1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Linguistic Variation
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of On the category and morphosyntax of numerals
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

This paper investigates the morphosyntax of numerals. Based on Russian and Dutch, we show that a division into three subcategories is necessary: (i) numeral ONE; (ii) Cardinals ≥ TWO; (iii) Indefinite Numerals such as MANY (cf., Barbiers 2007). We introduce a bi-partite structure, in which a low Classifier projection is connected to a high Classifier projection by an (abstract) preposition. Building on Borer (2005), Barbiers (2007), Kayne (2019), Corver (2021) we argue that ONE is an underspecified lower classifier, exhibiting meaningful parallels with the underspecified anchoring head at the clausal level (cf., Ritter & Wiltschko 2009, 2014). Cardinals are phrasal. Indefinite Numerals are subject to variation in whether they head ClassP-low or ClassP-high. Based on the morphosyntactic properties of the three categories we conclude that in some environments the PP and ClassP-high layers are not projected.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lv.24047.mor
2025-08-29
2026-06-08

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lv.24047.mor
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/lv.24047.mor/lv.24047.mor.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lv.24047.mor&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aarts, Bas
    2015 Numerals: which word class do they belong to?Grammarianism. https://grammarianism.wordpress.com/2015/09/28/numerals-which-word-class-do-they-belong-to/
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Acquaviva, Paolo
    2008 Lexical plurals: A morphosemantic approach. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199534210.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199534210.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Adams, Karen L., & Faires Conklin, Nancy
    1973 Toward a Theory of Natural Classification. Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society(), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bailyn, John F.
    2011 The Syntax of Russian (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511984686
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511984686 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bailyn, John F., & Nevins, Andrew
    2008 Russian genitive plurals are impostors. InAsaf Bachrach & Andrew Nevins (eds.), Inflectional IdentityVol., –. OUP Oxford. 10.1093/oso/9780199219254.003.0008
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199219254.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  6. Barbiers, Sjef
    2005 Variation in the morphosyntax of ONE. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, (). –. 10.1007/s10828‑004‑6539‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-004-6539-z [Google Scholar]
  7. 2007 Indefinite numerals ONE and MANY and the cause of ordinal suppletion. Lingua(). –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.03.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2017 Kwantitatief er en ze. Nederlandse taalkunde(). –. 10.5117/NEDTAA2017.2.BARB
     https://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2017.2.BARB [Google Scholar]
  9. Borer, Hagit
    2005 Structuring sense volume I: In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263905.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263905.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bošković, Željko
    2006 Case and agreement with genitive of quantification in Russian. InCedric Boeckx (ed.), Agreement Systems, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.92.07bos
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.92.07bos [Google Scholar]
  11. Brattico, Pauli & Alina Leinonen
    2009 Case distribution and nominalization: Evidence from Finnish. Syntax(). –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2008.01114.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2008.01114.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Bylinina, Lisa & Rick Nouwen
    2018 On “zero” and semantic plurality. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics(): , –. 10.5334/gjgl.441
     https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.441 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Rint Sybesma
    1999 Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry(). –. 10.1162/002438999554192
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554192 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chomsky, Noam
    2001 Derivation by phase. InMichael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, –. Cambridge: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cinque, Guglielmo
    2010 The syntax of adjectives: a comparative study. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262014168.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014168.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cinque, Guglielmo & Iliyana Krapova
    2007 A note on Bulgarian numeral classifiers. InGabriela Alboiu, Andrei A. Avram, Larisa Avram & Daniela Isac (eds.), Pitar Moş: A Building With a View. Papers in Honour of Alexandra Cornilescu, –. Bucharest: Editura Universității din Bucureşti.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Corbett, Greville G.
