1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. The Mental Lexicon
  4. Volume 18, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 18, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1871-1340
  • E-ISSN: 1871-1375
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate on how speakers and listeners process and interpret information in a morphological system that is very complex and not very transparent. A well-known test case is the German nominal number system. In this paper we employ discriminative learning (e.g., Ramscar & Yarlett, 2007; Baayen et al., 2011, 2019) to test whether discriminative learning networks can be used to better understand the processing of German number. We analyse behavioral data obtained from a patient with primary progressive aphasia (Domahs et al., 2017), and the unimpaired system. We test a model that implements the traditional cues borrowed from the schema approach (Köpcke, 1988, 1993; Köpcke et al., 2021), and compare it to a model that uses segmental and phonotactic information only. Our results for the unimpaired system demonstrate that a model based on only biphones as cues is better able to predict the number of a given word-form than a model using structural phonological cues. We also test whether a discriminative learning model can predict the number decisions by the aphasic patient. The results demonstrate that a biphone-based discriminative model trained on the patient’s responses is superior to a structure-based model in approximating the patient’s behavior.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ml.23017.pla
2024-06-21
2025-04-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ml.23017.pla
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, J. R. and Lebiere, C. J.
    (1998) The atomic components of thought. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Arndt-Lappe, S. and Ernestus, M.
    (2021) Morphology-phonology interaction. InPirrelli, V., Plag, I., and Dressler, W. U., editors, Word knowledge and word usage: A cross-disciplinary guide to the mental lexicon, pages191–227. De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin & New York.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Arndt-Lappe, S., Schrecklinger, R., and Tomaschek, F.
    (2022) Stratification effects without morphological strata, syllable counting effects without counts: Modelling English stress assignment with Naive Discriminative Learning. Morphology.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Filipović Durdević, D., Hendrix, P., and Marelli, M.
    (2011) An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, 118(3):438–481. 10.1037/a0023851
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023851 [Google Scholar]
  5. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., and Gulikers, L.
    (1996) Celex2. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Baayen, R. H., Chuang, Y.-Y., Shafaei-Bajestan, E., and Blevins, J. P.
    (2019) The discriminative lexicon. A unified computational model for the lexicon and lexical processing in comprehension and production grounded not in (de)composition but in linear discriminative learning. Complexity, 1–39. 10.1155/2019/4895891
     https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4895891 [Google Scholar]
  7. Behrens, H.
    (2009) Usage-based and emergentist approaches to language acquisition. Linguistics, 47(2):383–411. 10.1515/LING.2009.014
     https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2009.014 [Google Scholar]
  8. Beser, D.
    (2021) Falling through the gaps: Neural architectures as models of morphological rule learning.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Biedermann, B., Beyersmann, E., Mason, C., Machleb, F., Moormann, M., and Lorenz, A.
    (2018) Production of german -n plurals in aphasia: Effects of dominance and predictability. Aphasiology, 32(9):1087–1112. 10.1080/02687038.2017.1387228
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2017.1387228 [Google Scholar]
  10. Boswijk, V. and Coler, M.
    (2020) What is salience?Open Linguistics, 61:713–722. 10.1515/opli‑2020‑0042
     https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0042 [Google Scholar]
  11. Buch, A.
    (2011) Linguistic spaces: Kernel-based models of natural language. Phd dissertation, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen.
  12. Chuang, Y.-Y., Loo, K., Blevins, J. P., and Baayen, R. H.
    (2020) Estonian case inflection made simple. A case study in Word and Paradigm morphology with Linear Discriminative Learning. InKörtvélyessy, L. and Štekauer, P., editors, Complex Words: Advances in morphology, pages119–141. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 10.1017/9781108780643.008
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108780643.008 [Google Scholar]
  13. Daelemans, W.
    (2002) A comparison of analogical modeling of language to memory-based language processing. InSkousen, R., Lonsdale, D., and Parkinson, D. B., editors, Analogical modeling: An exemplar-based approach to language, pages157–179. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. 10.1075/hcp.10.13dae
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.10.13dae [Google Scholar]
  14. Daelemans, W., Zavrel, J., van der Sloot, K., and van den Bosch, A.
    (2007) TiMBL: Tilburg Memory Based Learner, version 6.0, Reference Guide: LK Technical Report 04–02. ILK, Tilburg.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Dankers, V., Langedijk, A., McCurdy, K., Williams, A., and Hupkes, D.
