1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. The Mental Lexicon
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Morpho-phonology is not independent of semantics
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Morpho-phonological alternations in inflectional paradigms are commonly analyzed as purely formal phenomena, in which the mapping of phonological structure and morpho-syntactic categories is organized without recourse to semantic properties of the words involved. The present paper explores the role of semantics using the Discriminative Lexicon approach (Baayen, et al. 2019). The test case explored in this paper is German nominal number, a system involving complex morpho-phonological variation (e.g. Köpcke et al., 2021; Heitmeier et al., 2021; Plag et al., 2024; McCurdy, 2024). Using word2vec vectors as semantic representations, and triphones as form representations, we created two-layer linear discriminative learning (LDL) networks that map form representations directly onto semantic representations (modeling comprehension), and semantic representations onto form representations (modeling production). The LDL mappings successfully predict the forms and the meanings of the singular and plural nouns taken from a pertinent study (Domahs et al., 2017). A number of semantic and phonological measures derived from the LDL network also very successfully distinguished between singular and plural forms. Our results demonstrate that semantics, in addition to formal and grammatical properties, may play a decisive role in the representation and processing of German nominal number. The system of German nominal number can be understood as emerging from the distributional properties of words on the one hand, and basic principles of discriminative human learning on the other.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24008.pla
2025-09-12
2026-05-15

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ml.24008.pla
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. J.
    (1998) The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnold, D., Tomaschek, F., Lopez, F., Sering, K., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2017) Words from spontaneous conversational speech can be recognized with human-like accuracy by an error-driven learning algorithm that discriminates between meanings straight from smart acoustic features, bypassing the phoneme as recognition unit. PLOS ONE, (), . Retrieved fromjournals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0174623. 10.1371/journal.pone.0174623
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174623 [Google Scholar]
  3. Arseniev-Koehler, A.
    (2024) Theoretical foundations and limits of word embeddings: What types of meaning can they capture?Sociological Methods & Research, (), –. 10.1177/00491241221140142
     https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221140142 [Google Scholar]
  4. Auguste, J., Rey, A., & Favre, B.
    (2017) Evaluation of word embeddings against cognitive processes: Primed reaction times in lexical decision and naming tasks. InProceedings of the 2nd workshop on evaluating vector space representations for NLP (pp.–). 10.18653/v1/W17‑5304
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-5304 [Google Scholar]
  5. Baayen, R. H.
    (2008) Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511801686
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801686 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baayen, R. H., Chuang, Y.-Y., & Blevins, J. P.
    (2018) Inflectional morphology with linear mappings. The Mental Lexicon, (), –. 10.1075/ml.18010.baa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.18010.baa [Google Scholar]
  7. Baayen, R. H., Chuang, Y.-Y., & Heitmeier, M.
    (2019) Wpmwithldl: Implementation of word and paradigm morphology with linear discriminative learning [Computer software manual]. (R package version 1.4.6, available athttps://osf.io/xq92s/)
  8. Baayen, R. H., Chuang, Y.-Y., Shafaei-Bajestan, E., & Blevins, J. P.
    (2019) The discriminative lexicon: A unified computational model for the lexicon and lexical processing in comprehension and production grounded not in (de) composition but in linear discriminative learning. Complexity, (), –. 10.1155/2019/4895891
     https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4895891 [Google Scholar]
  9. Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Filipović Durdević, D., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M.
    (2011) An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, (), –. 10.1037/a0023851
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023851 [Google Scholar]
  10. Baayen, R. H., & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F.
    (2005) Semantic density and past-tense formation in three germanic languages. Language, , –. 10.1353/lan.2005.0112
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0112 [Google Scholar]
  11. Behrens, H.
    (2009) Usage-based and emergentist approaches to language acquisition. Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/LING.2009.014
     https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2009.014 [Google Scholar]
  12. Berent, I., Pinker, S., Tzelgov, J., Bibi, U., & Goldfarb, L.
    (2005) Computation of semantic number from morphological information. Journal of Memory and Language, , –. 10.1016/j.jml.2005.05.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  13. Beser, D.
