1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. The Mental Lexicon
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Morphological processing in written word recognition
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Morphological effects are consistently reported in written word recognition but their theoretical explanation is still debated. The paper aims to disentangle the specific role of morphological information from orthography during written word recognition. We exploit the “morphemic ambiguity” of stem-homographs, words that share formally identical but morphologically and semantically unrelated stems (e.g., , “blackberry” and , “to die”). Two unmasked visual priming lexical decision experiments are described. The results replicate the inhibitory priming effects elicited by stem-homographs, extend it to their allomorphic variants in Italian (e.g., , and , “he/she dies”, verb form deriving from an allomorph (-) of the homographic stem - of and differentiate the stem-homographs and the stem-allomorphs inhibition from the positional effects of orthographic overlap in prime-target pairs. The pattern of data confirms the presence of mechanisms of morphological segmentation in word recognition. On the other hand, the effects fit with hypotheses of graded morphology where word stems are supposed to affect the processing of words on the basis of multiple connections between regular and irregular forms included in their inflectional paradigms and derivational families.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24012.bra
2025-08-05
2026-03-16

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ml.24012.bra
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allen, M., & Badecker, W.
    (1999) Stem homograph inhibition and stem allomorphy: Representing and processing inflected forms in a multilevel lexical system. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1006/jmla.1999.2639
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2639 [Google Scholar]
  2. (2002) Inflectional regularity: Probing the nature of lexical representation in a cross-modal priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1006/jmla.2001.2831
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2831 [Google Scholar]
  3. Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D.
    (2012) Morphological processing as we know it: An analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in Psychology, , . 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baayen, R. H.
    (2007) Storage and computation in the mental lexicon. InThe mental lexicon (pp.–). Brill. 10.1163/9780080548692_006
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9780080548692_006 [Google Scholar]
  5. Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Đurđević, D. F., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M.
    (2011) An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, (), –. 10.1037/a0023851
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023851 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baayen, R. H., Feldman, L. B., & Schreuder, R.
    (2006) Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.008 [Google Scholar]
  7. Badecker, W., & Allen, M.
    (2002) Morphological parsing and the perception of lexical identity: A masked priming study of stem homographs. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1006/jmla.2001.2838
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2838 [Google Scholar]
  8. Barber, H., Domınguez, A., & de Vega, M.
    (2002) Human brain potentials indicate morphological decomposition in visual word recognition. Neuroscience Letters, (), –. 10.1016/S0304‑3940(01)02500‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02500-9 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B.
    (2013) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-2.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bertinetto, P. M., Burani, C., Laudanna, A., Marconi, L., Ratti, D., Rolando, C., & Thornton, A. M.
    (2005) Colfis (corpus e lessico di frequenza dell’italiano scritto). Available onwww.istc.cnr.it/material/database, –.
  11. Beyersmann, E., & Grainger, J.
    (2023) The role of embedded words and morphemes in reading. InLinguistic morphology in the mind and brain (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003159759‑3
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003159759-3 [Google Scholar]
  12. Beyersmann, E., Grainger, J., & Castles, A.
    (2019) Embedded stems as a bootstrapping mechanism for morphological parsing during reading development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, , –. 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.01.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.01.010 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bracco, G., Laudanna, A.
    (2012) L’informazione fonologica nell’elaborazione lessicale delle parole scritte. InLessico e Lessicologia (pp.–). Bulzoni.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C.
    (1988) Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, (), –. 10.1016/0010‑0277(88)90017‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90017-0 [Google Scholar]
  15. Carreiras, M., Perdomo, A., & Meseguer, E.
    (2005) Are stem homographs and orthographic neighbours processed differently during silent reading?Language and Cognitive Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01690960444000179
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960444000179 [Google Scholar]
  16. Crepaldi, D., Amenta, S., & Marelli, M.
    (2019) For a probabilistic and multidisciplinary approach to the investigation of morphological processing. Cortex, , –. 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.05.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2019.05.010 [Google Scholar]
  17. Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M., & Nickels, L.
    (2010) ‘Fell’ primes ‘fall’, but does ‘bell’ prime ‘ball’? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  18. de Almeida, R. G., Gallant, J., Antal, C., & Libben, G.
    (2024) Semantic access to ambiguous word roots cannot be stopped by affixation — Not even in sentence contexts: Evidence from eye-tracking and the maze taskJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. De Martino, M., Mancuso, A., Russo, A. G., Elia, A., Di Salle, F., Saponiero, R., ... & Laudanna, A.
    (2020) Producing regularly and irregularly inflected verb forms: behavioural and neuroimaging data from the three Italian conjugations. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, (), –. 10.1080/23273798.2019.1668953
     https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1668953 [Google Scholar]
  20. Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J.
