1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. The Mental Lexicon
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Processing of compound constituents
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

In this paper, we explore whether the cognitive system is sensitive to distributional information when reading novel compounds. In two lexical decision experiments, we investigate the role of positional constituent frequency and interpretability in processing novel noun-noun compounds in Italian. Experiment 1 presents a classical factorial design, manipulating position-specificity and position of occurrence of constituent morphemes. Experiment 2 is a more exploratory regression approach investigating a greater range of positional frequency values at two different presentation durations. Results suggest a weak effect of position-specific frequency and a strong effect of compound interpretability. Post-hoc analyses reveal an effect of constituent position on interpretability ratings, suggesting that position-specific frequency enters compound processing through the backdoor of interpretability. The findings underscore the dynamic nature and the role of distributional properties in compound processing.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24010.has
2026-05-21
2026-06-07

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ml.24010.has
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aitchison, J.
    (2012) Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. John Wiley & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D.
    (2012) Morphological processing as we know it: An analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Front Psychol, , . 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232 [Google Scholar]
  3. Amenta, S., Günther, F., & Marelli, M.
    (2020) A (distributional) semantic perspective on the processing of morphologically complex words. The Mental Lexicon, (), –. 10.1075/ml.00014.ame
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.00014.ame [Google Scholar]
  4. Andrews, S.
    (1986) Morphological influences on lexical access: Lexical or nonlexical effects?Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1016/0749‑596X(86)90046‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(86)90046-X [Google Scholar]
  5. Andrews, S., Miller, B., & Rayner, K.
    (2004) Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, (), –. 10.1080/09541440340000123
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440340000123 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baayen, R. H., & Schreuder, R.
    (2000) Towards a psycholinguistic computational model for morphological parsing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, (), –. 10.1098/rsta.2000.0586
     https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2000.0586 [Google Scholar]
  7. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Cortese, M. J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R.
    (2007) The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/BF03193014
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193014 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, , –. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  9. Benjamin, S., & Schmidtke, D.
    (2023) Conceptual combination during novel and existing compound word reading in context: A self-paced reading study. Memory & Cognition, (), –. 10.3758/s13421‑022‑01378‑z
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01378-z [Google Scholar]
  10. Bertram, R., Baayen, R. H., & Schreuder, R.
    (2000) Effects of Family Size for Complex Words. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1006/jmla.1999.2681
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2681 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bliese, P., Chen, G., Downes, P., Schepker, D., & Lang, J.
    (2025) multilevel: Multilevel Functions (Version 2.7.1) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/multilevel/index.html
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Brainard, D. H.
    (1997) The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, (), –. 10.1163/156856897X00357
     https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897X00357 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bronk, M., Zwitserlood, P., & Bolte, J.
    (2013) Manipulations of word frequency reveal differences in the processing of morphologically complex and simple words in German. Front Psychol, , . 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00546
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00546 [Google Scholar]
  14. Burani, C., & Laudanna, A.
    (1992) Chapter 18: Units of Representation for Derived Words in the Lexicon. InR. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning. (pp.–). North-Holland. 10.1016/S0166‑4115(08)62803‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62803-4 [Google Scholar]
  15. Butterworth, B.
    (1983) Lexical representation. InB. Butterworth (Ed.), Development, writing and other language processes, Vol. 2 (pp.–). Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Coolen, R., Van Jaarsveld, H. J., & Schreuder, R.
    (1991) The interpretation of isolated novel nominal compounds. Memory & Cognition, (), –. 10.3758/BF03197138
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197138 [Google Scholar]
  17. Crepaldi, D., Hemsworth, L., Davis, C. J., & Rastle, K.
    (2016) Masked suffix priming and morpheme positional constraints. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove), (), –. 10.1080/17470218.2015.1027713
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1027713 [Google Scholar]
  18. Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M., & Nickels, L.
    (2010) ‘Fell’ primes ‘fall’, but does ‘bell’ prime ‘ball’? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  19. Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., & Davis, C. J.
    (2010) Morphemes in their place: Evidence for position-specific identification of suffixes. Mem Cognit, (), –. 10.3758/MC.38.3.312
     https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.3.312 [Google Scholar]
  20. Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J.
    (2013) Seeing stems everywhere: Position-independent identification of stem morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, (), –. 10.1037/a0029713
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029713 [Google Scholar]
  21. de Almeida, R. G., Antal, C., & Salehi, K.