    (2021) Falling through the gaps: Neural architectures as models of morphological rule learning. Retrieved fromhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2105.03710
  14. Boleda, G.
    (2020) Distributional semantics and linguistic theory. Annual Review of Linguistics, (), –. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011619‑030303
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011619-030303 [Google Scholar]
  15. Boswijk, V., & Coler, M.
    (2020) What is salience?Open Linguistics, , –. 10.1515/opli‑2020‑0042
     https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0042 [Google Scholar]
  16. Buch, A.
    (2011) Linguistic spaces: Kernel-based models of natural language (PhD Dissertation). Universität Tübingen, Tübingen.
  17. Carlson, M. T., & Crosson, A. C.
    (2025) The synchronic status of historical bound roots in the mental lexicon: A dynamic, psychocentric perspective. The Mental Lexicon. (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Charlesworth, T. E., Yang, V., Mann, T. C., Kurdi, B., & Banaji, M. R.
    (2021) Gender stereotypes in natural language: Word embeddings show robust consistency across child and adult language corpora of more than 65 million words. Psychological Science, (), –. 10.1177/0956797620963619
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620963619 [Google Scholar]
  19. Chuang, Y.-Y., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2021) Discriminative learning and the lexicon: Ndl and ldl. InOxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.375
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.375 [Google Scholar]
  20. Chuang, Y.-Y., Brown, D., Baayen, H., & Evans, R.
    (2023) Paradigm gaps are associated with weird “distributional semantics” properties. The Mental Lexicon. (), –.10.1075/ml.22013.chu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.22013.chu [Google Scholar]
  21. Daelemans, W.
    (2002) A comparison of analogical modeling of language to memory-based language processing. InR. Skousen, D. Lonsdale, & D. B. Parkinson (Eds.), Analogical modeling: An exemplar-based approach to language (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.10.13dae
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.10.13dae [Google Scholar]
  22. Daelemans, W., Zavrel, J., van der Sloot, K., & van den Bosch, A.
    (2007) TiMBL: Tilburg Memory Based Learner, version 6.0, Reference Guide: LK Technical Report 04–02. Tilburg: ILK.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Dankers, V., Langedijk, A., McCurdy, K., Williams, A., & Hupkes, D.
    (2021) Generalising to german plural noun classes, from the perspective of a recurrent neural network. InProceedings of the 25th conference on computational natural language learning (pp.–). Retrieved fromhttps://aclanthology.org/2021.conll-1.8. 10.18653/v1/2021.conll‑1.8
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.conll-1.8 [Google Scholar]
  24. Diessel, H.
    (Ed.) (2019) The grammar network. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108671040
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108671040 [Google Scholar]
  25. Domahs, F., Bartha-Doering, L., Domahs, U., & Delazer, M.
    (2017) Wie muss ein “guter” Deutscher Plural klingen?InN. Fuhrhop, R. Szczepaniak, & K. Schmidt (Eds.), Sichtbare und hörbare Morphologie (pp.–). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110528978‑008
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110528978-008 [Google Scholar]
  26. Eisenberg, P., & Fuhrhop, N.
    (2020) Grundriss der Deutschen Grammatik -- Das Wort (5.Auflage ed.). Stuttgart & Weimar: J.B. Metzler.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Fábregas, A.
    (2018) Defectiveness in morphology. InOxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Retrieved fromhttps://oxfordre.com/linguistics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-499. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.499
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.499 [Google Scholar]
  28. Firth, J.
    (1957) A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930–1955. Studies in Linguistic Analysis, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Günther, F., Petilli, M. A., & Marelli, M.
    (2020) Semantic transparency is not invisibility: A computational model of perceptually-grounded conceptual combination in word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, , . 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104104
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104104 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hahn, U., & Nakisa, R. C.
