1887
image of Investigating language processing in stroke-affected brains

Abstract

Stroke represents one of the leading causes of acquired cognitive and communicative impairments, limiting the ability to use language appropriately and profoundly impacting quality of life and social participation. Post-stroke aphasia offers a crucial pathway for the understanding of the neuropsychological correlates of language processing and, despite advances in acute stroke management, linguistic deficits continue to represent a significant challenge for rehabilitation and long-term care. Additionally, one of the major challenges in investigating post-stroke language deficits lies in the marked variability across patients. In this pilot study, we investigated whether stimulus design may enhance the detection of linguistic processing deficits in stroke-affected individuals, targeting lexical class distinctions and morphosyntax/lexical semantics interface-level processing. Results from twelve Italian-speaking patients with unilateral stroke (6 left-hemisphere, 6 right-hemisphere) revealed differential effects of lesion lateralisation and lexical class on task performance. Task accuracy was shaped by individual and lesion-related factors, revealing task-specific dissociations between left- and right-hemisphere patients. These findings underscore the value of using targeted linguistic stimuli to detect subtle deficits that may go undetected by standard screening tools, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of post-stroke aphasia.

Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ml.25010.tod
2026-05-07
2026-06-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/ml.25010.tod/ml.25010.tod.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/ml.25010.tod&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Andersen, K. K., Olsen, T. S., Dehlendorff, C., & Kammersgaard, L. P.
    (2009) Hemorrhagic and ischemic strokes compared: stroke severity, mortality, and risk factors. Stroke, (), –. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.540112
    https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.540112 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arcara, G., & Bambini, V.
    (2016) A test for the assessment of pragmatic abilities and cognitive substrates (apacs): Normative data and psychometric properties. Frontiers in psychology, , . 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00070
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00070 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, M. C.
    (2003) Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns and adjectives (Vol.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615047
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615047 [Google Scholar]
  4. Barner, D., & Bale, A.
    (2002) No nouns, no verbs: psycholinguistic arguments in favor of lexical underspecification. Lingua, (), –. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(02)00050‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(02)00050-5 [Google Scholar]
  5. Barner, D., … Bale, A.
    (2005) No nouns, no verbs? a rejoinder to panagiotidis. Lingua, (), –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2004.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2004.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Battista, P., Miozzo, A., Piccininni, M., Catricalà, E., Capozzo, R., Tortelli, R., … Logroscino, G.
    (2017, 12). Primary progressive aphasia: a review of neuropsychological tests for the assessment of speech and language disorders. Aphasiology, , –. 10.1080/02687038.2017.1378799
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2017.1378799 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bertinetto, P. M.
    (1986) Tempo, aspetto e azione nel verbo italiano. il sistema dell’indicativo. Accademia della Crusca.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bertoni, D., Bruni, S., Saviola, D., De Tanti, A., & Costantino, C.
    (2024) The role of cognitive reserve in post-stroke rehabilitation outcomes: A systematic review. Brain Sciences, (), . 10.3390/brainsci14111144
    https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14111144 [Google Scholar]
  9. Biondo, N., Ivanova, M. V., Pracar, A. L., Baldo, J., & Dronkers, N. F.
    (2024) Mapping sentence comprehension and syntactic complexity: evidence from 131 stroke survivors. Brain Communications, (), . 10.1093/braincomms/fcae379
    https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcae379 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bishop, D.
    (2009) Trog 2: test for reception of grammar-version 2. Giunti.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Brady, M. C.
