1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. The Mental Lexicon
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Recognition advantage of proper names
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study investigates whether the recognition advantage of proper names (PN) over common nouns (CN) — reported in several languages — is also observed in Spanish, and whether different types of PN (e.g., personal vs. geographical) are affected to the same extent. Drawing on semantic theories that assign different presuppositional meanings to subcategories of PN, we designed four experiments to examine PN processing patterns: a lexical decision task, two categorization tasks, and a semantic priming task. To explore which semantic factors account for variability within each subcategory, we also conducted a series of regression analyses. The results confirm a cross-linguistic recognition advantage for PN in categorization tasks; however, this effect is limited to personal PN — even after controlling for affective factors and familiarity — while the advantage for geographical PN appears to be language-specific. Participants’ behavioral responses to geographical PN resembled those elicited by CN. These findings suggest that PN is a semantically heterogeneous category, and that their recognition lies on a continuum with that of CN.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24036.her
2025-05-06
2025-05-14

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ml.24036.her
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abrams, L., & D. K. Davis
    (2017) Competitors or Teammates: How Proper Names Influence Each Other. Current Directions in Psychological Science, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Adorni, R., Manfredi, M., & Proverbio, A. M.
    (2014) Electro-cortical manifestations of common vs. proper name processing during reading. Brain and Language, , –. 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.05.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  3. Almond, N. M., &Morrison, C.
    (2017) Effects of aging and recall of common and uncommon first names using the face-name association technique compared with the pure-lists technique over repeated trials. Healthy Aging Research. () 10.1097/HXR.0000000000000004
     https://doi.org/10.1097/HXR.0000000000000004 [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson, J. M.
    (2004) On the grammatical status of names. Language, 80(), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bajo Pérez, E.
    (2002) La caracterización morfosintáctica del nombre propio. A Coruña: Toxosoutos.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Blomberg, F., Roll, M., Frid, J., Lindgren, M., & Horne, M.
    (2020) The role of affective meaning, semantic associates, and orthographic neighbours in modulating the N400 in single words. The Mental Lexicon, (), –. 10.1075/ml.19021.blo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.19021.blo [Google Scholar]
  7. Bredart, S.
    (2017) The cognitive psychology and neuroscience of naming people. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Review, , –. 10.1016/j
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j [Google Scholar]
  8. Bredart, S., Brennen, T., & Valentine, T.
    (2002) The cognitive psychology of proper names. New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Brennen, T.
    (2000) On the meaning of personal names. Names, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bright, W.
    (2003) What IS a name? Reflections on onomastics. Language and Linguistics, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Burke, D. M., MacKay, D. G., Worthley, J. S., & Wade, E.
    (1991) On the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and older adults?Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1016/0749‑596X(91)90026‑G
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90026-G [Google Scholar]
  12. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I.
    (1984) Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, (), –. 10.1037/0096‑1523.10.3.340
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.10.3.340 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bonin, P., Gelin, M., Dioux, V., & Méot, A.
    (2019) “It is alive!” Evidence for animacy effects in semantic categorization and lexical decision. Applied Psycholinguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S0142716419000092
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716419000092 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cedrus Corporation
    Cedrus Corporation (1996) SuperLab Pro (Version 2.0.4) [Computer software]. San Pedro, CA: Cedrus Corporation.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Coates, R.
    (2017) The meaning of names: A defence of The Pragmatic Theory of Properhood (TPTP) addressed to Van Langendonck, Anderson, Colman and McClure. Onoma, , –. 10.34158/ONOMA.52/2017/1
     https://doi.org/10.34158/ONOMA.52/2017/1 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cohen, G., & Faulkner, D.
    (1986) Memory for proper names: Age differences in retrieval. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Cohen, G., & Burke, D. M.
    (1993) Memory for proper names: A review. Memory, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Cohen, G.
    (1990) Why is it difficult to put names to faces?British Journal of Psychology, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Colombetti, G.
    (2005) Appraising Valence. Journal of Consciousness Studies, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. D’Argembeau, A., & Van der Linden, M.
    (2004) Influence of affective meaning on memory for contextual information. Emotion, (), –. 10.1037/1528‑3542.4.2.173
     https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.4.2.173 [Google Scholar]
  21. Desai R. H., Tadimeti U., & Riccardi N.
    (2023) Proper and common names in the semantic system. Brain Structure and Function, (), –. 10.1007/s00429‑022‑02593‑9.
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-022-02593-9 [Google Scholar]
  22. Duchon, A., Perea, M., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Martí, A., & Carreiras, M.
    (2013) EsPal: One-stop shopping for Spanish word properties. Behavior Research Methods, , –. 10.3758/s13428‑013‑0326‑1
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0326-1 [Google Scholar]
  23. Fernández Juncal, C.
    (2021) Estructura formal del repertorio antroponímico español. Revista de Filología Española, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Fernández Leborans, M. J.
