1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. The Mental Lexicon
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Reading aloud prefixed words in a case of acquired dyslexia
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Reading aloud of morphologically complex words has been consistently found to be impaired in acquired dyslexia. This morphological disorder is characterized by the production of larger numbers of errors with complex than with simple words and by the production of so-called morphological errors, i.e. errors that reflect the internal morphological structure of words and are dissociable from purely visual errors. However, most previous research has focused on suffixed words (e.g., [pay][ment]), while much less is known about how prefixed words (e.g., [pre][pay]) are affected. In the present study, we report three experiments involving a German speaker with acquired phonological dyslexia. We aimed to provide a characterization of the impairment of prefixed words, as well as to test whether there are systematic differences in how prefixes and suffixes are impaired. Our findings suggest that prefixed words show the same general pattern of morphological impairment previously reported for other types of complex words; however, prefixes tend to be more severely impaired than suffixes. This aligns with accounts proposing that prefixes are acquired and processed less easily than suffixes, and more vulnerable in language loss.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ml.20005.cia
2026-05-05
2026-05-11

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ml.20005.cia
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abrahantes, J. C., & Aerts, M.
    (2012) A solution to separation for clustered binary data. Statistical Modelling: An International Journal, (), –. 10.1177/1471082X1001200102
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1471082X1001200102 [Google Scholar]
  2. Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D.
    (2012) Morphological Processing as We Know It: An Analytical Review of Morphological Effects in Visual Word Identification. Frontiers in Psychology, . 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232 [Google Scholar]
  3. Auclair-Ouellet, N., Fossard, M., Laforce, R., Bier, N., & Macoir, J.
    (2017) Conception or *conceivation? The processing of derivational morphology in semantic dementia. Aphasiology, (), –. 10.1080/02687038.2016.1168918
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2016.1168918 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baayen, H.
    (2008) Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511801686
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801686 [Google Scholar]
  5. Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Đurđević, D. F., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M.
    (2011) An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, (), . 10.1037/a0023851
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023851 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baayen, R. H., & Smolka, E.
    (2020) Modeling Morphological Priming in German With Naive Discriminative Learning. Frontiers in Communication, . 10.3389/fcomm.2020.00017
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00017 [Google Scholar]
  7. Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A.
    (1991) Morphological composition in the lexical output system. Cognitive Neuropsychology, (), –. 10.1080/02643299108253377
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02643299108253377 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, (), –. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  9. Beauvillain, C.
    (1996) The integration of morphological and whole-word form information during eye fixations on prefixed and suffixed words. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1006/jmla.1996.0041
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0041 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bergman, M. W., Hudson, P. T. W., & Eling, P. A. T. M.
    (1988) How Simple Complex Words Can Be: Morphological Processing and Word Representations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, (), –. 10.1080/14640748808402282
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748808402282 [Google Scholar]
  11. Castles, A., Coltheart, M., Savage, G., Bates, A., & Reid, L.
    (1996) Morphological Processing and Visual Word Recognition Evidence from Acquired Dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, (), –. 10.1080/026432996381773
     https://doi.org/10.1080/026432996381773 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cayado, D. K. T., Wray, S., Lai, M. C.-H., Chong, A. J., & Stockall, L.
    (2025) Breaking down prefixed words is unaffected by morphological boundary opacity: Evidence from behavioral and MEG experiments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, (), –. 10.3758/s13423‑025‑02758‑7
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02758-7 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chung, Y., Rabe-Hesketh, S., Dorie, V., Gelman, A., & Liu, J.
    (2013) A Nondegenerate Penalized Likelihood Estimator for Variance Parameters in Multilevel Models. Psychometrika, (), –. 10.1007/s11336‑013‑9328‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-013-9328-2 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ciaccio, L. A., Burchert, F., & Semenza, C.
    (2020a) Derivational Morphology in Agrammatic Aphasia: A Comparison Between Prefixed and Suffixed Words. Frontiers in Psychology, . 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01070
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01070 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ciaccio, L. A., & Clahsen, H.
    (2020) Variability and Consistency in First and Second Language Processing: A Masked Morphological Priming Study on Prefixation and Suffixation. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12370
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12370 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ciaccio, L. A., & Fievet, T.
    (2025) Investigating the role of cross-linguistic influences in non-native morphological processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, –. 10.1017/S1366728925100618
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728925100618 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ciaccio, L. A., Kgolo, N., & Clahsen, H.
    (2020b) Morphological decomposition in Bantu: A masked priming study on Setswana prefixation. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, –. 10.1080/23273798.2020.1722847
     https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2020.1722847 [Google Scholar]
  18. Colé, P., Beauvillain, C., & Segui, J.
    (1989) On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1016/0749‑596X(89)90025‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90025-9 [Google Scholar]
  19. Cutler, A., Hawkins, J., & Gilligan, G.
    (1985) The suffixing preference: A processing explanation. Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/ling.1985.23.5.723
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1985.23.5.723 [Google Scholar]
  20. De Bleser, R., Cholewa, J., Stadie, N., & Tabatabaie, S.
    (2004) Lemo — Lexikon modell-orientiert, Einzelfalldiagnostik bei Aphasie, Dyslexie und Dysgraphie. München/Jena: Urban & Fischer.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J.
