oa Truncated vocatives in Romanesco

References

1. Abatantuono, Michele, Marco Navigli & Fabrizio Rocca
   1999 Come t’antitoli? Ovvero Si le cose nun le sai… salle!. Rome: Gremese.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Abatantuono, Michele, Marco Navigli & Fabrizio Rocca
   2000 Come t’antitoli 2. Ovvero Si le sai dille! Anacaponzio?. Rome: Gremese.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aronoff, Mark
   1994 Morphology by itself. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Auer, Peter
   1997 Co-Occurrence restrictions between linguistic variables. A case for social dialectology, phonological theory and variation studies. InFrans L. Hinskens, Roeland van Hout & W. Leo Wetzels (eds.), Variation, change, and phonological theory, 69–99. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.146.05aue
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.146.05aue [Google Scholar]
5. Baayen, R. Harald, Anna Endresen, Laura A. Janda, Anastasia Makarova & Tore Nesset
   2013 Making choices in Russian: Pros and cons of statistical methods for rival forms. Russian Linguistics371. 253–291. 10.1007/s11185‑013‑9118‑6
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-013-9118-6 [Google Scholar]
6. Bernhard, Gerald
   1998 Das Romanesco des ausgehenden 20. Jahrhunderts. Variationslinguistische Untersuchungen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110936841
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110936841 [Google Scholar]
7. Breimaier, Federica
   2022 Il neutro a Molfetta: dialettologia e crowdsourcing. InLaura Baranzini, Matteo Casoni & Sabine Christopher (eds.), Linguisti in contatto 3. Ricerche di linguistica italiana in Svizzera e sulla Svizzera, 39–53. Bellinzona: Osservatorio linguistico della Svizzera italiana.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Christensen, Rune H. B.
   2019 A tutorial on fitting cumulative link mixed models with clmm2 from the ordinal package. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ordinal/vignettes/clmm2_tutorial.pdf. (27 April 2022.)
   [Google Scholar]
9. D’Achille, Paolo
   1995 A Paolo, e falla finita! Una nota sull’a allocutivo nel romanesco e nell’«italiano de Roma». Contributi di Filologia dell’Italia Mediana91. 251–267 (later updated inPaolo D’Achille & Claudio Giovanardi, Dal Belli ar Cipolla. Conservazione e innovazione nel romanesco contemporaneo, 29–41. Rome: Carocci 2001.
   [Google Scholar]
10. De Mauro, Tullio & Luca Lorenzetti
    1991 Dialetti e lingue nel Lazio. InAlberto Caracciolo (ed.), Storia d’Italia. Le regioni dall’Unità a oggi. Il Lazio, 306–364. Turin: Einaudi.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dörnyei, Zoltán
    2007 Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Endresen, Anna & Laura A. Janda
    2016 Five statistical models for likert-type experimental data on acceptability judgments. Journal of Research Design and Statistics in Linguistics and Communication Science31. 217–250.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Ervin-Tripp, Susan M.
    1964 An analysis of the interaction of language, topic and listener. American Anthropologist661. 86–102.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gibson, Edward & Evelina Fedorenko
    2013 The need for quantitative methods in syntax and semantics research. Language and cognitive processes281. 88–124. 10.1080/01690965.2010.515080
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.515080 [Google Scholar]
15. Giovanardi, Claudio
    2020 Sui neologismi della lettera “A” del Vocabolario del romanesco contemporaneo (VRC). InVincenzo Faraoni & Michele Loporcaro (eds.), « ’E parole de Roma ». Studi di etimologia e lessicologia romanesche, 215–226. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110677492‑012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110677492-012 [Google Scholar]
16. Giudici, Alberto & Chiara Zanini
    2021 A plural indefinite quantifier on the Romance-Slavic border. Word Structure14(2). 195–225. 10.3366/word.2021.0187
    https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2021.0187 [Google Scholar]
17. Gries, Stefan Th
    2020 On classification trees and random forests in corpus linguistics: Some words of caution and suggestions for improvement. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 16(3). 617–647. 10.1515/cllt‑2018‑0078
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2018-0078 [Google Scholar]
18. Hothorn, Torsten, Peter Buehlmann, Sandrine Dudoit, Annette Molinaro & Mark Van Der Laan
    2006 Survival ensembles. Biostatistics71. 355–373. 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxj011 [Google Scholar]
19. Howe, Jeff
    2006 The rise of crowdsourcing. WiredXIV6. pp.1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Incarbone Giornetti, Rossella
    (ed.) 1991 Benedetto Micheli, La Libberta romana acquistata e defesa. Povema eroicomico in dialetto romanesco del sec. XVIII. Rome: A.S. Edizioni.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kenstowicz, Michael
    2019 The analysis of truncated vocatives in Taviano (Salentino) Italian. Catalan Journal of Linguistics181. 131–159. 10.5565/rev/catjl.257
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.257 [Google Scholar]
22. Levshina, Natalia
    2020 Conditional inference trees and random forests. InMagali Paquot & Stephan Th. Gries (eds.), A practical handbook of corpus Linguistics, 611–643. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑46216‑1_25
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46216-1_25 [Google Scholar]
23. Loporcaro, Michele & Vincenzo Faraoni
    2021 Il costrutto allocutivo a Nando! in romanesco: fonologia, morfologia, sintassi, semantica, pragmatica. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie1371. 561–600. 10.1515/zrp‑2021‑0022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zrp-2021-0022 [Google Scholar]
24. Pasolini, Pier Paolo
    1955 Ragazzi di vita. Milan: Garzanti (quotations from the digital edition, in CD-ROM, of Letteratura Italiana Einaudi, Turin, Einaudi 2000).
    [Google Scholar]
25. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2020 R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing). Vienna. https://www.R-project.org
    [Google Scholar]
26. Schmid, Heinrich
    1976 It. Teodò! ‘Oh Theodor!’: vocativus redivivus?. InGermán Colón & Robert Kopp (eds.), Mélanges de langues et de littératures romanes offerts à Carl Theodor Gossen, vol.21, 827–864. Bern: Francke & Liège: Marche Romane.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Sonnenhauser, Barbara & Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna
    2013 Vocative!. In: Eaed. (eds.), Vocative! Addressing between system and performance, 1–23. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110304176.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110304176.1 [Google Scholar]
28. Strobl, Carolin, Anne-Laure Boulesteix, Thomas Kneib, Thomas Augustin & Achim Zeileis
    2008 Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics91. 10.1186/1471‑2105‑9‑307
    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-307 [Google Scholar]
29. Strobl, Carolin, Anne-Laure Boulesteix, Achim Zeileis & Torsten Hothorn
    2007 Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinformatics81. 10.1186/1471‑2105‑8‑25
    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-25 [Google Scholar]
30. Tagliamonte, Sali A. & R. Harald Baayen
    2012 Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change24(2). 135–178. 10.1017/S0954394512000129
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394512000129 [Google Scholar]
31. Vaccaro, Giulio
    2012 Posso fare un unico vocabolarione romanesco? Per un Dizionario del romanesco letterario. il 996 10. 65–85.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Vignuzzi, Ugo
    1994 Il dialetto perduto e ritrovato. In: Tullio De Mauro (ed.), Come parlano gli italiani, 25–33. Florence: La Nuova Italia.
    [Google Scholar]