1887
image of The role of orthography and phonology during L1 vs. L2 typed production
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Dual-route models of typing assume two pathways to retrieve a word’s spelling: a direct route connecting word to letter representations, and an indirect route via sound representations. The individual contribution of each route may depend on the modality of language acquisition: the first language (L1) is acquired sequentially in spoken and written modality respectively, whereas the second language (L2) is often acquired simultaneously in both modalities. We investigated whether sequential bilinguals rely more on the direct route during L2 vs. L1 typing. French-English bilinguals performed a typed picture-word interference task in their L1 and L2. We compared facilitation in naming for distractors that were phonologically (P) related, phonologically + orthographically (PO) related, or unrelated to the target. We predicted more facilitation by PO vs. P distractors in the L2 than in the L1. Participants showed significant facilitation by PO distractors, but not by P distractors, suggesting that orthographic overlap (together with phonology) helped retrieving the target spelling, whereas phonological overlap alone did not. The magnitude of this effect was similar across L1 and L2, contrary to our predictions. However, the absence of mere phonological facilitation suggests that phonology only contributes to typing when supported by orthography.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24022.muy
2024-12-16
2025-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Afonso, O., & Álvarez, C. J.
    (2011) Phonological effects in handwriting production: Evidence from the implicit priming paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aitchison, J., & Todd, P.
    (1982) Slips of the mind and slips of the pen. InR. N. St. Clair & W. von Raffler-Engel (Eds.), Language and cognitive styles: Patterns of neurolinguistic and psycholinguistic development (pp.–). Swets & Zeitlinger.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2015) Parsimonious mixed models. ArXiv E-Print, under Revision.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bonin, P., & Fayol, M.
    (2000) Writing words from pictures: What representations are activated, and when?Memory & Cognition, (), –. 10.3758/BF03201257
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201257 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonin, P., Méot, A., Lagarrigue, A., & Roux, S.
    (2015) Written object naming, spelling to dictation, and immediate copying: Different tasks, different pathways?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, (), –. 10.1080/17470218.2014.978877
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.978877 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonin, P., Poulin-Charronnat, B., Lukowski Duplessy, H., Bard, P., Vinter, A., Ferrand, L., & Méot, A.
    (2020) IMABASE: A new set of 313 colourised line drawings standardised in French for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, age-of-acquisition, and imageability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, (), –. 10.1177/1747021820932822
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820932822 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brysbaert, M.
    (2013) Lextale_FR A Fast, Free, and Efficient Test to Measure Language Proficiency in French. Psychologica Belgica, (), –. 10.5334/pb‑53‑1‑23
    https://doi.org/10.5334/pb-53-1-23 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brysbaert, M., & Stevens, M.
    (2018) Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models: A Tutorial. Journal of Cognition, (), . 10.5334/joc.10
    https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.10 [Google Scholar]
  9. de Leeuw, J. R.
    (2015) jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/s13428‑014‑0458‑y
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y [Google Scholar]
  10. Duñabeitia, J. A., Crepaldi, D., Meyer, A. S., New, B., Pliatsikas, C., Smolka, E., & Brysbaert, M.
    (2018) MultiPic: A standardized set of 750 drawings with norms for six European languages. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, (), –. 10.1080/17470218.2017.1310261
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1310261 [Google Scholar]
  11. Grosjean, F.
    (1997) The bilingual individual. Interpreting, (), –. 10.1075/intp.2.1‑2.07gro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.2.1-2.07gro [Google Scholar]
  12. Lange, K., Kühn, S., & Filevich, E.
    (2015) “Just another tool for online studies” (JATOS): An easy solution for setup and management of web servers supporting online studies. PLoS ONE.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M.
    (2012) Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/s13428‑011‑0146‑0
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0 [Google Scholar]
  14. Lenth, R., Singmann, H., Love, J., Buerkner, P., & Herve, M.
    (2020) Package ‘ emmeans.’CRAN Repository.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Mishra, R. K., & Singh, N.
    (2014) Language non-selective activation of orthography during spoken word processing in Hindi–English sequential bilinguals: An eye tracking visual world study. Reading and Writing, (), –. 10.1007/s11145‑013‑9436‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9436-5 [Google Scholar]
  16. Qu, Q., & Damian, M. F.
    (2017) Orthographic effects in spoken word recognition: Evidence from Chinese. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, (), –. 10.3758/s13423‑016‑1164‑9
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1164-9 [Google Scholar]
  17. Qu, Q., Damian, M. F., Zhang, Q., & Zhu, X.
    (2011) Phonology contributes to writing: Evidence from written word production in a nonalphabetic script. Psychological Science, (), –. 10.1177/0956797611417001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Qu, Q., & Damian, M. F.
    (2019) The role of orthography in second-language spoken word production: Evidence from Tibetan Chinese bilinguals. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, (), –. 10.1177/1747021819850382
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819850382 [Google Scholar]
  19. Rapp, B., Benzing, L., & Caramazza, A.
    (1997) The autonomy of lexical orthography. Cognitive Neuropsychology, (), –. 10.1080/026432997381628
    https://doi.org/10.1080/026432997381628 [Google Scholar]
  20. Saryazdi, R., Bannon, J., Rodrigues, A., Klammer, C., & Chambers, C. G.
    (2018) Picture perfect: A stimulus set of 225 pairs of matched clipart and photographic images normed by Mechanical Turk and laboratory participants. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/s13428‑018‑1028‑5
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1028-5 [Google Scholar]
  21. Shelton, J. R., & Weinrich, M.
    (1997) Further evidence of a dissociation between output phonological and orthographic lexicons: A case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, (), –. 10.1080/026432997381637
    https://doi.org/10.1080/026432997381637 [Google Scholar]
  22. Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., Aust, F., Højsgaard, S., Fox, J., Lawrence, M. A., Mertens, U., & Love, J.
    (2016) afex: Analysis of factorial experiments. InR package version 0.16–1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afex
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Veivo, O., & Järvikivi, J.
    (2013) Proficiency modulates early orthographic and phonological processing in L2 spoken word recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang, Q., & Damian, M. F.
    (2010) Impact of phonology on the generation of handwritten responses: Evidence from picture-word interference tasks. Memory & Cognition, (), –. 10.3758/MC.38.4.519
    https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.4.519 [Google Scholar]
  25. Ziegler, J. C., & Ferrand, L.
    (1998) Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, (), –. 10.3758/BF03208845
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208845 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24022.muy
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24022.muy
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: bilingualism ; typewriting ; word production ; phonological activation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error