    (2025) Early morpho-orthographic and semantic effects in word recognition: Evidence from a foveal-splitting dichoptic paradigm with anaglyphs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication. 10.1037/xlm0001533
     https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001533 [Google Scholar]
  22. De Jong IV, N. H., Schreuder, R., & Harald Baayen, R.
    (2000) The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01690960050119625
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119625 [Google Scholar]
  23. de Jong, N. H., Feldman, L. B., Schreuder, R., Pastizzo, M., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2002) The Processing and Representation of Dutch and English Compounds: Peripheral Morphological and Central Orthographic Effects. Brain and Language, (), –. 10.1006/brln.2001.2547
     https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2547 [Google Scholar]
  24. Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M.
    (2007) The role of the frequency of constituents in compound words: Evidence from Basque and Spanish. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, (), –. 10.3758/BF03193108
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193108 [Google Scholar]
  25. Forster, K. I.
    (1976) Accessing the mental lexicon. InR. J. Wales & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.), New Approaches to Language Mechanisms.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Gagné, C. L.
    (2001) Relation and lexical priming during the interpretation of noun-noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (), –. 10.1037/0278‑7393.27.1.236
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.236 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L.
    (2006) Using Conceptual Combination Research to Better Understand Novel Compound Words*. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Using-Conceptual-Combination-Research-to-Better-Gagn%C3%A9-Spalding/2bae227d96d82fd067757e5c3caa32d9dbec0bcf
     [Google Scholar]
  28. (2009) Constituent integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational structures?Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1016/j.jml.2008.07.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  29. Gagné, C. L., Spalding, T. L., & Gorrie, M. C.
    (2005) Sentential Context and the Interpretation of Familiar Open-Compounds and Novel Modifier-Noun Phrases. Language and Speech, (), –. 10.1177/00238309050480020401
     https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309050480020401 [Google Scholar]
  30. Geyken, A., Habermas, J., Klemperer, V., Kraus, K., & Lenz, S.
    (2006) The DWDS corpus: A reference corpus for the German language of the 20 century. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-DWDS-corpus%3A-A-reference-corpus-for-the-German-Geyken-Habermas/fe4f5331d975486cc1195e1de0c272c354d6402c
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C.
    (2011) A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Front Psychol, , . 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054 [Google Scholar]
  32. Günther, F., & Marelli, M.
    (2016) Understanding Karma Police: The Perceived Plausibility of Noun Compounds as Predicted by Distributional Models of Semantic Representation. PLOS ONE, (), . 10.1371/journal.pone.0163200
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163200 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2020) Trying to make it work: Compositional effects in the processing of compound “nonwords.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), (), –. 10.1177/1747021820902019
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820902019 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hasenäcker, J., & Schroeder, S.
    (2019) Compound reading in German: Effects of constituent frequency and whole-word frequency in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, , –. 10.1037/xlm0000623
     https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000623 [Google Scholar]
  35. Juhasz, B. J., & Berkowitz, R. N.
    (2011) Effects of morphological families on English compound word recognition: A multitask investigation. Language and Cognitive Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01690965.2010.498668
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.498668 [Google Scholar]
  36. Juhasz, B. J., Starr, M. S., Inhoff, A. W., & Placke, L.
    (2003) The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming , lexical decisions and eye fixations. British Journal of Psychology, (), –. 10.1348/000712603321661903
     https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661903 [Google Scholar]
  37. Keuleers, E., Diependaele, K., & Brysbaert, M.
    (2010) Practice Effects in Large-Scale Visual Word Recognition Studies: A Lexical Decision Study on 14,000 Dutch Mono- and Disyllabic Words and Nonwords. Frontiers in Psychology, . 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00174
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00174 [Google Scholar]
  38. Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M.
    (2012) The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/s13428‑011‑0118‑4
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0118-4 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kuperman, V., Schreuder, R., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2009) Reading polymorphemic Dutch compounds: Toward a multiple route model of lexical processing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, (), –. 10.1037/a0013484
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013484 [Google Scholar]
  40. Lenth, R. V., Bolker, B., Buerkner, P., Giné-Vázquez, I., Herve, M., Jung, M., Love, J., Miguez, F., Riebl, H., & Singmann, H.
    (2023) emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means (Version 1.8.6) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/index.html
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Libben, G.