    (2000) German inflection: Single route or dual route?Cognitive Psychology, (), –. 10.1006/cogp.2000.0737
     https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2000.0737 [Google Scholar]
  31. Harris, Z.
    (1954) Distributional structure. Word, (), –. 10.1080/00437956.1954.11659520
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1954.11659520 [Google Scholar]
  32. Heitmeier, M.
    (2022) Judilingmeasures.jl. https://quantling.github.io/JudiLingMeasures.jl
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Heitmeier, M., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2020) Simulating phonological and semantic impairment of english tense inflection with linear discriminative learning. The Mental Lexicon, (), –. 10.1075/ml.20003.hei
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.20003.hei [Google Scholar]
  34. Heitmeier, M., Chuang, Y.-Y., & Baayen, H.
    (2025) The Discriminative Lexicon: Theory, implementation in the Julia package JudiLing, and applications. Manuscript, University of Tübingen.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Heitmeier, M., Chuang, Y.-Y., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2021) Modeling morphology with linear discriminative learning: Considerations and design choices. Frontiers in Psychology, . 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720713
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720713 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hilpert, M.
    (2019) Higher-order schemas in morphology: What they are, how they work, and where to find them. Word Structure, (), –. 10.3366/word.2019.0149
     https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2019.0149 [Google Scholar]
  37. Hothorn, T., & Zeileis, A.
    (2015) partykit: A modular toolkit for recursive partytioning in r. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Kamin, L. J.
    (1969) Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. InB. A. Campbell & R. M. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp.–). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Kassambara, A., & Mundt, F.
    (2020) Extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses [r package factoextra version 1.0.7]. Retrieved fromhttps://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:225959968
  40. Köpcke, K.-M.
    (1988) Schemas in german plural formation. Lingua, (), –. 10.1016/0024‑3841(88)90064‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(88)90064-2 [Google Scholar]
  41. (1993) Schemata bei der pluralbildung im deutschen: Versuch einer kognitiven morphologie (Vol.). Tübingen: G. Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. (1998) The acquisition of plural marking in english and german revisited: Schemata versus rules. Journal of Child Language, (), –. 10.1017/S0305000998003407
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000998003407 [Google Scholar]
  43. Köpcke, K.-M., Schimke, S., & Wecker, V.
    (2021) Processing of german noun plurals: Evidence for first- and second-order schemata. Word Structure, (), –. 10.3366/word.2021.0173
     https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2021.0173 [Google Scholar]
  44. Köpcke, K.-M., & Wecker, V.
    (2017) Source- and product-oriented strategies in l2 acquisition of plural marking in german. Morphology, (), –. Retrieved fromhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11525-016-9292-5
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Lieber, R.
    (2021) Introducing morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108957960
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108957960 [Google Scholar]
  46. Luo, X.
    (2021) Judiling: An implementation for discriminative learning in julia (Master Thesis, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen). Retrieved fromhttps://github.com/MegamindHenry/JudiLing.jl/blob/master/thesis/thesis_JudiLing__An_implementation_for_Discriminative_Learning_in_Julia.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  47. MacLeod, B.
    (2015) A critical evaluation of two approaches to defining perceptual salience. Ampersand, , –. 10.1016/j.amper.2015.07.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2015.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  48. MacWhinney, B., Pléh, C., & Bates, E.
    (1985) The development of sentence interpretation in hungarian. Cognitive psychology, (), –. 10.1016/0010‑0285(85)90007‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(85)90007-6 [Google Scholar]
  49. Marcus, G. F., Brinkmann, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R., & Pinker, S.
    (1995) German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology, (), –. 10.1006/cogp.1995.1015
     https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1995.1015 [Google Scholar]
  50. McCurdy, K.
    (2024) Rules, frequency, and predictability in morphological generalization: Behavioral and computational evidence from the german plural system. Edinburgh Research Archive. https://era.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/41429.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. McCurdy, K., Goldwater, S., & Lopez, A.