    (2021) Generalising to german plural noun classes, from the perspective of a recurrent neural network. InProceedings of the 25th conference on computational natural language learning, pages94–108. 10.18653/v1/2021.conll‑1.8
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.conll-1.8 [Google Scholar]
  16. Danks, D.
    (2003) Equilibria of the rescorla-wagner model. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 471:109–121. 10.1016/S0022‑2496(02)00016‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2496(02)00016-0 [Google Scholar]
  17. Diessel, H.
    editor (2019) The grammar network. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 10.1017/9781108671040
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108671040 [Google Scholar]
  18. Domahs, F., Bartha, L., Lochy, A., Benke, T., and Delazer, M.
    (2006) Number words are special: Evidence from a case of primary progressive aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 19(1):1–37. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2005.07.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2005.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  19. Domahs, F., Bartha-Doering, L., Domahs, U., and Delazer, M.
    (2017) Wie muss ein “guter” deutscher plural klingen?InFuhrhop, N., Szczepaniak, R., and Schmidt, K., editors, Sichtbare und hörbare Morphologie, pages205–237. De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin & Boston. 10.1515/9783110528978‑008
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110528978-008 [Google Scholar]
  20. Eisenberg, P. and Fuhrhop, N.
    (2020) Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik – Das Wort. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart & Weimar, 5. auflage edition.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Friedman, L. and Wall, M.
    (2005) Graphical views of suppression and multicollinearity in multiple linear regression. The American Statistician, 59(2):127–136. 10.1198/000313005X41337
     https://doi.org/10.1198/000313005X41337 [Google Scholar]
  22. Fábregas, A. and Penke, M.
    (2021) Word storage and computation. InPirrelli, V., Plag, I., and Dressler, W. U., editors, Word knowledge and word usage: A cross-disciplinary guide to the mental lexicon, pages455–50582, Berlin & Boston. De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Grandon, B., Schlechtweg, M., and Ruigendijk, E.
    (2023) Processing of noun plural marking in german-speaking children: an eye-tracking study. Journal of Child Language, page online. 10.1017/S0305000923000521
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000923000521 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hahn, U. and Nakisa, R. C.
    (2000) German inflection: Single route or dual route?Cognitive Psychology, 41(4):313–360. 10.1006/cogp.2000.0737
     https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2000.0737 [Google Scholar]
  25. Heitmeier, M., Chuang, Y., Axen, S., and Baayen, R. H.
    (2024) Frequency-informed linear discriminative learning. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 171. 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1242720
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1242720 [Google Scholar]
  26. Heitmeier, M., Chuang, Y.-Y., and Baayen, R. H.
    (2023) How trial-to-trial learning shapes mappings in the mental lexicon: Modelling lexical decision with linear discriminative learning. Cognitive Psychology, 1461:101598. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101598
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101598 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hilpert, M.
    (2019) Higher-order schemas in morphology: What they are, how they work, and where to find them. Word Structure, 12(3):261–273. 10.3366/word.2019.0149
     https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2019.0149 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hothorn, T. and Zeileis, A.
    (2015) partykit: A modular toolkit for recursive partytioning in r. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 16(1):3905–3909.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Janssen, U. and Domahs, F.
    (2008) Going on with optimised feet: Evidence for the interaction between segmental and metrical structure in phonological encoding from a case of primary progressive aphasia. Aphasiology, 22(11):1157–1175. 10.1080/02687030701820436
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030701820436 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kamin, L. J.
    (1969) Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. InCampbell, B. A. and Church, R. M., editors, Punishment and aversive behavior, pages276–296. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Köpcke, K.-M.
    (1988) Schemas in german plural formation. Lingua, 74(4):303–335. 10.1016/0024‑3841(88)90064‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(88)90064-2 [Google Scholar]
  32. (1993) Schemata bei der Pluralbildung im Deutschen: Versuch einer kognitiven Morphologie, volume 47 of Studien zur deutschen Grammatik. G. Narr, Tübingen.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. (1998) The acquisition of plural marking in english and german revisited: Schemata versus rules. Journal of Child Language, 25(2):293–319. 10.1017/S0305000998003407
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000998003407 [Google Scholar]