    (2009) Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. Memory & Cognition, , –. 10.3758/MC.37.6.895
     https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.6.895 [Google Scholar]
  22. Dryer, M. S.
    (2013) Prefixing versus suffixing in inflectional morphology. InM. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures (WALS) Online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Druks, J., & Froud, K.
    (2002) The syntax of single words: Evidence from a patient with a selective function word reading deficit. Cognitive Neuropsychology, (), –. 10.1080/02643290143000141
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290143000141 [Google Scholar]
  24. Ferrari Bridgers, F., & Kacinik, N.
    (2017) How Linearity and Structural Complexity Interact and Affect the Recognition of Italian Derived Words. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, (), –. 10.1007/s10936‑016‑9427‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9427-1 [Google Scholar]
  25. Forster, K. I., & Azuma, T.
    (2000) Masked priming for prefixed words with bound stems: Does submit prime permit?Language and Cognitive Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01690960050119698
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119698 [Google Scholar]
  26. Funnell, E.
    (1987) Morphological Errors in Acquired Dyslexia: A Case of Mistaken Identity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, (), –. 10.1080/14640748708401801
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748708401801 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2000) Deep dyslexia. InE. Funnell (Ed.), Case studies in the neuropsychology of reading (pp.–). London: Psychology Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Gelman, A., Jakulin, A., Pittau, M. G., & Su, Y.-S.
    (2008) A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models. The Annals of Applied Statistics, (), –. 10.1214/08‑AOAS191
     https://doi.org/10.1214/08-AOAS191 [Google Scholar]
  29. Greenberg, J. H.
    (1963) Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. InJ. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (pp.–). London: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Hamilton, A. C., & Coslett, H. B.
    (2008) Role of inflectional regularity and semantic transparency in reading morphologically complex words: Evidence from acquired dyslexia. Neurocase, (), –. 10.1080/13554790802368679
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13554790802368679 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hasenäcker, J., Schröter, P., & Schroeder, S.
    (2017) Investigating developmental trajectories of morphemes as reading units in German. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, , –. 10.1037/xlm0000353
     https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000353 [Google Scholar]
  32. Heister, J., Würzner, K.-M., Bubenzer, J., Pohl, E., Hanneforth, T., Geyken, A., & Kliegl, R.
    (2011) DlexDB — eine lexikalische Datenbank für die psychologische und linguistische Forschung. Psychologische Rundschau, (), –. 10.1026/0033‑3042/a000029
     https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000029 [Google Scholar]
  33. Huber, W., Poeck, K., Weniger, D., & Willmes, K.
    (1983) Der Aachener Aphasie Test (AAT) [The Aachen Aphasia Test]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Jakobson, R.
    (1941/1968) Child Language, Aphasia, and Phonological Universals (H. Keiler, Trans.). Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Jarema, G., Perlak, D., & Semenza, C.
    (2010) The processing of compounds in bilingual aphasia: A multiple-case study. Aphasiology, (), –. 10.1080/02687030902958225
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030902958225 [Google Scholar]
  36. Job, R., & Sartori, G.
    (1984) Morphological decomposition: Evidence from crossed phonological dyslexia. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, (), –. 10.1080/14640748408402171
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748408402171 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kay, J.
    (1988) On the origin of morphological errors in two cases of acquired dyslexia. Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/ling.1988.26.4.669
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1988.26.4.669 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kazanina, N.
    (2011) Decomposition of prefixed words in Russian. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, , –. 10.1037/a0024335
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024335 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kim, S. Y., Wang, M., & Taft, M.
    (2015) Morphological Decomposition in the Recognition of Prefixed and Suffixed Words: Evidence from Korean. Scientific Studies of Reading, (), –. 10.1080/10888438.2014.991019
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2014.991019 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kolk, H., & Heeschen, C.
    (1992) Agrammatism, paragrammatism and the management of language. Language and Cognitive Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01690969208409381
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969208409381 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kuczaj, S. A., II.
    (1979) Evidence for a language learning strategy: On the relative ease of acquisition of prefixes and suffixes. Child Development, (), . 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.1979.tb02972.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1979.tb02972.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Lago, S., Gračanin-Yuksek, M., Şafak, D. F., Demir, O., Kırkıcı, B., & Felser, C.
