1887
Volume 18, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1871-1340
  • E-ISSN: 1871-1375
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Most of the empirical evidence that lays the ground for research on recognition of printed morphologically complex words comes from experimental paradigms employing morphological priming, e.g., exposure to morphologically related forms. Furthermore, most of these paradigms rely on context-less presentation of isolated words. We examined whether well-established morphological priming effects (i.e., faster recognition of a word preceded by a morphologically related word) are observable under more natural conditions of fluent text reading. Using the GECO database of eye-movements recorded during the reading of a novel, we examined the long-lag morphological and identity priming in one’s first language (L1, English and Dutch) or second language (L2, English). While the effects of identity priming were ubiquitous, no evidence of morphological priming was observed in the L1 or L2 eye-movement record. We discuss implications of these findings for ecological validity and generalizability of select current theories of morphological processing.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ml.21014.cos
2023-10-03
2025-02-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amenta, S. and Crepaldi, D.
    (2012) Morphological Processing as We Know It: An Analytical Review of Morphological Effects in Visual Word Identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 31. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Đurđević, D. F., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M.
    (2011) An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological review, 118(3), 438. 10.1037/a0023851
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023851 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–8. Retrieved fromCRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
  4. Bertram, R.
    (2011) Eye movements and morphological processing in reading. The Mental Lexicon, 6(1), 83–109. 10.1075/ml.6.1.04ber
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.6.1.04ber [Google Scholar]
  5. Basnight-Brown, D., Chen, L., Hua, S., Kostić, A. and Feldman, L.
    (2007) Monolingual and bilingual recognition of regular and irregular English verbs: Sensitivity to form similarity varies with first language experience. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(1), pp.65–80. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bentin, S., & Feldman, L. B.
    (1990) The contribution of morphological and semantic relatedness to repetition priming at short and long lags: Evidence from Hebrew. The quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 42(4), 693–711. 10.1080/14640749008401245
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749008401245 [Google Scholar]
  7. Boston, M. F., Hale, J., Kliegl, R., Patil, U., & Vasishth, S.
    (2008) Parsing costs as predictors of reading difficulty: An evaluation using the Potsdam Sentence Corpus. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2(1). 10.16910/jemr.2.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.2.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  8. Burani, C.
    (2010) Word morphology enhances reading fluency in children with developmental dyslexia. Lingue e linguaggio, 9(2), 177–198.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Burani, C., Marcolini, S., De Luca, M., & Zoccolotti, P.
    (2008) Morpheme-based reading aloud: Evidence from dyslexic and skilled Italian readers. Cognition, 108(1), 243–262. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.010 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brysbaert, M., New, B., & Keuleers, E.
    (2012) Adding part-of-speech information to the SUBTLEX-US word frequencies. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 991–997. 10.3758/s13428‑012‑0190‑4
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0190-4 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brysbaert, M.
    (2019) How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. Journal of Cognition, 2(1), 16. 10.5334/joc.72
    https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.72 [Google Scholar]
  12. Brysbaert, M., & Stevens, M.
    (2018) Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models: A Tutorial. Journal of cognition, 1(1), 9. 10.5334/joc.10
    https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.10 [Google Scholar]
  13. Carlisle, J. F., & Stone, C. A.
    (2005) Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Reading research quarterly, 40(4), 428–449. 10.1598/RRQ.40.4.3
    https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.40.4.3 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chamberland, C., Saint-Aubin, J., & Légère, M. A.
    (2013) The impact of text repetition on content and function words during reading: Further evidence from eye movements. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 67(2), 94. 10.1037/a0028288
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028288 [Google Scholar]
  15. Christie, A.
    (1920) The mysterious affair at styles. N.p.: John Lane. Retrieved on7 November, 2012, from Project Gutenberg, www.gutenberg.org
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ciaccio, L. A., & Jacob, G.
    (2019) Native speakers like affixes, L2 speakers like letters? An overt visual priming study investigating the role of orthography in L2 morphological processing. PLOS ONE, 14(12), e0226482. 10.1371/journal.pone.0226482
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226482 [Google Scholar]
  17. Clahsen, H. and Neubauer, K.
    (2010) Morphology, frequency, and the processing of derived words in native and non-native speakers. Lingua, 120(11), pp.2627–2637. 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.06.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.06.007 [Google Scholar]
  18. Clahsen, H., & Felser, C.
    (2006) How native-like is non-native language processing?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(12), 564–570. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  19. Conklin, K., & Pellicer-Sánchez, A.
