1887
Volume 17, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1871-1340
  • E-ISSN: 1871-1375
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Aging involves a variety of cognitive and language changes. Word association norms (WANs), which describe the first word people say or write after reading or hearing a stimulus word, reflect the organization of semantic knowledge. The aim of this study was to create a WAN corpus for Mexican older adults, with 114 participants responding to 117 nouns. The results of eight measures of word-word relationships showed that participants generated an average of 38.14 different response words for each stimulus word. Of these responses, 41.88% were of high associative strength and 20.70% were idiosyncratic, demonstrating the uniqueness of responses of older adults. In addition, we compared their responses to a corpus for younger adults (Barrón-Martínez & Arias-Trejo, 2014). A qualitative analysis categorizing the responses into syntagmatic and paradigmatic types showed that the older group tended to respond with words from a different grammatical class. Responses of the younger adults were also more cohesive and less varied than those of the older group. This corpus for older adults is an essential resource for evaluating age-related changes in semantic memory, and it provides a point of comparison for responses from people with neurodegenerative diseases.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ml.22001.ari
2022-10-06
2024-10-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baayen, R. H., Tomaschek, F., Gahl, S., and Ramscar, M.
    (2017) The Ecclesiastes principle in language change. InHundt, M., Mollin, S., and Pfenninger, S. (Eds.) The changing English language: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp.21–48). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316091746.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316091746.002 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barrón-Martínez, J. B., & Arias-Trejo, N.
    (2014) Word Association Norms in Mexican Spanish. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17(e90), 1–13. 10.1017/sjp.2014.91
    https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2014.91 [Google Scholar]
  3. Buchanan, E. M., Valentine, K. D., & Maxwell, N. P.
    (2019) English semantic feature production norms: An extended database of 4436 concepts. Behavior Research Methods, 51(4), 1849–1863. 10.3758/s13428‑019‑01243‑z
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01243-z [Google Scholar]
  4. Brainerd, C. J., Yang, Y., Reyna, V., Howe, M., Mills, B. A.
    , & Review (2008) Semantic processing in “associative” false memory. Psychonomic Bulletin, 15(6), 1035–1053. 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1035
    https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.6.1035 [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, R., & Berko, J.
    (1960) Word Association and the Acquisition of Grammar. Child Development, 31(1), 1. 10.2307/1126377
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1126377 [Google Scholar]
  6. Burke, D. M., & Peters, L.
    (1986) Word associations in old age: Evidence for consistency in semantic encoding during adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 1(4), 283. 10.1037/0882‑7974.1.4.283
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.1.4.283 [Google Scholar]
  7. Burke, D. M., & Shafto, M. A.
    (2004) Aging and Language Production. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(1), 21–24. 10.1111/j.0963‑7214.2004.01301006.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01301006.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Cadavid, S., Beato, M. S., & Fernandez, Á.
    (2012) Falso reconocimiento en listas DRM con tres palabras críticas: Asociación directa vs. inversa. Psicológica, 33(1). https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/169/16923098003.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Callejas, A., Correa, Á., Lipiáñez, J., & Tudela, P.
    (2003) Normas asociativas intracategoriales para 612 palabras de seis categorías semánticas en Español. Psicológica, 24(2), 185–201. dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=669366
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F.
    (1975) A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological review, 82(6), 407–428. 10.1037/0033‑295X.82.6.407
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407 [Google Scholar]
  11. De Deyne, S., Navarro, D., Perfors, A., Brysbaert, M., & Storms, G.
    (2019) The Small World of Words: English word association norms for over 12,000 cue words. Behavior Research Methods, 51(3), 987–1006. 10.3758/s13428‑018‑1115‑7
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1115-7 [Google Scholar]
  12. De Deyne, S., & Storms, G.
    (2008) Word associations: Network and semantic properties. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 213–231. 10.3758/BRM.40.1.213
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.1.213 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dubossarsky, H., De Deyne, S., & Hills, T. T.
    (2017) Quantifying the Structure of Free Association Networks Across the Life Span. Developmental Psychology, 58(8), 1560. 10.1037/dev0000347
    https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000347 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ervin, S. M.
    (1961) Changes with Age in the Verbal Determinants of Word-Association. The American Journal of Psychology, 74(3), 361. 10.2307/1419742
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1419742 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fernández, A., Díez, E., Alonso, M. A., & Beato, M. S.
    (2004) Free-association norms form the Spanish names of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 361, 577–583. 10.3758/BF03195604
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195604 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ferrand, L., & New, B.
    (2003) Semantic and associative priming in the mental lexicon. InP. Bonin (Ed.), Mental Lexicon: Some Words to Talk about Words (pp.25–43). Nova Science Publisher.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Frank, M. C., Braginsky, M., Yurovsky, D., & Marchman, V. A.
    (2016) Wordbank: An open repository for developmental vocabulary data. Journal of Child Language. 10.1017/S0305000916000209
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000916000209 [Google Scholar]
  18. Goldfarb, R., & Halpern, H.
    (1984) Word association responses in normal adult subjects. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 13(1), 37–55. 10.1007/BF01067901
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067901 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gollan, T. H., Salmon, D. P., & Paxton, J. L.
