1887
image of Long-lag morphological priming and inflectional paradigm size effects
in Estonian and Finnish text reading
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Morphological priming and paradigm size effects have been established in single word reading studies, however, morphological priming effects in longer texts have not been observed, and, to the best of our knowledge, paradigmatic effects in text reading have not yet been examined. The current study utilized the Multilingual Eye-Tracking Corpus MECO (Siegelman et al., 2022) to explore paradigmatic and morphological priming effects during text reading in Estonian and Finnish, two morphologically rich Finno-Ugric languages. The results showed clear inflectional paradigm size effects for Estonian during text reading in several eye movement measures, but not for Finnish. This may be linked to the support from the inflectional paradigm being semantically more beneficial to the reader in Estonian than in Finnish. The current study also showed clear long-lag inflectional priming effects in text reading, unlike what was observed in prior studies in Dutch, English, and Spanish. This study is thus the first to show that inflectional priming can extend beyond word or sentence level and suggest that inflectional variants of a particular word in Estonian and Finnish get and remain activated even when text context is present.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24035.loo
2025-04-01
2025-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amenta, S. & Crepaldi, D.
    (2012) Morphological processing as we know it: an analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in Psychology, . 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baayen, R. H. & Linke, M.
    (2020) An introduction to the generalized additive model. InS. T. Gries & M. Paquot (Eds.), A practical handbook of corpus linguistics. Springer, Berlin.(forthcoming). Springer, Berlin. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑46216‑1_23
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46216-1_23 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Filipovic Durdjevic, D., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M.
    (2011) An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, (), –. 10.1037/a0023851
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023851 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baayen, R. H., Vasishth, S., Bates, D., & Kliegl, R.
    (2017) The cave of shadows. addressing the human factor with generalized additive mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, , –. 10.1016/j.jml.2016.11.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.11.006 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bertram, R.
    (2011) Eye movements and morphological processing in reading. The Mental Lexicon, (), –. 10.1075/ml.6.1.04ber
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.6.1.04ber [Google Scholar]
  6. Bertram, R. & Hyönä, J.
    (2023) The importance of eye movement research for gaining insight into morphological processing. InLinguistic Morphology in the Mind and Brain (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003159759‑9
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003159759-9 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bertram, R., Hyönä, J., & Laine, M.
    (2000) The role of context in morphological processing: Evidence from Finnish. Language and Cognitive Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01690960050119634
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119634 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cop, U., Dirix, N., Drieghe, D., & Duyck, W.
    (2017) Presenting geco: An eyetracking corpus of monolingual and bilingual sentence reading. Behavior Research Methods, , –. 10.3758/s13428‑016‑0734‑0
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0734-0 [Google Scholar]
  9. Coskun, M., Kuperman, V., & Rueckl, J.
    (2023) Long-lag repetition priming in natural text reading: No evidence for morphological effects. The Mental Lexicon, (), –. 10.1075/ml.21014.cos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.21014.cos [Google Scholar]
  10. Dann, K. M., Veldre, A., & Andrews, S.
    (2021) Morphological preview effects in english are restricted to suffixed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (), .
    [Google Scholar]
  11. De Jong, N. H., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2003) Morphological resonance in the mental lexicon. InR. H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp.–). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110910186.65
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110910186.65 [Google Scholar]
  12. Deutsch, C. A., Tewksbury, J. J., Tigchelaar, M., Battisti, D. S., Merrill, S. C., Huey, R. B., & Naylor, R. L.
    (2018) Increase in crop losses to insect pests in a warming climate. Science, (), –. 10.1126/science.aat3466
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat3466 [Google Scholar]
  13. Feldman, L. B.
    (1994) Beyond orthography and phonology: Differences between inflections and derivations. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1006/jmla.1994.1021
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1021 [Google Scholar]
  14. Feldman, L. B. & Bentin, S.
    (1994) Morphological analysis of disrupted morphemes: Evidence from Hebrew. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, (), –. 10.1080/14640749408401118
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749408401118 [Google Scholar]
  15. Feldman, L. B. & Milin, P.
    (2018) Psycholinguistic studies of word morphology and their implications for models of the mental lexicon and lexical processing. InMorphological Processing and Literacy Development (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315229140‑2
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315229140-2 [Google Scholar]
  16. Fox, J. & Weisberg, S.
    (2019) An R Companion to Applied Regression. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage, third edition.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Friedman, L. & Wall, M.
    (2005) Graphical views of suppression and multicollinearity in multiple regression. The American Statistician, , –. 10.1198/000313005X41337
    https://doi.org/10.1198/000313005X41337 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R.
    (1990) Generalized additive models. Wiley Online Library.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Henderson, L., Wallis, J., & Knight, D.
    (1984) Morphemic structure and lexical access. Attention and performance, (pp.–).
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kaalep, H.-J. & Muischnek, K.
    (2005) The corpora of estonian at the university of tartu: the current situation. InProceedings of the Second Baltic Conference on Human Language Technologies (pp.–).
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kamienkowski, J. E., Carbajal, M. J., Bianchi, B., Sigman, M., & Shalom, D. E.
