1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. The Mental Lexicon
  4. Volume 18, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 18, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1871-1340
  • E-ISSN: 1871-1375
PDF
EPUB

Abstract

Abstract

This study examined adult L2 learners’ morphological sensitivity in Chinese, a morphosyllabic language, and explored whether there is any modulating effects of L2 proficiency. Two word naming experiments (segment shifting and standard word naming) were administered to three participant groups, including native Chinese speakers, higher L2 Chinese proficiency learners, and lower L2 Chinese proficiency learners. In both experiments, reaction times (RTs) displayed only main effects of Chinese proficiency group and word type. This suggests that the morphological processing of L2 learners did not differ from that of native speakers, although the RTs of L2 learners were longer and exhibited more variability. Concerning error rates, both experiments showed that learners with higher and lower L2 proficiency had significantly higher error rates for words with unreliable morphological cues compared to those with reliable cues. Taken together, these findings indicate that L2 learners developed sensitivity to intraword morphological structure and employed decompositional strategies when reading Chinese words, irrespective of their L2 proficiency levels.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ml.22004.ke
2024-06-10
2025-05-15

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ml.22004.ke
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ml.22004.ke.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/ml.22004.ke&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Arcodia, G. F.
    (2011) A Construction Morphology account of derivation in Mandarin Chinese. Morphology, 21(1), 89–130. 10.1007/s11525‑010‑9173‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9173-2 [Google Scholar]
  2. Babcock, L., Stowe, J. C., Maloof, C. J., Brovetto, C., & Ullman, M. T.
    (2012) The storage and composition of inflected forms in adultlearned second language: A study of the influence of length of residence, age of arrival, sex, and other factors. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 151, 820840. 10.1017/S1366728912000053
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000053 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baayen, R. H., Fasiolo, M., Wood, S., & Chuang, Y. Y.
    (2022) A note on the modeling of the effects of experimental time in psycholinguistic experiments. The Mental Lexicon, 17(2), 178–212. 10.1075/ml.21012.baa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.21012.baa [Google Scholar]
  4. Booij, G. E.
    (2005) The grammar of words: an introduction to linguistic morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M.
    (2010) SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS One, 5(6), e10729. 10.1371/journal.pone.0010729
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010729 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, T.
    (2018) The contribution of morphological awareness to lexical inferencing in L2 Chinese: Comparing more-skilled and less-skilled learners. Foreign Language Annals, 51(4), 816–830. 10.1111/flan.12365
     https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12365 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chinese Proficiency Test Center
    Chinese Proficiency Test Center (2011) Grading syllabus for Chinese vocabulary and Chinese characters (in Chinese). Beijing: Economy and Science Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Crepaldi, D., Che, W. C., Su, I. F., & Luzzatti, C.
    (2012) Lexical-semantic variables affecting picture and word naming in Chinese: A mixed logit model study in aphasia. Behavioural Neurology, 25(3), 165–184. 10.1155/2012/178401
     https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/178401 [Google Scholar]
  9. Coughlin, C. E., & Tremblay, A.
    (2015) Morphological decomposition in native and non-native French speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(3), 524–542. 10.1017/S1366728914000200
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000200 [Google Scholar]
  10. Coupé, C.
    (2018) Modeling linguistic variables with regression models: Addressing non-Gaussian distributions, non-independent observations, and non-linear predictors with random effects and generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape. Frontiers in Psychology, 91, 307831. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00513
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00513 [Google Scholar]
  11. DeFrancis, J.
    (1989) Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. University of Hawaii Press. 10.1515/9780824841621
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824841621 [Google Scholar]
  12. Deng, T., Shi, J., Dunlap, S., Bi, H., & Chen, B.
    (2016) Morphological knowledge affects processing of L2 derivational morphology: An event-related potential study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 371, 47–57. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2015.09.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2015.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  13. Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J. A., Morris, J., & Keuleers, E.