    (2014) The nature of compounds: A psychocentric perspective. Cogn Neuropsychol, (), –. 10.1080/02643294.2013.874994
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2013.874994 [Google Scholar]
  42. (2017) The quantum metaphor and the organization of words in the mind. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, (), –. 10.1007/s41809‑017‑0003‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-017-0003-5 [Google Scholar]
  43. (2022) From Lexicon to Flexicon: The Principles of Morphological Transcendence and Lexical Superstates in the Characterization of Words in the Mind. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, . https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frai.2021.788430. 10.3389/frai.2021.788430
     https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.788430 [Google Scholar]
  44. Marelli, M., Crepaldi, D., & Luzzatti, C.
    (2009) Head position and the mental representation of nominal compounds: A constituent priming study in Italian. The Mental Lexicon, (), –. 10.1075/ml.4.3.05mar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.4.3.05mar [Google Scholar]
  45. Marelli, M., & Luzzatti, C.
    (2012) Frequency effects in the processing of Italian nominal compounds: Modulation of headedness and semantic transparency. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1016/j.jml.2012.01.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  46. Marelli, M., Traficante, D., & Burani, C.
    (2020) Reading morphologically complex words: Experimental evidence and learning models. InWord Knowledge and Word Usage (pp.–). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110440577‑014
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110440577-014 [Google Scholar]
  47. Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Bertram, R., Häikiö, T., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2004) Morphological Family Size in a Morphologically Rich Language: The Case of Finnish Compared With Dutch and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (), –. 10.1037/0278‑7393.30.6.1271
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1271 [Google Scholar]
  48. Peirce, J. W.
    (2007) PsychoPy — Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, (), –. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017 [Google Scholar]
  49. Pollatsek, A., & Hyönä, J.
    (2005) The role of semantic transparency in the processing of Finnish compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01690960444000098
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960444000098 [Google Scholar]
  50. Pollatsek, A., Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R.
    (2000) The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, (), –. 10.1037/0096‑1523.26.2.820
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.820 [Google Scholar]
  51. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2022) R: A Language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Schmidtke, D., & Kuperman, V.
    (2019) A paradox of apparent brainless behavior: The time-course of compound word recognition. Cortex, , –. 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.07.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  53. Schmidtke, D., Van Dyke, J. A., & Kuperman, V.
    (2021) CompLex: An eye-movement database of compound word reading in English. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/s13428‑020‑01397‑1
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01397-1 [Google Scholar]
  54. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H.
    (1997) How complex simple words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1006/jmla.1997.2510
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2510 [Google Scholar]
  55. Smolka, E., & Libben, G.
    (2016) ‘Can You Wash off the Hogwash’? — Semantic Transparency of First and Second Constituents in the Processing of German Compounds. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, –. 10.1080/23273798.2016.1256492
     https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1256492 [Google Scholar]
  56. Sobel, M. E.
    (1982) Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models. Sociological Methodology, , –. 10.2307/270723
     https://doi.org/10.2307/270723 [Google Scholar]
  57. Spalding, T. L., Gagné, C. L., Mullaly, A., & Ji, H.
    (2010) Relation-Based Interpretation of Noun-Noun Phrases: A New Theoretical Approach. InLinguistische Berichte. Sonderheft (Issue, pp.–).
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Štekauer, P.
    (2005) Meaning Predictability in Word Formation: Novel, context-free naming units. John Benjamins. 10.1075/sfsl.54
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.54 [Google Scholar]
  59. Taft, M.
    (1991) Reading and the Mental Lexicon. Psychology Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. (2023) Localist Lexical Representation of Polymorphemic Words: The AUSTRAL Model. InLinguistic Morphology in the Mind and Brain. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003159759‑11
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003159759-11 [Google Scholar]
  61. Taft, M., & Forster, K. I.
    (1975) Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, (), –. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(75)80051‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X [Google Scholar]
  62. (1976) Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, (), –. 10.1016/0022‑5371(76)90054‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5371(76)90054-2 [Google Scholar]
  63. van Jaarsveld, H. J., Coolen, R., & Schreuder, R.
    (1994) The role of analogy in the interpretation of novel compounds. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, (), –. 10.1007/BF02143919
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143919 [Google Scholar]
  64. Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D.
    (2002) Modern Applied Statistics with S (4th edition). Springer. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑21706‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24010.has
Loading
Processing of compound constituents
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.24010.has
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24010.has
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24010.has
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: frequency ; novel compounds ; morphological processing ; interpretability ; compounds

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error