    (2009) Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. Memory & Cognition, (), –. 10.3758/MC.37.6.895
     https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.6.895 [Google Scholar]
  21. Diependaele, K., Grainger, J., & Sandra, D.
    (2012) Derivational morphology and skilled reading. InThe Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139029377.016
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139029377.016 [Google Scholar]
  22. Domínguez, A., De Vega, M., & Barber, H.
    (2004) Event-related brain potentials elicited by morphological, homographic, orthographic, and semantic priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, (), –. 10.1162/089892904323057326
     https://doi.org/10.1162/089892904323057326 [Google Scholar]
  23. Drews, E., & Zwitserlood, P.
    (1995) Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Feldman, L. B., O’Connor, P. A., & del Prado Martín, F. M.
    (2009) Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, , –. 10.3758/PBR.16.4.684
     https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.4.684 [Google Scholar]
  25. Fischer-Baum, S., Charny, J., McCloskey, M.
    (2011) Both-edges representation of letter position in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, , –. 10.3758/s13423‑011‑0160‑3
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0160-3 [Google Scholar]
  26. Fowler, C. A., Napps, S. E., & Feldman, L.
    (1985) Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory & Cognition, , –. 10.3758/BF03197687
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197687 [Google Scholar]
  27. Frost, R., Deutsch, A., Gilboa, O., Tannenbaum, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W.
    (2000) Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory & Cognition, (), –. 10.3758/BF03211828
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211828 [Google Scholar]
  28. Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A.
    (1997) What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (), .
     [Google Scholar]
  29. García-Albea, J. E., Sanchez-Casas, R. M., & Igoa, J. M.
    (1998) The contribution of word form and meaning to language processing in Spanish: Some evidence from monolingual and bilingual studies. InSentence processing: A crosslinguistic perspective (pp.–). Brill. 10.1163/9780585492230_012
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9780585492230_012 [Google Scholar]
  30. Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J.
    (2001) Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, , –. 10.3758/BF03196148
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196148 [Google Scholar]
  31. Gonnerman, L. M., Seidenberg, M. S., & Andersen, E. S.
    (2007) Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, (), . 10.1037/0096‑3445.136.2.323
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.323 [Google Scholar]
  32. Grainger, J.
    (2018) Orthographic processing: A ‘mid-level’vision of reading: The 44th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, (), –. 10.1080/17470218.2017.1314515
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1314515 [Google Scholar]
  33. Grainger, J., & Beyersmann, E.
    (2017) Edge-aligned embedded word activation initiates morpho-orthographic segmentation. InPsychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol., pp.–). Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C.
    (2011) A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, , . 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054 [Google Scholar]
  35. Grainger, J., Dufau, S., & Ziegler, J. C.
    (2016) A vision of reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, (), –. 10.1016/j.tics.2015.12.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.12.008 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hay, J. B., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2005) Shifting paradigms: Gradient structure in morphology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, (), –. 10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  37. Järvikivi, J., Pyykkönen, P., & Niemi, J.
    (2009) Exploiting degrees of inflectional ambiguity: Stem form and the time course of morphological processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Laudanna, A., & Burani, C.
    (1986) Effetti di ripetizione e priming su forme verbali morfologicamente collegate. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Laudanna, A., Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A.
    (1989) Priming homographic stems. Journal of Memory and language, (), –. 10.1016/0749‑596X(89)90011‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90011-9 [Google Scholar]
  40. (1992) Processing inflectional and derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1016/0749‑596X(92)90017‑R
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90017-R [Google Scholar]
  41. Laudanna, A., Voghera, M., & Gazzellini, S.
    (2002) Lexical representations of written nouns and verbs in Italian. Brain and Language, (), –. 10.1006/brln.2001.2522
     https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2522 [Google Scholar]
  42. Leminen, A., Smolka, E., Dunabeitia, J. A., & Pliatsikas, C.
    (2019) Morphological processing in the brain: The good (inflection), the bad (derivation) and the ugly (compounding). Cortex, , –. 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.016
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.016 [Google Scholar]
  43. Lenth, R., Singmann, H., Love, J., Buerkner, P., & Herve, M.
    (2018) Package “Emmeans”. R Package Version 4.0–3.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Levelt, W. J.
    (1999) Language production: A blueprint of the speaker. InNeurocognition of Language (pp.–). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S.