    (2021) Predictors of poststroke aphasia recovery: A systematic review-informed individual participant data meta-analysis. Stroke, (), . 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031162
    https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031162 [Google Scholar]
  12. Breitenstein, C., Grewe, T., Flöel, A., Ziegler, W., Springer, L., Martus, P.
    , … others (2017) Intensive speech and language therapy in patients with chronic aphasia after stroke: a randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, controlled trial in a health-care setting. The Lancet, (), –. 10.1016/S0140‑6736(17)30067‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30067-3 [Google Scholar]
  13. Briggs, R. G., Pryor, D. P., Conner, A. K., Nix, C. E., Milton, C. K., Kuiper, J. K., … Sughrue, M. E.
    (2019, 6). The artery of aphasia, a uniquely sensitive posterior temporal middle cerebral artery branch that supplies language areas in the brain: Anatomy and report of four cases. World Neurosurgery, , –. 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.159
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.159 [Google Scholar]
  14. Brownsett, S. L., Warren, J. E., Geranmayeh, F., Woodhead, Z., Leech, R., & Wise, R. J.
    (2014) Cognitive control and its impact on recovery from aphasic stroke. Brain, (), –. 10.1093/brain/awt289
    https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt289 [Google Scholar]
  15. Capasso, R., & Miceli, G.
    (2001) Esame neuropsicologico per l’afasia: Enpa. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Caplan, D., Michaud, J., & Hufford, R.
    (2013) Dissociations and associations of performance in syntactic comprehension in aphasia and their implications for the nature of aphasic deficits. Brain and language, (), –. 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.07.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.07.007 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cappa, S. F., & Perani, D.
    (2003) The neural correlates of noun and verb processing. Journal of Neurolinguistics, (), –. 10.1016/S0911‑6044(02)00013‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0911-6044(02)00013-1 [Google Scholar]
  18. Caramazza, A.
    (1997) How many levels of processing are there in lexical access?Cognitive neuropsychology, (), –. 10.1080/026432997381664
    https://doi.org/10.1080/026432997381664 [Google Scholar]
  19. Catani, M., Jones, D. K., & Ffytche, D. H.
    (2005) Perisylvian language networks of the human brain. Annals of Neurology: Official Journal of the American Neurological Association and the Child Neurology Society, (), –. 10.1002/ana.20319
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20319 [Google Scholar]
  20. Catricalà, E., Gobbi, E., Battista, P., Miozzo, A., Polito, C., Boschi, V.
    , … others (2017) Sand: a screening for aphasia in neurodegeneration. development and normative data. Neurological Sciences, , –. 10.1007/s10072‑017‑3001‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-3001-y [Google Scholar]
  21. Catricalà, E., Rosa, P. A. D., Ginex, V., Mussetti, Z., Plebani, V., & Cappa, S. F.
    (2013, 6). An italian battery for the assessment of semantic memory disorders. Neurological Sciences, , –. 10.1007/s10072‑012‑1181‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-012-1181-z [Google Scholar]
  22. Chomsky, N.
    (1970) Remarks on nominalization. InR. Jacobs & P. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Readings in english transformational grammar (pp.–). Ginn and Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Cichon, N., Wlodarczyk, L., Saluk-Bijak, J., Bijak, M., Redlicka, J., Gorniak, L., & Miller, E.
    (2021) Novel advances to post-stroke aphasia pharmacology and rehabilitation. Journal of Clinical Medicine, (). 10.3390/jcm10173778
    https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173778 [Google Scholar]
  24. Corbetta, M., Ramsey, L. E., Callejas, A., Baldassarre, A., Hacker, C. D., Siegel, J. S.
    , … others (2015) Common behavioral clusters and subcortical anatomy in stroke. Neuron, (), –. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.027
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.027 [Google Scholar]
  25. Croft, W.
    (2001) Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2010, 5). Pragmatic functions, semantic classes, and lexical categories. Linguistics, , –. 10.1515/ling.2010.024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2010.024 [Google Scholar]
  27. Dronkers, N. F., Wilkins, D. P., Van Valin Jr, R. D., Redfern, B. B., & Jaeger, J. J.
    (2004) Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension. Cognition, (), –. 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  28. Engelter, S. T., Gostynski, M., Papa, S., Frei, M., Born, C., Ajdacic-Gross, V., … Lyrer, P. A.
