1887
Volume 12, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1871-1340
  • E-ISSN: 1871-1375
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

There is an on-going debate about how the language system handles expressions that may refer to different word senses. Some theories propose derivational operations triggered by a type-mismatch; others assume underspecified lexical representations that engage in sense selection. Previous studies yielded mixed evidence. To further understand the diverse results and to tease apart type conflicts from sense selection, we conducted an ERP study on one type of metonymy using question-answer pairs. We capitalized on the fact that the metonymic relation could be anticipated by a -word, yielding a type clash between the -word and the predicate that cannot be resolved in the question ( vs. ) – in contrast to the answer (). These conditions were contrasted with a non-metonymic reading. The results revealed a pronounced N400 at the verb of the question in contrast to the questions without a type clash, and no reliable differences at the artist’s name in the answer. We therefore argue for an underspecification account for this metonymy-type which is not preceded by the detection of a type conflict. In comparison with other metonymy-types, this substantiates a classification of sense alternations into sense selection and sense creation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ml.16014.wei
2018-03-15
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Asher, N.
    (2011) Lexical meaning in context: A web of words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511793936
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511793936 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bierwisch, M.
    (1988) On the grammar of local prepositions. In: M. Bierwisch , W. Motsch , I. Zimmermann . (Eds). Syntax, Semantik und Lexikon (pp.1–65). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. , Kretzschmar, F. , Tune, S. , Wang, L. , Genç, S. , Philipp, M. , Roehm, D. , & Schlesewsky, M.
    (2011) Think globally: Cross-linguistic variation in electrophysiological activity during sentence comprehension. Brain and language, 117(3), 133–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brouwer, H. , & Hoeks, J. C.
    (2013) A time and place for language comprehension: mapping the N400 and the P600 to a minimal cortical network. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 7, 758. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00758
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00758 [Google Scholar]
  5. Copestake, A. , & Briscoe, T.
    (1995) Semi-productive polysemy and sense extension. Journal of Semantics, 12, 15–67. doi: 10.1093/jos/12.1.15
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/12.1.15 [Google Scholar]
  6. Egg, M.
    (2010) Semantic underspecification. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(3), 166–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2010.00188.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00188.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Fishbein, J. , & Harris, J. A.
    (2014) Making sense of Kafka: structural biases induce early sense commitment for metonyms. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 94–112. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.06.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2014.06.005 [Google Scholar]
  8. Frisch, S. , & Schlesewsky, M.
    (2001) The N400 reflects problems of thematic hierarchizing. NeuroReport, 12(15), 3391–3394. doi: 10.1097/00001756‑200110290‑00048
    https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200110290-00048 [Google Scholar]
  9. Frisson, S. , & Frazier, L.
    (2005) Carving up word meaning: Portioning and grinding. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(2), 277–291. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  10. Frisson, S. , & Pickering, M. J.
    (1999) The processing of metonymy: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(6), 1366–1383.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (2007) The processing of familiar and novel senses of a word: Why reading Dickens is easy but reading Needham can be hard. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(4), 595–613. doi: 10.1080/01690960601017013
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960601017013 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gunter, T. C. , Friederici, A. D. , & Schriefers, H.
    (2000) Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 556–568. doi: 10.1162/089892900562336
    https://doi.org/10.1162/089892900562336 [Google Scholar]
  13. Huynh, H. , & Feldt, L. S.
    (1970) Conditions under which mean square ratios in repeated measurements designs have exact F-distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65(332), 1582–1589. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1970.10481187
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1970.10481187 [Google Scholar]
  14. Jackendoff, R.
    (1997) The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Keppel, G.
    (1991) Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim, A. , & Osterhout, L.
    (2005) The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(2), 205–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kutas, M. & K. D. Federmeier
    (2011) Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62: 621–647. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lau, E. F. , Phillips, C. , & Poeppel, D.
    (2008) A cortical network for semantics:(de) constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 920–933. doi: 10.1038/nrn2532
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2532 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lowder, M. W. , & Gordon, P. C.
    (2013) It’s hard to offend the college: Effects of sentence structure on figurative-language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(4), 993.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Piñango, M. M. , Zhang, M. , Foster‐Hanson, E. , Negishi, M. , Lacadie, C. , & Constable, R. T.
    (2016) Metonymy as Referential Dependency: Psycholinguistic and Neurolinguistic Arguments for a Unified Linguistic Treatment. Cognitive science, 1–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Pustejovsky, J.
    (1995) The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Schumacher, P. B.
    (2011) The hepatitis called … : Electrophysiological evidence for enriched composition. In J. Meibauer & M. Steinbach (Eds.), Experimental pragmatics / semantics (p.199–219). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.175.10sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.175.10sch [Google Scholar]
  23. (2013) When combinatorial processing results in reconceptualization: toward a new approach of compositionality. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 677. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00677
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00677 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2014) Content and context in incremental processing: ’the ham sandwich’ revisited. Philosophical Studies, 168(1), 151–165. doi: 10.1007/s11098‑013‑0179‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0179-6 [Google Scholar]
  25. Schumacher, P. B. , & Hung, Y. C.
    (2012) Positional influences on information packaging: Insights from topological fields in German. Journal of Memory and Language, 67(2), 295–310. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.05.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.05.006 [Google Scholar]
  26. Weckerly, J. , & Kutas, M.
    (1999) An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences. Psychophysiology, 36(05), 559–570. doi: 10.1111/1469‑8986.3650559
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3650559 [Google Scholar]
  27. Weiland, H. , Bambini, V. , & Schumacher, P. B.
    (2014) The role of literal meaning in figurative language comprehension: evidence from masked priming ERP. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 583. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00583
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00583 [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhang, Y. , Zhang, J. , & Min, B.
    (2012) Neural dynamics of animacy processing in language comprehension: ERP evidence from the interpretation of classifier–noun combinations. Brain and Language, 120(3), 321–331. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.10.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.10.007 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ml.16014.wei
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.16014.wei
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): ERP , experimental pragmatics , metonymy , N400 , type clash and underspecification
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error