    (2016) Using eye-tracking in applied linguistics and second language research. Second Language Research, 32(3), 453–467. 10.1177/0267658316637401
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316637401 [Google Scholar]
  20. Cop, U., Dirix, N., Drieghe, D., & Duyck, W.
    (2017) Presenting GECO: An eyetracking corpus of monolingual and bilingual sentence reading. Behavior research methods, 49(2), 602–615. 10.3758/s13428‑016‑0734‑0
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0734-0 [Google Scholar]
  21. Coughlin, C. and Tremblay, A.
    (2014) Morphological decomposition in native and non-native French speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(3), pp.524–542. 10.1017/S1366728914000200
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000200 [Google Scholar]
  22. Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M. and Nickels, L.
    (2010) ‘Fell’ primes ‘fall’, but does ‘bell’ prime ‘ball’? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(1), 83–99. 10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  23. Dann, K., Veldre, A., & Andrews, S.
    (2021) Morphological preview effects in English are restricted to suffixed words. Ea 3742, 1–57. 10.1037/xlm0001029
    https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001029 [Google Scholar]
  24. De Grauwe, S., Lemhöfer, K., Willems, R. and Schriefers, H.
    (2014) L2 speakers decompose morphologically complex verbs: fMRI evidence from priming of transparent derived verbs. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 81. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00802
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00802 [Google Scholar]
  25. Deacon, S. H., Tong, X., & Mimeau, C.
    (2019) 15 Morphological and Semantic Processing in Developmental Dyslexia. Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems, 3271. 10.1017/9781108553377.015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.015 [Google Scholar]
  26. Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J., Morris, J. and Keuleers, E.
    (2011) Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(4), pp.344–358. 10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  27. Dirix, N., Brysbaert, M., & Duyck, W.
    (2019) How well do word recognition measures correlate? Effects of language context and repeated presentations. Behavior research methods, 51(6), 2800–2816. 10.3758/s13428‑018‑1158‑9
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1158-9 [Google Scholar]
  28. Feldman, L. B., & Andjelković, D.
    (1992) Morphological analysis in word recognition. InAdvances in psychology (Vol.941, pp.343–360). North-Holland.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Feldman, L. B.
    (1992) Bi-alphabetism and the design of a reading mechanism. InD. M. Willows, R. S. Kruk, & E. Corcos (Eds.), Visual processes in reading and reading disabilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Feldman, L. B., & Bentin, S.
    (1994) Morphological analysis of disrupted morphemes: Evidence from Hebrew. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(2), 407–435. 10.1080/14640749408401118
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749408401118 [Google Scholar]
  31. Feldman, L. B., Kostić, A., Basnight-Brown, D. M., Durđević, D. F., & Pastizzo, M. J.
    (2010) Morphological facilitation for regular and irregular verb formations in native and non-native speakers: Little evidence for two distinct mechanisms. Bilingualism (Cambridge, England), 131, 119–135. 10.1017/S1366728909990459
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990459 [Google Scholar]
  32. Feldman, L. B., Rueckl, J., Diliberto, K., Pastizzo, M., & Vellutino, F. R.
    (2002) Morphological analysis by child readers as revealed by the fragment completion task. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 9(3), 529–535. 10.3758/BF03196309
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196309 [Google Scholar]
  33. Foote, R.
    (2015) The Storage And Processing Of Morphologically Complex Words In L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(4), 735–767. 10.1017/S0272263115000376
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000376 [Google Scholar]
  34. Forster, K., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C. and Carter, R.
    (1987) Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation?. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 39(2), 211–251. 10.1080/14640748708401785
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748708401785 [Google Scholar]
  35. Frost, R.
    (2012) Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(5), 263–279. 10.1017/S0140525X11001841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11001841 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2006) Becoming literate in Hebrew: the grain size hypothesis and Semitic orthographic systems. Developmental Science, 9(5), 439–440. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2006.00523.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00523.x [Google Scholar]
  37. Frost, R., Forster, K. and Deutsch, A.
    (1997) “What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation”: Correction to Frost et al. 1997. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(5), 1189–1191.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S.
    (1987) Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13(1), 104–115. 10.1037/0096‑1523.13.1.104
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.13.1.104 [Google Scholar]
  39. Godfroid, A., Ahn, J., Choi, I., Ballard, L., Cui, Y., Johnston, S., Lee, S., Sarkar, A., Yoon, H.
    (2018) Incidental vocabulary learning in a natural reading context: An eye-tracking study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(3), 1–22. 10.1017/S1366728917000219
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728917000219 [Google Scholar]
  40. Gonnerman, L., Seidenberg, M. and Andersen, E.
    (2007) Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), pp.323–345. 10.1037/0096‑3445.136.2.323
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.323 [Google Scholar]
  41. Grainger, J., Dufau, S., Montant, M., Ziegler, J. C., & Fagot, J.
    (2012) Orthographic processing in baboons (Papio papio). Science, 336(6078), 245–248. 10.1126/science.1218152
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1218152 [Google Scholar]
  42. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M.