    (2006) Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke: incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis. Stroke, (), –. 10.1161/01.STR.0000221815.64093.8c
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000221815.64093.8c [Google Scholar]
  29. Federmeier, K. D., Wlotko, E. W., & Meyer, A. M.
    (2008) What’s ‘right’in language comprehension: Event-related potentials reveal right hemisphere language capabilities. Language and linguistics compass, (), –. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2007.00042.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00042.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Feigin, V. L., Brainin, M., Norrving, B., Martins, S., Sacco, R. L., Hacke, W., … Lindsay, P.
    (2022) World stroke organization (wso): global stroke fact sheet 2022. International Journal of Stroke, (), –. 10.1177/17474930211065917
    https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930211065917 [Google Scholar]
  31. Flowers, H. L., Skoretz, S. A., Silver, F. L., Rochon, E., Fang, J., Flamand-Roze, C., & Martino, R.
    (2016) Poststroke aphasia frequency, recovery, and outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, (), –. 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.006 [Google Scholar]
  32. Fridriksson, J., den Ouden, D.-B., Hillis, A. E., Hickok, G., Rorden, C., Basilakos, A., … Bonilha, L.
    (2018) Anatomy of aphasia revisited. Brain, (), –. 10.1093/brain/awx363
    https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx363 [Google Scholar]
  33. Friederici, A. D.
    (2011) The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. Physiological reviews, (), –. 10.1152/physrev.00006.2011
    https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00006.2011 [Google Scholar]
  34. Fujii, M., Miyachi, S., Matsubara, N., Kinkori, T., Takebayashi, S., Izumi, T.
    , … others (2011) Selective propofol injection into the m1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (mca wada test) reduces adverse effects and enhances the reliability of the wada test for determining speech dominance. World neurosurgery, (), –. 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.10.048
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2010.10.048 [Google Scholar]
  35. Gajardo-Vidal, A., Lorca-Puls, D. L., Hope, T. M., Parker Jones, O., Seghier, M. L., Prejawa, S., … Price, C. J.
    (2018) How right hemisphere damage after stroke can impair speech comprehension. Brain, (), –. 10.1093/brain/awy270
    https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awy270 [Google Scholar]
  36. Garrard, P., & Ahmed, S.
    (2012) An abbreviated examination for the assessment of linguistic impairment in primary progressive aphasia. Eur J Neurol, , .
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Geschwind, N.
    (1965) Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. Brain, (), –. 10.1093/brain/88.3.585
    https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/88.3.585 [Google Scholar]
  38. Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Hillis, A. E., Weintraub, S., Kertesz, A., Mendez, M., Cappa, S. F., … Grossman, M.
    (2011, 3). Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology, , –. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821103e6
    https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821103e6 [Google Scholar]
  39. Hagoort, P.
    (2013) Muc (memory, unification, control) and beyond. Frontiers in Psychology, , . 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00416
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00416 [Google Scholar]
  40. Halai, A. D., Woollams, A. M., & Ralph, M. A. L.
    (2017, 1). Using principal component analysis to capture individual differences within a unified neuropsychological model of chronic post-stroke aphasia: Revealing the unique neural correlates of speech fluency, phonology and semantics. Cortex, , –. 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.016 [Google Scholar]
  41. Hamilton, R. H., Chrysikou, E. G., & Coslett, B.
    (2011) Mechanisms of recovery in aphasia: evidence from functional neuroimaging studies. Brain and Language, (), –. 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.02.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.02.005 [Google Scholar]
  42. Handjaras, G., Ricciardi, E., Leo, A., Lenci, A., Cecchetti, L., Cosottini, M., … Pietrini, P.
    (2016, 7). How concepts are encoded in the human brain: A modality independent, category-based cortical organization of semantic knowledge. NeuroImage, , –. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.063
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.063 [Google Scholar]
  43. Haspelmath, M.
    (2012) How to compare major word-classes across the world’s languages (Vol.) (No.). UCLA Working Papers in LinguisticsLos Angeles: UCLA.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Hickok, G.
