1887
Volume 12, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1871-1340
  • E-ISSN: 1871-1375
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The current study examined how non-native speakers process the highly productive derivational morphology of Arabic in which, in contrast to Indo-European languages, word formation involves interleaving a root and template structure. Previous research shows that native speakers of Arabic decompose morphologically complex words in lexical processing. Using cross-modal priming, the current study shows that non-native speakers of Arabic (L1 English) also decompose derived forms such that there is priming between words that share a common root which is not due to semantic or phonological overlap. In spite of the typological distance, native English speakers organize their L2 Arabic lexicons in a manner similar to native Arabic speakers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ml.12.1.02fre
2017-06-18
2018-10-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Babcock, L. , Stowe, J. C. , Maloof, C. J. , Brovetto, C. , & Ullman, M. T.
    (2012) The storage and composition of inflected forms in adult-learned second language: A study of the influence of length of residence, age of arrival, sex, and other factors. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(4), 820–840. doi: 10.1017/S1366728912000053
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000053 [Google Scholar]
  2. Basnight-Brown, D. M. , Chen, L. , Hua, S. , Kostic, A. , & Feldman, L. B.
    (2007) Monolingual and bilingual recognition of regular and irregular English verbs: Sensitivity to form similarity varies with first language experience. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(1), 65–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bat-El, O.
    (1994) Stem modification and cluster transfer in Modern Hebrew. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 12(4), 571–596. doi: 10.1007/BF00992928
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992928 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2003) Semitic verb structure within a universal perspective. Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 28, 29–60. doi: 10.1075/lald.28.02bat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.28.02bat [Google Scholar]
  5. Bentin, S. , & Frost, R.
    (1994) Morphologocal factors in visual word identification in Hebrew. In L. Feldman (Ed.) Morphological aspects of language processing. (pp.271–292). N.J., USA: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Boudelaa, S.
    (2014) Is the Arabic mental lexicon morpheme-based or stem-based? Implications for spoken and written word recognition. InHandbook of Arabic Literacy (pp.31–54). Springer Netherlands. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑8545‑7_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8545-7_2 [Google Scholar]
  7. Boudelaa, S. , & Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
    (2000) Non-concatenative morphemes in language processing: Evidence from Modern Standard Arabic. InISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop (ITRW) on Spoken Word Access Processes, 23–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Boudelaa, S. & Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
    (2001) Morphological units in the Arabic mental lexicon, Cognition, 81, 65–92. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0277(01)00119‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00119-6 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2004) Allomorphic variation in Arabic: implications for lexical processing and representation. Brain and Language, 90, 106–116. doi: 10.1016/S0093‑934X(03)00424‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00424-3 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2005) Discontinuous morphology in time: Incremental masked priming in Arabic. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 207–260. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000106
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960444000106 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2011) Productivity and priming: Morphemic decomposition in Arabic. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 624–652. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2010.521022
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.521022 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2013) Morphological structure in the Arabic mental lexicon: Parallels between standard and dialectal Arabic. Language and Cognitive Processes. 28(10), 1453–1473. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2012.719629
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.719629 [Google Scholar]
  13. Clahsen, H. , Balkhair, L. , Schutter, J-S. , & Cunnings, I.
    (2013) The time course of morphological processing in a second language. Second Language Research, 29(1), 7–31. doi: 10.1177/0267658312464970
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312464970 [Google Scholar]
  14. Clahsen, H. , Felser, C. , Neubauer, K. , Sato M. , & Silva R.
    (2010) Morphological structure in native and non-native language processing. Language Learning, 60, 21–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00550.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00550.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Cook, S. V. , & Gor, K.
    (2015) Lexical access in L2: Representational deficit or processing constraint?The Mental Lexicon, 10(2), 247–270. doi: 10.1075/ml.10.2.04coo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.10.2.04coo [Google Scholar]
  16. Coughlin, C. E. , & Tremblay, A. (2015) Morphological decomposition in native and non-native French speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(03), 524–542. doi: 10.1017/S1366728914000200
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000200 [Google Scholar]
  17. Deutsch, A. , & Frost, R.
    (2003) Lexical organization and lexical access in a non- concatenated morphology: Mapping the mental lexicon. In Y. Shimron (Ed.) Language processing and acquisition in Languages of Semitic, Root Based Morphology. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lald.28.09deu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.28.09deu [Google Scholar]
  18. Diependaele, K. , Duñabeitia, J. A. , Morris, J. , & Keuleers, E.
    (2011) Fast Morphological Effects in First and Second Language Word Recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 344–358. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  19. Diependaele, K. , Sandra, D. & Grainger, J.
