Volume 15, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1871-1340
  • E-ISSN: 1871-1375
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



In this study we examined uses of the number 3017 as a neologism by members of an online forum. 3017 has a number of factors working against its success as a neologism, but its use grew dramatically over the course of six years. Statistical analyses showed that the growth data were very well modeled by both a quadratic and a sigmoid curve. The form was used primarily as an adjective and to a lesser extent as a noun over the first 500 days, before verbal forms came to dominate. To understand the structure of the 3017 concept in the mental lexicons of users, we examine attempts to define the term, and disagreements and negotiations about what the term does and does not include. Finally, we include examples of users’ creativity and productivity with the form, including readily-understood jokes.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. 3017 Treatment
    3017 Treatment (2014) Retrieved fromwww.urbandictionary.comon01/28/2017.
  2. Algeo, J.
    (Ed.) (1991) Fifty years among the new words: A dictionary of neologisms, 1941–1991. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Altmann, E. G. , Pierrehumbert, J. B. , & Motter, A. E.
    (2011) Niche as a determinant of word fate in online groups. PLoS ONE, 6(5), 1–12. 10.1371/journal.pone.0019009
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019009 [Google Scholar]
  4. Badger & Blade online forum
    Badger & Blade online forum (2017) Retrieved fromhttps://www.badgerandblade.com/forumon07/21/2017.
  5. Chaffin, R. , Morris, R. K. , & Seely, R. E.
    (2001) Learning new word meaning from context: A case study of eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27(1), 225–235.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chambers, J. K.
    (1992) Dialect acquisition. Language, 68(4), 673–705. 10.1353/lan.1992.0060
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1992.0060 [Google Scholar]
  7. Crystal, D.
    (2003) The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. de Vaan, L. , Schreuder, R. , & Baayen, R. H.
    (2007) Regular morphologically complex neologisms leave detectable traces in the mental lexicon. The Mental Lexicon, 2(1), 1–24. 10.1075/ml.2.1.02vaa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.2.1.02vaa [Google Scholar]
  9. Fischer, R.
    (1998) Lexical change in present-day English: A corpus-based study of the motivation, institutionalization, and productivity of creative neologisms. Tübingen, Germany: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Geeraerts, D.
    (2015) How words and vocabularies change. In J. Taylor (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the word (pp.416–430). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gladwell, M.
    (2000) The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. New York: Little, Brown, and Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hohenhaus, P.
    (2006)  Bouncebackability: A Web-as-corpus-based study of a new formation, its interpretation, generalization/spread and subsequent decline. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 3, 17–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kerremans, D.
    (2015) A web of new words: A corpus-based study of the conventionalization process of English neologisms. New York: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑04788‑2
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-04788-2 [Google Scholar]
  14. Kjellmer, G.
    (2000) Potential words. Word, 51(2), 205–228. doi:  10.1080/00437956.2000.11432501
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2000.11432501 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kouzis-Loukas, D.
    (2016) Learning Scrapy. Birmingham, UK: Packt Publishing Ltd. https://scrapy.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lehrer, A.
    (2003) Understanding trendy neologisms. Rivista di Linguistica, 15(2), 369–382.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Manning, C. D. , Surdeanu, M. , Bauer, J. , Finkel, J. , Bethard, S. J. , & McClosky, D.
    (2014) The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit. InProceedings of 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations (pp.55–60). 10.3115/v1/P14‑5010
    https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/P14-5010 [Google Scholar]
  19. Metcalf, A.
    (2002) Predicting new words: The secrets of their success. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Neuman, Y. , Nave, O. , & Dolev, E.
    (2010) Buzzwords on their way to a tipping-point: A view from the blogosphere. Complexity, 16(4), 58–68. 10.1002/cplx.20347
    https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.20347 [Google Scholar]
  21. Oxford English Dictionary
    Oxford English Dictionary (2017) Retrieved fromwww.oed.comon01/27/2017.
  22. Paradowski, M. B. , & Jonak, L.
    (2012) Diffusion of linguistic innovation as social coordination. Psychology of Language and Communication, 16(2), 131–142. doi:  10.2478/v10057‑012‑0010‑z
    https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-012-0010-z [Google Scholar]
  23. Python Core Team
    Python Core Team (2017) Python: A dynamic, open source progamming language. Python Software Foundation. https://www.python.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Reali, F. , & Griffiths, T. L.
    (2010) Words as alleles: Connecting language evolution with Bayesian learners to models of genetic drift. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277, 429–436. 10.1098/rspb.2009.1513
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1513 [Google Scholar]
  25. Richardson, L.
    (2017) The BeautifulSoup library for Python. www.crummy.com/software/BeautifulSoup/

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): internet forum; neologisms; number words
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error