1887
Volume 16, Issue 2-3
  • ISSN 1871-1340
  • E-ISSN: 1871-1375
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Valid and reliable measurements of response latency are crucial in testing empirical predictions across fields of psychology. In research utilizing verbal responses, acoustic latency is the typical measure of response latency, but its validity has been questioned. We describe a simple and affordable alternative – articulatory latency based on tracking lip position. Using this method, we measured the acoustic and articulatory latencies of syllables beginning with various simple and complex onsets and ending with “uh” using the speeded naming task, where participants were instructed to have their mouths either closed or open before articulating. The initial oral configuration, place of articulation, and voicing all had significant effects on this measure of articulatory latency across segments, factors that researchers must consider in designing experiments and selecting stimuli.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ml.19018.liu
2022-03-08
2022-05-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abercombie, D.
    (1967) Elements of general phonetics. Aldine Pub. Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews, S. , Woollams, A. , & Bond, R.
    (2005) Spelling–sound typicality only affects words with digraphs: Further qualifications to the generality of the regularity effect on word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 53 , 567–593.   10.1016/j.jml.2005.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baayen, R. H. , Davidson, D. J. , & Bates, D. M.
    (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of memory and language, 59 (4), 390–412. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  4. Balota, D. A. , & Abrams, R. A.
    (1995) Mental chronometry: beyond onset latencies in the lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21 , 1289–1302.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bates, D. , Maechler, M. , Bolker, B. , & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.   10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bell-Berti, F. , & Harris, K. S.
    (1981) A temporal model of speech production. Phonetica, 38 , 9–20. 10.1159/000260011
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000260011 [Google Scholar]
  7. Boersma, P. , & Weenink, D.
    (1996) Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer, version 3.4. Institute of Phonetic Sciences of the University of Amsterdam, Report, 132 , 182.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Boersma, P.
    (2001) Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5 , 341–345.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bolker, B. M. , Brooks, M. E. , Clark, C. J. , Geange, S. W. , Poulsen, J. R. , Stevens, M. H. H. , & White, J. S. S.
    (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in ecology & evolution, 24 (3), 127–135. 10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chao, Y.-R.
    (1936) Types of plosives in Chinese. Proc. 2nd Int. Cong. Phonetic Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 106–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cholin, J. , Dell, G. S. , & Levelt, W. J. M.
    (2011) Planning and articulation in incremental word production: Syllable-frequency effects in English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 109–122.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chomsky, N. , & Halle, M.
    (1968) The Sound Pattern of English, New York: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Coltheart, M. , Rastle, K. , Perry, C. , Landon, R. , & Ziegler, J.
    (2001) DRC: A dual-route cascade model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108 , 204–256. 10.1037/0033‑295X.108.1.204
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cox, D. R. , & Snell, E. J.
    (1989) Analysis of binary data (Vol. 32). Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dale, R. , Kehoe, C. , & Spivey, M. J.
    (2007) Graded motor responses in the time course of categorizing atypical exemplars. Memory & Cognition, 35 (1), 15–28. 10.3758/BF03195938
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195938 [Google Scholar]
  16. Eisenhart, C.
    (1947) Effects of rounding on grouped data. Selected Techniques of Statistical Analysis (ed. C. Eisenhart , M. Hastay and W. A. Wallis ), Chapter 4. New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ellis, A. J.
    (1874) On early English pronunciation, part IV, with especial reference to Shakespeare and Chaucer. London: Trübner & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Farnetani, E.
    (1999) Labial coarticulation. In W. J. Hardcastle & N. Hewlett (Eds.). Coarticulation. Cambridge: University Press, 31–65. 10.1017/CBO9780511486395.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486395.003 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fisher, R. A.
    (1922) On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, A, 222, 309–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fowler, C. A.
    (1980) Coarticulation and theories of extrinsic timing. Journal of Phonetics, 8 , 113–133. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)31446‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31446-9 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fromkin, V.
    (1964) Lip position in American English vowels. Language and Speech, 7 , 215–225. 10.1177/002383096400700402
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096400700402 [Google Scholar]
  22. Guisan, A. , & Zimmermann, N. E.
    (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological modelling, 135 , 147–186. 10.1016/S0304‑3800(00)00354‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9 [Google Scholar]
  23. Holbrook, B. B. , Kawamoto, A. H. , & Liu, Q.
    (2019) Task demands and segment priming effects in the naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45 (5), 807–821.   10.1037/xlm0000631
    https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000631 [Google Scholar]
  24. Jansen, P. A. , & Watter, S.
    (2008) SayWhen: An automated method for high-accuracy speech onset detection. Behavior Research Methods, 40 , 744–751. 10.3758/BRM.40.3.744
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.744 [Google Scholar]
  25. Johansson, T.
    (2011) Hail the impossible: p-values, evidence, and likelihood. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 52 , 113–125. 10.1111/j.1467‑9450.2010.00852.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2010.00852.x [Google Scholar]
  26. Kawamoto, A.
    (1999) Incremental encoding and incremental articulation in speech production: Evidence based on response latency and initial segment duration. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 48–49.   10.1017/S0140525X99331770
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99331770 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kawamoto, A. H. , Kello, C. T. , Jones, R. M. , & Bame, K.
