1887
image of The influence of semantic primes on the typing of word targets
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Typing is a complex activity involving identifying and encoding the to-be-typed word, planning, and executing the keystrokes. Different mechanisms have been proposed to explain how contextual information about meaning influences the processing of a target word (for example, semantic priming), and it is unclear how this information influences the typing output of the target word. When the interval between the prime and target is short, the prime is thought to automatically activate the target. With a longer interval, the facilitation may be more strategic. The influence of the prime on the output of the target may thus depend on the interval between the two. We found that at both short and long intervals, related semantic primes facilitated the speed of the first keystroke of the target word. However, there was no effect on how quickly the non-initial letters of the target were entered, suggesting that information from semantic primes influences the planning and initiation of typing, but not the execution of remaining keystrokes. Interestingly, the initial and non-initial keystrokes were faster when the interstimulus interval was long, suggesting participants encode the letters of the prime which could interfere with encoding and typing the target if the interval between them is short.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24015.man
2024-12-09
2025-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Becker, C. A.
    (1980) Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies. Memory & cognition, (), –. 10.3758/BF03213769
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213769 [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen, R., Levy, R., & Eisape, T.
    (2021) On factors influencing typing time: insights from a viral online typing game. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, , . RetrievedSeptember 11, 2023. Retrieved fromhttps://escholarship.org/uc/item/8bb8v4g3
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F.
    (1975) A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological review, (), . 10.1037/0033‑295X.82.6.407
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407 [Google Scholar]
  4. Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L.
    (2014) Conceptual composition: Typing time as an index of morphological and semantic effects during English compound processing. Lingue e Linguaggio, (), –. 10.1418/78409
    https://doi.org/10.1418/78409 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2016) Effects of morphology and semantic transparency on typing latencies in English compound and pseudocompound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (), –. 10.1037/xlm0000258
    https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000258 [Google Scholar]
  6. Hutchison, K. A., Balota, D. A., Neely, J. H., Cortese, M. J., Cohen-Shikora, E. R., Tse, C. S., … & Buchanan, E.
    (2013) The semantic priming project. Behavior research methods, , –. 10.3758/s13428‑012‑0304‑z
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0304-z [Google Scholar]
  7. Libben, G., Gallant, J., & Dressler, W. U.
    (2021) Textual effects in compound processing: A Window on words in the world. Frontiers in Communication, , Article 646454. 10.3389/fcomm.2021.646454
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.646454 [Google Scholar]
  8. Logan, G. D.
    (2018) Automatic control: How experts act without thinking. Psychological Review, (), –. 10.1037/rev0000100
    https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000100 [Google Scholar]
  9. Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W.
    (1971) Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of experimental psychology, (), . 10.1037/h0031564
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031564 [Google Scholar]
  10. Neely, J. H., Keefe, D. E., & Ross, K. L.
    (1989) Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (), . 10.1037/0278‑7393.15.6.1003
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1003 [Google Scholar]
  11. Scaltritti, M., Arfe, B., Torrance, M., & Peressotti, F.
    (2016) Typing pictures: Linguistic processing cascades into finger movements. Cognition, , –. 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.07.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.07.006 [Google Scholar]
  12. Scaltritti, M., Pinet, S., Longcamp, M., & Alario, F. X.
    (2017) On the functional relationship between language and motor processing in typewriting: an EEG study. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, , –. 10.1080/23273798.2017.1283427
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1283427 [Google Scholar]
  13. Taikh, A., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L.
    (2023) Influence of the constituent morpheme boundary on compound word access. Memory & Cognition, –. 10.3758/s13421‑023‑01494‑4
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-023-01494-4 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24015.man
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24015.man
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error