    (2009) The functional neuroanatomy of language. Physics of life reviews, (), –. 10.1016/j.plrev.2009.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2009.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  45. Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D.
    (2004) Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition, (), –. 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.011 [Google Scholar]
  46. (2007) The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature reviews neuroscience, (), –. 10.1038/nrn2113
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2113 [Google Scholar]
  47. Huber, W., Poeck, K., Weniger, D., & Willmes, K.
    (1983) Aachener aphasie test (aat): Handanweisung. Verlag für Psychologie Hogrefe.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Jakubíček, M., Kilgarriff, A., Kovář, V., Rychlỳ, P., & Suchomel, V.
    (2013) The tenten corpus family. In7th international corpus linguistics conference cl (p.–).
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Kakinuma, K., Osawa, S.-i., Hosokawa, H., Oyafuso, M., Ota, S., Kobayashi, E.
    , … others (2022) Determination of language areas in patients with epilepsy using the super-selective wada test. IBRO Neuroscience Reports, , –. 10.1016/j.ibneur.2022.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibneur.2022.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  50. Kandel, E.
    (2021) Principles of neural science (6th edition). McGraw Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Kang, X., Herron, T. J., Ettlinger, M., & Woods, D. L.
    (2015) Hemispheric asymmetries in cortical and subcortical anatomy. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, (), –. 10.1080/1357650X.2015.1032975
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2015.1032975 [Google Scholar]
  52. Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S.
    (1983) The boston naming test. lea & febiger. Philadelphia, PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Kiran, S.
    (2012) What is the nature of poststroke language recovery and reorganization?International Scholarly Research Notices, (), .
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Kümmerer, D., Hartwigsen, G., Kellmeyer, P., Glauche, V., Mader, I., Klöppel, S., … Saur, D.
    (2013) Damage to ventral and dorsal language pathways in acute aphasia. Brain, (), –. 10.1093/brain/aws354
    https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws354 [Google Scholar]
  55. Lakoff, G.
    (2008) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Law, S. P., Yum, Y. N., & Cheung, G. W.-L.
    (2017, 11). Neural correlates of concreteness effect in semantic processing of single chinese characters using mixed-effects modeling. Journal of Neurolinguistics, , –. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  57. Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S.
    (1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and brain sciences, (), –. 10.1017/S0140525X99001776
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001776 [Google Scholar]
  58. Levin, B., & Hovav, M. R.
    (1994) Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface (Vol.). MIT press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Luzzatti, C., De Bleser, R., Scola, I., Frustaci, M., & Willmes, K.
    (2023) Update on the psychometric properties for the italian version of the aachen aphasia test (it-aat). Aphasiology, (), –. 10.1080/02687038.2022.2037501
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2022.2037501 [Google Scholar]
  60. Luzzatti, C., Willmes, K., De Bleser, R., Bianchi, A., Chiesa, G., De Tanti, A., … Pozzoli, C.
    (1994) Nuovi dati normativi per la versione italiana dell’aachener aphasia test. Archivio di Psicologia, Neurologia e Psichiatria, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Marantz, A.
    (2013) No escape from morphemes in morphological processing. Language and cognitive processes, (), –. 10.1080/01690965.2013.779385
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.779385 [Google Scholar]
  62. Matchin, W., & Hickok, G.
    (2020) The cortical organization of syntax. Cerebral Cortex, (), –. 10.1093/cercor/bhz180
    https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhz180 [Google Scholar]
  63. Meier, E. L., Johnson, J. P., Pan, Y., & Kiran, S.
    (2019) The utility of lesion classification in predicting language and treatment outcomes in chronic stroke-induced aphasia. Brain imaging and behavior, (), –. 10.1007/s11682‑019‑00118‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-019-00118-3 [Google Scholar]
  64. Mendelow, A. D.
    (2015) Stroke: Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Elsevier Health Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Miceli, G., Laudanna, A., & Capasso, R.