    (1999) El nombre propio. InI. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (Vol., pp.–). Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Goh, W. D., Yap, M. J., Lau, M. C., Ng, M. M. R., & Tan, L. -C.
    (2016) Semantic richness effects in spoken word recognition: A lexical decision and semantic categorization megastudy. Frontiers in Psychology, , . 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00976
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00976 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hernández Muñoz, N. & Sánchez-Gutiérrez, C. H.
    (2019) Gabriel versus París: El reconocimiento del nombre propio en español. Moenia, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Hollis, J., & Valentine, T.
    (2001) Proper-name processing: Are proper names pure referencing expressions?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Hu, Z., & Liu, H.
    (2019) The affective meaning of words is constrained by the conceptual meaning. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, , –. 10.1007/s10936‑019‑09663‑w
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09663-w [Google Scholar]
  29. Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K.
    (2002) Names and noun phrases. InThe Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (pp.–). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Izura, C., & Hernández Muñoz, N.
    (2017) The role of semantics in Spanish word recognition: An insight from lexical decision and categorization tasks. Open Linguistics, , –, 10.1515/opli‑2017‑0025
     https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2017-0025 [Google Scholar]
  31. James, L. E.
    (2004) Meeting Mr. Farmer versus meeting a farmer: specific effects of aging on learning proper names. Psychology and Aging, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Kavé, G., Fridkin, S., & Ayalon, L.
    (2018) Demographic factors and retrieval of object and proper names after age 70. PLoS ONE, (), . 10.1371/journal.pone.0191876
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191876 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kripke, S.
    (1980) Naming and necessity. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Kuperman, V., Estes, Z., Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A.B.
    Emotion and language: valence and arousal affect word recognition. J Exp Psychol Gen 2014 Jun; ():–. 10.1037/a0035669
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035669 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lu, Z., & Bai, X.
    (2023) The processing differences between Chinese proper nouns and common nouns in the left and right hemispheres of the brain. Brain Sciences, (), . 10.3390/brainsci13030424
     https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13030424 [Google Scholar]
  36. Lucas, I., Sánchez-Adam, A., Vila, J., & Guerra, P.
    (2019) Positive emotional reactions to loved names. Psychophysiology. 10.1111/psyp.13363
     https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13363 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lucas, M.
    (2000) Semantic priming without association: A meta-analytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, , –. 10.3758/BF03212999
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212999 [Google Scholar]
  38. Luchelli, F., & De Renzi, E.
    (1991) Proper name anomia. Cortex, , –
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Lyons, J.
    (1977) Semantics (Vol.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Mignot, E., & Philippe, M.
    (2022) Introduction: Proper names and the lexicon — an exposition”, Lexis, , . 10.4000/lexis.6906
     https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.6906 [Google Scholar]
  41. Montemurro, S., Mondini, S., Nucci, M., & Semenza, C.
    (2018) Proper name retrieval in cognitive decline: The role of cognitive reserve. The Mental Lexicon, (), –. 10.1075/ml.18004.mon
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.18004.mon [Google Scholar]
  42. Montemurro, S., Mondini, S., Crovace C., & G. Jarema
    (2019) Cognitive Reserve and Its Effect in Older Adults on Retrieval of Proper Names, Logo Names and Common Nouns. Frontiers in Communication, . 10.3389/fcomm.2019.00014
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00014 [Google Scholar]
  43. Morton, N. W., Zippi, E. L., Noh, S. M., & Preston, A. R.
    (2021) Semantic knowledge of famous people and places is represented in hippocampus and distinct cortical networks. Journal of Neuroscience, (), –. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2034‑19.2021
     https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2034-19.2021 [Google Scholar]
  44. Moss, H. E., Ostrin, R. K., Tyler, L. K., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
    (1995) Accessing different types of lexical semantic information: Evidence from priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (), –. 10.1037/0278‑7393.21.4.863
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.863 [Google Scholar]
  45. Müller, H. M., & Kutas, M.
    (1996) What’s in a name? Electrophysiological differences between spoken nouns, proper names and one’s own name. NeuroReport, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Müller, M. H.
    (2010) Neurolinguistic findings on the language lexicon: The special role of proper names. Chinese Journal of Psychology, (), –. 10.4077/CJP.2010.AMM032
     https://doi.org/10.4077/CJP.2010.AMM032 [Google Scholar]
  47. Neely, J. H.
    (1991) Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. InD. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp.–). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Nyström, S.
    (2016) Names and Meaning. InC. Hough (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Names and Naming (pp.–), Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199656431.013.26
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199656431.013.26 [Google Scholar]
  49. O’Rourke T., & De Diego Balaguer R.
    (2020) Names and their meanings: a dual-process account of proper-name encoding and retrieval. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, , –. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.11.005.