    (2011) Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(4), 344–358. 10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  14. Embick, D., Creemers, A., & Goodwin Davies, A.
    (2021) Morphology and the mental lexicon: Three questions about decomposition. InA. Papafragou, J. C. Trueswell, & L. R. Gleitman (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Mental Lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Feldman, L. B., Frost, R., & Pnini, T.
    (1995) Decomposing words into their constituent morphemes: Evidence from English and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 947–960. 10.1037/0278‑7393.21.4.947
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.947 [Google Scholar]
  16. Feldman, L. B., Kostić, A., Basnight-Brown, D. M., Đurđević, D. F., & Pastizzo, M. J.
    (2010) Morphological facilitation for regular and irregular verb formations in native and non-native speakers: Little evidence for two distinct mechanisms. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(02):119–135. 10.1017/S1366728909990459
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990459 [Google Scholar]
  17. Feldman, L. B., & Prostko, B.
    (2002) Graded aspects of morphological processing: Task and processing time. Brain and Language, 81(1–3), 12–27. 10.1006/brln.2001.2503
     https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2503 [Google Scholar]
  18. Feldman, L. B., & Kroll, J. F.
    (2019) Learning and using morphology and morphosyntax in a second language. Oxford Research Encyclopedias. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.604
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.604 [Google Scholar]
  19. Frost, R.
    (2012) Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(5), 263–279. 10.1017/S0140525X11001841
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11001841 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gao, F., Wang, J., Wu, C., Wang, M. Y., Zhang, J., & Yuan, Z.
    (2022) The neural dynamics associated with lexicality effect in reading single Chinese words, pseudo-words and non-words. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 16(2), 471–481. 10.1007/s11571‑021‑09720‑y
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-021-09720-y [Google Scholar]
  21. Gor, K.
    (2017) The mental lexicon of L2 learners of Russian: Phonology and morphology in lexical storage and access. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 25(2), 277–302. 10.1353/jsl.2017.0011
     https://doi.org/10.1353/jsl.2017.0011 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ke, S. & Koda, K.
    (2017) Contributions of morphological awareness to adult L2 Chinese word meaning inferencing. The Modern Language Journal, 101(4), 742–755. 10.1111/modl.12428
     https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12428 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ke, S., & Koda, K.
    (2019) Is vocabulary knowledge sufficient for word-meaning inference? An investigation of the role of morphological awareness in adult L2 learners of Chinese. Applied Linguistics, 40(3), 456–477. 10.1093/applin/amx040
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx040 [Google Scholar]
  24. Larsen-Freeman, D.
    (2010) Not so fast: A discussion of L2 morpheme processing and acquisition. Language Learning, 60(1), 221–230. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00556.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00556.x [Google Scholar]
  25. Lexicon of Common Words in Contemporary Chinese
    Lexicon of Common Words in Contemporary Chinese (2008) Lexicon of Common Words in Contemporary Chinese. Beijing: Commercial Presss.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, P., Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B.
    (1993) Processing a language without inflections: A reaction time study of sentence interpretation in Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(2), 169–192. 10.1006/jmla.1993.1010
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1010 [Google Scholar]
  27. Liang, L., & Chen, B.
    (2014) Processing morphologically complex words in second-language learners: The effect of proficiency. Acta Psychologica, 1501, 69–79. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.009 [Google Scholar]
  28. Meara, P.
    (1996) The dimensions of lexical competence. InG. Brown, K. Malmkjaer, & J. Williams (Eds.), Performance and Competence in Second Language Acquisition (pp.35–53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Maeng, J., & Kim, S-A.
    (2023) L2 processing of morphologically complex words in Chinese. Linguistic Research, 401, 1–31. 10.17250/khisli.40..202309.001
     https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.40..202309.001 [Google Scholar]
  30. Neubauer, K., & Clahsen, H.
    (2009) Decomposition of inflected words in a second language: An experimental study of German participles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(3), 403–435. 10.1017/S0272263109090354
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109090354 [Google Scholar]
  31. Share, D. L.
    (2008) On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an” outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. 10.1037/0033‑2909.134.4.584
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2021) Is the Science of Reading Just the Science of Reading English?. Reading Research Quarterly, 561, S391–S402. 10.1002/rrq.401