    (1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, , –. 10.1017/S0140525X99001776
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001776 [Google Scholar]
  46. Libben, G., & De Almeida, R. G.
    (2003, January). Is there a morphological parser?InMorphology 2000: Selected papers from the 9th Morphology Meeting, Vienna, 24–28 February 2000 (pp.–). John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/cilt.218.18lib
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.218.18lib [Google Scholar]
  47. Marelli, M., & Baroni, M.
    (2015) Affixation in semantic space: Modeling morpheme meanings with compositional distributional semantics. Psychological Review, (), –. 10.1037/a0039267
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039267 [Google Scholar]
  48. Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L.
    (1994) Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, (), –. 10.1037/0033‑295X.101.1.3
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  49. Milin, P., Smolka, E., & Feldman, L. B.
    (2017) Models of lexical access and morphological processing. InThe handbook of psycholinguistics (pp.–). Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118829516.ch11
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118829516.ch11 [Google Scholar]
  50. Plaut, D. C., & Gonnerman, L. M.
    (2000) Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing?Language and Cognitive Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01690960050119661
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119661 [Google Scholar]
  51. Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B.
    (2004) The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, , –. 10.3758/BF03196742
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196742 [Google Scholar]
  52. Rueckl, J. G., & Raveh, M.
    (1999) The influence of morphological regularities on the dynamics of a connectionist network. Brain and Language, (), –. 10.1006/brln.1999.2106
     https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2106 [Google Scholar]
  53. Russo, A. G., Esposito, F., Laudanna, A., Mancuso, A., Di Salle, F., Elia, A., & De Martino, M.
    (2021) The neural substrate of noun morphological inflection: A rapid event-related fMRI study in Italian. Neuropsychologia, , . 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107699
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107699 [Google Scholar]
  54. Stevens, P., & Plaut, D. C.
    (2022) From decomposition to distributed theories of morphological processing in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, (), –. 10.3758/s13423‑022‑02086‑0
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02086-0 [Google Scholar]
  55. Stolz, J. A., & Feldman, L. B.
    (1995) The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. InMorphological aspects of language processing (pp.–). L.B. (Ed.) (1995) Morphological Aspects of Language Processing (1st ed.). Psychology Press. 10.4324/9780203773291
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203773291 [Google Scholar]
  56. Taft, M.
    (1979) Lexical access-via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS). Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, (), –. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(79)90544‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90544-9 [Google Scholar]
  57. (2001) Processing of orthographic structure by adults of different reading ability. Language and Speech, (), –. 10.1177/00238309010440030301
     https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309010440030301 [Google Scholar]
  58. (2004) Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, (), –. 10.1080/02724980343000477
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000477 [Google Scholar]
  59. Taft, M., & Forster, K. I.
    (1975) Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, (), –. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(75)80051‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X [Google Scholar]
  60. Taft, M., & Nguyen-Hoan, M.
    (2010) A sticky stick? The locus of morphological representation in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01690960903043261
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960903043261 [Google Scholar]
  61. Tsang, Y. K., & Chen, H. C.
    (2010) Morphemic ambiguity resolution in Chinese: Activation of the subordinate meaning with a prior dominant-biased context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, (), –. 10.3758/PBR.17.6.875
     https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.6.875 [Google Scholar]
  62. (2013) Early morphological processing is sensitive to morphemic meanings: Evidence from processing ambiguous morphemes. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  63. Tsang, Y. K., Wong, A. W. K., Huang, J., & Chen, H. C.
    (2014) Morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic processing in word recognition and production: Evidence from ambiguous morphemes. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, (), –. 10.1080/01690965.2013.790554
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.790554 [Google Scholar]
  64. Wu, Y., Duan, R., Zhao, S., & Tsang, Y. K.
    (2020) Processing ambiguous morphemes in Chinese compound word recognition: Behavioral and ERP evidence. Neuroscience, , — . 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.08.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.08.006 [Google Scholar]
  65. Wu, Y., Tsang, Y. K., Wong, A. W. K., & Chen, H. C.
    (2017) The processing of homographic morphemes in Chinese: An ERP study. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, (), — . 10.1080/23273798.2016.1227857
     https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1227857 [Google Scholar]
  66. Xu, J., & Taft, M.
    (2015) The effects of semantic transparency and base frequency on the recognition of English complex words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Zhao, S., Wu, Y., Tsang, Y. K., Sui, X., & Zhu, Z.
    (2021) Morpho-semantic analysis of ambiguous morphemes in Chinese compound word recognition: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, , Article 107862. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107862
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107862 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24012.bra
Loading
Morphological processing in written word recognition
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.24012.bra
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24012.bra
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24012.bra
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: allomorphy ; priming ; visual word recognition ; morphological processing ; stem allomorphs ; stem homographs ; morpho-orthographic segmentation ; Lemma level

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error