    1978 Universals in the syntax of cardinal numerals. Lingua. –. 10.1016/0024‑3841(78)90042‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(78)90042-6 [Google Scholar]
  18. Corver, Norbert
    2021 Adverbial -s as last resort. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory(). –. 10.1007/s11049‑021‑09527‑w
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-021-09527-w [Google Scholar]
  19. Croft, William
    1994 Semantic universals in classifier systems. WORD(). –. 10.1080/00437956.1994.11435922
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1994.11435922 [Google Scholar]
  20. Csirmaz, Anikó & Dékány, Éva
    2014 Hungarian is a classifier language. InRaffaele Simone & Francesca Masini (eds.), Word Classes: Nature, typology and representation, –. John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.332.08csi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.332.08csi [Google Scholar]
  21. De Belder, Marijke
    2011 A morphosyntactic decomposition of countability in Germanic. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics(). –. 10.1007/s10828‑011‑9045‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-011-9045-0 [Google Scholar]
  22. Dékány, Éva
    2021 The Hungarian nominal functional sequence. Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑63441‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63441-4 [Google Scholar]
  23. Dočekal, Mojmir
    2012 Atoms, groups and kinds in Czech. Acta Linguistica Hungarica: An International Journal of Linguistics(). –. 10.1556/ALing.59.2012.1‑2.5
     https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.59.2012.1-2.5 [Google Scholar]
  24. Dočekal, Mojmir & Marcin Wągiel
    2018 Event and degree numerals: Evidence from Czech. InDenisa Lenertová, Roland Meyer, Radek Šimík, and Luka Szucsich (eds.), Advances in Formal Slavic Linguistics 2016, –. Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.5281/zenodo.2554021
     https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2554021 [Google Scholar]
  25. Doetjes, Jenny S.
    1996 Mass and count: Syntax or semantics?InAnna Arregi & Crit Cremers (eds.), Proceedings of Meaning on the HIL, –. Leiden: HIL.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. 1998 Een beetje or the “mass only” puzzle. InSjef Barbiers, Johan Rooryck, & Jeroen van de Weijer (eds.), Small words in the big picture, –. Leiden: HIL.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Donohue, Mark
    2005 Numerals and their position in Universal Grammar. Journal of Universal Language(). –. 10.22425/jul.2005.6.2.1
     https://doi.org/10.22425/jul.2005.6.2.1 [Google Scholar]
  28. Duffield, Nigel
    2001 On certain head-final effects in Vietnamese. InKarine Megerdoomian & Leora Anne Bar-el (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, –. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Franks, Steven
    1994 Parametric properties of numeral phrases in Slavic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory(). –. 10.1007/BF00992929
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992929 [Google Scholar]
  30. Goto, Ksenia
    2012 On Russian Numeral Classifiers. 論叢 現代語・現代文化. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Grimm, Scott & Mojmir Dočekal
    2021 Counting aggregates, groups and kinds: Countability from the perspective of a morphologically complex language. InHana Filip (ed.), Countability in Natural Language, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316823774.005
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823774.005 [Google Scholar]
  32. Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
    1993 Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. InKenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Kayser (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, –. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Heeroma, Klaas Hanzen
    1948 De telwoorden. De Nieuwe Taalgids. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Her, One-Soon, Ching-Perng Chen & Hui-Chin Tsai
    2015 Justifying silent elements in syntax: The case of a silent numeral, a silent classifier, and two silent nouns in Mandarin Chinese. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics(). –. 10.1075/ijchl.2.2.02her
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.2.2.02her [Google Scholar]
  35. Her, One-Soon, Harald Hammarström & Marc Allassonnière-Tang
    2022 Defining numeral classifiers and identifying classifier languages of the world. Linguistics Vanguard(). –. 10.1515/lingvan‑2022‑0006
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2022-0006 [Google Scholar]
  36. Her, One-Soon, & Lai, Wan-Jun
    2012 Classifiers: The Many Ways to Profile ’one’ — A Case Study of Taiwan Mandarin. International Journal of Computer Processing of Languages(). –. 10.1142/S1793840612400053
     https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793840612400053 [Google Scholar]
  37. Hurford, James R.
    1987 Language and number: The emergence of a cognitive system. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Ionin, Tania & Ora Matushansky
    2018 Cardinals: The syntax and semantics of cardinal- containing expressions. Cambridge: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/8703.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8703.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kagan, Olga
    2010 Genitive objects, existence and individuation. Russian Linguistics(). –. 10.1007/s11185‑009‑9051‑x
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-009-9051-x [Google Scholar]
