Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1871-1340
  • E-ISSN: 1871-1375
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


Swedish native speakers (NSs) unconsciously use tones realized on word stems to predict upcoming suffixes during speech comprehension. The present response time study investigated whether relatively proficient second language (L2) learners of Swedish have acquired the underlying association between tones and suffixes without explicit instruction, internalizing a feature that is specific to their L2. Learners listened to sentences in which the tone on the verb stem either validly or invalidly cued the following present or past tense inflection. Invalidly cued suffixes led to increased decision latencies in a verb tense identification task, suggesting that learners pre-activated suffixes associated with stem tones in a manner similar to NSs. Thus, L2 learners seemed to have acquired the tone-suffix connections through implicit mechanisms. Correctly cued suffixes were associated with a smaller processing advantage in the L2 group relative to NSs performing the same task; nevertheless, results suggest a tendency for increasingly native-like tone processing with cumulative language experience. The way suffix type affected response times also indicates exposure-related effects.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bannert, R
    (2004) På väg mot svenskt uttal. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bruce, G
    (1977) Swedish word accents in sentence perspective. Lund: Gleerups.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chan, R.K.W. , & Leung, J.H.C
    (2014) Implicit learning of L2 word stress regularities. Second Language Research, 30, 463–484. doi: 10.1177/0267658313510169
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658313510169 [Google Scholar]
  4. Clausen, S.J. , & Kristensen, L.B.
    (2015) The cognitive status of stød. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 38, 163–187. doi: 10.1017/S0332586515000141
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586515000141 [Google Scholar]
  5. Davis, M.H. , Marslen-Wilson, W.D. , & Gaskell, M.G.
    (2002) Leading up the lexical garden-path: Segmentation and ambiguity in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 218–244. doi: 10.1037/0096‑1523.28.1.218
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.1.218 [Google Scholar]
  6. De Diego-Balaguer, R. , Toro, J.M. , Rodriguez-Fornells, A. , & Bachoud-Levi, A.C
    (2007) Different neurophysiological mechanisms underlying word and rule extraction from speech. PLoS ONE, 2, e1175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001175
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001175 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dell, G.S. , Reed, K.D. , Adams, D.R. , & Meyer, A.S.
    (2000) Speech errors, phonotactic constraints, and implicit learning: A study of the role of experience in language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1355–1367. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.26.6.1355
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1355 [Google Scholar]
  8. DeKeyser, R
    (2005) What makes second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 55 (Suppl. 1), 1–25. doi: 10.1111/j.0023‑8333.2005.00294.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00294.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Dienes, Z. , Altmann, G. , Kwan, L. , & Goode, A
    (1995) Unconscious knowledge of artificial grammars is applied strategically. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1322–1338. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.21.5.1322
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.5.1322 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dulany, D.E. , Carlson, R.A. , & Dewey, G.I.
    (1984) A case of syntactical learning and judgment: how conscious and how abstract?Journal Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 541–555. doi: 10.1037/0096‑3445.113.4.541
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.4.541 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dörnyei, Z
    (2005) The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellis, N.C.
    (2006) Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 164–94. doi: 10.1093/applin/aml015
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml015 [Google Scholar]
  13. Francis, A.P. , Schmidt, G.L. , Carr, T.H. , & Clegg, B.A.
    (2009) Incidental learning of abstract rules for non-dominant word orders. Psychological Research, 73, 60–74. doi: 10.1007/s00426‑008‑0138‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0138-6 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gardner, R.C.
    (1985) Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Granena, G
    (2013) Individual differences in sequence learning ability and second language acquisition in early childhood and adulthood, Language Learning, 63, 1–39. doi: 10.1111/lang.12018
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12018 [Google Scholar]
  16. Göransson, U. , & Parada, M
    (1997) På svenska! 1 (2nd ed.). Lund: Folkuniversitetets förlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hao, Y.-C
    (2012) Second language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese tones by tonal and non-tonal language speakers, Journal of Phonetics, 40, 269–279. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hoffmann, J. , & Sebald, A
    (2005) When obvious covariations are not even learned implicitly. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 449–480. doi: 10.1080/09541440440000203
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440440000203 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jiang, N
    (2007) Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning. Language Learning, 57, 1–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2007.00397.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00397.x [Google Scholar]
  20. Jiménez, L. , & Méndez, C
    (1999) Which attention is needed for implicit sequence learning?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 236–259. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.25.1.236
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.236 [Google Scholar]
  21. Karpicke, J.D. , & Pisoni, D.B.
    (2004) Using immediate memory span to measure implicit learning. Memory & Cognition, 32, 956–964. doi: 10.3758/BF03196873
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196873 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kemps, R.J.J.K. , Ernestus, M. , Schreuder, R. , & Baayen, R.H.
    (2005) Prosodic cues for morphological complexity: The case of Dutch plural nouns. Memory & Cognition, 33, 430–446. doi: 10.3758/BF03193061
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193061 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lardiere, D
    (1998) Case and tense in the “fossilized” steady state. Second Language Research, 14, 1–26. doi: 10.1191/026765898674105303
    https://doi.org/10.1191/026765898674105303 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee, Y.-S. , Vakoch, D.A. , & Wurm, L.H.