    (1996) Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. Psychological review, 103(3), 518. 10.1037/0033‑295X.103.3.518
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.518 [Google Scholar]
  43. Grainger, J., Colé, P. and Segui, J.
    (1991) Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(3), 370–384. 10.1016/0749‑596X(91)90042‑I
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90042-I [Google Scholar]
  44. Green, P. and MacLeod, C. J.
    (2016) SIMR: an R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods Ecol Evol, 71: 493–498. 10.1111/2041‑210X.12504
    https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12504 [Google Scholar]
  45. Haddad, L., Weiss, Y., Katzir, T., & Bitan, T.
    (2018) Orthographic Transparency Enhances Morphological Segmentation in Children Reading Hebrew Words. Frontiers in Psychology, 81. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02369
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02369 [Google Scholar]
  46. Heyer, V. and Clahsen, H.
    (2015) Late bilinguals see a scan in scanner and in scandal: dissecting formal overlap from morphological priming in the processing of derived words. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(3), 543–550. 10.1017/S1366728914000662
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000662 [Google Scholar]
  47. Jacob, G., Fleischhauer, E. And Clahsen, H.
    (2013) Allomorphy and affixation in morphological processing: A cross-modal priming study with late bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(4), 924–933. 10.1017/S1366728913000291
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000291 [Google Scholar]
  48. Jacob, G., Heyer, V. and Veríssimo, J.
    (2017) Aiming at the same target: A masked priming study directly comparing derivation and inflection in the second language. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22(6), 619–637. 10.1177/1367006916688333
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916688333 [Google Scholar]
  49. Jacob, G.
    (2018) Morphological priming in bilingualism research. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(3), 443–447. 10.1017/S1366728917000451
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728917000451 [Google Scholar]
  50. Juhasz, B. J., Starr, M. S., Inhoff, A. W., & Placke, L.
    (2003) The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 223–244. 10.1348/000712603321661903
    https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661903 [Google Scholar]
  51. Kamienkowski, J. E., Carbajal, M. J., Bianchi, B., Sigman, M., & Shalom, D. E.
    (2018) Cumulative repetition effects across multiple readings of a word: Evidence from eye movements. Discourse Processes, 55(3), 256–271. 10.1080/0163853X.2016.1234872
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2016.1234872 [Google Scholar]
  52. Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B.
    (2010) SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 643–650. 10.3758/BRM.42.3.643
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.3.643 [Google Scholar]
  53. Kirkici, B., & Clahsen, H.
    (2013) Inflection and derivation in native and non-native language processing: Masked priming experiments on Turkish. Bilingualism, 16(4), 776. 10.1017/S1366728912000648
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000648 [Google Scholar]
  54. Kuperman, V., Matsuki, K., & Van Dyke, J. A.
    (2018) Contributions of reader-and text-level characteristics to eye-movement patterns during passage reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(11), 1687.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Kuperman, V., Drieghe, D., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M.
    (2013) How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(3), 563–580. 10.1080/17470218.2012.658820
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.658820 [Google Scholar]
  56. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H.
    (2017) lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of statistical software, 82(13), 1–26. 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 [Google Scholar]
  57. Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M.
    (2012) Introducing LexTALE: a quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English. Behavior research methods, 44(2), 325–343. 10.3758/s13428‑011‑0146‑0
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0 [Google Scholar]
  58. Leminen, A., Smolka, E., Duñabeitia, J. and Pliatsikas, C.
    (2019) Morphological processing in the brain: The good (inflection), the bad (derivation) and the ugly (compounding). Cortex, 1161, 4–44. 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.016 [Google Scholar]
  59. Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A.