    (2019) Straight from the horse’s mouth. Agreement attraction effects with Turkish possessors. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1075/lab.17019.lag
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.17019.lag [Google Scholar]
  43. Leminen, A., Smolka, E., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Pliatsikas, C.
    (2019) Morphological processing in the brain: The good (inflection), the bad (derivation) and the ugly (compounding). Cortex, , –. 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.016
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.016 [Google Scholar]
  44. Luzzatti, C., Mondini, S., & Semenza, C.
    (2001) Lexical Representation and Processing of Morphologically Complex Words: Evidence from the Reading Performance of an Italian Agrammatic Patient. Brain and Language, (), –. 10.1006/brln.2001.2475
     https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2475 [Google Scholar]
  45. Marelli, M., Aggujaro, S., Molteni, F., & Luzzatti, C.
    (2013) Understanding the mental lexicon through neglect dyslexia: A study on compound noun reading. Neurocase, (), –. 10.1080/13554794.2011.654222
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13554794.2011.654222 [Google Scholar]
  46. Marusch, T., Jäger, L. A., Burchert, F., & Nickels, L.
    (2017) Verb morphology in speakers with agrammatic aphasia. The Mental Lexicon, (), –. 10.1075/ml.17006.mar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.17006.mar [Google Scholar]
  47. Marzi, C., & Pirrelli, V.
    (2023) A discriminative information-theoretical analysis of the regularity gradient in inflectional morphology. Morphology, (), –. 10.1007/s11525‑023‑09415‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-023-09415-6 [Google Scholar]
  48. Mondini, S., Arcara, G., & Semenza, C.
    (2012) Lexical and buffer effects in reading and in writing Noun-Noun compound nouns. Behavioural Neurology, (), –. 10.1155/2012/298306
     https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/298306 [Google Scholar]
  49. Patterson, K.
    (1980) Derivational Errors. InM. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Deep dyslexia. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K.
    (2019) PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/s13428‑018‑01193‑y
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y [Google Scholar]
  51. Powell, M. J.
    (2009) The BOBYQA algorithm for bound constrained optimization without derivatives. Cambridge NA Report NA2009/06, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. R Development Core Team
    R Development Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Ramscar, M.
    (2013) Suffixing, prefixing, and the functional order of regularities in meaningful strings. Psihologija, (), –. 10.2298/PSI1304377R
     https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1304377R [Google Scholar]
  54. Rastle, K., Tyler, L., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
    (2006) New evidence for morphological errors in deep dyslexia. Brain and Language, (), –. 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.10.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  55. Scalise, S., Guevara, E.
    (2005) The Lexicalist Approach to Word-Formation and the Notion of the Lexicon. In: Štekauer, P., Lieber, R. (eds.) Handbook of Word-Formation (pp.–). Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑3596‑9_7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_7 [Google Scholar]
  56. Semenza, C., Arcara, G., Facchini, S., Meneghello, F., Ferraro, M., Passarini, L., … Mondini, S.
    (2011) Reading compounds in neglect dyslexia: The headedness effect. Neuropsychologia, (), –. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.07.020
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.07.020 [Google Scholar]
  57. Semenza, C., Butterworth, B., Panzeri, M., & Ferreri, T.
    (1990) Word formation: New evidence from aphasia. Neuropsychologia, (), –. 10.1016/0028‑3932(90)90075‑Y
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(90)90075-Y [Google Scholar]
  58. Semenza, C., Girelli, L., Spacal, M., Kobal, J., & Mesec, A.
    (2002) Derivation by Prefixation in Slovenian: Two Aphasia Case Studies. Brain and Language, (), –. 10.1006/brln.2001.2521
     https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2521 [Google Scholar]
  59. Semenza, C., & Mondini, S.
    (2015) Word-formation in aphasia. InWord-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe (pp.–). 10.1515/9783110375732‑033
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375732-033 [Google Scholar]
  60. Slobin, D. I.
    (1973) Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. InA. Ferguson & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp.–). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. St. Clair, M. C., Monaghan, P., & Ramscar, M.
    (2009) Relationships between language structure and language learning: The suffixing preference and grammatical categorization. Cognitive Science, (), –. 10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2009.01065.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01065.x [Google Scholar]
  62. Štekauer, P., Valera, S., & Kőrtvélyessy, L.
    (2012) Word-Formation in the World’s Languages: A Typological Survey. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge Core. 10.1017/CBO9780511895005
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511895005 [Google Scholar]
  63. Stevens, P., & Plaut, D. C.
    (2022) From decomposition to distributed theories of morphological processing in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, (), –. 10.3758/s13423‑022‑02086‑0
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02086-0 [Google Scholar]
  64. Stupak, I. V., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2022) An inquiry into the semantic transparency and productivity of German particle verbs and derivational affixation. The Mental Lexicon, (), –. 10.1075/ml.22012.stu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.22012.stu [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.20005.cia
Loading
Reading aloud prefixed words in a case of acquired dyslexia
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.20005.cia
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.20005.cia
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.20005.cia
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: phonological dyslexia ; prefixes ; complex words ; embedded stems ; reading aloud

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error