1887
Volume 17, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1871-1340
  • E-ISSN: 1871-1375

Abstract

Abstract

The N400 event-related brain potential (ERP) can be used to evaluate language comprehension, and may be a particularly powerful tool for the assessment of individuals who are behaviourally unresponsive. This study presents a set of semantic violation sentences developed in Canadian French and characterizes their ability to elicit an N400 effect in healthy adults. A novel set of 100 French sentences were created and normed through two surveys that assessed sentence cloze probability ( = 98) and semantic plausibility ( = 99). The best 80 sentences (40 congruent; 40 incongruent) were selected for the final stimulus set and tested for their ability to elicit N400 effects in 33 French-speaking individuals. The final stimulus set successfully generated an N400 effect in the grand-average across all individuals, and in the grand-average within age groups (young, middle-age, and older adults). On a single-subject level, the final stimulus set elicited N400 effects in 76% of the participants. The feasibility of using this stimulus set to assess semantic processing in behaviourally unresponsive individuals was demonstrated in a case example of a French individual in a disorder of consciousness. These sentences enable the inclusion of Canadian French speakers in this simple assessment of language comprehension abilities.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ml.20032.aze
2022-03-25
2022-05-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alcaide-Aguirre, R. E., Warschausky, S. A., Brown, D., Aref, A., & Huggins, J. E.
    (2017) Asynchronous brain–computer interface for cognitive assessment in people with cerebral palsy. Journal of Neural Engineering, 14(6), 066001. 10.1088/1741‑2552/aa7fc4
    https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aa7fc4 [Google Scholar]
  2. Angrilli, A., Penolazzi, B., Vespignani, F., De Vincenzi, M., Job, R., Ciccarelli, L., Palomba, D., & Stegagno, L.
    (2002) Cortical brain responses to semantic incongruity and syntactic violation in Italian language: An event-related potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 322(1), 5–8. 10.1016/S0304‑3940(01)02528‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02528-9 [Google Scholar]
  3. Blain-Moraes, S., Boshra, R., Ma, H. K., Mah, R., Ruiter, K., Avidan, M., Connolly, J. F., & Mashour, G. A.
    (2016) Normal Brain Response to Propofol in Advance of Recovery from Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10. 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00248
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00248 [Google Scholar]
  4. Byrne, J. M., Dywan, C. A., & Connolly, J. F.
    (1995) Assessment of children’s receptive vocabulary using event-related brain potentials: Development of a clinically valid test. Child Neuropsychology, 1(3), 211–223. 10.1080/09297049508400226
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049508400226 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chetail, F., Colin, C., & Content, A.
    (2012) Electrophysiological markers of syllable frequency during written word recognition in French. Neuropsychologia, 50(14), 3429–3439. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.044
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.044 [Google Scholar]
  6. Connolly, J. F., Phillips, N. A., Stewart, S. H., & Brake, W. G.
    (1992) Event-related potential sensitivity to acoustic and semantic properties of terminal words in sentences. Brain and Language, 43(1), 1–18. 10.1016/0093‑934X(92)90018‑A
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(92)90018-A [Google Scholar]
  7. D’Arcy, R. C. N., Marchand, Y., Eskes, G. A., Harrison, E. R., Phillips, S. J., Major, A., & Connolly, J. F.
    (2003) Electrophysiological assessment of language function following stroke. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 662–672. 10.1016/S1388‑2457(03)00007‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00007-5 [Google Scholar]
  8. Desrochers, A.
    (2006) OMNILEX: Une base de données sur le lexique du français contemporain. Cahiers linguistiques d’Ottawa, 34, 25–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Duncan, C., Barry, R., Connolly, J. F., Fischer, C., Michie, P., Naatanen, R., Polich, J., Reinvang, I., & Van Petten, C.
