1887
Linguistic Perspectives on Morphological Processing
  • ISSN 1871-1340
  • E-ISSN: 1871-1375
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

An extensive body of psycholinguistic research suggests that word reading involves morphological decomposition: Individual morphemes are extracted and lexically accessed when skilled readers are presented with multi-morphemic orthographic stimuli. This view is supported by the Morpheme Interference Effect (MIE): Responses to pseudowords that contain real morphemes are slower and less accurate than responses to pseudowords that contain invented morphemes. The MIE was previously demonstrated in several languages with linear morphologies. Here, we examined whether the MIE applies to Hebrew, a language with an interleaved morphology, and whether it generalizes across the nominal and verbal domains. Participants performed a lexical decision task on visually presented Hebrew words and pseudowords derived from real or invented roots. The results showed robust MIEs in both the verbal and nominal domains. Specifically, pseudowords derived from real roots induced significantly lower accuracy and longer response times compared to pseudowords derived from invented roots. Participants’ verbal and nominal MIEs were significantly correlated, suggesting that the MIE captures a general sensitivity to morphological structure.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ml.11.2.05yab
2016-07-18
2019-10-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amenta, S. , & Crepaldi, D
    (2012) Morphological processing as we know it: An analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232 [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews, S
    (1997) The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 439–461. doi: 10.3758/BF03214334
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214334 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baayen, R.H. , Milin, P. , Đurđević, D.F. , Hendrix, P. , & Marelli, M
    (2011) An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, 118, 438–481. doi: 10.1037/a0023851
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023851 [Google Scholar]
  4. Balota, D.A. , Cortese, M.J. , Sergent-Marshall, S.D. , Spieler, D.H. , & Yap, M.J
    (2004) Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 283–316. doi: 10.1037/0096‑3445.133.2.283
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bat-El, O
    (1994) Stem modification and cluster transfer in Modern Hebrew. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 12, 571–596. doi: 10.1007/BF00992928
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992928 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2003) The fate of the consonantal root and the binyan in Optimality Theory. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes, 32, 31–60. doi: 10.4000/rlv.442
    https://doi.org/10.4000/rlv.442 [Google Scholar]
  7. Beyersmann, E. , Castles, A. , & Coltheart, M
    (2012) Morphological processing during visual word recognition in developing readers: Evidence from masked priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1306–1326. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.656661
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.656661 [Google Scholar]
  8. Burani, C. , Arduino, L.S. , & Marcolini, S
    (2006) Naming morphologically complex pseudowords: A headstart for the root?The Mental Lexicon, 1, 299–327. doi: 10.1075/ml.1.2.07bur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.1.2.07bur [Google Scholar]
  9. Butterworth, B
    (1983) Lexical representations. In B.Butterwoth (Ed.), Language production (pp.257–294). London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bybee, J
    (1995) Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 425–455. doi: 10.1080/01690969508407111
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969508407111 [Google Scholar]
  11. Caramazza, A. , Laudanna, A. , & Romani, C
    (1988) Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297–332. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0277(88)90017‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90017-0 [Google Scholar]
  12. Carlisle, J.F
    (2000) Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing, 12, 169–190. doi: 10.1023/A:1008131926604
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008131926604 [Google Scholar]
  13. Casalis, S. , Colé, P. , & Sopo, D
    (2004) Morphological awareness in developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 114–138. doi: 10.1007/s11881‑004‑0006‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-004-0006-z [Google Scholar]
  14. Casalis, S. , Quémart, P. , & Duncan, L.G
    (2015) How language affects children’s use of derivational morphology in visual word and pseudoword processing: evidence from a cross-language study. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–10. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00452
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00452 [Google Scholar]
  15. Coltheart, M. , Davelaar, E. , Jonasson, T. , & Besner, D
    (1977) Access to the internal lexicon. In S.Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp.535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Crepaldi, D. , Rastle, K. , & Davis, C.J
    (2010) Morphemes in their place: Evidence for position-specific identification of suffixes. Memory & Cognition, 38, 312–321. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.3.312
    https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.3.312 [Google Scholar]
  17. Crepaldi, D. , Rastle, K. , Davis, C.J. , & Lupker, S.J
    (2013) Seeing stems everywhere: position-independent identification of stem morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 39, 510–525. doi: 10.1037/a0029713