  40. Kayne, Richard S.
    2005 Silent Years, Silent Hours. InMovement and Silence. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179163.003.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179163.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2007 Several, few and many. Lingua(). –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.03.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2015 Once and twice. Studies in Chinese Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/scl‑2015‑0001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/scl-2015-0001 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2019 Some thoughts on one and two and other numerals. InLudovico Franco & Paolo Lorusso (eds.), Linguistic Variation: Structure and Interpretation, –. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501505201‑019
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501505201-019 [Google Scholar]
  44. Khrizman, Keren
    2016 Functional unit classifiers in (non)-classifier Russian. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication(). –. 10.4148/1944‑3676.1115
     https://doi.org/10.4148/1944-3676.1115 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2020 The cardinal/collective alternation in Russian numerals. InTeodora Radeva-Bork and Peter Kosta (eds.), Current Developments in Slavic Linguistics: Twenty Years After, –. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Khrizman, Keren & Susan Rothstein
    2015 Russian approximative inversion as a measure construction. InGerhild Zybatow, Petr Biskup, Marcel Guhl, Claudia Hurtig, Olav Mueller-Reichau and Maria Yastrebova (eds.), Slavic Grammar from a Formal Perspective. The 10th Anniversary FDSL Conference, Leipzig 2013, –. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Klockmann, Heidi
    2017 The design of semi-lexicality. Evidence from Case and Agreement in the nominal domain. Utrecht: LOT dissertation.
  48. Leu, Thomas
    2005 Something invisible in English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Lyskawa, Paulina
    2020 The structure of Polish numerically-quantified expressions. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics(): . –. 10.5334/gjgl.880
     https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.880 [Google Scholar]
  50. Madariaga, Nerea, & Iván Igartua
    2017 Idiosyncratic (Dis)agreement Patterns: The Structure and Diachrony of Russian Paucal Subjects. Scando-Slavica(), –. 10.1080/00806765.2017.1390922
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00806765.2017.1390922 [Google Scholar]
  51. Mamta, Kumari
    2023 Austro-Asiatic numeration. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research(). –. 10.47191/ijsshr/v6‑i7‑75
     https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i7-75 [Google Scholar]
  52. Martí Girbau, Núria
    2010 The syntax of partitives. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona dissertation.
  53. Matushansky, Ora
    2015 On Russian approximative inversion. InGerhild Zybatow, Petr Biskup, Marcel Guhl, Claudia Hurtig, Olav Mueller-Reichau and Maria Yastrebova (eds.), Slavic Grammar from a Formal Perspective. The 10th Anniversary FDSL Conference, Leipzig 2013, –. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Morozova, Irina & Sjef Barbiers
    2024 How and why is ONE different?Nota Bene (). –. Johns Benjamins. 10.1075/nb.00014.mor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/nb.00014.mor [Google Scholar]
  55. Nakonetchnaja-Lalanne, Victoria
    2013 К вопросу о функционировании собирательных числительных в современном русском языке / On the issue of the functional distinction between collective and cardinal numerals in contemporary Russian. Russian Linguistics(). –. 10.1007/s11185‑012‑9103‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-012-9103-5 [Google Scholar]
  56. Nesset, Tore & Laura A. Janda
    2023 A network of allostructions: Quantified subject constructions in Russian. Cognitive Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/cog‑2021‑0117
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2021-0117 [Google Scholar]
  57. Nikunlassi, Ahti
    2006 On the use of collective numerals with inanimate nouns in Russian (norm and usage). Scando-Slavica(). –. 10.1080/00806760600883735
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00806760600883735 [Google Scholar]
  58. Norris, Mark
    2018 The morphosyntax of number in Estonian numeral-noun constructions. Proceedings of the linguistic society of America. –. 10.3765/plsa.v3i1.4337
     https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v3i1.4337 [Google Scholar]
  59. Online Etymology Dictionary, a
    Online Etymology Dictionary, a, n.d.eleven (num.). InOnline Etymology Dictionary. RetrievedAugust 28, 2024. https://www.etymonline.com/word/eleven#etymonline_v_5729
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Online Etymology Dictionary, b
    Online Etymology Dictionary, b, n.d.twelve (num.). InOnline Etymology Dictionary. RetrievedAugust 28, 2024. https://www.etymonline.com/word/twelve#etymonline_v_18864
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Perlmutter, David M.
