Volume 12, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1871-1340
  • E-ISSN: 1871-1375
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


In tasks such as lexical decision, people respond differently to morphologically complex words compared to morphologically simple ones (e.g. in English, vs. ). These divergent responses could conceivably arise from differences in activation levels, or alternatively, from the additional steps required to decompose complex words. To investigate this issue, we used the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) false memory paradigm, which probes activation of lexical representations by measuring the probability of recalling or recognizing a word (such as ) after listening to a list of its phonological neighbors (such as , , etc.). Our results showed a significant false memory effect for complex words, which demonstrates that similar-sounding words can activate representations for stem-plus-affix combinations. Our results also showed no significant difference between false memory rates for complex versus simple words, which suggests that complex stem-plus-affix representations activate at levels equivalent to those of simple stem representations. These findings indicate that differences in activation level probably do not lie at the source of divergent responses to complex and simple words, and that decomposition is the more likely origin.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Allen, M. , & Badecker, W.
    (2002) Inflectional regularity: Probing the nature of lexical representation in a cross-modal priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(4), 705–722. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2831
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2831 [Google Scholar]
  2. Amberg, M. , Yamashita, J. , & Wallace, W.
    (2004) Implicit word activation during pre-recognition processing influences correct recognition and estimates of presentation frequency. Memory, 12(2), 129–139. doi: 10.1080/09658210244000298
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210244000298 [Google Scholar]
  3. Amenta, S. , & Crepaldi, D.
    (2012) Morphological processing as we know it: an analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in Psychology. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baayen, R. H. , Dijkstra, T. , & Schreuder, R.
    (1997) Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(1), 94–117. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2509
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2509 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ballardini, N. , Yamashita, J. A. , & Wallace, W. P.
    (2008) Presentation duration and false recall for semantic and phonological associates. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.01.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.01.008 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ballou, M. R. , & Sommers, M. S.
    (2008) Similar phenomena, different mechanisms: Semantic and phonological false memories are produced by independent mechanisms. Memory & Cognition, 36(8), 1450–1459. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.8.1450
    https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.8.1450 [Google Scholar]
  7. Balota, D. A. , Yap, M. J. , Hutchison, K. A. , Cortese, M. J. , Kessler, B. , Loftis, B. , Neely, J. H. , Nelson, D. L. , Simpson, G. B. , Treiman, R.
    (2007) The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459. doi: 10.3758/BF03193014
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193014 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bergman, M. W. , Hudson, P. T. , & Eling, P. A.
    (1988) How simple complex words can be: Morphological processing and word representations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40(1), 41–72. doi: 10.1080/14640748808402282
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748808402282 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bozic, M. , & Marslen-Wilson, W.
    (2010) Neurocognitive Contexts for Morphological Complexity: Dissociating Inflection and Derivation. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(11), 1063–1073. doi: 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2010.00254.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00254.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Broadbent, D. E.
    (1967) Word-frequency effect and response bias. Psychological Review, 74(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1037/h0024206
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024206 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brysbaert, M. , Warriner, A. B. , & Kuperman, V.
    (2014) Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 904–911. doi: 10.3758/s13428‑013‑0403‑5
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5 [Google Scholar]
  12. Burani, C. , & Thornton, A. M.
    (2003) The interplay of root, suffix and whole-word frequency in processing derived words. Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs, 151, 157–208.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Caramazza, A. , Laudanna, A. , & Romani, C.
    (1988) Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28(3), 297–332. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0277(88)90017‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90017-0 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chan, K. Y. , & Vitevitch, M. S.
    (2009) The influence of the phonological neighborhood clustering coefficient on spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(6), 1934.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chateau, D. , Knudsen, E. V. , & Jared, D.
    (2002) Masked priming of prefixes and the influence of spelling – meaning consistency. Brain and Language, 81(1), 587–600. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2549
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2549 [Google Scholar]
  16. Collins, A. M. , & Loftus, E. F.
    (1975) A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.82.6.407
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cortese, M. J. , Khanna, M. M. , White, K. K. , Veljkovic, I. , & Drumm, G.
    (2008) The activation and monitoring of memories produced by words and pseudohomophones. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 393–414. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  18. Crepaldi, D. , Rastle, K. , Coltheart, M. , & Nickels, L.
    (2010) “Fell” primes “fall”, but does “bell” prime “ball”? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(1), 83–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  19. Deese, J.
