1887
image of Fixed-VSO word order in Mayan is a syntactic, not prosodic, innovation
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Fixed-VSO word order is understood to be a relatively recent innovation within the Mayan language family (England 1991), although it is a matter of recent debate whether this innovation is best understood as a prosodic (Clemens & Coon 2018) or a syntactic (Little 2020b) one. This paper adjudicates between these two proposals by closely examining the fixed-VSO Mayan language Mam. The data from Mam are consistent with Little’s (2020b) syntactic approach by which objects raise overtly in the narrow syntax, where they hold certain structural and interpretational properties consistent with their high position.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lv.24052.elk
2025-09-25
2026-05-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ables, Klaus & Ad Neeleman
    2012 Linear asymmetries and the LCA. Syntax():–. 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2011.00163.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2011.00163.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Acker, Ann Michelle
    2016 Voice and valence in Q’anjob’al. Doctoral dissertation, UCLA.
  3. Aissen, Judith
    1992 Topic and focus in Mayan. Language:–. 10.1353/lan.1992.0017
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1992.0017 [Google Scholar]
  4. 1997 On the syntax of obviation. Language:–. 10.1353/lan.1997.0042
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1997.0042 [Google Scholar]
  5. 1999 Agent focus and inverse in Tzotzil. Language:–. 10.2307/417057
    https://doi.org/10.2307/417057 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brodkin, Dan
    2023 Two steps to high absolutive syntax: Austronesian voice and agent focus in Mandar. Journal of East Asian Linguistics:–. 10.1007/s10831‑022‑09248‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-022-09248-0 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bruening, Ben
    2010 Double object constructions disguised as prepositional datives. Linguistic Inquiry():–. 10.1162/ling.2010.41.2.287
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2010.41.2.287 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2018 Double object constructions and prepositional dative constructions are distinct: a reply to Ormazabal and Romero 2020. Linguistic Inquiry():–. 10.1162/LING_a_00268
    https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00268 [Google Scholar]
  9. Clemens, Lauren
    2014 Prosodic noun incorporation and verb-initial syntax. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
  10. Clemens, Lauren & Jessica Coon
    2018 Deriving verb-initial word order in Mayan. Language:–. 10.1353/lan.2018.0017
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2018.0017 [Google Scholar]
  11. Clemens, Lauren & Maria Polinsky
    2017 VSO and VOS word order: primarily in Austronesian and Mayan languages. InBlackwell Companion to Syntax, 2nd ed., ed. byMartin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk–. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Coon, Jessica, Pedro Mateo Pedro, and Omer Preminger
    2014 The role of case in A-bar extraction asymmetries: evidence from Mayan. Linguistic Variation:–. 10.1075/lv.14.2.01coo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.14.2.01coo [Google Scholar]
  13. Davis, Henry
    1999 Word order and configurationality in St’át’imcets. In34th international conference on Salish and Neighboring languages, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Diesing, Molly
    1992Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dryer, Matthew
    2013 “Definite Articles.” In: Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.) WALS Online (v2020.4) [Data set]. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.13950591
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13950591 [Google Scholar]