    1970 On the article in English. InManfred Bierwisch & Karl Erich Heidolph (eds.), Progress in linguistics, –. 10.1515/9783111350219.233
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111350219.233 [Google Scholar]
  62. Pijnenburg, W. J. J.
    1988 ‘De etymologie van elf en van duizend’. Mededelingenblad van vereniging van Oudgermanisten. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Postma, Gertjan
    1997 Logical Entailment and the Possessive Nature of Reflexive Pronouns. InHans Bennis, Pierre Pica & Johan Rooryck (eds.), Atomism and Binding, –. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. 2023 De paucalis in het Nederlands en de structuur van de grammatica. Nederlandse Taalkunde (). –. 10.5117/NEDTAA2023.3.003.POST
     https://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2023.3.003.POST [Google Scholar]
  65. Qi, Jianjun & Chuansheng He
    2019 The morphosyntax of numerals ʥi33/ʥĩ35 ‘one’ in Shuhi and implications for the semantics of numerals. Lingua. –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2019.03.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  66. Ritter, Elizabeth & Martina Wiltschko
    2009 Varieties of INFL: Tense, location, and person. InJeroen van Craenenbroeck (ed.), Alternatives to Cartography, –. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110217124.153
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110217124.153 [Google Scholar]
  67. 2014 The composition of INFL. NLLT. –. 10.1007/s11049‑014‑9248‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9248-6 [Google Scholar]
  68. Roehrs, Dorian
    2008 Something inner- and cross-linguistically different. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics(). –. 10.1007/s10828‑007‑9016‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-007-9016-7 [Google Scholar]
  69. Rothstein, Susan
    2017 Semantics for Counting and Measuring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9780511734830
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9780511734830 [Google Scholar]
  70. Shlonsky, Ur
    2004 The form of Semitic noun phrases. Lingua(). –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2003.09.019
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2003.09.019 [Google Scholar]
  71. 2012 On some properties of nominals in Hebrew and Arabic, the construct state and the mechanisms of AGREE and MOVE. Italian Journal of Linguistics(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Sleeman, Petra
    2025 The diminutive form eentje: A syntactic analysis. Paper presented atthe Grote Taaldag, 31 January, Utrecht.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Slim, Mieke S.
    2023 Are all, every and each all the same? The trajectory of universality in the development of English universal quantifiers. Talk atthe ComSyn Lectures, 12 October, Leiden.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Sussex, Roland
    1976 The Numeral Classifiers of Russian. Russian Linguistics(), –. 10.1007/BF03545839
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03545839 [Google Scholar]
  75. Svenonius, Peter
    2008 The position of adjectives and other phrasal modifiers in the decomposition of DP. InLouise McNally & Christopher Kennedy (eds.), Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics and discourseVol., –. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199211616.003.0002
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199211616.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  76. Wągiel, Marcin
    2014 Boys, girls, and scissors: A semantic analysis of Polish NPs headed by the numeral ‘dwoje’. InLudmila Veselovská and Markéta Janebová (eds.), Nominal Structures: All in Complex DPs, –. Olomouc: Palacký University.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 2020 Several quantifiers are different than others: Polish indefinite numerals. InFranc Marušič, Petra Mišmaš and Rok Žaucer (eds.), Advances in Formal Slavic Linguistics 2017, –. Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.5281/zenodo.3764869
     https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3764869 [Google Scholar]
  78. Wiltschko, Martina
    2014 The Universal Structure of Categories: Towards a Formal Typology. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139833899
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139833899 [Google Scholar]
  79. Yadroff, Michael
    1999 Formal properties of functional categories: The minimalist syntax of Russian nominal and prepositional expressions. Indiana University dissertation.
  80. Yadroff, Michael, & Loren Billings
    1998 The syntax of approximative inversion in Russian (and the general architecture of nominal expressions). Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics. –.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lv.24047.mor
Loading
On the category and morphosyntax of numerals
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.24047.mor
/content/journals/10.1075/lv.24047.mor
/content/journals/10.1075/lv.24047.mor
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: Indefinite Numerals ; comparative morphosyntax ; Dutch ; Hebrew ; ONE ; classifiers ; Cardinals ; Russian

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error