1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. The Mental Lexicon
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of What can emotion and abstract words tell us about context availability ratings?
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Semantic dimensions such as context availability, imageability and valence, form core components of many theoretical accounts of lexical processing. Typically, normative data for such semantic dimensions are drawn from subjective ratings, however, questions have been raised regarding the reliability and validity of these ratings. In this paper, we discuss this issue with a focus on context availability norms. Using data collected for another study, we show that context availability ratings required significantly higher rates of data exclusions at the level of both participants and items compared to other variables. In addition, high standard deviations at the item level, indicated a substantial degree of disagreement between participants. This suggested that some participants may have had difficulty understanding the concept of context availability which hindered their ability to complete the ratings. We provide recommendations for future research focusing on context availability and for norm collection procedures more broadly in order that the validity of such norms can be improved. In particular, we suggest that clear guidelines are required for data cleaning in order that the reliability of such norms is maximised and to facilitate replication across studies.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24013.mas
2025-01-10
2025-01-22

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ml.24013.mas
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Altarriba, J., & Bauer, L. M.
    (2004) The distinctiveness of emotion concepts: A comparison between emotion, abstract, and concrete words. The American Journal of Psychology, –. RetrievedJuly 2020fromhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4149007. 10.2307/4149007
     https://doi.org/10.2307/4149007 [Google Scholar]
  2. Altarriba, J., Bauer, L. M., & Benvenuto, C.
    (1999) Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, , –. 10.3758/BF03200738
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200738 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V.
    (2014) Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, , –. 10.3758/s13428‑013‑0403‑5
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5 [Google Scholar]
  4. Connell, L., & Lynott, D.
    (2012) Strength of perceptual experience predicts word processing performance better than concreteness or imageability. Cognition, (), –. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.010 [Google Scholar]
  5. Dymarska, A., Connell, L., & Banks, B.
    (2023) Weaker than you might imagine: Determining imageability effects on word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, , 104398. 10.1016/j.jml.2022.104398
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2022.104398 [Google Scholar]
  6. Goh, W. D., Yap, M. J., Lau, M. C., Ng, M. M., & Tan, L. C.
    (2016) Semantic richness effects in spoken word recognition: A lexical decision and semantic categorization megastudy. Frontiers in Psychology, , 190665. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00976
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00976 [Google Scholar]
  7. Kousta, S. T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E.
    (2011) The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, (), –. 10.1037/a0021446
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021446 [Google Scholar]
  8. Mason, C., Hameau, S. & Nickels, L.
    (2024a) Emotion words in lexical decision and reading aloud. (manuscript submitted for publication)
     [Google Scholar]
  9. (2024b) Emotion and abstract word processing in Chinese-English bilinguals. (manuscript in preparation)
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Nickels, L., Lampe, L. F., Mason, C., & Hameau, S.
    (2022) Investigating the influence of semantic factors on word retrieval: Reservations, results and recommendations. Cognitive Neuropsychology, (), –. 10.1080/02643294.2022.2109958
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2022.2109958 [Google Scholar]
  11. Paivio, A., Smythe, P. C., & Yuille, J. C.
    (1968) Imagery versus meaningfulness of nouns in paired-associated learning. Canadian Journal of Psychology, , –. 10.1037/h0082782
     https://doi.org/10.1037/h0082782 [Google Scholar]
  12. Pollock, L.
    (2018) Statistical and methodological problems with concreteness and other semantic variables: A list memory experiment case study. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/s13428‑017‑0938‑y
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0938-y [Google Scholar]
  13. Rice, C. A., Tokowicz, N., Fraundorf, S. H., & Liburd, T. L.
    (2019) The complex interactions of context availability, polysemy, word frequency, and orthographic variables during lexical processing. Memory & Cognition, , –. 10.3758/s13421‑019‑00934‑4
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00934-4 [Google Scholar]
  14. Schwanenflugel, P. J., Harnishfeger, K. K., & Stowe, R. W.
    (1988) Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1016/0749‑596X(88)90022‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90022-8 [Google Scholar]
  15. Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Stowe, R. W.
    (1989) Context availability and the processing of abstract and concrete words in sentences. Reading Research Quarterly, –. 10.2307/748013
     https://doi.org/10.2307/748013 [Google Scholar]
  16. Strik-Lievers, F., Bolognesi, M. and Winter, B.
    (2021) The linguistic dimensions of concrete and abstract concepts: lexical category, morphological structure, countability, and etymology. Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/cog‑2021‑0007
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2021-0007 [Google Scholar]
  17. Taylor, E., Nation, K., & Hsiao, Y.
    (2022) Context availability and sentence availability ratings for 3,000 English words and their association with lexical processing. Journal of Cognition, (), . 10.5334/joc.211
     https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.211 [Google Scholar]
  18. Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V. & Brysbaert, M.
    (2013) Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, , –. 10.3758/s13428‑012‑0314‑x
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x [Google Scholar]
  19. Westbury, C. F., Shaoul, C., Hollis, G., Smithson, L., Briesemeister, B. B., Hofmann, M. J., & Jacobs, A. M.
    (2013) Now you see it, now you don’t: On emotion, context, and the algorithmic prediction of human imageability judgments. Frontiers in Psychology, , 68986. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00991
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00991 [Google Scholar]
  20. Winter, B.
    (2023) Abstract concepts and emotion: Cross-linguistic evidence and arguments against affective embodiment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, (), 20210368. 10.1098/rstb.2021.0368
     https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0368 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24013.mas
Loading
What can emotion and abstract words tell us about context availability ratings?
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.24013.mas
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24013.mas
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24013.mas
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: lexical semantics ; lexical processing ; context availability

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error