    (2006) Word association in early Alzheimer’s disease. Brain and Language, 99(3), 289–303. 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Harada, C. N., Natelson Love, M. C., & Triebel, K. L.
    (2013) Normal cognitive aging. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 29(4), 737–752. 10.1016/j.cger.2013.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2013.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hirsh, K. W., & Tree, J. J.
    (2001) Word association norms for two cohorts of British adults. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 14(1), 1–44. 10.1016/S0911‑6044(00)00002‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0911-6044(00)00002-6 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hoffman, P. & Morcom, A. M.
    (2018) Age-related changes in the neural networks supporting semantic cognition: A meta-analysis of 47 functional neuroimaging studies. Neuroscience Biobehavioral Reviews, 841, 134–150. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.11.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.11.010 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hutchison, K. A., Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., & Watson, J. M.
    (2008) Predicting semantic priming at the item level. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 611, 1036–1066. 10.1080/17470210701438111
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701438111 [Google Scholar]
  24. im Walde, S. S., Borgwaldt, S., & Jauch, R.
    (2012) Association Norms of German Noun Compounds. InProceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’12) (pp.632–639).
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jackson-Maldonado, D., Thal, D., Marchman, V., Newton, T., Fenson, L., & Conboy, B.
    (2003) MacArthur inventarios del desarrollo de habilidades comunicativas [MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories, Words and Sentences]. User’s guide and technical manual. Brookes.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Krieger-Redwood, K., Wang, H. T., Poerio, G., Martinon, L. M., Riby, L. M., Smallwood, J., & Jefferies, E.
    (2019) Reduced semantic control in older adults is linked to intrinsic DMN connectivity. Neuropsychologia, 1321, 107133. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107133
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107133 [Google Scholar]
  27. Loaiza, V. M., & McCabe, D. P.
    (2012) Temporal–contextual processing in working memory: Evidence from delayed cued recall and delayed free recall tests. Memory & Cognition, 40(2), 191–203. 10.3758/s13421‑011‑0148‑2
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0148-2 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lovelace, E. A., & Cooley, S.
    (1982) Free associations of older adults to single words and conceptually related word triads. Journal of Gerontology, 37(4), 432–437. 10.1093/geronj/37.4.432
    https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/37.4.432 [Google Scholar]
  29. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A.
    (2004) The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36(3), 402–407. 10.3758/BF03195588
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195588 [Google Scholar]
  30. Nelson, D. L., Schreiber, T. A., & McEvoy, C. L.
    (1992) Processing implicit and explicit representations. Psychological review, 99(2), 322. 10.1037/0033‑295X.99.2.322
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.2.322 [Google Scholar]
  31. McNeill, D.
    (1970) The acquisition of language. Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Minto-García, A., Arias-Trejo, N., & Vargas-García, E. M.
    (2020) Lexical relations in Spanish-speaking older adults. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 491, 663–716. 10.1007/s10936‑020‑09708‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09708-5 [Google Scholar]
  33. Riegel, K. & Riegel, R. M.
    (1964) Changes in associative behavior during later years of life: A cross-sectional analysis. Vita Humana, 71, 1–32. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26761516. 10.1159/000270049
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000270049 [Google Scholar]
  34. Salles, J. F. D., Holderbaum, C. S., Becker, N., Carvalho Rodrigues, J. D., Liedtke, F. V., Zibetti, M. R., & Piccoli, L. F.
    (2008) Normas de associação semântica para 88 palavras do português brasileiro. Psico, 39(3), 7.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Salthouse, T. A.
    (2004) What and when of cognitive aging. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(4), 140–144. 10.1111/j.0963‑7214.2004.00293.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00293.x [Google Scholar]
  36. Stilson, D. W., Haaseth, K., Walsmith, C. R., Schneider, R. J., & Rogers, M.
    (1972) Marbe’s law, stimulus expectancy, and response competition. The American Journal of Psychology, 85(4), 549–567. 10.2307/1421718
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1421718 [Google Scholar]
  37. Vivas, J., Vivas, L., Comesaña, A., Coni, A. G., & Vorano, A.
    (2017) Spanish semantic feature production norms for 400 concrete concepts. Behavior Research Methods, 49(3), 1095–1106. 10.3758/s13428‑016‑0777‑2
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0777-2 [Google Scholar]
  38. Vivas, L., Yerro, M., Romanelli, S., García Coni, A., Comesaña, A., Lizarralde, F., Passoni, I., & Vivas, J.
    (2021) New Spanish semantic feature production norms for older adults. Behavior Research Methods, 54(2), 970–986. 10.3758/s13428‑021‑01660‑z
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01660-z [Google Scholar]
  39. World Health Organization, WHO
    World Health Organization, WHO (2021) Aging and Health. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health
  40. Wulff, D. U., Hills, T., & Mata, R.
    (2018) Structural differences in the semantic networks of younger and older adults. PsyArXiv. 10.31234/osf.io/s73dp
    https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/s73dp [Google Scholar]
  41. Zortea, M., Menegola, B., Villavicencio, A., & de Salles, J. F.
    (2014) Graph analysis of semantic word association among children, adults, and the elderly. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 271, 90–99. 10.1590/S0102‑79722014000100011
    https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722014000100011 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.22001.ari
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.22001.ari
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error