    (2018) Cumulative repetition effects across multiple readings of a word: Evidence from eye movements. Discourse Processes, (), –. 10.1080/0163853X.2016.1234872
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2016.1234872 [Google Scholar]
  22. Karlsson, F.
    (1986) Frequency considerations in morphology. STUF-Language Typology and Universals, (), –. 10.1524/stuf.1986.39.14.19
    https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.1986.39.14.19 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2015) Finnish: An Essential Grammar, 3rd edition. (Routledge Essential Grammars). London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315743233
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315743233 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kuperman, V.
    (2022) A cross-linguistic study of spatial parameters of eye-movement control during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, (), .
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Laine, M. & Virtanen, P.
    (1999) WordMill Lexical Search Program. University of Turku, Finland: Center for Cognitive Neuroscience.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lõo, K., Järvikivi, J., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2018a) Whole-word frequency and inflectional paradigm size facilitate Estonian case-inflected noun processing. Cognition, , –. 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lõo, K., Järvikivi, J., Tomaschek, F., Tucker, B. V., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2018b) Production of estonian case-inflected nouns shows whole-word frequency and paradigmatic effects. Morphology, , –. 10.1007/s11525‑017‑9318‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-017-9318-7 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lõo, K., Tomaschek, F., Lippus, P., & Tucker, B. V.
    (2023) Paradigmatic and syntagmatic effects in estonian spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, (), –. 10.1177/00238309221107000
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309221107000 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lõo, K., Toth, A., Karaca, F., & Järvikivi, J.
    (2022) Morphological processing is gradient not discrete in L1 and L2 English masked priming. The Mental Lexicon, (), –. 10.1075/ml.21008.loo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.21008.loo [Google Scholar]
  30. Milin, P., Kuperman, V., Kostić, A., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2009) Paradigms bit by bit: an information-theoretic approach to the processing of paradigmatic structure in inflection and derivation. InJ. P. Blevins & J. Blevins (Eds.), Analogy in grammar: form and acquisition (pp.–). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547548.003.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547548.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  31. Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Bertram, R., Häikiö, T., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2004) Morphological family size in a morphologically rich language: The case of Finnish compared to Dutch and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Kostić, A., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2004) Putting the bits together: An information theoretical perspective on morphological processing. Cognition, , –. 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.015 [Google Scholar]
  33. Mousikou, P. & Schroeder, S.
    (2019) Morphological processing in single-word and sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (), .
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Müante, T. F., Say, T., Clahsen, H., Schiltz, K., & Kutas, M.
    (1999) Decomposition of morphologically complex words in English: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, (), –. 10.1016/S0926‑6410(98)00028‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00028-7 [Google Scholar]
  35. Paterson, K. B., Alcock, A., & Liversedge, S. P.
    (2011) Morphological priming during reading: Evidence from eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01690965.2010.485392
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.485392 [Google Scholar]
  36. Raveh, M.
    (2002) The contribution of frequency and semantic similarity to morphological processing. Brain and Language, (), –. 10.1006/brln.2001.2527
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2527 [Google Scholar]
  37. Raveh, M. & Rueckl, J. G.
    (2000) Equivalent effects of inflected and derived primes: Long-term morphological priming in fragment completion and lexical decision. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1006/jmla.1999.2673
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2673 [Google Scholar]
  38. Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Münte, T. F., & Clahsen, H.
    (2002) Morphological priming in Spanish verb forms: An erp repetition priming study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, (), –. 10.1162/089892902317361958
    https://doi.org/10.1162/089892902317361958 [Google Scholar]
  39. Royle, P., Drury, J. E., Bourguignon, N., & Steinhauer, K.
    (2012) The temporal dynamics of inflected word recognition: A masked erp priming study of french verbs. Neuropsychologia, (), –. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.007 [Google Scholar]
  40. Schmidtke, D., Van Dyke, J. A., & Kuperman, V.
    (2021) Complex: An eye-movement database of compound word reading in. Behavior Research Methods, , –. 10.3758/s13428‑020‑01397‑1
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01397-1 [Google Scholar]
  41. Schreuder, R. & Baayen, R. H.
    (1997) How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, , –. 10.1006/jmla.1997.2510
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2510 [Google Scholar]
  42. Siegelman, N., Schroeder, S., Acartüirk, C., Ahn, H.-D., Alexeeva, S., Amenta, S., Bertram, R., Bonandrini, R., Brysbaert, M., Chernova, D.,
    (2022) Expanding horizons of cross-linguistic research on reading: The multilingual eye-movement corpus. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/s13428‑021‑01772‑6
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01772-6 [Google Scholar]
  43. Stanners, R. F., Neiser, J. J., Hernon, W. P., & Hall, R.
    (1979) Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, , –. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(79)90219‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90219-6 [Google Scholar]
  44. Tomaschek, F., Hendrix, P., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2018) Strategies for addressing collinearity in multivariate linguistic data. Journal of Phonetics, , –. 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  45. Viitso, T.-R.
    (2007) Estonian language, chapter Structure of the Estonian language: Phonology, morphology and word formation, (pp.–). Estonian Academy Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Weyerts, H., Muinte, T. F., Smid, H. G., & Heinze, H.-J.
    (1996) Mental representations of morphologically complex words: an event-related potential study with adult humans. Neuroscience Letters, (), –. 10.1016/S0304‑3940(96)12442‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(96)12442-3 [Google Scholar]
  47. Wood, S. N.
    (2017) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. CRC press. 10.1201/9781315370279
    https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315370279 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24035.loo
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24035.loo
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error