    (1959) On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(1), 17–22. doi: 10.1037/h0046671
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046671 [Google Scholar]
  20. Diependaele, K. , Grainger, J. , & Sandra, D.
    (2012) Derivational morphology and skilled reading. The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 311–332. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139029377.021
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139029377.021 [Google Scholar]
  21. Dodson, C. S. , & Schacter, D. L.
    (2001) “If I had said it I would have remembered it: Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(1), 155–161. doi: 10.3758/BF03196152
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196152 [Google Scholar]
  22. Feldman, L. B.
    (2000) Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(6), 1431.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Feldman, L. B. , & Larabee, J.
    (2001) Morphological facilitation following prefixed but not suffixed primes: Lexical architecture or modality-specific processes?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(3), 680–692.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Forster, K. I.
    (1976) Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. Walker (Eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms (Vol.30, pp.256–287). New York: North-Holland.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Fowler, C. A. , Napps, S. E. , & Feldman, L.
    (1985) Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory & Cognition, 13(3), 241–255. doi: 10.3758/BF03197687
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197687 [Google Scholar]
  26. Gallo, D. A.
    (2006) Associative illusions of memory: False memory research in DRM and related tasks. Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (2010) False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion. Memory & Cognition, 38(7), 833–848. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.7.833
    https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.7.833 [Google Scholar]
  28. Garoff-Eaton, R. J. , Kensinger, E. A. , & Schacter, D. L.
    (2007) The neural correlates of conceptual and perceptual false recognition. Learning & Memory, 14(10), 684–692. doi: 10.1101/lm.695707
    https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.695707 [Google Scholar]
  29. Giraudo, H. , & Grainger, J.
    (2003) On the role of derivational affixes in recognizing complex words: Evidence from masked priming. In R. H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological Structure in Language Processing (Vol.151, pp.209–232). New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110910186.209
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110910186.209 [Google Scholar]
  30. Glanzer, M. , & Bowles, N.
    (1976) An analysis the word-frequency effect in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Learning and Memory, 2(1), 21–31. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.2.1.21
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.2.1.21 [Google Scholar]
  31. Goh, W. D. , Suárez, L. , Yap, M. J. , & Tan, S. H.
    (2009) Distributional analyses in auditory lexical decision: Neighborhood density and word-frequency effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(5), 882–887. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.882
    https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.5.882 [Google Scholar]
  32. Goldinger, S. D. , Luce, P. A. , & Pisoni, D. B.
    (1989) Priming lexical neighbors of spoken words: Effects of competition and inhibition. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(5), 501–518. doi: 10.1016/0749‑596X(89)90009‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90009-0 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hicks, J. L. , & Marsh, R. L.
    (1999) Attempts to reduce the incidence of false recall with source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(5), 1195–1209.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hyönä, J. , Laine, M. , & Niemi, J.
    (1995) Effects of a word’s morphological complexity on readers’ eye fixation patterns. Studies in Visual Information Processing, 6, 445–452. doi: 10.1016/S0926‑907X(05)80037‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-907X(05)80037-6 [Google Scholar]
  35. Jaeger, T. F.
    (2008) Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  36. Jarvella, R. J. , & Wennstedt, O.
    (1993) Recognition of partial regularity in words and sentences. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 34(1), 76–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9450.1993.tb01102.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1993.tb01102.x [Google Scholar]
  37. Johnson, M. K.
    (2006) Memory and reality. American Psychologist, 61(8), 760–776. doi: 10.1037/0003‑066X.61.8.760
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.8.760 [Google Scholar]
  38. Johnson, M. K. , Hashtroudi, S. , & Lindsay, D. S.
    (1993) Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 3. doi: 10.1037/0033‑2909.114.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  39. Johnson, M. K. , & Raye, C. L.
    (1981) Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88(1), 67. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.88.1.67
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.67 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kempley, S. T. , & Morton, J.
    (1982) The effects of priming with regularly and irregularly related words in auditory word recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 73(4), 441–454. doi: 10.1111/j.2044‑8295.1982.tb01826.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1982.tb01826.x [Google Scholar]
  41. Kroll, N. E. , Knight, R. T. , Metcalfe, J. , Wolf, E. S. , & Tulving, E.
    (1996) Cohesion failure as a source of memory illusions. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(2), 176–196. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0010 [Google Scholar]
  42. Laine, M. , & Koivisto, M.
    (1998) Lexical access to inflected words as measured by lateralized visual lexical decision. Psychological Research, 61(3), 220–229. doi: 10.1007/s004260050027
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s004260050027 [Google Scholar]
  43. Leinonen, A. , Grönholm-Nyman, P. , Järvenpää, M. , Söderholm, C. , Lappi, O. , Laine, M. , & Krause, C. M.
    (2009) Neurocognitive processing of auditorily and visually presented inflected words and pseudowords: evidence from a morphologically rich language. Brain Research, 1275, 54–66. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.03.057
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.03.057 [Google Scholar]
