Linguistic Perspectives on Morphological Processing
  • ISSN 1871-1340
  • E-ISSN: 1871-1375
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


The present study investigates to what extent morphological priming varies across different groups of native speakers of a language. In two masked-priming experiments, we investigate the processing of morphologically complex Turkish words in Turkish heritage speakers raised and living in Germany. Materials and experimental design were based on Kırkıcı and Clahsen’s (2013) study on morphological processing in Turkish native speakers and L2 learners, allowing for direct comparisons between the three groups. Experiment 1 investigated priming effects for morphologically related prime-target pairs. Heritage speakers showed a similar pattern of results as the L1 comparison group, with significant priming effects for prime-target pairs with inflected primes (e.g. ‘sorar-sor’ asks-ask) as well as for prime-target pairs with derived primes (e.g. ‘sağlık-sağ’ health-healthy). In Experiment 2, we measured priming effects for prime-target pairs which were semantically and morphologically unrelated, but only related with regard to orthographic overlap (e.g. ‘devre-dev’ period-giant). Unlike both L1 speakers raised in Turkey and highly proficient L2 learners, heritage speakers also showed significant priming effects in this condition. Our results suggest that heritage speakers differ from both native speakers and L2 learners in that they rely more on (orthographic) surface form properties of the stimulus during early stages of word recognition, at the expense of morphological decomposition.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Andrews, S. , & Hersch, J
    (2010) Lexical precision in skilled readers: Individual differences in masked neighbor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 299–318. doi: 10.1037/a0018366
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018366 [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews, S. , Lo, S
    (2012) Not all skilled readers have cracked the code: Individual differences in masked form priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(1), 152–163. doi: 10.1037/a0024953
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024953 [Google Scholar]
  3. Andrews, S. , & Lo, S
    (2013) Is morphological priming stronger for transparent than opaque words? It depends on individual differences in spelling and vocabulary. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 279–296. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Barr, D. , Levy, R. Scheepers, C. , & Tily, H.J
    (2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Beyersmann, E. , Casalis, S. , Ziegler, J.C. , & Grainger, J
    (2015) Language proficiency and morpho-orthographic segmentation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1054‑1061. doi: 10.3758/s13423‑014‑0752‑9
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0752-9 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bolger, P.A. , & Zapata, G.C
    (2011) Psycholinguistic approaches to language processing in heritage speakers. Heritage Language Journal, 8, 1–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Clahsen, H. , & Neubauer, K
    (2010) Morphology, frequency, and the processing of derived words in native and nonnative speakers. Lingua, 120, 2627–2637. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.06.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.06.007 [Google Scholar]
  8. Clahsen, H. , Felser, C. , Sato, M. & Silva, R
    (2010) Morphological structure in native and nonnative language processing. Language Learning60: 21–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00550.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00550.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Diependaele, K. , Duñabeitia, J.A. , Morris, J. , & Keuleers, E
    (2011) Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 344–358. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  10. Feldman, L.B. , Kostic, A. , Basnight-Brown, D.M. , Filipovic Durdevic, D. , & Pastizzo, M.J
    (2010) Morphological facilitation for regular and irregular verb formations in native and nonnative speakers: Little evidence for two distinct mechanisms. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 119–135. doi: 10.1017/S1366728909990459
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990459 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gor, K. , & Cook, S
    (2010) Non-native processing of verbal morphology: In search of regularity. Language Learning, 60.1, 88–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00552.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00552.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Heyer, V. , & Clahsen, H
    (2015) Late bilinguals see a scan in scanner AND in scandal: Dissecting formal overlap from morphological priming in the processing of derived words. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 543–550. doi: 10.1017/S1366728914000662
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000662 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kırkıcı, B. , & Clahsen, H
    (2013) Inflection and derivation in native and non-native language processing: Masked priming experiments on Turkish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 776–794. doi: 10.1017/S1366728912000648
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000648 [Google Scholar]
  14. Lavric, A. , Elchlepp, H. , & Rastle, K
    (2012) Tracking hierarchical processing in morphological decomposition with brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 811–816. doi: 10.1037/a0028960
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028960 [Google Scholar]
  15. Marslen-Wilson, W.D
    (2007) Morphological processes in language comprehension. In G. Gaskel (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Marslen-Wilson, W.D. , Bozic, M. , & Randall, B
    (2008) Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form, and meaning. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 394–421. doi: 10.1080/01690960701588004
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701588004 [Google Scholar]
  17. Montrul, S
    (2002) Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinctions in adult bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 39–68. doi: 10.1017/S1366728902000135
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728902000135 [Google Scholar]
  18. Montrul, S. , & Bowles, M
    (2009) Back to basics: Incomplete knowledge of Differential Object Marking in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 363–383. doi: 10.1017/S1366728909990071
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990071 [Google Scholar]
  19. Montrul, S. , Foote, R. , & Perpiñán, S
    (2008) Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning, 58, 503–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2008.00449.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00449.x [Google Scholar]
  20. Neubauer, K. , & Clahsen, H
    (2009) Decomposition of inflected words in a second language: An experimental study of German participles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 403–435. doi: 10.1017/S0272263109090354
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109090354 [Google Scholar]
  21. Rastle, K. , Davis, M.D. , Marslen-Wilson, W.D. , & Tyler, L.K
    (2000) Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 407–437. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119689
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119689 [Google Scholar]
  22. Rastle, K. , Davis, M.D. , & New, B
    (2004) The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morphoorthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090–1098. doi: 10.3758/BF03196742
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196742 [Google Scholar]
  23. Rastle, K. , & Davis, M.H
    (2008) Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 942–971. doi: 10.1080/01690960802069730
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802069730 [Google Scholar]
  24. Rothman, J
    (2009) Understanding the nature and outcomes of early bilingualism: Romance languages as heritage languages, International Journal of Bilingualism, 13, 155–163. doi: 10.1177/1367006909339814
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006909339814 [Google Scholar]
  25. Rothman, J. , & Treffers-Daller, J
    (2014) A prolegomenon to the construct of the native speaker: Heritage speaker bilinguals are natives too!Applied Linguistics, 35, 93–98. doi: 10.1093/applin/amt049
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt049 [Google Scholar]
  26. Say, B. , Zeyrek, D. , Oflazer, K. , & Özge, U
    (2002) Development of a corpus and a Treebank for present-day written Turkish. In K.İmer & G.Doğan (Eds.), Current research in Turkish linguistics. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics. Northern Cyprus: Eastern Mediterranean University.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Schneider, W. , Eschman, A. , & Zuccolotto, A
    (2002) E-Prime User’s Guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Silva, R. & Clahsen, H
    (2008) Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11: 245–260. doi: 10.1017/S1366728908003404
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003404 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): complex words; heritage speakers; masked priming; morphological decomposition; Turkish
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error