Semantic neighbourhoods

References

1. Buchanan, L., Westbury, C. & Burgess, C.
   (2001) Characterizing semantic space: Neighborhood effects in word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 531–544. 10.3758/BF03196189
   https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196189 [Google Scholar]
2. Danguecan, A. N., & Buchanan, L.
   (2016) Semantic neighborhood effects for abstract versus concrete words. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1034. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01034
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01034 [Google Scholar]
3. Durda, Kevin K.
   (2013) “Embodied Properties of Semantic Knowledge Acquired from Natural Language”. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 4910. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/4910
   [Google Scholar]
4. Durda, K. & Buchanan, L.
   (2008) WINDSOR: Windsor improved norms of distance and similarity of representations of semantics. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 705–712. 10.3758/BRM.40.3.705
   https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.705 [Google Scholar]
5. Jones, M. N., Johns, B. T. & Recchia, G.
   (2012) The role of semantic diversity in lexical organization. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 66, 115–124. 10.1037/a0026727
   https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026727 [Google Scholar]
6. Kenett, Y. N., Levi, E., Anaki, D. & Faust, M.
   (2017) The semantic distance task: Quantifying semantic distance with semantic network path length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 1470–1489. 10.1037/xlm0000391
   https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000391 [Google Scholar]
7. Lund, K., & Burgess, C.
   (1996) Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 28(2), 203–208. 10.3758/BF03204766
   https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204766 [Google Scholar]
8. Malhi, S. K. & Buchanan, L.
   (2018) A test of the symbol interdependency hypothesis with both concrete and abstract stimuli. PLOS ONE, 13, e0192719. 10.1371/journal.pone.0192719
   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192719 [Google Scholar]
9. Matchett, K. and Buchanan, L.
   (2018) Exploring intralexical meaning: Semantic neighbourhood and transparency effects on the reading of compound words. Manuscript submitted for review.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Mirman, D.
    (2011) Effects of near and distant semantic neighbors on word production. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 11, 32–43. 10.3758/s13415‑010‑0009‑7
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-010-0009-7 [Google Scholar]
11. Rotaru, A. S. & Vigliocco, G., & Frank, S. L.
    (2018) Modeling the Structure and Dynamics of Semantic Processing. Cognitive Science. doi:  10.1111/cogs.12690
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12690 [Google Scholar]
12. Shaoul, C. & Westbury, C.
    (2010) The Westbury Lab Wikipedia Corpus, Edmonton, AB: University of Alberta (downloaded fromwww.psych.ualberta.ca/~westburylab/downloads/westburylab.wikicorp.download.html).
    [Google Scholar]
13. Schvaneveldt, R. W. & Meyer, D. E.
    (1973), “Retrieval and comparison processes in semantic memory”, inKornblum, S. (Ed.), Attention and performance IV, New York: Academic Press, pp.395–409.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Yap, M. J., Pexman, P. M., Wellsby, M., Hargreaves, I. S. & Huff, M. J.
    (2012) An abundance of riches: cross-task comparisons of semantic richness effects in visual word recognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 72.
    [Google Scholar]