  44. Luce, P. A. , Goldinger, S. D. , Auer, E. T. , & Vitevitch, M. S.
    (2000) Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(3), 615–625. doi: 10.3758/BF03212113
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212113 [Google Scholar]
  45. Luce, P. A. , & Pisoni, D. B.
    (1998) Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19(1), 1–36. doi: 10.1097/00003446‑199802000‑00001
    https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001 [Google Scholar]
  46. Magnuson, J. S. , Dixon, J. A. , Tanenhaus, M. K. , & Aslin, R. N.
    (2007) The dynamics of lexical competition during spoken word recognition. Cognitive Science, 31(1), 133–156. doi: 10.1080/03640210709336987
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210709336987 [Google Scholar]
  47. Marian, V. , Bartolotti, J. , Chabal, S. , & Shook, A.
    (2012) CLEARPOND: Cross-Linguistic Easy-Access Resource for Phonological and Orthographic Neighborhood Densities. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e43230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043230
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043230 [Google Scholar]
  48. Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
    (1987) Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25(1), 71–102. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0277(87)90005‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(87)90005-9 [Google Scholar]
  49. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. , Ford, M. , Older, L. , & Zhou, X.
    (1996) The combinatorial lexicon: Priming derivational affixes. InProceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society: July 12–15, 1996, University of California, San Diego (Vol.18, pp.223–227). Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. , Hare, M. , & Older, L.
    (1993) Inflectional morphology and phonological regularity in the English mental lexicon. InProceedings of the 15th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.693–698).
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. , Tyler, L. K. , Waksler, R. , & Older, L.
    (1994) Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101(1), 3–33. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.101.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  52. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. , & Welsh, A.
    (1978) Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10(1), 29–63. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0285(78)90018‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(78)90018-X [Google Scholar]
  53. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. , & Zhou, X.
    (1999) Abstractness, allomorphy, and lexical architecture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(4), 321–352. doi: 10.1080/016909699386257
    https://doi.org/10.1080/016909699386257 [Google Scholar]
  54. McDermott, K. B. , & Watson, J. M.
    (2001) The rise and fall of false recall: The impact of presentation duration. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(1), 160–176. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2771
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2771 [Google Scholar]
  55. Morton, J.
    (1969) Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76(2), 165–178. doi: 10.1037/h0027366
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027366 [Google Scholar]
  56. Niemi, J. , Laine, M. , & Tuominen, J.
    (1994) Cognitive morphology in Finnish: Foundations of a new model. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(3), 423–446. doi: 10.1080/01690969408402126
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969408402126 [Google Scholar]
  57. Norman, K. A. , & Schacter, D. L.
    (1997) False recognition in younger and older adults: Exploring the characteristics of illusory memories. Memory & Cognition, 25(6), 838–848. doi: 10.3758/BF03211328
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211328 [Google Scholar]
  58. Nusbaum, H. C. , Pisoni, D. B. , & Davis, C. K.
    (1984) Sizing up the Hoosier mental lexicon: Measuring the familiarity of 20,000 words. Research on Speech Perception Progress Report, 10(10), 357–376.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Pastizzo, M. J. , & Feldman, L. B.
    (2002) Does prime modality influence morphological processing?Brain and Language, 81(1), 28–41. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2504
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2504 [Google Scholar]
  60. (2009) Multiple dimensions of relatedness among words: Conjoint effects of form and meaning in word recognition. The Mental Lexicon, 4(1), 1–25. doi: 10.1075/ml.4.1.01pas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.4.1.01pas [Google Scholar]
  61. Paul Boersma , & David Weenink
    (2014) Praat: doing phonetics by computer. (Version 5.4.04). Retrieved fromwww.praat.org
  62. Pérez-Mata, M. N. , Read, J. D. , & Diges, M.
    (2002) Effects of divided attention and word concreteness on correct recall and false memory reports. Memory, 10(3), 161–177. doi: 10.1080/09658210143000308
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210143000308 [Google Scholar]
  63. Perlak, D. , Feldman, L. B. , & Jarema, G.
    (2008) Defining regularity: Does degree of phonological and orthographic similarity among Polish relatives influence morphological processing?The Mental Lexicon, 3(2), 239–258. doi: 10.1075/ml.3.2.04per
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.3.2.04per [Google Scholar]
  64. Rastle, K. , Davis, M. H. , Marslen-Wilson, W. D. , & Tyler, L. K.
    (2000) Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4–5), 507–537. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119689
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119689 [Google Scholar]
  65. Rastle, K. , Davis, M. H. , & New, B.
    (2004) The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1090–1098. doi: 10.3758/BF03196742
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196742 [Google Scholar]
  66. Reid, A. , & Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
    (2000) Organising principles in lexical representation: Evidence from Polish. InProceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.387–392).