     https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.401 [Google Scholar]
  33. Shen, H., & Ke, C.
    (2007) Radical awareness and word acquisition among nonnative learners of Chinese. The Modern Language Journal, 911, 97–111. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00511.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00511.x [Google Scholar]
  34. Silva, R., & Clahsen, H.
    (2008) Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(2), 245–260. 10.1017/S1366728908003404
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003404 [Google Scholar]
  35. Su, Y-F., & Samuels, S. J.
    (2010) Developmental changes in character-complexity and word- length effects when reading Chinese script. Reading and Writing, 231, 1085–1108. 10.1007/s11145‑009‑9197‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9197-3 [Google Scholar]
  36. Tian, S., & Baayen, H. R.
    (2022) Productivity and semantic transparency: An exploration of word formation in Mandarin Chinese. The Mental Lexicon, 17(3), 458–479. 10.1075/ml.22009.she
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.22009.she [Google Scholar]
  37. Tseng, Y. H., Hsieh, S. K., & Chen, P. Y.
    (2020, December). Computational modeling of affixoid behavior in Chinese morphology. InD. Scott, N. Bel & C. Zong (eds.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp.2879–2888). Barcelona: International Committee on Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/2020.coling‑main.258
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.258 [Google Scholar]
  38. Uchihara, T., & Saito, K.
    (2019) Exploring the relationship between productive vocabulary knowledge and second language oral ability. The Language Learning Journal, 47(1), 64–75. 10.1080/09571736.2016.1191527
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1191527 [Google Scholar]
  39. Vainio, S., Pajunen, A., & Hyönä, J.
    (2014) L1 and L2 word recognition in Finnish: Examining L1 effects on L2 processing of morphological complexity and morphophonological transparency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(1), 133–162. 10.1017/S0272263113000478
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000478 [Google Scholar]
  40. Wade-Woolley, L., Geva, E.
    (1999) Processing inflected morphology in second language word recognition: Russian-speakers and English-speakers read Hebrew. Reading and Writing111, 321–343. 10.1023/A:1008097300762
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008097300762 [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, J., Huang, L., & Guo, S.
    (2016) The overall design and quality analysis of the unified comprehensive Chinese examination of the preparatory education for international students in China [in Chinese]. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, 381, 53–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang, M., Liu, Y., & Perfetti, C. A.
    (2004) The implicit and explicit learning of orthographic structure and function of a new writing system. Scientific Studies of Reading, 81, 357–379. 10.1207/s1532799xssr0804_3
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0804_3 [Google Scholar]
  43. Xu, Y., Chang, L.-Y., & Perfetti, C. A.
    (2014) The effect of radical-based grouping in character learning in Chinese as a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, 981, 773–793. 10.1111/modl.12122
     https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12122 [Google Scholar]
  44. Yang, J.
    (2000) Orthographic effect on word recognition by learners of Chinese as a Foreign Language. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association, 351, 1–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Zeng, L.
    (2008) Quantitative and qualitative study of Chinese semi-affixes (in Chinese). Chinese Teaching in the World, 41, 75–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhang, D.
    (2017) Word reading in L1 and L2 learners of Chinese: Similarities and differences in the functioning of component processes. The Modern Language Journal, 101(2), 391–411. 10.1111/modl.12392
     https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12392 [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhang, H., & Koda, K.
    (2018) Word-knowledge development in Chinese as a heritage language learners: A comparative study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(1), 201–223. 10.1017/S0272263116000450
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000450 [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhang, E. H., Lai, X. X., Li, D., Lei, V. L. C., Chen, Y., & Cao, H. W.
    (2021) Electrophysiological correlates of character transposition in two-character Chinese word identification. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 601, 101024. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2021.101024
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2021.101024 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.22004.ke
Loading
Adult L2 learners’ morphological sensitivity in a morphosyllabic language
The Mental Lexicon 18, 446 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.22004.ke
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.22004.ke
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.22004.ke
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Chinese; morphological processing; second language proficiency; word naming

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error