    (2009) Bilingual lexical access in context: Evidence from eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(2), 381–390. 10.1037/a0014875
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014875 [Google Scholar]
  60. Linke, M., Bröker, F., Ramscar, M., & Baayen, H.
    (2017) Are baboons learning “orthographic” representations? Probably not. PLOS ONE, 12(8), e0183876. 10.1371/journal.pone.0183876
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183876 [Google Scholar]
  61. Liversedge, S. P., Blythe, H. I., & Drieghe, D.
    (2012) Beyond isolated word recognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(5), 293–294. 10.1017/S0140525X12000210
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000210 [Google Scholar]
  62. Lowder, M. W., Choi, W., Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M.
    (2018) Lexical predictability during natural reading: Effects of surprisal and entropy reduction. Cognitive Science, 42(Suppl 4), 1166–1183. 10.1111/cogs.12597
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12597 [Google Scholar]
  63. Mann, V., & Singson, M.
    (2003) Linking morphological knowledge to English decoding ability: Large effects of little suffixes. InReading complex words (pp.1–25). Springer, Boston, MA. 10.1007/978‑1‑4757‑3720‑2_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3720-2_1 [Google Scholar]
  64. Marantz, A.
    (2013) No escape from morphemes in morphological processing. Language and cognitive processes, 28(7), 905–916. 10.1080/01690965.2013.779385
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.779385 [Google Scholar]
  65. Marelli, M., Traficante, D., & Burani, C.
    (2020) Reading morphologically complex words: Experimental evidence and learning models. Word Knowledge and Word Usage, 5531. 10.1515/9783110440577‑014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110440577-014 [Google Scholar]
  66. Marelli, M., & Luzzatti, C.
    (2012) Frequency effects in the processing of Italian nominal compounds: Modulation of headedness and semantic transparency. Journal of memory and language, 66(4), 644–664. 10.1016/j.jml.2012.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  67. Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L., Waksler, R. and Older, L.
    (1994) Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101(1), 3–33. 10.1037/0033‑295X.101.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  68. Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
    (2007) Processes in language comprehension. Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics, 495–524.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Masson, M. E. J., & MacLeod, C. M.
    (1992) Reenacting the route to interpretation: Enhanced perceptual identification without prior perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(2), 145–176. 10.1037/0096‑3445.121.2.145
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.121.2.145 [Google Scholar]
  70. Matin, E.
    (1974) Saccadic suppression: a review and an analysis. Psychological bulletin, 81(12), 899. 10.1037/h0037368
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037368 [Google Scholar]
  71. McDonald, J. L.
    (2006) Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(3), 381–401. 10.1016/j.jml.2006.06.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.06.006 [Google Scholar]
  72. Milin, P., Smolka, E., & Feldman, L. B.
    (2017) Models of lexical access and morphological processing. InE. M. Fernández & H. S. Cairns (Eds.), The handbook of psycholinguistics (pp.240–268). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118829516.ch11
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118829516.ch11 [Google Scholar]
  73. Mousikou, P., & Schroeder, S.
    (2019) Morphological processing in single-word and sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(5), 881.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Münte, T. F., Say, T., Clahsen, H., Schiltz, K., & Kutas, M.
    (1999) Decomposition of morphologically complex words in English: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 7(3), 241–253. 10.1016/S0926‑6410(98)00028‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00028-7 [Google Scholar]
  75. Neubauer, K. and Clahsen, H.
    (2009) Decomposition of inflected words in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(3), pp.403–435. 10.1017/S0272263109090354
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109090354 [Google Scholar]
  76. Paterson, K. B., Alcock, A., & Liversedge, S. P.
    (2011) Morphological priming during reading: Evidence from eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(4–6), 600–623. 10.1080/01690965.2010.485392
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.485392 [Google Scholar]
  77. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved fromwww.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Radach, R., Huestegge, L., & Reilly, R.
    (2008) The role of global top-down factors in local eye-movement control in reading. Psychological research, 72(6), 675–688. 10.1007/s00426‑008‑0173‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0173-3 [Google Scholar]
  79. Raney, G. E., & Rayner, K.
    (1995) Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 49(2), 151. 10.1037/1196‑1961.49.2.151
    https://doi.org/10.1037/1196-1961.49.2.151 [Google Scholar]
  80. Rastle, K., Davis, M., Marslen-Wilson, W. and Tyler, L.
    (2000) Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4–5), 507–537. 10.1080/01690960050119689
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119689 [Google Scholar]
  81. Raveh, M. and Rueckl, J.
    (2000) Equivalent Effects of Inflected and Derived Primes: Long-Term Morphological Priming in Fragment Completion and Lexical Decision. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(1), 103–119. 10.1006/jmla.1999.2673
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2673 [Google Scholar]
  82. Rayner, K., & Liversedge, S. P.
    (2011) Linguistic and cognitive influences on eye movements during reading. InS. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of eye movements (p.751–766). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199539789.013.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199539789.013.0041 [Google Scholar]
  83. Rayner, K.
    (2009) The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. 10.1080/17470210902816461
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461 [Google Scholar]
  84. (1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. 10.1037/0033‑2909.124.3.372
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372 [Google Scholar]
  85. Rayner, K., Raney, G. E., & Pollatsek, A.
    (1995) Eye movements and discourse processing. InR. Lorch & E. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp.9–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Rayner, K.