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029713 [Google Scholar]
  18. Deacon, S.H. , & Kirby, J.R
    (2004) Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223–238. doi: 10.1017/S0142716404001110
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001110 [Google Scholar]
  19. Deutsch, A
    (2015) The role of the nominal-pattern morpheme in lexical access in Hebrew: Evidence from written-word perception and single-word production. InThe 9th International Morphological Processing Conference (pp.53–54). Potsdam, Germany.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (2016) The separability of morphological processes from semantic meaning and syntactic class in production of single words: Evidence from the Hebrew root morpheme. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45, 1–28. doi: 10.1007/s10936‑014‑9317‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9317-3 [Google Scholar]
  21. Deutsch, A. , Frost, R. , & Forster, K.I
    (1998) Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1238–1255. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.24.5.1238
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.24.5.1238 [Google Scholar]
  22. Deutsch, A. , Frost, R. , Pelleg, S. , Pollatsek, A. , & Rayner, K
    (2003) Early morphological effects in reading: evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 415–422. doi: 10.3758/BF03196500
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196500 [Google Scholar]
  23. Deutsch, A. , Frost, R. , Pollatsek, A. , & Rayner, K
    (2005) Morphological parafoveal preview benefit effects in reading: Evidence from Hebrew. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 341–371. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000115
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960444000115 [Google Scholar]
  24. Deutsch, A. , & Malinovitch, T
    (2016) The role of the morpho-phonological word-pattern unit in single-word production in Hebrew. Journal of Memory and Language, 87, 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.005 [Google Scholar]
  25. Deutsch, A. , & Meir, A
    (2011) The role of the root morpheme in mediating word production in Hebrew. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 716–744. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2010.496238
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.496238 [Google Scholar]
  26. Efron, B. , & Tibshirani, R.J
    (1994) An introduction to the bootstrap. CRC press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Elbro, C. , & Arnbak, E
    (1996) The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 209–240. doi: 10.1007/BF02648177
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648177 [Google Scholar]
  28. Frost, R
    (2012) Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 263–279. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11001841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11001841 [Google Scholar]
  29. Frost, R. , Deutsch, A. , & Forster, K.I
    (2000) Decomposing morphologically complex words in a nonlinear morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 751–765. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.26.3.751
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.751 [Google Scholar]
  30. Frost, R. , Deutsch, A. , Gilboa, O. , Tannenbaum, M. , & Marslen-Wilson, W
    (2000) Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory & Cognition, 28(8), 1277–1288. doi: 10.3758/BF03211828
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211828 [Google Scholar]
  31. Frost, R. , Forster, K.I. , & Deutsch, A
    (1997) What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 829–856. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.23.4.829
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.23.4.829 [Google Scholar]
  32. Frost, R. , Kugler, T. , Deutsch, A. , & Forster, K.I
    (2005) Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: principles of lexical organization in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1293–326. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.31.6.1293
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1293 [Google Scholar]
  33. Frost, R. , & Plaut, D.C
    (2005) The word-frequency database for printed Hebrew. Available fromword-freq.mscc.huji.ac.il/index.html
  34. Fruchter, J. , & Marantz, A
    (2015) Decomposition, lookup, and recombination: MEG evidence for the Full Decomposition model of complex visual word recognition. Brain and Language, 143, 81–96. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  35. Giraudo, H. , & Grainger, J
    (2000) Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 421–444. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119652
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119652 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2001) Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 127–131. doi: 10.3758/BF03196148
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196148 [Google Scholar]
  37. Goral, M. , & Obler, L.K
    (2003) Root-morpheme processing during word recognition in Hebrew speakers across the adult life span. In J.Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and aquisition in languages of semitic, root-based, morphology (pp.223–242). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/lald.28.12gor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.28.12gor [Google Scholar]
  38. Grainger, J. , Dufau, S. , Montant, M. , Ziegler, J.C. , & Fagot, J
    (2012) Orthographic processing in Baboons (Papio papio). Science, 336, 245–248. doi: 10.1126/science.1218152
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1218152 [Google Scholar]
  39. Horvath, J. , & Siloni, T