    (2005) Masked cross-modal priming: Unravelling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(1–2), 75–114. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000197
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960444000197 [Google Scholar]
  20. Feldman, L. B. , Barac-Cikoja, D. & Kostić, A.
    (2002) Semantic aspects of morphological processing: Transparency effects in Serbian. Memory & Cognition, 30(4), 629–636. doi: 10.3758/BF03194964
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194964 [Google Scholar]
  21. Feldman, L. B. , Frost, R. , & Pnini, T.
    (1995) Decomposing words into their constituent morphemes: evidence from English and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 947–960.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Feldman, L. B. , Kostić, A. , Basnight-Brown, D. M. , Filipović Đurđević, D. , Pastizzo, M. J.
    (2010) Morphological facilitation for regular and irregular verb formations in native and non-native speakers: Little evidence for two distinct mechanisms. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 119–135. doi: 10.1017/S1366728909990459
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990459 [Google Scholar]
  23. Feldman, L. B. , O’Connor, P. A. , Moscoso del Prado Martín, F.
    (2009) Early morphological processing is morphosyntactic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(4), 684–691. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.4.684
    https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.4.684 [Google Scholar]
  24. Feldman, L. B. , & Soltano, E. G.
    (1999) Morphological priming: The role of prime duration, semantic transparency, and affix position. Brain & Language, 68, 33–39. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2077
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2077 [Google Scholar]
  25. Foote, R.
    (2015) The storage and processing of morphologically complex words in L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, pp.1–33. doi: 10.1017/S0272263115000376
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000376 [Google Scholar]
  26. Forster, K. I. & Forster, J. C.
    (2003) DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(1), 116–124. doi: 10.3758/BF03195503
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195503 [Google Scholar]
  27. Frost, R. , Deutsch, A. & Forster, K. I.
    (2000) Decomposing Morphologically Complex Words in a Nonlinear Morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory, & Cognition, 26, 751–765. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.26.3.751
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.751 [Google Scholar]
  28. Frost, R. , Deutsch, A. , Gilboa, O. , Tannenbaum, M. & Marslen-Wilson, W.
    (2000) Morphological Priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory & Cognition, 28(6), 1277–1288. doi: 10.3758/BF03211828
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211828 [Google Scholar]
  29. Gor, K.
    (2010) Beyond the obvious: Do second language learners process inflectional morphology?Language Learning, 60(1), 1–20. Introduction to the thematic issue. Guest editor K. Gor . doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00549.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00549.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Gor, K. , & Cook, S.
    (2010) Non-native processing of verbal morphology: In search of regularity. Language Learning, 60(1), 88–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00552.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00552.x [Google Scholar]
  31. Gor, K. , & Jackson, S. (2013) Morphological decomposition and lexical access in a native and second language: A nesting doll effect. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(7), 1065–1091. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2013.776696
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.776696 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hamburger, M. , & Slowiaczek, L. M.
    (1996) Phonological priming reflects lexical competition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 520–525. doi: 10.3758/BF03214558
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214558 [Google Scholar]
  33. Holes, C.
    (1995) Modern Arabic: structures, functions, and varieties. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Jacob, G. , Fleischhauer, E. & Clahsen, H.
    (2013) Allomorphy and afixation in morphological processing: A cross-modal priming study with late bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 924–933. doi: 10.1017/S1366728913000291
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000291 [Google Scholar]
  35. Jiang, N.
    (2000) Lexical representation and development in a second language. Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 47–77. doi: 10.1093/applin/21.1.47
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.1.47 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kieffer, M. J. & Lesaux, N. K.
    (2008) The role of derivational morphology in the reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English language learners. Reading and Writing, 21, 783–804. doi: 10.1007/s11145‑007‑9092‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9092-8 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kirkici, B. & Clahsen, H.
    (2013) Inflection and derivation in native and non-native language processing: Masked priming experiments in Turkish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(4), 776–791. doi: 10.1017/S1366728912000648
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000648 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kossmann, M.
    (2013) The Arabic influence on northern Berber. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Kroll, J. F. & Stewart, E.
    (1994) Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149–174. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1994.1008
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1008 [Google Scholar]
  40. Longtin, C. , Segui, J. & Hallé, P. A.
    (2003) Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(3), 313–334. doi: 10.1080/01690960244000036
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960244000036 [Google Scholar]
  41. Marslen-Wilson, W. , Tyler, L. , Waksler, R. , & Older, L.
    (1994) Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3–33. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.101.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  42. McCarthy, J. J.