    (2006) Batteria per l’analisi dei deficit afasici. EMS.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Mtui, E., Gruener, G., & Dockery, P.
    (2020) Fitzgerald’s clinical neuroanatomy and neuroscience e-book: Fitzgerald’s clinical neuroanatomy and neuroscience e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Panagiotidis, P.
    (2005) Against category-less roots in syntax and word learning: objections to barner and bale (2002). Lingua, (), –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2003.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2003.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  68. (2015) Categorial features (Vol.). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Papagno, C., Capasso, R., & Miceli, G.
    (2009, 3). Reversed concreteness effect for nouns in a subject with semantic dementia. Neuropsychologia, , –. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.019 [Google Scholar]
  70. Peelen, M. V., Romagno, D., & Caramazza, A.
    (2012) Independent representations of verbs and actions in left lateral temporal cortex. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, (), –. 10.1162/jocn_a_00257
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00257 [Google Scholar]
  71. Plowman, E., Hentz, B., & Ellis, C.
    (2012) Post-stroke aphasia prognosis: A review of patient-related and stroke-related factors. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, (), –. 10.1111/j.1365‑2753.2011.01650.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01650.x [Google Scholar]
  72. Pulvermüller, F.
    (1999) Words in the brain’s language. Behavioral and brain sciences, (), –. 10.1017/S0140525X9900182X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X9900182X [Google Scholar]
  73. R Core-Team
    R Core-Team (2024) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna: Austria.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Romagno, D.
    (2012) Beyond the mental lexicon: evidence from neuropsychology and implications for the morphosyntax/semantics interface. Studi e Saggi Linguistici, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. (2016) Principles of categorization: the case of word classes. Archivio Glottologico Italiano.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. (2019) Exploring the neurocognitive basis of language processing: the case of word classes and the key role of interface semantics. Atti del Sodalizio Glottologico Milanese, ().
    [Google Scholar]
  77. (2024) Word classes and neurolinguistics. InA. De Cesare Greenwald & G. Salvi (Eds.), Manuals of romance linguistics (p.–). Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110746389‑031
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110746389-031 [Google Scholar]
  78. Romagno, D., Busso, L., & Elce, V.
    (2020) L’architettura neurocognitiva del linguaggio fra concetti e grammatica. BISMoS: una batteria di test per lo studio dell’interfaccia fra semantica e morfosintassi in italiano. Edizioni ETS.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Romagno, D., Rota, G., Ricciardi, E., & Pietrini, P.
    (2012) Where the brain appreciates the final state of an event: The neural correlates of telicity. Brain and language, (), –. 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.06.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  80. Rosch, E. H.
    (1973) Natural categories. Cognitive psychology, (), –. 10.1016/0010‑0285(73)90017‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0 [Google Scholar]
  81. Saur, D., Lange, R., Baumgaertner, A., Schraknepper, V., Willmes, K., Rijntjes, M., & Weiller, C.
    (2006) Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke. Brain, (), –. 10.1093/brain/awl090
    https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl090 [Google Scholar]
  82. Shapiro, K., & Caramazza, A.
    (2003) Looming a loom: Evidence for independent access to grammatical and phonological properties in verb retrieval. Journal of Neurolinguistics, (), –. 10.1016/S0911‑6044(02)00010‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0911-6044(02)00010-6 [Google Scholar]
  83. Shapiro, K., Shelton, J., & Caramazza, A.
    (2000) Grammatical class in lexical production and morphological processing: Evidence from a case of fluent aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, , –. 10.1080/026432900750038281
    https://doi.org/10.1080/026432900750038281 [Google Scholar]