    (2009) Hebrew idioms: The organization of the lexical component. Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics, 1, 283–310. doi: 10.1163/187666309X12491131130666
    https://doi.org/10.1163/187666309X12491131130666 [Google Scholar]
  40. Itai, A. , & Wintner, S
    (2008) Language resources for Hebrew. Language Resources and Evaluation, 42, 75–98. doi: 10.1007/s10579‑007‑9050‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-007-9050-8 [Google Scholar]
  41. Janssen, N. , Bi, Y. , & Caramazza, A
    (2008) A tale of two frequencies: Determining the speed of lexical access for Mandarin Chinese and English compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1191–1223. doi: 10.1080/01690960802250900
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802250900 [Google Scholar]
  42. Jarvella, R.J. , & Wennstedt, O
    (1993) Recognition of partial regularity in words and sentences. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 34, 76–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9450.1993.tb01102.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1993.tb01102.x [Google Scholar]
  43. Kavé, G. , & Levy, Y
    (2004) Preserved morphological decomposition in persons with Alzheimer’s Disease. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 47, 835–847. doi: 10.1044/1092‑4388(2004/062)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2004/062) [Google Scholar]
  44. (2005) The processing of morphology in old age. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 48, 1442–1451. doi: 10.1044/1092‑4388(2005/100)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2005/100) [Google Scholar]
  45. Kirby, J.R. , Deacon, S.H. , Bowers, P.N. , Izenberg, L. , Wade-Woolley, L. , & Parrila, R
    (2012) Children’s morphological awareness and reading ability. Reading and Writing, 25, 389–410. doi: 10.1007/s11145‑010‑9276‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9276-5 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kolan, L. , Leikin, M. , & Zwitserlood, P
    (2011) Morphological processing and lexical access in speech production in Hebrew: Evidence from picture–word interference. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 286–298. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  47. Laudanna, A. , Cermele, A. , & Caramazza, A
    (1997) Morpho-lexical representations in naming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 49–66. doi: 10.1080/016909697386907
    https://doi.org/10.1080/016909697386907 [Google Scholar]
  48. Leikin, M. , & Even Zur, H
    (2006) Morphological processing in adult dyslexia. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 471–490. doi: 10.1007/s10936‑006‑9025‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9025-8 [Google Scholar]
  49. Longtin, C.-M. , & Meunier, F
    (2005) Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 26–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.008 [Google Scholar]
  50. Mahfoudhi, A. , Elbeheri, G. , Al-Rashidi, M. , & Everatt, J
    (2010) The role of morphological awareness in reading comprehension among typical and learning disabled native Arabic speakers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 500–514. doi: 10.1177/0022219409355478
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409355478 [Google Scholar]
  51. Manelis, L. , & Tharp, D.A
    (1977) The processing of affixed words. Memory & Cognition, 5, 690–695. doi: 10.3758/BF03197417
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197417 [Google Scholar]
  52. Marslen-Wilson, W. , Tyler, L.K. , Waksler, R. , & Older, L
    (1994) Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3–33. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.101.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  53. Martin, J. , Frauenfelder, U.H. , & Colé, P
    (2014) Morphological awareness in dyslexic university students. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 1213–1233. doi: 10.1017/S0142716413000167
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000167 [Google Scholar]
  54. McBride-Chang, C. , Wagner, R.K. , Muse, A. , Chow, B.W.-Y. , & Shu, H
    (2005) The role of morphological awareness in children’s vocabulary acquisition in English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 415–435. doi: 10.1017/S014271640505023X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640505023X [Google Scholar]
  55. Meunier, F. , & Longtin, C.-M
    (2007) Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 457–471. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.005 [Google Scholar]
  56. Nagy, W. , Berninger, V.W. , & Abbott, R.D
    (2006) Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147. doi: 10.1037/0022‑0663.98.1.134
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.134 [Google Scholar]
  57. Rastle, K. , & Davis, M.H
    (2008) Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 942–971. doi: 10.1080/01690960802069730
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802069730 [Google Scholar]
  58. Rastle, K. , Davis, M.H. , Marslen-Wilson, W.D. , & Tyler, L.K
    (2000) Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 507–537. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119689
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119689 [Google Scholar]
  59. Rastle, K. , Davis, M.H. , & New, B
    (2004) The broth in my brother’s brothel: morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090–1098. doi: 10.3758/BF03196742
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196742 [Google Scholar]
  60. Ravid, D. , & Mashraki, Y.E
    (2007) Prosodic reading, reading comprehension and morphological skills in Hebrew-speaking fourth graders. Journal of Research in Reading, 30, 140–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9817.2007.00340.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00340.x [Google Scholar]