    (1998) Initial phoneme versus whole word criterion to initiate pronunciation: Evidence based on response latency and initial phoneme duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24 , 862–885.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kawamoto, A. H. , & Kello, C. T.
    (1999) Effect of onset cluster complexity in speeded naming: A test of rule-based approaches. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25 (2), 361.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kawamoto, A. H. , Liu, Q. , Lee, R. J. , & Grebe, P. R.
    (2014) The segment as the minimal planning unit in speech production: Evidence based on absolute response latencies. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67 (12), 2340–2359. 10.1080/17470218.2014.927892
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.927892 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kawamoto, A. H. , Liu, Q. , Mura, K. , & Sanchez, A.
    (2008) Articulatory preparation in the delayed naming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 58 , 347–365. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kello, C. T. , & Kawamoto, A. H.
    (1998) Runword: An IBM-PC software package for the collection and acoustic analysis of speeded naming response. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 30 , 371–383. 10.3758/BF03200668
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200668 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kelso, J. A. S. , Tuller, B. , & Harris, K. S.
    (1983) A “dynamic pattern” perspective on the control and coordination of movement. In P. F. MacNeilage (Ed.), The production of speech. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4613‑8202‑7_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8202-7_7 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kessler, B. , Treiman, R. , & Mullenix, J.
    (2002) Phonetic biases in voice key response time measurements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47 , 145–171. 10.1006/jmla.2001.2835
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2835 [Google Scholar]
  34. Krause, P. A. , & Kawamoto, A. H.
    (2019) Anticipatory mechanisms influence articulation in the form preparation task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 45, 319–335.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ladefoged, P. & Maddieson, I.
    (1996) The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Laver, J.
    (1994) Principles of phonetics, Oxford University Press., Oxford, UK. 10.1017/CBO9781139166621
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166621 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2003) Linguistic Phonetics. In M. Aronoff , & J. Rees-Miller (Ed.). The handbook of linguistics, 150–179. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756409.ch7
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756409.ch7 [Google Scholar]
  38. Levelt, W. J. M. , Roelofs, A. , & Meyer, A. S.
    (1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22 , 1–38. 10.1017/S0140525X99001776
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001776 [Google Scholar]
  39. Liu, Q. , Holbrook, B. , Kawamoto, A. H. , & Krause, P.
    (2021) Articulatory and acoustic latency data for: Verbal reaction times based on tracking lip movement.   10.7910/DVN/HAYIAC, Harvard Dataverse, V1 UNF:6:hFCN4bSdgCAQ0CSleAYAaQ== [fileUNF]
    https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HAYIAC [Google Scholar]
  40. Liu, Q. , & Kawamoto, A.
    (2010) Simulating the elimination and enhancement of the plosivity effect in reading aloud. InProceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol.32, No.32).
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Liu, Q. , Kawamoto, A. H. , Payne, K. K. , & Dorsey, G. N.
    (2018) Anticipatory coarticulation and the minimal planning unit of speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44 , 139–153.   10.1037/xhp0000443
    https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000443 [Google Scholar]
  42. McFadden, D. L.
    (1973) Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In: P. Zarembka (Ed.). Frontiers in Econometrics, Wiley, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Mooshammer, C. , Goldstein, L. , Nam, H. , McClure, S. , Saltzman, E. , & Tiede, M.
    (2012) Bridging planning and execution: Temporal planning of syllables. Journal of phonetics, 40 , 374–389. 10.1016/j.wocn.2012.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2012.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  44. Nagelkerke, N. J.
    (1991) A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78 , 691–692. 10.1093/biomet/78.3.691
    https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/78.3.691 [Google Scholar]
  45. Ohala, J. J.
    (1983) The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In: P. F. MacNeilage (Ed.). The production of speech. New York: Springer-Verlag. 189–216. 10.1007/978‑1‑4613‑8202‑7_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8202-7_9 [Google Scholar]
  46. (1997, August). Aerodynamics of phonology. InProceedings of the Seoul International Conference on Linguistics, 92–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. (2006) Speech aerodynamics. In Brown, Keith (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics, 2, 684–689. Oxford: Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00025‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00025-0 [Google Scholar]
  48. (2011, August). Accommodation to the Aerodynamic Voicing Constraint and its Phonological Relevance. InProceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 64–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Palo, P. , Schaeffler, S. , & Scobbie, J. M.