    (2020) Inflecting when there’s no majority: Limitations of encoder-decoder neural networks as cognitive models for german plurals. Retrieved fromhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2005.08826
  52. McCurdy, K., Lopez, A., & Goldwater, S.
    (2020) Conditioning, but on which distribution? Grammatical gender in german plural inflection. InProceedings of the workshop on cognitive modeling and computational linguistics (pp.–). Retrieved fromhttps://aclanthology.org/2020.cmcl-1.8. 10.18653/v1/2020.cmcl‑1.8
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.cmcl-1.8 [Google Scholar]
  53. Mujezinović, E., Kapatsinski, V., & van de Vijver, R.
    (2024) One cue’s loss is another cue’s gain — learning morphophonology through unlearning. Cognitive Science, (), . 10.1111/cogs.13450
     https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13450 [Google Scholar]
  54. Nieder, J., Chuang, Y.-Y., van de Vijver, R., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2022) A Discriminative Lexicon approach to word comprehension, production and processing: Maltese plurals. Language, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Pearce, J. M., & Bouton, M. E.
    (2001) Theories of associative learning in animals. Annual Review of Psychology, (), –. 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.111
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.111 [Google Scholar]
  56. Penke, M., & Krause, M.
    (2002) German noun plurals: A challenge to the dual-mechanism model. Brain and Language, (), –. 10.1006/brln.2001.2526
     https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2526 [Google Scholar]
  57. Penke, M., Wimmer, E., Hennies, J., Hess, M., & Rothweiler, M.
    (2016) Inflectional morphology in german hearing-impaired children. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, (), –. 10.3109/14015439.2014.940382
     https://doi.org/10.3109/14015439.2014.940382 [Google Scholar]
  58. Pescuma, V. N., Zanini, C., Crepaldi, D., & Franzon, F.
    (2021) Form and function: A study on the distribution of the inflectional endings in italian nouns and adjectives. Frontiers in Psychology, , . 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720228
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720228 [Google Scholar]
  59. Plag, I.
    (2018) Word-formation in English, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316771402
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316771402 [Google Scholar]
  60. Plag, I., Heitmeier, M., & Domahs, F.
    (2024) German nominal number interpretation in an impaired mental lexicon: A naive discriminative learning perspective. The Mental Lexicon. (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Polišenská, D.
    (2010) Dutch children’s acquisition of verbal and adjectival inflection (PhD Dissertation). Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
  62. Ramscar, M., Yarlett, D., Dye, M., Denny, K., & Thorpe, K.
    (2010) The effects of feature-label-order and their implications for symbolic learning. Cognitive Science, (), –. 10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2009.01092.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01092.x [Google Scholar]
  63. Rescorla, R., & Wagner, A.
    (1972) A theory of pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. InA. Black & W. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning ii: Current research and theory (p.–). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Rescorla, R. A.
    (1988a) Behavioral studies of pavlovian conditioning. Annual Review of Neuroscience, (), –. 10.1146/annurev.ne.11.030188.001553
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.11.030188.001553 [Google Scholar]
  65. (1988b) Pavlovian conditioning. it’s not what you think it is. American Psychologist, (), –. 10.1037/0003‑066X.43.3.151
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.43.3.151 [Google Scholar]
  66. Rosen, E.
    (2022) Modeling human-like morphological prediction. InProceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics (pp.–). Retrieved fromhttps://aclanthology.org/2022.scil-1.11
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Saito, M., Tomaschek, F., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2020) Relative functional load determines co-articulatory movements of the tongue tip. InProceedings of the 12th international seminar on speech production. New Haven, CT. Retrieved fromhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/353071272 ()
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Schakel, A. M., & Wilson, B. J.
    (2015) Measuring word significance using distributed representations of words. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.02297.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Schmid, H.-J., & Günther, F.