    (1979) Formal problems in Semitic morphology and phonology. Dissertation MIT, Cambridge, MA.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. (1981) A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic inquiry, 12(3), 373–418.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. McCarthy, J. , & Prince, A.
    (1990) Prosodic morphology and templatic morphology. InPerspectives on Arabic linguistics II: papers from the second annual symposium on Arabic linguistics (pp.1–54).
    [Google Scholar]
  45. McDonald, J. L.
    (2006) Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 381–401. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.06.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.06.006 [Google Scholar]
  46. Neubauer, K. & Clahsen, H.
    (2009) Decomposition of inflected words in a second language: An experimental study of German participles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 403–35. doi: 10.1017/S0272263109090354
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109090354 [Google Scholar]
  47. Perea, M. , & Lupker, S. J.
    (2003) Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita and S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp.97–120). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Perea, M. , Abu Mallouh, R. , & Carreiras, M.
    (2010) The search of an input coding scheme: Transposed-letter priming in Arabic. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17, 375–380. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.3.375
    https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.3.375 [Google Scholar]
  49. Portin, M. , Lehtonen, M. , & Laine, M. (2007) Processing of inflected nouns in late bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28 (1), 135–156. doi: 10.1017/S014271640607007X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640607007X [Google Scholar]
  50. Portin, M. , Lehtonen, M. , Harrer, G. , Wande, E. , Niemi, J. , & Laine, M.
    (2008) L1 effects on the processing of inflected nouns in L2. Acta Psychologica, 128 (3), 452–465. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  51. Prunet, J. , Beland, R. & Idrissi, A.
    (2000) The Mental Representation of Semitic Words. Linguistic Inquiry, 31, 609–648. doi: 10.1162/002438900554497
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554497 [Google Scholar]
  52. Rastle, K. , Davis, M. H. , Marslen-Wilson, W. D. , & Tyler, L. K.
    (2000) Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time course study. Language and cognitive processes. 15(4/5), 507–537. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119689
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119689 [Google Scholar]
  53. Rastle, K. , Lavric, A. , Elchlepp, H. , & Crepaldi, D.
    (2015) Processing differences across regular and irregular inflections revealed through ERPs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(3), 747–760.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Ratcliffe, R.
    (1997) Prosodic templates in a word-based morphological analysis of Arabic. In Eid, M. and R. R. Ratcliffe (eds.) Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics X, Papers from the tenth annual symposium on Arabic linguistics, pp.147–172. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. doi: 10.1075/cilt.153.10rat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.153.10rat [Google Scholar]
  55. Ratcliffe, R. R.
    (2004) Sonority-based parsing at the margins of Arabic morphology: In response to Prunet, Béland and Idrissi (2000) and Davis and Zawaydeh (1999, 2001). Al-'Arabiyya, 37, 7395.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Silva, R. , & Clahsen, H.
    (2008) Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 245–260. doi: 10.1017/S1366728908003404
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003404 [Google Scholar]
  57. Slowiaczek, L. M. , & Hamburger, M.
    (1992) Prelexical facilitation and lexical interference in auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(6), 1239–1250.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Ussishkin, A.
    (2000) The emergence of fixed prosody. Ph.D. thesis, University of California at Santa Cruz.
  59. (2003) Templatic effects as fixed prosody: The verbal system in Semitic. Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science series, 4, pp.511–530.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. (2005) A Fixed Prosodic Theory of Nonconcatenative Templatic Morphology. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 23(1), pp.169–218. doi: 10.1007/s11049‑003‑7790‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-003-7790-8 [Google Scholar]
  61. Ussishkin, A. , Dawson, C. R. , Wedel, A. , & Schluter, K.
    (2015) Auditory masked priming in Maltese spoken word recognition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(9), 1096–1115. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1005635
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1005635 [Google Scholar]
  62. Velan, H. , & Frost, R.
    (2009) Letter-transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew. Journal of Memory & Language, 61, 285–302. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  63. Versteegh, K.
    (1997) The Arabic Language. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Voga, М. , Anastassiadis-Symeonidis, А. , & Giraudo, H.
    (2014) Does morphology play a role in L2 processing? Two masked priming experiments with Greek speakers of ESL. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 37, 338–352. doi: 10.1075/li.37.2.10vog
    https://doi.org/10.1075/li.37.2.10vog [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ml.12.1.02fre
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.12.1.02fre
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error