1887
Volume 16, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1871-1340
  • E-ISSN: 1871-1375
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The bulk of second language (L2) vocabulary learning happens incidentally through reading (Rott, 2007Webb, 2008), but individual differences, such as prior knowledge, modulate the efficacy of such incidental learning. One individual difference that is strongly predicted to play a role in L2 vocabulary is declarative memory ability; however, links between these two abilities have not been explored (Hamrick, Lum, & Ullman, 2018). This study considered declarative memory in conjunction with varying degrees of prior knowledge, since declarative memory may serve a compensatory function (Ullman & Pullman, 2015). L2 Spanish learners completed measures of prior Spanish vocabulary knowledge, declarative memory ability, and incidental L2 vocabulary learning. The results suggest that better declarative memory predicts better immediate learning in general and better vocabulary retention two days later, but only for those with more prior knowledge, consistent with the Matthew Effect previously reported in the literature (Stanovich, 1986).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ml.20012.mur
2021-10-08
2021-12-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bates, D., Machler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using Ime4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bozeat, S., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Patterson, K., Garrard, P., & Hodges, J. R.
    (2000) Non-verbal semantic impairment in semantic dementia. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1207–1215. 10.1016/S0028‑3932(00)00034‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00034-8 [Google Scholar]
  3. Breitenstein, C., Jansen, A., Deppe, M., Foerster, A. F., Sommer, J., Wolbers, T., & Knecht, S.
    (2005) Hippocampus activity differentiates good from poor learners of a novel lexicon. NeuroImage, 25, 958–968. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.019 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chandler, P. M.
    (2017, July). A Spanish Vocabulary Levels Test. Paper presented at theannual conference of the American Association of Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese, Chicago, IL.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Davis, M., & Gaskell, M. G.
    (2009) A complementary systems account of word learning: Neural and behavioral evidence. Philosophical transactions: Biological sciences, 364, 3773–3800. 10.1098/rstb.2009.0111
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0111 [Google Scholar]
  6. Elgort, I., & Warren, P.
    (2014) L2 vocabulary learning from reading: Explicit and tacit lexical knowledge and the role of learner and item variables. Language Learning, 64, 365–414. 10.1111/lang.12052
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12052 [Google Scholar]
  7. Hamrick, P., Graff, C., & Finch, B.
    (2019) Contributions of episodic memory to novel Word learning. The Mental Lexicon, 14, 381–398. 10.1075/ml.19019.ham
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.19019.ham [Google Scholar]
  8. Hamrick, P., Lum, J. A. G., & Ullman, M. T.
    (2018) Child first and adult second language are tied to general-purpose learning systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, 1487–1492. 10.1073/pnas.1713975115
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713975115 [Google Scholar]
  9. Hamrick, P., & Pandza, N. B.
    (2020) Contributions of semantic and contextual diversity to the word frequency effect in L2 lexical access. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(1), 25–34. 10.1037/cep0000189
    https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000189 [Google Scholar]
  10. James, E., Gaskell, M. G., Weighall, A., & Henderson, L.
    (2017) Consolidation of vocabulary during sleep: The rich get richer?Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 77, 1–13. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.054
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.054 [Google Scholar]
  11. Jamieson, R. K., Avery, J. E., Johns, B. T., & Jones, M. N.
    (2018) An instance theory of Semantic memory. Computational Brain & Behavior, 1, 119–136. 10.1007/s42113‑018‑0008‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-018-0008-2 [Google Scholar]
  12. Jiang, N., & Forster, K. I.
    (2001) Cross-language priming asymmetries in lexical decision And episodic recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 32–51. 10.1006/jmla.2000.2737
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2737 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kensinger, E. A., Ullman, M. T., & Corkin, S.