  84. Shapiro, K. A., Mottaghy, F. M., Schiller, N. O., Poeppel, T. D., Flüß, M. O., Müller, H.-W., … Krause, B. J.
    (2005) Dissociating neural correlates for nouns and verbs. Neuroimage, (), –. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.10.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.10.015 [Google Scholar]
  85. Sheppard, S. M., Meier, E. L., Kim, K. T., Breining, B. L., Keator, L. M., Tang, B., … Hillis, A. E.
    (2021) Neural correlates of syntactic comprehension: A longitudinal study. Brain and language, , . 10.1016/j.bandl.2021.105068
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2021.105068 [Google Scholar]
  86. Shetreet, E., Friedmann, N., & Hadar, U.
    (2010) The neural correlates of linguistic distinctions: Unaccusative and unergative verbs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, (), –. 10.1162/jocn.2009.21371
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21371 [Google Scholar]
  87. Sihvonen, A. J., Vadinova, V., Garden, K. L., Meinzer, M., Roxbury, T., O’Brien, K., … Brownsett, S. L.
    (2023) Right hemispheric structural connectivity and poststroke language recovery. Human Brain Mapping, (), –. 10.1002/hbm.26252
    https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26252 [Google Scholar]
  88. Stern, Y.
    (2002) What is cognitive reserve? theory and research application of the reserve concept. Journal of the international neuropsychological society, (), –. 10.1017/S1355617702813248
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617702813248 [Google Scholar]
  89. (2012) Cognitive reserve in ageing and alzheimer’s disease. The Lancet Neurology, (), –. 10.1016/S1474‑4422(12)70191‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70191-6 [Google Scholar]
  90. Tenny, C. L.
    (1994) Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface (Vol.). Springer Netherlands. Retrieved fromlink.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-011-1150-8. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑1150‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1150-8 [Google Scholar]
  91. Thye, M., & Mirman, D.
    (2018) Relative contributions of lesion location and lesion size to predictions of varied language deficits in post-stroke aphasia. NeuroImage: Clinical, , –. 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.10.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.10.017 [Google Scholar]
  92. Tucker, A. M., & Stern, Y.
    (2014) Cognitive reserve and the aging brain. Geriatric neurology, p.–. 10.1002/9781118730676.ch5
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118730676.ch5 [Google Scholar]
  93. Valenzuela, M. J., & Sachdev, P.
    (2006) Brain reserve and dementia: a systematic review. Psychological medicine, (), –. 10.1017/S0033291705006264
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291705006264 [Google Scholar]
  94. Van Valin, R. D., & LaPolla, R. J.
    (1997) Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799 [Google Scholar]
  95. Van Valin Jr, R. D.
    (1990) Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language, –. 10.2307/414886
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414886 [Google Scholar]
  96. (2005) Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511610578
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610578 [Google Scholar]
  97. Vendler, Z.
    (1967) Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Williams, A., Reddigari, S., & Pylkkänen, L.
    (2017, 6). Early sensitivity of left perisylvian cortex to relationality in nouns and verbs. Neuropsychologia, , –. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.04.029
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.04.029 [Google Scholar]
  99. Wilson, S. M., Entrup, J. L., Schneck, S. M., Onuscheck, C. F., Levy, D. F., Rahman, M.
    , … others (2023) Recovery from aphasia in the first year after stroke. Brain, (), –. 10.1093/brain/awac129
    https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awac129 [Google Scholar]
  100. Xia, Q., & Peng, G.
    (2022, 2). The roles of object and action, and concreteness and imageability, in the distinction between nouns and verbs: An erp study on monosyllabic words in chinese. Journal of Neurolinguistics, . 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2021.101026
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2021.101026 [Google Scholar]
  101. Zhang, Y., Wang, K., Yue, C., Mo, N., Wu, D., Wen, X., & Qiu, J.
    (2018, 4). The motor features of action verbs: fmri evidence using picture naming. Brain and Language, , –. 10.1016/j.bandl.2018.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2018.02.002 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.25010.tod
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.25010.tod
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error