    (2009) Event-related potentials in clinical research: Guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300 and N400. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120, 1883–1908. 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.07.045
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2009.07.045 [Google Scholar]
  10. Federmeier, K. D., Kutas, M., & Schul, R.
    (2010) Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension. Brain and Language, 115(3), 149–161. 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.07.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2010.07.006 [Google Scholar]
  11. Federmeier, K. D., McLennan, D. B., De Ochoa, E., & Kutas, M.
    (2002) The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 39(2), 133–146. 10.1111/1469‑8986.3920133
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3920133 [Google Scholar]
  12. Federmeier, K. D., Van Petten, C., Schwartz, T. J., & Kutas, M.
    (2003) Sounds, Words, Sentences: Age-Related Changes Across Levels of Language Processing. Psychology and Aging, 18(4), 858–872. 10.1037/0882‑7974.18.4.858
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.18.4.858 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fischer, C., Luaute, J., & Morlet, D.
    (2010) Event-related potentials (MMN and novelty P3) in permanent vegetative or minimally conscious states. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 121(7), 1032–1042. 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.02.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2010.02.005 [Google Scholar]
  14. Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Mecklinger, A.
    (1996) Temporal structure of syntatic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22(5), 1219–1248.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Giacino, J., Kalmar, K., & Whyte, J.
    (2004) The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: Measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(12), 2020–2029. 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.033
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.033 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gunter, T. C., Jackson, J. L., & Mulder, G.
    (1992) An Electrophysiological Study of Semantic Processing in Young and Middle-Aged Academics. Psychophysiology, 29(1), 38–54. 10.1111/j.1469‑8986.1992.tb02009.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1992.tb02009.x [Google Scholar]
  17. Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M.
    (2000) ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: The P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation. 19.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Isel, F., Hahne, A., Maess, B., & Friederici, A. D.
    (2007) Neurodynamics of sentence interpretation: ERP evidence from French. Biological Psychology, 74(3), 337–346. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kemmotsu, N., Girard, H. M., Kucukboyaci, N. E., McEvoy, L. K., Hagler, D. J., Dale, A. M., Halgren, E., & McDonald, C. R.
    (2012) Age-Related Changes in the Neurophysiology of Language in Adults: Relationship to Regional Cortical Thinning and White Matter Microstructure. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(35), 12204–12213. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0136‑12.2012
    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0136-12.2012 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kotchoubey, B.
    (2005) Event-related potential measures of consciousness: Two equations with three unknowns. Progress in Brain Research, 150, 427–444. 10.1016/S0079‑6123(05)50030‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(05)50030-X [Google Scholar]
  21. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A.
    (1984) Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307(5947), 161–163. 10.1038/307161a0
    https://doi.org/10.1038/307161a0 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D.
    (2011) Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A.
    (1980) Event-related potentials to semantically inapprpriate and surprisingly large words. Biological Psychology, 11, 99–116. 10.1016/0301‑0511(80)90046‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(80)90046-0 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kutas, M., & Iragui, V.
    (1998) The N400 in a semantic categorization task across 6 decades. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 108(5), 456–471. 10.1016/S0168‑5597(98)00023‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00023-9 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kutas, M., & van Petten, C.
    (1994) Psycholinguistics electrified: Event-related potential investigations. InM. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp.83–143). Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kutas, M., & Van Petten, C.
    (1998) Event-related brain potential studies of language. Advances in Psychophysiology, 3, 139–187.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lai, C. L., Lin, R. T., Liou, L. M., & Liu, C. K.
    (2010) The role of event-related potentials in cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease. Clinical Neurophysiology, 121(2), 194–199. 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2009.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee, M. S., Lee, S. H., Moon, E. O., Moon, Y. J., Kim, S., Kim, S. H., & Jung, I. K.
    (2013) Neuropsychological correlates of the P300 in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 40, 62–69. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.08.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.08.009 [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, R., Song, W., Du, J., Huo, S., & Shan, G.