  16. Elfner, Emily
    2012 Syntax-prosody interactions in Irish. Doctoral dissertation, UMass Amherst.
  17. England, Nora
    1983A Grammar of Mam: A Mayan Language. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 1991 Changes in basic word order in Mayan languages. International Journal of American Linguistics:–. 10.1086/ijal.57.4.3519735
    https://doi.org/10.1086/ijal.57.4.3519735 [Google Scholar]
  19. Folli, Raffaella & Heidi Harley
    2007 Causation, obligation, and argument structure: on the nature of little v. Linguistic Inquiry():–. 10.1162/ling.2007.38.2.197
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.2.197 [Google Scholar]
  20. Guasti, Maria Teresa
    1996 Semantic restrictions in Romance causative constructions and the incorporation approach. Linguistic Inquiry:–.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Guilfoyle, Eithne, Henrietta Hung, & Lisa Travis
    1992 Spec of IP and Spec of VP: Two subjects in Austronesian languages. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, , –. 10.1007/BF00133368
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133368 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kayne, Richard
    1994The antisymmetry of syntax (Vol.). MIT press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Little, Carol Rose
    2020a Left branch extraction, object shift, and freezing effects in Tumbalá Ch’ol. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2020b Mutual dependencies of nominal and clausal syntax in Ch’ol. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
  25. McCloskey, James
    2021 Predicates and heads in Irish clausal syntax. A revised and expanded version of McCloskey 2005. Ms., University of California, Santa Cruz.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Norman, William, and Lyle Campbell
    1978 Toward a Proto-Mayan syntax: a comparative perspective on grammar. InPapers in Mayan Linguistics, ed.Nora England, –. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Miscellaneous Publications in Anthropology.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Otaki, Koichi, Koji Sugisaki, Noriaki Yusa, & Masatoshi Koizumi
    2019 Two routes to the Mayan VOS: from the view of Kaqchikel. 言語研究 (Gengo Kenkyu) : –.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Pérez Vail, José Reginaldo
    2014 La inversión y obviación en mam de Cajolá. Master’s thesis, CIESAS, Mexico.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ramchand, Gillian
    1996 Two subject positions in Scottish Gallic: the syntax-semantics interface. Natural Language Semantics:–. 10.1007/BF00355412
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355412 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2014 Deriving variable linearization: a commentary on Simpson and Syed (2013). Natural Language & Linguistic Theory:263282. 10.1007/s11049‑013‑9225‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-013-9225-5 [Google Scholar]
  31. Reinhart, Tanya
    1983 Coreference and bound anaphora: a restatement of the anaphora questions. Linguistics and Philosophy:–. 10.1007/BF00868090
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00868090 [Google Scholar]
  32. Ross, John Robert
    1974 Three batons for cognitive psychology. InCognition and the symbolic processes, ed. byW. Weimer, and D. Palermo, –. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Royer, Justin
    2023 Binding and Anticataphora in Mayan. Linguistic Inquiry–.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Scott, Tessa
    2021 Formalizing three types of mixed A/A’ agreement. Presented at Move and Agree: Forum on the formal typology of A’ agreement. Hosted virtually by theUniversity of British Columbia and McGill University.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Selkirk, Elisabeth
    2011 The syntax-phonology interface. InJ. A. Goldsmith, J. Riggle, & A. C. L. Yu (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, –. Blackwell Publishing. 10.1002/9781444343069.ch14
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343069.ch14 [Google Scholar]
  36. Tada, Hiraoki
    1993 The A/A-bar partition in derivation. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
  37. Takita, Kensuke
    2020 Labeling for linearization. The Linguistic Review, (), –. 10.1515/tlr‑2019‑2035
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2019-2035 [Google Scholar]
  38. Tollan, Rebecca, & Clemens, Lauren
    2022 Syntactic ergativity as a constraint on crossing dependencies: the perspective from Mayan. Linguistic Inquiry, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Ussery, Cherlon
    2018 Inversion as rightward-dative shift in Icelandic ditransitives. InProceedings of Nels. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA: GLSA.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wexler, Kenneth, and Culicover, Peter
    1977 Some syntactic implications of a theory of language learnability. InCulicover, P., Wasow, T., and Akmajian, A., eds., Formal syntax, –. New York, Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Yuan, Michelle
    2022 Ergativity and object shift across Inuit. Language:–. 10.1353/lan.0.0270
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0270 [Google Scholar]
  42. Zavala, Roberto Maldonado
    2007 Inversion and obviation in Mesoamerica. InEndangered Languages, eds.Peter Austin and Andrew Simpson, volume Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft, –. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 2017 Alignment patterns. InThe Mayan Languages, eds.Judith Aissen, Nora C. England, and Roberto Zavala Maldonado, –. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lv.24052.elk
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lv.24052.elk
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: Mam ; Mayan ; morphosyntax ; prosody ; word order
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error