    (2015, August). Effect of phonetic onset on acoustic and articulatory speech reaction times studied with tongue ultrasound. InProceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Glasgow, 10–14 August 2015. International Phonetic Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Palo, P.
    (2019) Measuring pre-speech articulation (Doctoral dissertation, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh).
  51. Passy, P.
    (1890) Étude sur les changements phonétiques Firmin-Didot. Firmin-Didot.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Perry, C. , Ziegler, J. C. , & Zorzi, M.
    (2007) Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114 , 273–315. 10.1037/0033‑295X.114.2.273
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.273 [Google Scholar]
  53. Pickett, J. M.
    (1980) The sounds of speech communication. Baltimore: University Park Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Pinheiro, J. C. , & Bates, D. M.
    (2000) Linear mixed-effects models: basic concepts and examples. Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus, 3–56. 10.1007/978‑1‑4419‑0318‑1_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0318-1_1 [Google Scholar]
  55. Plaut, D. , McClelland, J. L. , Seidenberg, M. S. , & Patterson, K.
    (1996) Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103 , 56–115. 10.1037/0033‑295X.103.1.56
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.1.56 [Google Scholar]
  56. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URLhttps://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Rastle, K. , Croot, K. P. , Harrington, J. M. , & Coltheart, M.
    (2005) Characterizing the motor execution stage of speech production: Consonantal effects on delayed naming latency and onset duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31 , 1083–1095.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Rastle, K. , & Davis, M. H.
    (2002) On the complexities of measuring naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28 , 307–314.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Revelle, W.
    (2019) psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psychVersion = 1.9.12.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Saltzman, E.
    (1986) Task dynamic coordination of the speech articulators: A preliminary model. Experimental brain research series, 15, 129–144. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑71476‑4_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-71476-4_10 [Google Scholar]
  61. Saltzman, E. , & Kelso, J. A.
    (1987) Skilled actions: A task-dynamic approach. Psychological review, 94, 84–106. 10.1037/0033‑295X.94.1.84
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.84 [Google Scholar]
  62. Saltzman, E. L. , & Munhall, K. G.
    (1989) A dynamical approach to gestural patterning in speech production. Ecological psychology, 1, 333–382. 10.1207/s15326969eco0104_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0104_2 [Google Scholar]
  63. Schaeffler, S. , Scobbie, J. M. , & Schaeffler, F.
    (2014, May). Measuring reaction times: vocalisation vs. articulation. InProceedings of the 10th International Seminar in Speech Production (ISSP 10). [make sure we cite this for no advantage between lip and tongue]
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Schmidt, R. A.
    (1988) Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL, England: Human Kinetics Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Spieler, D. H. & Balota, D. A.
    (1997) Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level. Psychological Science, 8 , 411–416. 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.1997.tb00453.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00453.x [Google Scholar]
  66. Sternberg, S. , Monsell, S. , Knoll, R. L. , & Wright, C. E.
    (1978) The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting, in G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information Processing in Motor Control and Learning. New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑665960‑3.50011‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-665960-3.50011-6 [Google Scholar]
  67. Stevens, K. N.
    (1998) Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge: MIT.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. (2002) Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111 , 1872–1891. 10.1121/1.1458026
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1458026 [Google Scholar]
  69. Sweet, H.
    (1877) A handbook of phonetics (Vol. 2). Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Tilsen, S. , Spincemaille, P. , Xu, B. , Doerschuk, P. , Luh, W. M. , Feldman, E. , & Wang, Y.
    (2016) Anticipatory posturing of the vocal tract reveals dissociation of speech movement plans from linguistic units. PLoS ONE, 11 (1), e0146813. 10.1371/journal.pone.0146813
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146813 [Google Scholar]
  71. Tricker, A. R.
    (1984) Effects of rounding on the moments of a probability distribution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 33 (4), 381–390.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Tyler, M. D. , Tyler, L. , & Burnham, D. K.
    (2005) The delayed trigger voice key: An improved analogue voice key for psycholinguistic research. Behavior Research Methods, 37 , 139–147. 10.3758/BF03206408
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206408 [Google Scholar]
  73. van der Linden, L. , Riès, S. K. , Legou, T. , Burle, B. , Malfait, N. , & Alario, F.
    (2014) A comparison of two procedures for verbal response time fractionation. Frontiers in psychology, 5 , 1213. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01213
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01213 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ml.19018.liu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.19018.liu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): acoustic latency; articulation; articulatory latency; naming task; reaction time
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error