    (1975) The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive psychology, 7(1), 65–81. 10.1016/0010‑0285(75)90005‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5 [Google Scholar]
  87. Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Münte, T. and Clahsen, H.
    (2002) Morphological Priming in Spanish Verb Forms: An ERP Repetition Priming Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(3), 443–454. 10.1162/089892902317361958
    https://doi.org/10.1162/089892902317361958 [Google Scholar]
  88. Royle, P., Drury, J. E., Bourguignon, N., & Steinhauer, K.
    (2012) The temporal dynamics of inflected word recognition: A masked ERP priming study of French verbs. Neuropsychologia, 50(14), 3542–3553. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.007 [Google Scholar]
  89. Rueckl, J. & Aicher, K.
    (2008) Are CORNER and BROTHER morphologically complex? Not in the long term. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(7–8), 972–1001. 10.1080/01690960802211027
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802211027 [Google Scholar]
  90. Rueckl, J. G., & Galantucci, B.
    (2005) The locus and time course of long-term morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(1–2), 115–138. 10.1080/01690960444000188
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960444000188 [Google Scholar]
  91. Rueckl, J. G., Mikolinski, M., Raveh, M., Miner, C. S., & Mars, F.
    (1997) Morphological priming, fragment completion, and connectionist networks. Journal of Memory and Language, 36(3), 382–405. 10.1006/jmla.1996.2489
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.2489 [Google Scholar]
  92. Schmidtke, D., Van Dyke, J. A., & Kuperman, V.
    (2020) CompLex: an eye-movement database of compound word reading in English. Behavior Research Methods, 53(1), 59–77. 10.3758/s13428‑020‑01397‑1
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01397-1 [Google Scholar]
  93. Schmidtke, D., & Kuperman, V.
    (2020) Psycholinguistic Methods and Tasks in Morphology. InOxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.600
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.600 [Google Scholar]
  94. (2019) A paradox of apparent brainless behavior: The time-course of compound word recognition. Cortex, 1161, 250–267. 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  95. Schmidtke, D., Matsuki, K., & Kuperman, V.
    (2017) Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(11), 1793.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Seidenberg, M. S., & Gonnerman, L. M.
    (2000) Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4 (9), 353–361. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(00)01515‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01515-1 [Google Scholar]
  97. Seidenberg, M. S.
    (2011) Reading in different writing systems: One architecture, multiple solutions. In: Dyslexia across languages: Orthography and the brain-gene-behavior link, ed.P. McCardle, B. Miller, J. R. Lee & O. J. L. Tzeng, pp.146–68. Paul H. Brookes.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. (2012) Writing systems: Not optimal, but good enough. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(5), 305. 10.1017/S0140525X12000337
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000337 [Google Scholar]
  99. Silva, R. and Clahsen, H.
    (2008) Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(2), 245–260. 10.1017/S1366728908003404
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003404 [Google Scholar]
  100. Stanners, R., Neiser, J., Hernon, W. and Hall, R.
    (1979) Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(4), 399–412. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(79)90219‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90219-6 [Google Scholar]
  101. Traficante, D., Marcolini, S., Luci, A., Zoccolotti, P., Burani, C.
    (2011) How do roots and suffixes influence reading of morphological pseudowords: A study on Italian dyslexic children, Language and Cognitive Processes, 26 (4–5–6), 777–793. 10.1080/01690965.2010.496553
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.496553 [Google Scholar]
  102. Ulicheva, A., Harvey, H., Aronoff, M., & Rastle, K.
    (2020) Skilled readers’ sensitivity to meaningful regularities in English writing. Cognition, 1951, 103810. 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.013 [Google Scholar]
  103. Westfall, J., Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M.
    (2014) Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(5), 2020–2045. 10.1037/xge0000014
    https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000014 [Google Scholar]
  104. Weyerts, H., Münte, T. F., Smid, H. G., & Heinze, H. J.
    (1996) Mental representations of morphologically complex words: an event-related potential study with adult humans. Neuroscience Letters, 206(2–3), 125–128. 10.1016/S0304‑3940(96)12442‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(96)12442-3 [Google Scholar]
  105. Von der Malsburg, T., & Angele, B.
    (2017) False positives and other statistical errors in standard analyses of eye movements in reading. Journal of memory and language, 941, 119–133. 10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.003 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.21014.cos
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.21014.cos
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error