  34. Köpcke, K.-M., Schimke, S., and Wecker, V.
    (2021) Processing of german noun plurals: Evidence for first- and second-order schemata. Word Structure, 14(1):1–24. 10.3366/word.2021.0173
     https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2021.0173 [Google Scholar]
  35. Köpcke, K.-M. and Wecker, V.
    (2017) Source- and product-oriented strategies in l2 acquisition of plural marking in german. Morphology, 27(1):77–103. 10.1007/s11525‑016‑9292‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-016-9292-5 [Google Scholar]
  36. Köpcke, K.-M. and Zubin, D.
    (1996) Prinzipien für die genuszuweisung im deutschen. Deutsch – typologisch, pages 473 – 491. de Gruyter, Berlin [u.a.]. 10.1515/9783110622522‑021
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110622522-021 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lieber, R.
    (2021) Introducing morphology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 10.1017/9781108957960
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108957960 [Google Scholar]
  38. Luo, X.
    (2021) Judiling: An implementation for discriminative learning in julia. Master thesis, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Luo, X., Chuang, Y.-Y., and Baayen, R. H.
    (2023) JudiLing: an implementation in Julia of Linear Discriminative Learning algorithms for language model.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. MacLeod, B.
    (2015) A critical evaluation of two approaches to defining perceptual salience. Ampersand, 21:83–92. 10.1016/j.amper.2015.07.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2015.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  41. Marcus, G. F., Brinkmann, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R., and Pinker, S.
    (1995) German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology, 29(3):189–256. 10.1006/cogp.1995.1015
     https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1995.1015 [Google Scholar]
  42. McCurdy, K., Goldwater, S., and Lopez, A.
    (2020a) Inflecting when there’s no majority: limitations of encoder-decoder neural networks as cognitive models for german plurals. 10.18653/v1/2020.acl‑main.159
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.159 [Google Scholar]
  43. McCurdy, K., Lopez, A., and Goldwater, S.
    (2020b) Conditioning, but on which distribution? grammatical gender in german plural inflection. InProceedings of the workshop on cognitive modeling and computational linguistics, pages59–65. 10.18653/v1/2020.cmcl‑1.8
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.cmcl-1.8 [Google Scholar]
  44. Nastase, V. and Popescu, M.
    (2009) What’s in a name? in some languages, grammatical gender. InProceedings of the 2009 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, pages1368–1377, Singapore.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Nieder, J., Chuang, Y.-Y., van de Vijver, R., and Baayen, R. H.
    (2022) A Discriminative Lexicon approach to word comprehension, production and processing: Maltese plurals. Accepted for publication. Language.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Pearce, J. M. and Bouton, M. E.
    (2001) Theories of associative learning in animals. Annual review of psychology, 52(1):111–139. 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.111
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.111 [Google Scholar]
  47. Penke, M. and Krause, M.
    (2002) German noun plurals: A challenge to the dual-mechanism model. Brain and Language, 81(1–3):303–311. 10.1006/brln.2001.2526
     https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2526 [Google Scholar]
  48. Penke, M., Wimmer, E., Hennies, J., Hess, M., and Rothweiler, M.
    (2016) Inflectional morphology in german hearing-impaired children. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 41(1):9–26. 10.3109/14015439.2014.940382
     https://doi.org/10.3109/14015439.2014.940382 [Google Scholar]
  49. Pescuma, V. N., Zanini, C., Crepaldi, D., and Franzon, F.
    (2021) Form and function: A study on the distribution of the inflectional endings in italian nouns and adjectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 121:720228. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720228
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720228 [Google Scholar]
  50. Pirrelli, V., Marzi, C., Ferro, M., Cardillo, F. A., Baayen, H. R., and Milin, P.
    (2021) Psycho-computational modelling of the mental lexicon. InPirrelli, V., Plag, I., and Dressler, W. U., editors, Word knowledge and word usage: A cross-disciplinary guide to the mental lexicon, pages23–82, Berlin & Boston. De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Plag, I.