  61. Saiegh-Haddad, E. , & Geva, E
    (2008) Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English–Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 21, 481–504. doi: 10.1007/s11145‑007‑9074‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9074-x [Google Scholar]
  62. Schiff, R. , & Raveh, M
    (2007) Deficient morphological processing in adults with developmental dyslexia: another barrier to efficient word recognition?Dyslexia, 13, 110–129. doi: 10.1002/dys.322
    https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.322 [Google Scholar]
  63. Schiff, R. , & Ravid, D
    (2007) Morphological analogies in Hebrew-speaking university students with dyslexia compared with typically developing gradeschoolers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 237–253. doi: 10.1007/s10936‑006‑9043‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9043-6 [Google Scholar]
  64. (2013) Morphological processing in Hebrew-speaking students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 220–229. doi: 10.1177/0022219412449425
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412449425 [Google Scholar]
  65. Schiff, R. , Schwartz-Nahshon, S. , & Nagar, R
    (2011) Effect of phonological and morphological awareness on reading comprehension in Hebrew-speaking adolescents with reading disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia, 61, 44–63. doi: 10.1007/s11881‑010‑0046‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-010-0046-5 [Google Scholar]
  66. Seidenberg, M.S
    (1987) Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy?In M.Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance 12: The psychology of reading (pp.245–263). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Share, D.L
    (2008) On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584–615. doi: 10.1037/0033‑2909.134.4.584
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584 [Google Scholar]
  68. Siegel, L.S
    (2008) Morphological awareness skills of English language learners and children with dyslexia. Topics in Language Disorders, 28, 15–27. doi: 10.1097/01.adt.0000311413.75804.60
    https://doi.org/10.1097/01.adt.0000311413.75804.60 [Google Scholar]
  69. Sonnenstuhl, I. , Eisenbeiss, S. , & Clahsen, H
    (1999) Morphological priming in the German mental lexicon. Cognition, 72, 203–236. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00033‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00033-5 [Google Scholar]
  70. Taft, M. , & Forster, K.I
    (1975) Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638–647. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(75)80051‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X [Google Scholar]
  71. Traficante, D. , Marcolini, S. , Luci, A. , Zoccolotti, P. , & Burani, C
    (2011) How do roots and suffixes influence reading of pseudowords: A study of young Italian readers with and without dyslexia. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 777–793. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2010.496553
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.496553 [Google Scholar]
  72. Ussishkin, A
    (1999) The inadequacy of the consonantal root: Modern Hebrew denominal verbs and output-output correspondence. Phonology, 16, 401–442. doi: 10.1017/S0952675799003796
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675799003796 [Google Scholar]
  73. (2006) Affix-favored contrast inequity and psycholinguistic grounding for non-concatenative morphology. Morphology, 16, 107–125. doi: 10.1007/s11525‑006‑0005‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-006-0005-3 [Google Scholar]
  74. Velan, H. , Deutsch, A. , & Frost, R
    (2013) The flexibility of letter-position flexibility: Evidence from eye movements in reading Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1143–1152. doi: 10.1037/a0031075
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031075 [Google Scholar]
  75. Velan, H. , & Frost, R
    (2007) Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: The impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 913–918. doi: 10.3758/BF03194121
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194121 [Google Scholar]
  76. (2009) Letter-transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 285–302. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  77. (2011) Words with and without internal structure: What determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing?Cognition, 118, 141–156. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.013 [Google Scholar]
  78. Velan, H. , Frost, R. , Deutsch, A. , & Plaut, D.C
    (2005) The processing of root morphemes in Hebrew: Contrasting localist and distributed accounts. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 169–206. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000214
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960444000214 [Google Scholar]
  79. Yap, M.J. , Sibley, D.E. , Balota, D.A. , Ratcliff, R. , & Rueckl, J
    (2015) Responding to nonwords in the lexical decision task: Insights from the English Lexicon Project. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 597–613. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000064
    https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000064 [Google Scholar]
  80. Yarkoni, T. , Balota, D. , & Yap, M
    (2008) Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 971–979. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.971
    https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.5.971 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ml.11.2.05yab
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error