    (2015) Connecting the P300 to the diagnosis and prognosis of unconscious patients. Neural Regeneration Research, 10(3), 473–480. 10.4103/1673‑5374.153699
    https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.153699 [Google Scholar]
  30. Näätänen, R.
    (1990) The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13(02), 201–233. 10.1017/S0140525X00078407
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00078407 [Google Scholar]
  31. Paller, K. A., Kutas, M., & Mayes, A. R.
    (1987) Neural correlates of encoding in an incidental learning paradigm. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 67(4), 360–371. 10.1016/0013‑4694(87)90124‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(87)90124-6 [Google Scholar]
  32. Park, D. C., & Reuter-Lorenz, P.
    (2009) The adaptive brain: Aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 173–196. 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093656
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093656 [Google Scholar]
  33. Perrin, F., Schnakers, C., Schabus, M., Degueldre, C., Goldman, S., Brédart, S., Faymonville, M.-E., Lamy, M., Moonen, G., Luxen, A., Maquet, P., & Laureys, S.
    (2006) Brain response to one’s own name in vegetative state, minimally conscious state, and locked-in syndrome. Archives of Neurology, 63(4), 562–569. 10.1001/archneur.63.4.562
    https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.63.4.562 [Google Scholar]
  34. Risetti, M., Formisano, R., Toppi, J., Quitadamo, L. R., Bianchi, L., Astolfi, L., Cincotti, F., & Mattia, D.
    (2013) On ERPs detection in disorders of consciousness rehabilitation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 775. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00775
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00775 [Google Scholar]
  35. Robichon, F., Besson, M., & Faïta, F.
    (1996) Normes de complétion pour 744 contextes linguistiques français de différents formats. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 50(2), 205. 10.1037/1196‑1961.50.2.205
    https://doi.org/10.1037/1196-1961.50.2.205 [Google Scholar]
  36. Rodriguez, R. A., Bussière, M., Froeschl, M., & Nathan, H. J.
    (2014) Auditory-evoked potentials during coma: Do they improve our prediction of awakening in comatose patients?Journal of Critical Care, 29(1), 93–100. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.08.020
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.08.020 [Google Scholar]
  37. Rohaut, B., Faugeras, F., Chausson, N., King, J.-R., Karoui, I. E., Cohen, L., & Naccache, L.
    (2015) Probing ERP correlates of verbal semantic processing in patients with impaired consciousness. Neuropsychologia, 66, 279–292. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.014 [Google Scholar]
  38. Sabourin, L., Leclerc, J. C., Lapierre, M., Burkholder, M., & Brien, C.
    (2016) The language background questionnaire in L2 research: Teasing apart the variables. Annual Meeting of the Canadian Linguistics Association, Calgary, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Schafer, E. W. P.
    (1985) Neural adaptability: A biological determinant of g factor intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(02), 240–241. 10.1017/S0140525X00020628
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00020628 [Google Scholar]
  40. Schnakers, C., Vanhaudenhuyse, A., Giacino, J., Ventura, M., Boly, M., Majerus, S., Moonen, G., & Laureys, S.
    (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: Clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurology, 9(1), 35. 10.1186/1471‑2377‑9‑35
    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-9-35 [Google Scholar]
  41. Stough, C. K. K., Nettelbeck, T., & Cooper, C. J.
    (1990) Evoked brain potentials, string length and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 11(4), 401–406. 10.1016/0191‑8869(90)90223‑E
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(90)90223-E [Google Scholar]
  42. Van Berkum, J. J., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M.
    (1999) Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(6), 657–671. 10.1162/089892999563724
    https://doi.org/10.1162/089892999563724 [Google Scholar]
  43. Wlotko, E. W., Lee, C.-L., & Federmeier, K. D.
    (2010) Language of the aging brain: Event-related potential studies of comprehension in older adults. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(8), 623–638. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2010.00224.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00224.x [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhu, Z., Yang, F., Li, D., Zhou, L., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., & Chen, X.
    (2017) Age-related reduction of adaptive brain response during semantic integration is associated with gray matter reduction. PLOS ONE, 12(12), e0189462. 10.1371/journal.pone.0189462
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189462 [Google Scholar]
  45. Ziegler, J. C., Benraïss, A., & Besson, M.
    (1999) From print to meaning: An electrophysiological investigation of the role of phonology in accessing word meaning. Psychophysiology, 36(6), 775–785. 10.1111/1469‑8986.3660775
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3660775 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ml.20032.aze
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.20032.aze
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error