1887
Volume 15, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1871-1340
  • E-ISSN: 1871-1375
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The paper is aimed at the evaluation of whether, and if, to what degree, the psychological factor of creativity affects the interpretation of complex words. The research covered 324 students (17–18 years old) who attended (at the time of the experiment) various secondary schools in Košice, Slovakia. For the sake of evaluation, the respondents were divided into two cohorts (H-cohort and L-cohort) for each of the creativity variables, based on their high vs. low scores achieved in the (TTCT). These variables include Elaboration, Fluency, Flexibility and Originality and two subscores, the Creative Strengths and the Composite Score. The interpretation test includes potential compound words and converted words, i.e., potential words that admit numerous potential readings. The evaluation process is primarily based on Štekauer’s theory of meaning predictability (2005), and covers four variables: the predictability rate, the objectified predictability rate, hapax legomena, and the average number of readings per informant. The results suggest that while the H-cohort is more ‘creative’ in interpreting potential words the influence of the individual variables/subscores varies substantially.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ml.00018.kor
2020-10-30
2020-11-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baas, M.
    (2019) In the mood for creativity. InV. J. C. Kaufman & R. J. E. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (2nd ed.) (pp.257–272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/9781316979839.014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.014 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barbot, B., & Eff, H.
    (2019) The genetic basis of creativity: A multivariate approach. InV. J. C. Kaufman & R. J. E. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (2nd ed.) (pp.132–147). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/9781316979839.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.009 [Google Scholar]
  3. Beghetto, R. A.
    (2019) Creativity in classrooms. InV. J. C. Kaufman & R. J. E. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (2nd ed.) (pp.587–606). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/9781316979839.029
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.029 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cotter, K. N., Christensen, A. P., & Silvia, P. J.
    (2019) Creativity’s role in everyday life. InV. J. C. Kaufman & R. J. E. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (2nd ed.) (pp.640–652). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/9781316979839.032
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.032 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cramond, B., Matthews-Morgan, J., Bandalos, D. & Zuo, L.
    (2005) A report on the 40-year follow-up of the Torrance tests of creative thinking: Alive and well in the New Millennium. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4), 283–291. doi:  10.1177/001698620504900402
    https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620504900402 [Google Scholar]
  6. Gajda, A., Karwowski, M. & Beghetto, R. A.
    (2017) Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(2), 269–299. doi:  10.1037/edu0000133
    https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000133 [Google Scholar]
  7. Guilford, J. P.
    (1956) Structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267–293. 10.1037/h0040755
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040755 [Google Scholar]
  8. (1986) Creative talents: Their nature, uses and development. Buffalo, NY: Bearly Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ivcevic, Z., & Hoffmann, J.
    (2019) Emotions and creativity: From process to person and product. InV. J. C. Kaufman & R. J. E. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (2nd ed.) (pp.273–295). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/9781316979839.015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.015 [Google Scholar]
  10. Jurčová, M. & Szobiová, E.
    (2008) Torranceho figurálny test tvorivého myslenia. Príručka. Bratislava: Psychodiagnostika.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kim, K. H.
    (2006) Is creativity unidimensional or multidimensional? Analyses of the Torrance tests of creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 251–259. doi:  10.1207/s15326934crj1803_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1803_2 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2017) The Torrance tests of creative thinking – figural or verbal: Which one should we use?Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 4(2), 302–321. doi:  10.1515/ctra‑2017‑0015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2017-0015 [Google Scholar]
  13. Körtvélyessy, L., Štekauer, P. and Zimmermann, J.
    (2015) Word-formation strategies: semantic transparency vs. formal economy. InL. Bauer, L. Körtvélyessy, & P. Štekauer (Eds.), Semantics of Complex Words (pp.85–114). Dordrecht: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Plucker, J. A., Makel, M. C., & Qian, M.
    (2019) Assessment of Creativity. InV. J. C. Kaufman & R. J. E. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (2nd ed.) (pp.44–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/9781316979839.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.005 [Google Scholar]
  15. Reiter-Palmon, R., Mitchell, K. S., & Royston, R.
    (2019) Improving creativity in organizational settings: Applying research on creativity to organizations. InV. J. C. Kaufman & R. J. E. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (2nd ed.) (pp.515–545). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/9781316979839.026
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.026 [Google Scholar]
  16. Runco, M. A., & Acar, S.
    (2019) Divergent thinking. InV. J. C. Kaufman & R. J. E. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (2nd ed.) (pp.224–254). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/9781316979839.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.013 [Google Scholar]
  17. Runco, M. A., Millar, G., Acar, S., & Cramond, B.
    (2010) Torrance tests of creative thinking as predictors of personal and public achievement: A fifty-year follow-up. Creativity Research Journal, 22(4), 361–368. doi:  10.1080/10400419.2010.523393
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.523393 [Google Scholar]
  18. Štekauer, P.
    (2005) Meaning Predictability in Word-Formation. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sfsl.54
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.54 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2017) Competition in natural languages. InJ. Santana-Lario & S. Valera (Eds.), Competing Patterns in English Affixation (pp.15–32). Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Sternberg, R. J.
    (2006) The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal18(1), 87–98. 10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10 [Google Scholar]
  21. Torrance, E. P.
    (1966) The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Norms-Technical Manual Research Edition-Verbal Tests, Forms A and B-Figural Tests, Forms A and B. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (1974) The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking – Norms, Technical Manual Research Edition – Verbal Tests, Forms A and B – Figural Tests, Forms A and B. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (1987) Guidelines for administration and scoring/comments on using the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (1990) The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking – Norms, Technical Manual Figural (Streamlined) Forms A & B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (1998) The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking – Norms, Technical Manual Figural (Streamlined) Forms A & B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Vartanian, O.
    (2019) Neuroscience of creativity. InV. J. C. Kaufman & R. J. E. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (2nd ed.) (pp.148–172). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/9781316979839.010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.010 [Google Scholar]
  27. Ward, T. B., & Kennedy, E. S.
    (2017) Creativity research: more studies, greater sophistication and the importance of “big” questions. The Journal of Creative Behavior51(4), 285–288. doi:  10.1002/jocb.192
    https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.192 [Google Scholar]
  28. Ward, T. B., & Kolomyts, Y.
    (2019) Creative cognition. InV. J. C. Kaufman & R. J. E. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (2nd ed.) (pp.175–199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/9781316979839.011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.011 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ml.00018.kor
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.00018.kor
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error