    (2018) Word-formation in English, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 10.1017/9781316771402
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316771402 [Google Scholar]
  52. Pollsenská, D.
    (2010) Dutch children’s acquisition of verbal and adjectival inflection. Phd dissertation, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
  53. Ramscar, M. and Yarlett, D.
    (2007) Linguistic self-correction in the absence of feedback: A new approach to the logical problem of language acquisition. Cognitive science, 31(6):927–960. 10.1080/03640210701703576
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210701703576 [Google Scholar]
  54. Ramscar, M., Yarlett, D., Dye, M., Denny, K., and Thorpe, K.
    (2010) The effects of feature-label-order and their implications for symbolic learning. Cognitive Science, 34(6):909–957. 10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2009.01092.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01092.x [Google Scholar]
  55. Rath, D., Domahs, F., Dressel, K., Claros-Salinas, D., Klein, E., Willmes, K., and Krinzinger, H.
    (2015) Patterns of linguistic and numerical performance in aphasia. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 11:2. 10.1186/s12993‑014‑0049‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1186/s12993-014-0049-1 [Google Scholar]
  56. Rescorla, R. and Wagner, A.
    (1972) A theory of pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. InBlack, A. and Prokasy, W., editors, Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory, pages64–99. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Rescorla, R. A.
    (1988a) Behavioral studies of pavlovian conditioning. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 11(1):329–352. 10.1146/annurev.ne.11.030188.001553
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.11.030188.001553 [Google Scholar]
  58. (1988b) Pavlovian conditioning. it’s not what you think it is. American Psychologist, 43(3):151–160. 10.1037/0003‑066X.43.3.151
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.43.3.151 [Google Scholar]
  59. Rosen, E.
    (2022) Modeling human-like morphological prediction. InProceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics 2022, pages133–142.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Schmid, H.-J. and Günther, F.
    (2016) Toward a unified socio-cognitive framework for salience in language. Frontiers in Psychology, 71:1110. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01110
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01110 [Google Scholar]
  61. Seyboth, M. and Domahs, F.
    (2023) Why do he she disagree: The role of binary morphological features in grammatical gender agreement in german. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 521:923–955. 10.1007/s10936‑022‑09926‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09926-z [Google Scholar]
  62. Simoens, H., Housen, A., and De Cuypere, L.
    (2017) The effect of perceptual salience on processing l2 inflectional morphology. InGass, S. M., Spinner, P., and Behney, J., editors, Salience in second language acquisition, pages107–130. Routledge, New York. 10.4324/9781315399027‑6
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315399027-6 [Google Scholar]
  63. Tomaschek, F. and Baayen, R. H.
    (2017) Articulatory patterns of monomorphemic and dimorphemic homophonous words. InFOR 2373 ‘Spoken Morphology’ Colloquium Series (talk).
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Tomaschek, F., Domahs, U., and Domahs, F.
    (2023) Modeling german word stress. Glossa, 81:1–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Tomaschek, F., Plag, I., Ernestus, M., and Baayen, R. H.
    (2021) Phonetic effects of morphology and context: Modeling the duration of word-final S in English with naïve discriminative learning. Journal of Linguistics, 57(1):123–161. 10.1017/S0022226719000203
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226719000203 [Google Scholar]
  66. Tomaschek, F. and Ramscar, M.
    (2022) Understanding the phonetic characteristics of speech under uncertainty-implications of the representation of linguistic knowledge in learning and processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 131:754395. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.754395
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.754395 [Google Scholar]
  67. Twain, M.
    (1880) A Tramp Abroad. American Publishing Company, Hartford, Connecticut.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. van de Vijver, R. and Uwambayinema, E.
    (2022) A word-based account of comprehension and production of Kinyarwanda nouns in the Discriminative Lexicon. Linguistics Vanguard. 10.1515/lingvan‑2021‑0160
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2021-0160 [Google Scholar]
  69. Wiese, R.
    (2000) The phonology of German. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. (2009) The grammar and typology of plural noun inflection in varieties of german. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 12(2):137–173. 10.1007/s10828‑009‑9030‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-009-9030-z [Google Scholar]
  71. Williams, A., Drozdov, A., and Bowman, S. R.
    (2019) Do latent tree learning models identify meaningful structure in sentences. InProceedings of the 57th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, pages253–267, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Wulf, D. J.
    (2002) Applying analogical modeling to the german plural. InSkousen, R., Lonsdale, D., and Parkinson, D. B., editors, Analogical modeling: An exemplar-based approach to language, pages109–122. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. 10.1075/hcp.10.09wul
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.10.09wul [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.23017.pla
Loading
German nominal number interpretation in an impaired mental lexicon
The Mental Lexicon 18, 417 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.23017.pla
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.23017.pla
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.23017.pla
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): aphasia; discriminative learning; German; morpho-phonology; number inflection

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error