar]
51. Marušič, Franc Lanko
    2023 Circumfixation. InPeter Ackema, Sabrina Bendjaballah, Eulalia Bonet & Antonio Fábregas (eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell companion to morphology, –. Wiley Online Library. 10.1002/9781119693604.morphcom013
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119693604.morphcom013 [Google Scholar]
52. McCarthy, John J.
    2003 Sympathy, cumulativity, and the duke-of-york gambit. InCaroline Féry & Ruben van de Vijver (eds.), The syllable in optimality theory, –. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511497926.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497926.003 [Google Scholar]
53. Müller, Gereon
    2004 A Distributed Morphology Approach to Syncretism in Russian Noun Inflection. InOlga Arnaudova, Wayles Browne, Maria Luisa Rivero & Danijela Stojanovic (eds.), Proceedings of FASL 12, –. University of Ottawa.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Müller, Gereon
    2020 Inflectional morphology in harmonic serialism. Sheffield: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Neef, Martin
    1996 Wortdesign: Eine deklarative Analyse der deutschen Verbflexion. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Noyer, Rolf
    1992 Features, positions, and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT dissertation.
57. Prentice, Jack
    1994 Manado Malay: Product and agent of language change. InTom Dutton & Darrel T. Tryon (eds.), Language contact and change in the Austronesian world, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110883091.411
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110883091.411 [Google Scholar]
58. Pross, Tillmann & Antje Roßdeutscher
    2019 Towards a correlation of form, use and meaning of German ge-prefixed predicative participles. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics(). .
    [Google Scholar]
59. Pullum, Geoffrey K.
    1976 The duke of york gambit. Journal of linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S0022226700004813
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700004813 [Google Scholar]
60. Rathert, Monika
    2009 Zur Morphophonologie des Partizips II im Deutschen. Linguistische Berichte. –. 10.46771/2366077500218_2
    https://doi.org/10.46771/2366077500218_2 [Google Scholar]
61. Romero-Méndez, Rodrigo
    2009 A reference grammar of Ayutla Mixe (Tukyo’m ayuujk): State University of New York at Buffalo dissertation.
62. Roy, Isabelle
    2010 Deadjectival nominalizations and the structure of the adjective. InArtemis Alexiadou & Monika Rathert (eds.), The syntax of nominalizations across languages and frameworks, –. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110245875.129
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110245875.129 [Google Scholar]
63. Salzmann, Martin & Gerhard Schaden
    2019 The syntax and semantics of past participle agreement in Alemannic. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics().
    [Google Scholar]
64. Samuels, Bridget
    2010 The topology of infixation and reduplication. Linguistic Review(). –. 10.1515/tlir.2010.006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2010.006 [Google Scholar]
65. Sato, Yosuke
    2010 Complex phrase structures within morphological words: Evidence from English and Indonesian. Lingua(). –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2009.05.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.05.008 [Google Scholar]
66. Sato, Yosuke
    2019 How can one kill someone twice in Indonesian? causal pluralism and the tripartite VP structure. Handout presented atRecent Approaches to (Non-)Agentivity in Natural Language, National University of Singapore.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Selkirk, Elisabeth
    1996 The prosodic structure of function words. InJames L. Morgan & Katherine Demuth (eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition, –. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Selkirk, Elisabeth
    2011 The syntax-phonology interface. InJohn Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan Yu (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, –. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444343069.ch14
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343069.ch14 [Google Scholar]
69. Sneddon, James Neil
    1996 Indonesian: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Sternefeld, Wolfgang
    1995 Voice phrases and their specifiers. FAS Papers in Linguistics. –. 10.21248/zaspil.3.1995.830
    https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.3.1995.830 [Google Scholar]
71. Streffer, Helene
    2024 How much can you see: What a reprojection-based account of discontinuous agreement would say. Talk given atthe Myopia Workshop at Universität Leipzig.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Susanto
    Susanto 2013 Intonation in Bahasa Indonesia: a systemic functional study: English And Foreign Languages University Hyderabad dissertation.
73. Trommer, Jochen
    2001 Distributed Optimality: Universität Potsdam dissertation.
74. Trommer, Jochen & Eva Zimmermann
    2014 Generalised mora affixation and quantity manipulating morphology. Phonology. –. 10.1017/S0952675714000220
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675714000220 [Google Scholar]
75. Truckenbrodt, Hubert
    1999 On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic inquiry(). –. 10.1162/002438999554048
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554048 [Google Scholar]
76. Vikner, Sten
    1995 Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages. Oxford University Press, USA. 10.1093/oso/9780195083934.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195083934.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
77. Villalba, Xavier
    2013 Eventualities under deadjectival nominalizations. Borealis–An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics(). –. 10.7557/1.2.2.2617
    https://doi.org/10.7557/1.2.2.2617 [Google Scholar]
78. Vogt, Barbara
    2015 Initial secondary stress in German. InAmedeo De Dominicis (eds.), pS-prominenceS: Prominences in linguistics, –. Viterbo: Disucom Press.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Weisser, Philipp
    2024 A typology of shifting coordinators and what they can tell us about clitics and their formal modelling. Habilitation thesis. Leipzig.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Wiese, Richard
    2000 The phonology of German. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Originally published: 1996.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Wiese, Richard
    2008 A two-level approach to morphological structure. Journal of Germanic Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S147054270800010X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S147054270800010X [Google Scholar]
82. Wood, Jim
    2023 Icelandic nominalizations and allosemy. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198865155.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198865155.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
83. Yu, Alan
    2007 A natural history of infixation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279388.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279388.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
84. Zaleska, Joanna
    2018 Overlapping phonological domains in Indonesian. Poster presented atAMP2018.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Zato, Zoltan
    2020 Encoding states is not enough: The case of Spanish deadjectival nominalizations. Studia linguistica(). –. 10.1111/stul.12139
    https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12139 [Google Scholar]
86. Zeijlstra, Hedde
    2004 Sentential negation and negative concord: University of Amsterdam dissertation.
87. Zimmermann, Eva & Jochen Trommer
    2013 The linearization of morphological weight. InFabian Heck & Anke Assmann (eds.), Rule interaction in grammar, –. Leipzig: Universität Leipzig.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Zimmermann, Malte & Mary Amaechi
    2018 Find construction analyze: Making sense of serial verb constructions. Handout from talk presented atthe Goethe University Frankfurt.
89. Zingler, Tim
    2022 Circumfixation: A semasiological approach. Word Structure(). –. 10.3366/word.2022.0199
    https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2022.0199 [Google Scholar]