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.11.005 [Google Scholar]
  50. Peressotti, F., Cubelli, R., & Job, R.
    (2003) On recognizing proper names: The orthographic cue hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, (), –. 10.1016/S0010‑0285(03)00004‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00004-5 [Google Scholar]
  51. Pisoni, A., Vernice, M., Iasevoli, L., Cattaneo, Z., & Papagno, C.
    (2015) Guess who? Investigating the proper name processing network by means of tDCS. Neuropsychologia, , –. 10.1016/j.
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j [Google Scholar]
  52. Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
    Psychology Software Tools, Inc. (2012) [E-Prime 2.0]. Retrieved fromhttps://support.pstnet.com/
  53. Rangel Vicente, M.
    (2019) Le nom propre, une catégorie exceptionnelle? reCHERches, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Rastle, K. G., & D. B. Burke
    (1996) Priming the Tip of The Tongue. Journal of Memory and Language, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Renoult, L., Davidson, P. S. R., Palombo, D. J., Moscovitch, M., & Levine, B.
    (2012) Personal semantics: at the crossroads of semantic and episodic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, (), –. 10.1016/j.tics.2012.09.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  56. Reszegi, K.
    (2019) The mental and neural representation of names. In The economy in names, values, branding and globalization (pp.–). University of Uppsala.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Semenza, C.
    (2006) Retrieval pathways for common and proper names. Cortex, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. (2009) The neuropsychology of proper names. Mind and Language, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Semenza, C., Mondini, S., Borgo, F., Pasini, M., & Sgaramella, M. T.
    (2003) Proper names in patients with early Alzheimer’s disease. Neurocase, (), –. 10.1076/neur.9.1.63.14370
     https://doi.org/10.1076/neur.9.1.63.14370 [Google Scholar]
  60. Sulpizio, S., & Job, R.
    (2018) Early and multiple-loci divergency of proper and common names: An event-related potential investigation. Neuropsychologia, , –. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.07.034
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.07.034 [Google Scholar]
  61. Tacikowski, P., Cygan, H. B., & Nowicka, A.
    (2014) Neural correlates of own and close-other’s name recognition: ERP evidence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, , . 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00194
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00194 [Google Scholar]
  62. Tennant V. R., Harrison T. M, Adams J. N., La Joie R., Winer J. R., & Jagust W. J.
    (2021) Fusiform Gyrus Phospho-Tau is Associated with Failure of Proper Name Retrieval in Aging. Annals of Neurology, (), –. 10.1002/ana.26237
     https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.26237 [Google Scholar]
  63. Tranel, D.
    (2006) Impaired naming of unique landmarks is associated with left temporal polar damage. Neuropsychology, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Tulving, E., & Donaldson, W.
    (1972) Organization of memory. New York, NY: Academic
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Valentine, T., Brennen, T., & Bredart, S.
    (1996) The cognitive psychology of proper names: On the importance of being Ernest. London/New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Van Lancker, D., & Klein, K.
    (1990) Preserved recognition of familiar personal names in global aphasia. Brain and Language, (), –. 10.1016/0093‑934x(90)90159‑e
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934x(90)90159-e [Google Scholar]
  67. Van Lancker, D., & Ohnesorge, C. L.
    (2002) Personally familiar proper names are relatively successfully processed in the human right hemisphere; or, the missing link. Brain and Language, (), –. 10.1006/brln.2001.2564
     https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2564 [Google Scholar]
  68. Van Langendonck, W.
    (1999) Neurolinguistic and syntactic evidence for basic level meaning in proper names. Functions of Language, (), –. 10.1075/fol.6.1.04van
     https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.6.1.04van [Google Scholar]
  69. (2007) Theory and typology of proper names. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. (2013) A semantic-pragmatic theory of proper names. Acta Linguistica Lithuanica / Lietuvių kalbotyros klausimai, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Wang, L., Zhu, Z., Bastiaansen, M., Hagoort, P., & Yang, Y.
    (2013) Recognizing the emotional valence of names: An ERP study. Brain and Language, (), –. 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.01.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.01.006 [Google Scholar]
  72. Yap, M. J., Pexman, P. M., Hargreaves, I. S., & Huff, M. J.
    (2012) An abundance of riches: Cross-task comparisons of semantic richness effects in visual word recognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, , Article. 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00072
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00072 [Google Scholar]
  73. Yen, H. L., & Müller, H. M.
    (2003) Processing for proper names in Mandarin Chinese. InF. Schmalhofer, R. M. Young, & G. Katz (Eds.), Proceedings of the European Cognitive Science 2003 (p.). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Yen, H. L.
    (2006) Processing of proper names in Mandarin Chinese: A behavioral and neuroimaging study (Doctoral dissertation). Bielefeld: Bielefeld University.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24036.her
Loading
Recognition advantage of proper names
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.24036.her
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24036.her
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.24036.her
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: semantics ; common nouns ; valence ; recognition ; Proper names

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error