    (2016) Toward a unified socio-cognitive framework for salience in language. Frontiers in Psychology, , . 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01110
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01110 [Google Scholar]
  70. Schmitz, D., Plag, I., Baer-Henney, D., & Stein, S.
    (2021) Durational differences of word-final /s/ emerge from the lexicon: Modeling morpho-phonetic effects in pseudowords with linear discriminative learning. Frontiers in Psychology, . () 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.680889
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.680889 [Google Scholar]
  71. Schäfer, M.
    (2025) The role of meaning in the rivalry of -ity and -ness: Evidence from distributional semantics. English Language and Linguistics. 10.1017/S1360674324000443
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674324000443 [Google Scholar]
  72. Shafaei-Bajestan, E., Moradipour-Tari, M., Uhrig, P., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2021) LDL-auris: A computational model, grounded in error-driven learning, for the comprehension of single spoken words. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, –. 10.1080/23273798.2021.1954207
     https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2021.1954207 [Google Scholar]
  73. (2024) The pluralization palette: unveiling semantic clusters in english nominal pluralization through distributional semantics. Morphology, (), –. 10.1007/s11525‑024‑09428‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-024-09428-9 [Google Scholar]
  74. Simoens, H., Housen, A., & De Cuypere, L.
    (2017) The effect of perceptual salience on processing l2 inflectional morphology. InS. M. Gass, P. Spinner, & J. Behney (Eds.), Salience in second language acquisition (pp.–). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315399027‑6
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315399027-6 [Google Scholar]
  75. Stein, S. D., & Plag, I.
    (2021) Morpho-phonetic effects in speech production: Modeling the acoustic duration of english derived words with linear discriminative learning. Frontiers in Psychology, . () 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.678712
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.678712 [Google Scholar]
  76. Taatgen, N. A.
    (2001) Extending the past-tense debate: A model of the german plural. InProceedings of the annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol., pp.–).
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Tomaschek, F., Plag, I., Ernestus, M., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2021) Phonetic effects of morphology and context: Modeling the duration of word-final S in English with naïve discriminative learning. Journal of Linguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S0022226719000203
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226719000203 [Google Scholar]
  78. Tomaschek, F., & Ramscar, M.
    (2022) Understanding the phonetic characteristics of speech under uncertainty-implications of the representation of linguistic knowledge in learning and processing. Frontiers in Psychology, , . 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.754395
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.754395 [Google Scholar]
  79. Trommer, J.
    (2021) The subsegmental structure of german plural allomorphy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, (), –. 10.1007/s11049‑020‑09479‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-020-09479-7 [Google Scholar]
  80. Van der Maaten, L., & Hinton, G.
    (2008) Visualizing data using t-sne. Journal of Machine Learning Research, ().
     [Google Scholar]
  81. van de Vijver, R., & Uwambayinema, E.
    (2022) A word-based account of comprehension and production of Kinyarwanda nouns in the Discriminative Lexicon. Linguistics Vanguard. (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Wiese, R.
    (2000) The phonology of German. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. (2009) The grammar and typology of plural noun inflection in varieties of German. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, (), –. 10.1007/s10828‑009‑9030‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-009-9030-z [Google Scholar]
  84. Wulf, D. J.
    (2002) Applying analogical modeling to the german plural. InR. Skousen, D. Lonsdale, & D. B. Parkinson (Eds.), Analogical modeling: An exemplar-based approach to language (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.10.09wul
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.10.09wul [Google Scholar]
  85. Yamada, I., Asai, A., Sakuma, J., Shindo, H., Takeda, H., Takefuji, Y., & Matsumoto, Y.
    (2020, October). Wikipedia2Vec: An efficient toolkit for learning and visualizing the embeddings of words and entities from Wikipedia. InQ. Liu & D. Schlangen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2020 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing: System demonstrations (pp.–). Online: Association for Computational Linguistics. Retrieved fromhttps://aclanthology.org/2020.emnlp-demos.4. 10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp‑demos.4
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.4 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24008.pla
Loading
Morpho-phonology is not independent of semantics
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.24008.pla
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24008.pla
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24008.pla
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: discriminative learning ; morpho-phonology ; German ; number inflection ; semantic vectors

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error