    (2001) Bilateral medial temporal lobe damage does not affect lexical or grammatical processing: Evidence from amnesic patient H.M. Hippocampus, 11, 347–360. 10.1002/hipo.1049
    https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.1049 [Google Scholar]
  14. Koda, K., & Miller, R. T.
    (2018) Cross-linguistic interaction in L2 word meaning inference In English as a foreign language. InH. K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (pp.293–312). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bpa.7.14kod
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.7.14kod [Google Scholar]
  15. Laufer, B., & Nation, P.
    (1999) A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16, 33–51. 10.1177/026553229901600103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229901600103 [Google Scholar]
  16. Lee, S., & Pulido, D.
    (2017) The impact of topic interest, L2 proficiency, and gender on EFL incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Language Teaching Research, 21, 118–135. 10.1177/1362168816637381
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816637381 [Google Scholar]
  17. Malone, J.
    (2018) Incidental vocabulary learning in SLA: Effects of frequency, aural enhancement, and working memory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 651–675. 10.1017/S0272263117000341
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000341 [Google Scholar]
  18. McRae, K., & Jones, M. N.
    (2013) Semantic memory. InD. Reisberg (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp.206–219). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Nation, I. S. P.
    (1990) Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Papi, M.
    (2018) Motivation as quality: Regulatory fit effects on incidental vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 707–730. 10.1017/S027226311700033X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311700033X [Google Scholar]
  21. Pulido, D.
    (2003) Modeling the role of second language proficiency and topic familiarity in second language incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Language Learning, 53, 233–284. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00217
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00217 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2007) The effects of topic familiarity and passage sight vocabulary on L2 lexical inferencing and retention through reading. Applied Linguistics, 28, 66–86. 10.1093/applin/aml049
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml049 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2009) How involved are American L2 learners of Spanish in lexical input Processing tasks during reading?. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 31–58. 10.1017/S0272263109090020
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109090020 [Google Scholar]
  24. Pulido, D., & Hambrick, D. Z.
    (2008) The virtuous cycle: Modeling individual differences in L2 reading and vocabulary development. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20, 164–190.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2015) Changes in R. R Journal, 7, 293–297.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Renoult, L., Irish, M., Moscovitch, M., & Rugg, M. D.
    (2019) From knowing to remembering: The semantic-episodic distinction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 1041–1057. 10.1016/j.tics.2019.09.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.09.008 [Google Scholar]
  27. Rott, S.
    (2007) The effect of frequency of input-enhancements on word learning and text comprehension. Language Learning, 57, 165–199. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2007.00406.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00406.x [Google Scholar]
  28. Stanovich, K.
    (1986) Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 4, 360–407. 10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
    https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1 [Google Scholar]
  29. Takashima, A., Bakker, I., van Hell, J., Janzen, G., & McQueen, J.
    (2014) Richness of information about novel words influences how episodic and semantic memory networks interact during lexicalization. NeuroImage, 84, 265–278. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.023
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.023 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2017) Interaction between episodic and semantic memory networks in the acquisition and consolidation of novel spoken words. Brain and Language, 167, 44–60. 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.05.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.05.009 [Google Scholar]
  31. Trahan, D. E., & Larrabee, G. J.
    (1988) Continuous visual memory test: Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ullman, M. T.
    (2004) Contribution of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231–270. 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2007) The biocognition of the mental lexicon. InM. G. Gaskell, G. Altmann, & P. Bloom (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp.267–286). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (2014) The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiologically motivated theory of first and second language. InB. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp.135–158). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (2016) The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiological model of Language learning, knowledge, and use. InG. Hickok & S. A. Small (Eds.), The neurobiology of language (pp.953–968). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑407794‑2.00076‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407794-2.00076-6 [Google Scholar]
  36. Ullman, M. T. & Pullman, M. Y.
    (2015) A compensatory role for declarative memory in neurodevelopmental disorders. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 51, 205–222. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.01.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.01.008 [Google Scholar]
  37. Webb, S.
    (2008) The effects of context on incidental vocabulary learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20, 232–245.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Webb, S., & Chang, A. C. S.
    (2015) How does prior word knowledge affect vocabulary learning progress in an extensive reading program?, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 651–675. 10.1017/S0272263114000606
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000606 [Google Scholar]
  39. Wickens, T. D.
    (2002) Elementary signal detection theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Witzel, N. O., & Forster, K. I.
    (2012) How L2 words are stored: The episodic L2 hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1608–1621.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhao, A., Guo, Y., Biales, C., Olszewski, A.
    (2016) Exploring learner factors in second Language (L2) incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 28, 224–245.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ml.20012.mur
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.20012.mur
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error