    (1996) Tone perception in Cantonese and Mandarin: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 527–542. doi: 10.1007/BF01758181
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01758181 [Google Scholar]
  25. Leung, J. , & Williams, J.N.
    (2011) The implicit learning of mappings between forms and contextually-derived meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 33–55. doi: 10.1017/S0272263110000525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000525 [Google Scholar]
  26. Levy Scherrer, P. , & Lindemalm, K
    (2007) Rivstart: A1 + A2 Textbok. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Maclntyre, P.D. , Clément, R. , Dörnyei, Z. , & Noels, K.A.
    (1998) Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situated model of confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 82, 545–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1998.tb05543.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x [Google Scholar]
  28. Morgan-Short, K. , Steinhauer, K. , Sanz, C. , & Ullman, M.T.
    (2012) Explicit and implicit second language training differentially affect the achievement of native-like brain activation patterns. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 933–947. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00119
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00119 [Google Scholar]
  29. Nyborg, R. , Pettersson, N.-O. , & Holm, B
    (2001) Svenska utifrån. Stockholm: Svenska institutet.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Onishi, K. , Chambers, K. , & Fisher, C
    (2002) Learning phonotactic constraints from brief auditory experience. Cognition, 83, B13–B23. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0277(01)00165‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00165-2 [Google Scholar]
  31. Paulsson, M
    (2006) Välkomna!: Schwedisch Lehrbuch mit 2 Audio-CDs. Stuttgart, Germany: Ernst Klett Sprachen.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Perruchet, P
    (2008) Implicit learning. In J. Byrne (Series Ed.) & H.L. Roediger , III (Vol. Ed.), Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference. Vol. 2: Cognitive psychology of memory (pp.597–621), Oxford: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978‑012370509‑9.00149‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012370509-9.00149-2 [Google Scholar]
  33. Perruchet, P. , & Pacton, S
    (2006) Implicit learning and statistical learning: One phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 233–238. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.006 [Google Scholar]
  34. Pienemann, M. , & Håkansson, G
    (1999) A unified approach towards the development of Swedish as L2: A processability account. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 383–420. doi: 10.1017/S0272263199003022
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199003022 [Google Scholar]
  35. Pierrehumbert, J
    (2001) Stochastic phonology. GLOT, 5, 195–207.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Portin, M. , Lehtonen, M. , Harrer, G. , Wande, E. , Niemi, J. , & Laine, M
    (2008) L1 effects on the processing of inflected nouns in L2. Acta Psychologica, 128, 452–465. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  37. Reber, A.S.
    (1967) Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 6, 855–63. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(67)80149‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(67)80149-X [Google Scholar]
  38. (1993) Implicit learning and Tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Reber, A.S. , & Allen, R
    (1978) Analogy and abstraction strategies in synthetic grammar learning: A functionalist interpretation. Cognition, 6, 189–221. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0277(78)90013‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(78)90013-6 [Google Scholar]
  40. Rebuschat, P. , & Williams, J.N.
    (2012) Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 829–56. doi: 10.1017/S0142716411000580
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000580 [Google Scholar]
  41. Rehnqvist, G
    (2010) Svenska för utländska studenter (2nd ed.). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Riad, T
    (2014) The phonology of Swedish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Roll, M
    (2015) A neurolinguistic study of South Swedish word accents: Electrical brain potentials in nouns and verbs. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 38(2), 149–162. doi: 10.1017/S0332586515000189
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586515000189 [Google Scholar]
  44. Roll, M. , Horne, M. , & Lindgren, M
    (2010) Word accents and morphology – ERPs of Swedish word processing. Brain Research, 1330, 114–123. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.03.020
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.03.020 [Google Scholar]
  45. Roll, M. , Söderström, P. , & Horne, M
    (2013) Word-stem tones cue suffixes in the brain. Brain Research, 1520, 116–120. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.05.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2013.05.013 [Google Scholar]
  46. Roll, M. , Söderström, P. , Mannfolk, P. , Shtyrov, Y. , Johansson, M. , van Westen, D. , & Horne, M
    (2015) Word tones cueing morphosyntactic structure: Neuroanatomical substrates and activation time course assessed by EEG-fMRI. Brain and Language, 150, 14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.07.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2015.07.009 [Google Scholar]
  47. Salverda, A. , Dahan, D. , & McQueen, J
    (2003) The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension. Cognition, 90, 51–89. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0277(03)00139‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00139-2 [Google Scholar]
  48. Schmidt, R
    (2001) Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003 [Google Scholar]
  49. Skehan, P
    (2015) Foreign language aptitude and its relationship with grammar: A critical overview. Applied Linguistics, 36, 367–384. doi: 10.1093/applin/amu072
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu072 [Google Scholar]
  50. Söderström, P. , Roll, M. , & Horne, M
    (2012) Processing morphologically conditioned word accents. The Mental Lexicon, 7(1), 77–89. doi: 10.1075/ml.7.1.04soe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.7.1.04soe [Google Scholar]
  51. Thunberg, L
    (2008) Börja öva svensk grammatik. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Toro, J.M. , Sinnett, S. , & Soto-Faraco, S
    (2005) Speech segmentation by statistical learning depends on attention. Cognition, 97, B25–B34. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.006 [Google Scholar]
  53. Wayland, R.P. , & Guion, S.G.
    (2004) Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: A preliminary report. Language Learning, 54, 681–712. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00283.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00283.x [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error