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Reinitz, M. T.
    (2001) Illusions of Memory. Comments on Theoretical Biology, 6, 411–430.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Reinitz, M. T. , & Demb, J. B.
    (1994) Implicit and explicit memory for compound words. Memory & Cognition, 22(6), 687–694. doi: 10.3758/BF03209253
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209253 [Google Scholar]
  69. Roediger, H. L. , Balota, D. A. , & Watson, J. M.
    (2001) Spreading activation and arousal of false memories. The Nature of Remembering: Essays in Honor of Robert G. Crowder, 95–115.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Roediger, H. L. , & McDermott, K. B.
    (1995) Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 803–814.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Schacter, D. L. , Verfaellie, M. , & Anes, M. D.
    (1997) Illusory memories in amnesic patients: conceptual and perceptual false recognition. Neuropsychology, 11(3), 331. doi: 10.1037/0894‑4105.11.3.331
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.11.3.331 [Google Scholar]
  72. Scharinger, M. , Reetz, H. , & Lahiri, A.
    (2009) Levels of regularity in inflected word form processing. The Mental Lexicon, 4(1), 77–114. doi: 10.1075/ml.4.1.04sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.4.1.04sch [Google Scholar]
  73. Solomon, R. L. , & Postman, L.
    (1952) Frequency of usage as a determinant of recognition thresholds for words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43(3), 195–201. doi: 10.1037/h0054636
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054636 [Google Scholar]
  74. Sommers, M. S. , & Lewis, B. P.
    (1999) Who really lives next door: Creating false memories with phonological neighbors. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(1), 83–108. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2614
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2614 [Google Scholar]
  75. Stanners, R. F. , Neiser, J. J. , Hernon, W. P. , & Hall, R.
    (1979) Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(4), 399–412. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(79)90219‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90219-6 [Google Scholar]
  76. Stockall, L. , Stringfellow, A. , & Marantz, A.
    (2004) The precise time course of lexical activation: MEG measurements of the effects of frequency, probability, and density in lexical decision. Brain and Language, 90(1), 88–94. doi: 10.1016/S0093‑934X(03)00422‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00422-X [Google Scholar]
  77. Taft, M. , & Forster, K. I.
    (1975) Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(6), 638–647. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(75)80051‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X [Google Scholar]
  78. Underwood, B. J. , Kapelak, S. M. , & Malmi, R. A.
    (1976) Integration of discrete verbal units in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2(3), 293.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Vitevitch, M. S.
    (2007) The spread of the phonological neighborhood influences spoken word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 35(1), 166–175. doi: 10.3758/BF03195952
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195952 [Google Scholar]
  80. Wallace, W. P. , Shaffer, T. R. , Amberg, M. D. , & Silvers, V. L.
    (2001) Divided attention and prerecognition processing of spoken words and nonwords. Memory & Cognition, 29(8), 1102–1110. doi: 10.3758/BF03206379
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206379 [Google Scholar]
  81. Wallace, W. P. , Stewart, M. T. , & Malone, C. P.
    (1995) Recognition memory errors produced by implicit activation of word candidates during the processing of spoken words. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(4), 417–439. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1995.1019
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1019 [Google Scholar]
  82. Wallace, W. P. , Stewart, M. T. , Shaffer, T. R. , & Wilson, J. A.
    (1998) Are false recognitions influenced by prerecognition processing?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(2), 299.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Wallace, W. P. , Stewart, M. T. , Sherman, H. L. , & Mellor, M. D.
    (1995) False positives in recognition memory produced by cohort activation. Cognition, 55(1), 85–113. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0277(94)00646‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00646-3 [Google Scholar]
  84. Watson, J. M. , Balota, D. A. , & Roediger, H. L.
    (2003) Creating false memories with hybrid lists of semantic and phonological associates: Over-additive false memories produced by converging associative networks. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 95–118. doi: 10.1016/S0749‑596X(03)00019‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00019-6 [Google Scholar]
  85. Westbury, C. , Buchanan, L. , & Brown, N. R.
    (2002) Sounds of the neighborhood: False memories and the structure of the phonological lexicon. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(3), 622–651. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2821
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2821 [Google Scholar]
  86. Whaley, C. P.
    (1978) Word-nonword classification time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17(2), 143–154. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(78)90110‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90110-X [Google Scholar]
  87. Wurm, L. H.
    (2000) Auditory processing of polymorphemic pseudowords. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(2), 255–271. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2678
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2678 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): affix; complex words; false memory; lexical activation; stem; word recognition
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error